Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>.
(full text, mbox, link).
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gnome-screenshot: open in editor
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:07:39 +0000
Package: gnome-utils
Version: 2.20.0.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Thanks for packaging gnome-screenshot.
Most of the times I take a screenshot, I need to do some postprocessing
afterwards: so every time I save the file, then I open gimp and go to
look for the file that I saved.
It would be very useful to me if gnome-screenshot allowed to open the
image in an editor (such as gimp) instead of saving it.
Ciao,
Enrico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages gnome-utils depends on:
ii e2fslibs 1.40.5-2 ext2 filesystem libraries
ii gconf2 2.20.1-2+b1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.20-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-0 1.20.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libbonobo2-0 2.21.90-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii libbonoboui2-0 2.21.90-1 The Bonobo UI library
ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcairo2 1.4.14-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii libdbus-1-3 1.1.2-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libfontconfig1 2.5.0-2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.3.5-1+b1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgconf2-4 2.20.1-2+b1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libglade2-0 1:2.6.2-1 library to load .glade files at ru
ii libglib2.0-0 2.14.5-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome-desktop-2 2.20.3-1 Utility library for loading .deskt
ii libgnome2-0 2.20.1.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.20.1.1-1 A powerful object-oriented display
ii libgnomeprint2.2-0 2.18.0-2 The GNOME 2.2 print architecture -
ii libgnomeprintui2.2-0 2.18.2-1 GNOME 2.2 print architecture User
ii libgnomeui-0 2.20.1.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii libgnomevfs2-0 1:2.20.1-1 GNOME Virtual File System (runtime
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.12.5-2 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libgtop2-7 2.20.1-1 gtop system monitoring library
ii libhal1 0.5.10-5 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii liborbit2 1:2.14.10-0.1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii libpanel-applet2-0 2.20.3-1 library for GNOME Panel applets
ii libpango1.0-0 1.18.4-1 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpng12-0 1.2.15~beta5-3 PNG library - runtime
ii libpopt0 1.10-3 lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsm6 2:1.0.3-1+b1 X11 Session Management library
ii libstartup-notificatio 0.9-1 library for program launch feedbac
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.3-7 X11 client-side library
ii libxcomposite1 1:0.4.0-1 X11 Composite extension library
ii libxcursor1 1:1.1.9-1 X cursor management library
ii libxdamage1 1:1.1.1-3 X11 damaged region extension libra
ii libxext6 1:1.0.3-2 X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii libxfixes3 1:4.0.3-2 X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii libxi6 2:1.1.3-1 X11 Input extension library
ii libxinerama1 1:1.0.2-1 X11 Xinerama extension library
ii libxml2 2.6.31.dfsg-1 GNOME XML library
ii libxrandr2 2:1.2.2-1 X11 RandR extension library
ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-16 A free electronic cataloging syste
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-11 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages gnome-utils recommends:
ii gksu 2.0.0-5 graphical frontend to su
-- no debconf information
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#465453: asterisk: illegal free(env_var) after putenv(env_var)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:12:06 +0200
severity 465452 minor
severity 465453 minor
severity 465455 minor
severity 465460 minor
tags + 465452 upstream
tags + 465453 upstream
tags + 465455 upstream
tags + 465458 upstream
tags + 465460 upstream
tags + 465468 upstream
tags + 465478 upstream
thanks
Hi,
I'm not sure what you expect from this flood of bug reports.
These are all against the version of asterisk present in the stable
suite of Debian which means that no minor fixes are accepted -- only
security fixes and severe bugs, such as data corruption.
Moreover, these are all are upstream issues and I'm not sure what we can
do about them. Forwarding them to Digium is not an option for many
reasons: a) upstream needs a license disclaimer on all patches b) these
are against asterisk 1.2 which is frozen for only security fixes.
I'd suggest to:
- Verify which of these apply to asterisk 1.4 (present in
unstable/testing).
- Report back which of them apply so we can close the rest.
- Open up a bug report against bugs.digium.com suggesting your fixes to
upstream (be careful not to report any bristuff issues!)
- Then report back the URLs of the bugs on Digium's BTS.
I may be requiring too much from you but your bugs are *code* bugs and
you should approach upsteam with those.
I am keeping the bugs open for the moment even though I'm not too sure
about it.
Thanks,
Faidon
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>.
(full text, mbox, link).
To: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>, 465478@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#465478: Bug#465453: asterisk: illegal free(env_var) after
putenv(env_var)
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:37:23 +0100
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> tags + 465478 upstream
EBUGID?
--
Loïc Minier
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to 465478@bugs.debian.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>.
(full text, mbox, link).
On mar, 2008-02-12 at 18:07 +0000, Enrico Zini wrote:
> Most of the times I take a screenshot, I need to do some postprocessing
> afterwards: so every time I save the file, then I open gimp and go to
> look for the file that I saved.
>
> It would be very useful to me if gnome-screenshot allowed to open the
> image in an editor (such as gimp) instead of saving it.
This would be nice, but you should note that gimp already has a
screenshooter, which is much better than gnome-screenshot anyway, so
this looks superfluous.
