Debian Bug report logs -
#94760
[list.debian.devel] Re: chroot bind?
Reported by: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:06:26 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Fixed in version 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3
Done: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Acknowledgement sent to Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>:
New Bug report received and filed, but not forwarded.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #3 received at quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: bind
Severity: wishlist
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
We could harden the default configuration with the following directives:
options {
version 'Not available';
allow-transfer { none; };
allow-recursion { localnets; };
allow-query { localnets; };
}
We could allow the configuration of these directives via debconf, which
will ask questions like: "Allow zone-transfers from which hosts?",
Allow recursive queries from which sources?" and so forth.
A more desirable structure will be exhibited by a script called add-zone,
which will create a zone skeleton. This skeleton will be configured with
security in mind.
Also, the package should generate a key for use with tsig and add the
appropriate statements to /etc/bind/named.conf
I see there are plenty of volunteers for this task, but I am willing to
provide any assistance you may require.
Regards, Yotam Rubin
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 01:16:08PM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Dennis Schoen wrote:
>
> > As said before in this thread i'm also interested in having a
> > chrooted bind in Debian. I just set up 3 chrooted bind Debian boxes
> > so if there's anything were i can help...
> >
>
> Take a look at the package and let Nicholas and me know if anything is
> awry.
>
> > I've also a running init script that copies the needed files at
> > startup into the jail so that it's always up-to-date. Just mail me
> > privatly if you want to look at it.
> >
> > Dennis
> >
>
> What exactly would be the point of that? Are the needed files likely to
> change that often? And wouldn't this require keeping a copy of the
> standard bind package around as well?
>
> --
> Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>:
Bug#94760; Package bind.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>.
Your message did not contain a Subject field. They are recommended and
useful because the title of a $gBug is determined using this field.
Please remember to include a Subject field in your messages in future.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #8 received at 94760@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Any news on this one?
This bug report is pretty old (year 2001!).
Either close it, or comment that it's not much relevant after 7 years
anymore...
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
Bug reassigned from package `bind' to `bind9'.
Request was from Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:07:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>:
Bug#94760; Package bind9.
(full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent to Marco Rodrigues <gothicx@sapo.pt>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>.
(full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 94760@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
reassign 402231 bind9
reassign 92147 bind9
reassign 52745 bind9
reassign 197670 bind9
reassign 481921 bind9
reassign 157245 bind9
reassign 248193 bind9
reassign 442910 bind9
reassign 81252 bind9
reassign 156349 bind9
reassign 94760 bind9
reassign 212625 bind9
reassign 260915 bind9
reassign 402232 bind9
reassign 86488 bind9
reassign 149342 bind9
reassign 282239 bind9
reassign 128129 bind9
reassign 62547 bind9
reassign 106789 bind9
reassign 46856 bind9
reassign 85081 bind9
reassign 242579 bind9
reassign 45470 bind9
reassign 50013 bind9
reassign 88326 bind9
reassign 95773 bind9
reassign 190577 bind9
reassign 53550 bind9
reassign 132492 bind9
reassign 24280 bind9
reassign 441290 bind9
reassign 88982 bind9
reassign 355787 bind9
reassign 199252 bind9
reassign 70079 bind9
reassign 213706 bind9
reassign 129710 bind9
reassign 170872 bind9
reassign 86013 bind9
reassign 280955 bind9
reassign 260759 bind9
reassign 99538 bind9
reassign 234167 bind9
reassign 132582 bind9
reassign 81190 bind9
reassign 352054 bind9
reassign 169124 bind9
reassign 132494 bind9
reassign 55032 bind9
reassign 85909 bind9
reassign 197669 bind9
thanks
The bind package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental. I am reassigning its bugs to the bind9 package. Please
have a look at them, and close them if they don't apply to
bind9 anymore.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
Reply sent
to Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:46:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:46:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #20 received at 94760-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Version: 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3
Hi,
the bind9 bug list grew too much and the Debian BIND team cannot
simply test all the reported bugs against versions not in stable, so
this is mass bug close, as either the version is no longer relevant
(because of old-old-stable 9.8.x or old-stable 9.9.5 or even older
version of bind9) or the bug was already fixed.
However, if you can reproduce the bug with a current version in stable,
please use Debian BTS 'found <bug> <version_you_reproduced_the_issue>'
command to retag the bug and reopen it.
Cheers,
Ondrej
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 20 Nov 2017 07:40:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Mon Sep 2 00:32:30 2019;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.
From: yotam@makif.omer.k12.il (Yotam Rubin)Subject: Re: chroot bind?Date: 21 Apr 2001 13:19:35 -0600