Debian Bug report logs - #964958
pyerfa: please make the build reproducible

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: pyerfa: please make the build reproducible

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:42:36 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Source: pyerfa
Version: 1.7.0+ds-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bugs@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed that
pyerfa could not be built reproducibly.

This is because it uses the absolute build time in the generated
documentation.

Patch attached.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

[pyerfa.diff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 964958@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

To: 964958@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: pyerfa: please make the build reproducible

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:57:06 +0100

forwarded 964958 https://github.com/liberfa/pyerfa/pull/45
thanks

I've forwarded this upstream here:

  https://github.com/liberfa/pyerfa/pull/45


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Message #17 received at 964958-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

To: 964958-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#964958: fixed in pyerfa 1.7.0+ds-2

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:04:40 +0000

Source: pyerfa
Source-Version: 1.7.0+ds-2
Done: Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pyerfa, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 964958@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it> (supplier of updated pyerfa package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:48:40 +0000
Source: pyerfa
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7.0+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Astronomy Maintainers <debian-astro-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Antonio Valentino <antonio.valentino@tiscali.it>
Closes: 964958
Changes:
 pyerfa (1.7.0+ds-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/tests/control:
     - fix test dependencies
   * debian/patches:
     - new reproducible-build.patch, thanks to Chris Lamb.
       Closes: #964958.
Checksums-Sha1:
 1b97fa5f3cd99131e890548db78805a3f848b78c 2237 pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.dsc
 9df18f567a8f69f366aab18149c3e74fe8405ab6 4528 pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 37c1e94419e60a9106ef39dbb815ea8fd828e1c2f614d26fb35a756b330f7e5a 2237 pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.dsc
 2f61b9ca212f0091512996c7d578d6bf37561e253fe6a1b9b419dc7185dce783 4528 pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 73ae90f58074914bb0f6534cdff3ba7f 2237 python optional pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.dsc
 602310614990f06260e5108d972217cf 4528 python optional pyerfa_1.7.0+ds-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gyNe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.