Cheers,
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Philipp Berndt <berndt@smeet.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Marco Cabizza <marco87@gmail.com>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Subject: Re: Bug#465453: asterisk: illegal free(env_var) after putenv(env_var)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:20:46 +0100
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 20:12, you wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not sure what you expect from this flood of bug reports.
Hello Faidon,
sorry that I found so many bugs in your package ;-)
I had to fix them because I needed a stable version. Later I reported them and
shared my patches "in the hope that they would be useful".
> These are all against the version of asterisk present in the stable
> suite of Debian which means that no minor fixes are accepted -- only
> security fixes and severe bugs, such as data corruption.
Actucally I had thought that asterisk taking up all CPU time (#465460),
accessing freed memory (#465453), memory leaks (#465455) and a broken build
system (#465452, #465458) wouldn't be considered minor bugs that are not
worth fixing...
> Moreover, these are all are upstream issues and I'm not sure what we can
> do about them.
Hmmm... I had just read the bug reporting guidelines
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting where it says:
| Don't file bugs upstream
|
| If you file a bug in Debian, don't send a copy to the upstream software
| maintainers yourself, as it is possible that the bug exists only in Debian.
| If necessary, the maintainer of the package will forward the bug upstream.
In fact, I believe that some of the reported bugs only exist in your package
(which is based on 1.2.13) and have long been fixed in upstream 1.2.26.
Thus reporting them to you seemed reasonable to me.
> Forwarding them to Digium is not an option for many
> reasons: a) upstream needs a license disclaimer on all patches b) these
> are against asterisk 1.2 which is frozen for only security fixes.
>
> I'd suggest to:
> - Verify which of these apply to asterisk 1.4 (present in
> unstable/testing).
> - Report back which of them apply so we can close the rest.
> - Open up a bug report against bugs.digium.com suggesting your fixes to
> upstream (be careful not to report any bristuff issues!)
> - Then report back the URLs of the bugs on Digium's BTS.
>
> I may be requiring too much from you
I'm afraid you are, I wish I had more time though. If I were to test/debug
Digium's current version to see whether the bugs still exist there, I could
have used their version in the first place.
(In fact, what *is* the advantage of Debian asterisk_1.2.13~dfsg-2etch2 over
Digium asterisk-1.2.26 ?)
Anyway, at least some of them do apply to asterisk 1.4, too, e.g. #465460.
> but your bugs are *code* bugs and you should approach upsteam with those.
Why, they are just *bug* reports. The fact that I happened to find and share
some possible fixes shouldn't make a difference. The patches are meant as a
suggestion, just an example of how the bugs could be fixed. Just ignore the
patches if they bother you. ;-)
> I am keeping the bugs open for the moment even though I'm not too sure
> about it.
Not for me!
Best regards,
Philipp
>
> Thanks,
> Faidon
> severity 465452 minor
> tags + 465452 upstream
bristuff: xagi-test
> severity 465453 minor
> tags + 465453 upstream
putenv (was fixed upstream somewhere between 1.2.13 and 1.2.26)
> severity 465455 minor
> tags + 465455 upstream
bristuff: memleak
> severity 465460 minor
> tags + 465460 upstream
local_queue_frame_livelock (applies to 1.4 too)
> tags + 465458 upstream
SOLINK
> tags + 465468 upstream
tune_ast_softhangup_nolock
> tags + 465478 upstream
Not mine (and not an asterisk bug)
Message sent on to Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>:
Bug#465478.
(full text, mbox, link).
Hello!
I am investigating gnome-utils bugs and found your report here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465478
You can drag the image from gnome-screenshot and drop it into GIMP,
which will open it for editing. Does that work for you, or you need
something else?
See you,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@kov.eti.br>
Information stored: Bug#465478; Package gnome-utils.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded.
(full text, mbox, link).
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:35:30PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I am investigating gnome-utils bugs and found your report here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465478
> You can drag the image from gnome-screenshot and drop it into GIMP,
> which will open it for editing. Does that work for you, or you need
> something else?
Thanks, I didn't know it.
That would solve half of the problem, in that if gimp isn't open one
also has to go through the steps of starting gimp AND creating an empty
image. Note that if I have to start gimp manually, I can just as well
use its own acquire from screen function.
It would certainly make things easier than saving to a file and then
loading the file in gimp, which would mean going twice through those
insulting abominations that are gnome file dialogues.
I still wouldn't mind an "edit" button. If someone decides that it
would clutter the interface too much, however, I might disagree, but
that would be fair enough with me.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <enrico@debian.org>
Hey Enrico,
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 10:17 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> It would certainly make things easier than saving to a file and then
> loading the file in gimp, which would mean going twice through those
> insulting abominations that are gnome file dialogues.
>
> I still wouldn't mind an "edit" button. If someone decides that it
> would clutter the interface too much, however, I might disagree, but
> that would be fair enough with me.
I actually agree with you on this. I'll forward your bug to an upstream
bug report that is discussing a new UI for the screenshot app.
Thanks!
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
Debian Project
Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-utils' to 'gnome-screenshot'.
Request was from Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sat, 23 Jul 2016 16:21:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
No longer marked as found in versions gnome-utils/2.20.0.1-1.
Request was from Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sat, 23 Jul 2016 16:21:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
Request was from debian-bts-link@lists.debian.org
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Thu, 26 Nov 2020 17:51:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU General
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.