Debian Bug report logs - #941296
tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools

version graph

Package: src:tuxcmd-modules; Maintainer for src:tuxcmd-modules is Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>;

Reported by: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>

Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:48:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch, upstream

Found in versions tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5, tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5.1

Fixed in version tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-6

Done: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:48:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:48:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:44:54 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Version: 0.6.70+ds-5
Tags: patch upstream
User: debian-cross@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs

tuxcmd-modules fails to cross build from source, because it uses build
architecture build tools. Some (like pkg-config) are simply hard coded.
For others it uses wildly varying variable names making substitution
impossible. The attached patch makes tuxcmd-modules use standard
variables. Please consider applying it.

Helmut
[cross.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:27:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:27:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #10 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
To: 1011500@bugs.debian.org, 1011500-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:23:06 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tags 1011500 + pending patch
tags 941296 + pending patch
thanks

I've just uploaded tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1 to DELAYED/10:
  
  tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
  .
    * Non-maintainer upload.
    * Apply a patch by Vagrant Cascadian to ensure that tuxcmd-modules does not
      embed build paths in various binaries. (Closes: #1011500)
    * Apply a patch by Helmut Grohne to make it possible to cross-build
      tuxcmd-modules. (Closes: #941296)

The full debdiff is attached.


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
[tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.debdiff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Added tag(s) pending. Request was from "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:27:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:27:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:51:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:51:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #20 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
To: 1011500@bugs.debian.org, 1011500-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:47:43 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tags 1011500 + pending patch
thanks

I've just uploaded an updated version of tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1
to DELAYED/3. This variant of the upload actually includes the fix for
#941296 which was missed when preparing the upload.
  
  tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
  .
    * Non-maintainer upload.
    * Apply a patch by Vagrant Cascadian to ensure that tuxcmd-modules does not
      embed build paths in various binaries. (Closes: #1011500)
    * Apply a patch by Helmut Grohne to make it possible to cross-build
      tuxcmd-modules. (Closes: #941296)

The full debdiff is attached.


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-
[tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.debdiff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:51:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #28 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>
To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 1011500-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 1011500@bugs.debian.org, 1011500-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1011500: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 15:01:13 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 2022-11-18, Chris Lamb wrote:
> I've just uploaded an updated version of tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1
> to DELAYED/3. This variant of the upload actually includes the fix for
> #941296 which was missed when preparing the upload.

This hasn't yet landed in the archive, was it actually uploaded to
DELAYED/3?

It could have been uploaded to DELAYED/0 (e.g. without delay) as a QA
upload rather than as an NMU...

>   tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>   .
>     * Non-maintainer upload.
>     * Apply a patch by Vagrant Cascadian to ensure that tuxcmd-modules does not
>       embed build paths in various binaries. (Closes: #1011500)
>     * Apply a patch by Helmut Grohne to make it possible to cross-build
>       tuxcmd-modules. (Closes: #941296)

live well,
  vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:39:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:39:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #36 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
To: "Vagrant Cascadian" <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>, 1011500-quiet@bugs.debian.org, 1011500@bugs.debian.org, 1011500-submitter@bugs.debian.org, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1011500: tuxcmd-modules: reproducible-builds: embedded build paths in various binaries
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:35:15 +0000
Hi Vagrant,

> This hasn't yet landed in the archive, was it actually uploaded to
> DELAYED/3?

Somewhat unclear. I am pretty sure it was uploaded as I can find an
.upload file for it:

  $ cat tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.ssh-upload.upload
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.debian.tar.xz to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.buildinfo to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
  Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.changes to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.

> It could have been uploaded to DELAYED/0 (e.g. without delay) as a QA
> upload rather than as an NMU...

Oh sure, but 3 days delay easily allows issues to be caught...

However, in lieu of working out what has happened here, I'll re-upload
now without any DELAYED value. Thanks. :)


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-




Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:39:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Reply sent to Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 18:24:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 18:24:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #44 received at 941296-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
To: 941296-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#941296: fixed in tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-5.1
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 18:22:12 +0000
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Source-Version: 0.6.70+ds-5.1
Done: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxcmd-modules, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941296@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuxcmd-modules package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:15:30 +0000
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Binary: tuxcmd-modules tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.70+ds-5.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
 tuxcmd-modules - VFS modules for tuxcmd file manager
Closes: 941296 1011500
Changes:
 tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Apply a patch by Vagrant Cascadian to ensure that tuxcmd-modules does not
     embed build paths in various binaries. (Closes: #1011500)
   * Apply a patch by Helmut Grohne to make it possible to cross-build
     tuxcmd-modules. (Closes: #941296)
Checksums-Sha1:
 6fc6ac3504be05519bc4b735f90243e135729577 1875 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc
 bd233e743db6949ad28e506161cb93d4af9d2af9 334896 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 a264c655b39265b65c4065d58fab6572c96b0257 6868 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.debian.tar.xz
 42dc661e2086ac54df0c42e5ffbd1b6ae7dbc4fa 1307420 tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb
 e4e4014005f9d087cd810769b5e32986a8f879ed 9119 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.buildinfo
 bfb94903a3657ed8b33ffe5ad0ae7737b1eb20a3 138300 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 96e8930d7de3491aac8ae313fe0899e955de9da168342e7f9a0f8474146aa29d 1875 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc
 2577a41c065b359fde332612432b069b95a107a9dde86ba7362b74c01fc5f907 334896 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 d234e066ce887b420b25abf77d8049ccc3297ecde7f1f49c5625eb57f81a6783 6868 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.debian.tar.xz
 2d5f5f09ec8e65f3b596833fe61a02663cd5cc5219b7fce50da7703860eadea5 1307420 tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb
 df12ddf7cb6e14f13e9b05d935411db7d0459d8f0e947b89a0b47468db147058 9119 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.buildinfo
 2692687ea478b023ece770fa70a1e351992e9fec72e66c8f6192187176c4861a 138300 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb
Files:
 3c8e452d7fb0b5425894a5691f529ca0 1875 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc
 e62ee5fbf34fd29b7e5af2b303e3938b 334896 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 fce9c00c254fd7d7f563dceacc40d4fa 6868 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.debian.tar.xz
 3b3327be788e6252da55671fa7344905 1307420 debug optional tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb
 7b920c4425f943703b4367474ffc21fd 9119 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.buildinfo
 7322b7342f4388b0b66ea75cc32ca8bf 138300 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=n8IO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 23:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 23:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #49 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>
To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#941296: tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 14:58:24 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Control: found 941296 0.6.70+ds-5.1

On 2022-11-23, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> This hasn't yet landed in the archive, was it actually uploaded to
>> DELAYED/3?
>
> Somewhat unclear. I am pretty sure it was uploaded as I can find an
> .upload file for it:
>
>   $ cat tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.ssh-upload.upload
>   Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1.dsc to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
...
>   Successfully uploaded tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-5.1_amd64.changes to ssh.upload.debian.org for ssh-upload.
>
>> It could have been uploaded to DELAYED/0 (e.g. without delay) as a QA
>> upload rather than as an NMU...
>
> Oh sure, but 3 days delay easily allows issues to be caught...
>
> However, in lieu of working out what has happened here, I'll re-upload
> now without any DELAYED value. Thanks. :)

Hrm. Seems like the original version without the cross-building patches are what
actually landed in sid today...

live well,
  vagrant
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Marked as found in versions tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5.1; no longer marked as fixed in versions tuxcmd-modules/0.6.70+ds-5.1 and reopened. Request was from Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org> to 941296-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 23:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Sun, 27 Nov 2022 23:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>:
Bug#941296; Package src:tuxcmd-modules. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:54:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:54:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #59 received at 941296@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
To: "Vagrant Cascadian" <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>, 941296@bugs.debian.org, 941296-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#941296: tuxcmd-modules FTCBFS: uses build architecture build tools
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:50:42 +0000
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:

> Hrm. Seems like the original version without the cross-building patches are what
> actually landed in sid today...

Bah, okay. Re-uploading without DELAYED now. Thanks. :)


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-



Message sent on to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug#941296. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:54:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Reply sent to Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #67 received at 941296-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
To: 941296-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#941296: fixed in tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-6
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:27:17 +0000
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Source-Version: 0.6.70+ds-6
Done: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxcmd-modules, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941296@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuxcmd-modules package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:41:07 +0000
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Binary: tuxcmd-modules tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.70+ds-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Description:
 tuxcmd-modules - VFS modules for tuxcmd file manager
Closes: 941296
Changes:
 tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Actually apply a patch by Helmut Grohne to make it possible to cross-build
     tuxcmd-modules. This change was missing from the previous 0.6.70+ds-5.1
     upload; thanks to Vagrant Cascadian for spotting this. (Closes: #941296)
Checksums-Sha1:
 aedfb404b13f9cb28ab368c90bdf9f013b0feb7f 1867 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.dsc
 bd233e743db6949ad28e506161cb93d4af9d2af9 334896 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 df871563b49cf57a98927af70bd218779a4501fb 8012 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.debian.tar.xz
 1b69859564a75d1979c936432483bb9dfae20b4c 1307432 tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb
 aeb32a8e2e8e900634aa75d7de24b7f91ea2c340 9100 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.buildinfo
 cfb1de188d1cb4cbf5edd70fe65fb65413b9c337 138500 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 d4fd200986d559679d8f3186e761a15949a7a840d18892638405b997740fcd9b 1867 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.dsc
 2577a41c065b359fde332612432b069b95a107a9dde86ba7362b74c01fc5f907 334896 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 48fe1af8ecdd249898962c6d0dc781f36b0d3ea1ecd92b0a26e25f2286b0b418 8012 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.debian.tar.xz
 d459c89a42d7e0057f90037b6829870eaabbf6aeecaf75ac5b4d18451ed1043c 1307432 tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb
 db850ee76b4fe6935bce8e29666b0f15d72579f55f03d50de2469db65bc54c21 9100 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.buildinfo
 56a00de07d4257bf74e1af5df8694feaf74fd1f2589428dcbf6616fac7ee21a1 138500 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb
Files:
 f57b8d20cf3aa89c131afae2d33f9ae9 1867 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.dsc
 e62ee5fbf34fd29b7e5af2b303e3938b 334896 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
 f8fff7f62aa458dc2cdec36d1c6e49c5 8012 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6.debian.tar.xz
 ed9b74a4a12d4242100d8e65e7f58f5f 1307432 debug optional tuxcmd-modules-dbgsym_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb
 efcabd60918377ef0192e550ff7dc9b9 9100 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.buildinfo
 f6af94c0f47e9db9726596ef67337980 138500 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-6_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5dfm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 01 Jan 2023 07:31:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Wed May 17 11:32:02 2023; Machine Name: buxtehude

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.