Debian Bug report logs - #940013
apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:41:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Source: apophenia
Version: 1.0+ds-8
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bugs@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed
that apophenia could not be built reproducibly.

This is because it included build paths in (somewhat useless!)
log files. Patch attached that simply doesn't ship these in
the binary package. This is similar to #939548 [1] in dsdp and
#939650 [2] in libvdpau (please see the comments on the former
report).

Patch attached.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/
 [1] https://bugs.debian.org/939548
 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/939650


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

[apophenia.diff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 940013@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

To: 940013@bugs.debian.org, reproducible-bugs@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#940013: apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2020 08:13:05 -0000

Dear Maintainer,

> Source: apophenia
> Version: 0.999b+ds3-2
> Tags: patch

There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 367 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way.

Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Message #15 received at 940013@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>

To: 940013@bugs.debian.org, reproducible-bugs@lists.alioth.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#940013: apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 13:07:04 -0000

Chris Lamb wrote:

> [..]

Friendly ping on this?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Message #20 received at 940013-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@reproducible-builds.org>

To: 940013-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#940013: apophenia: please make the build reproducible

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:43:06 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 2019-09-11, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0] we noticed
> that apophenia could not be built reproducibly.
>
> This is because it included build paths in (somewhat useless!)
> log files. Patch attached that simply doesn't ship these in
> the binary package. This is similar to #939548 [1] in dsdp and
> #939650 [2] in libvdpau (please see the comments on the former
> report).

This no longer appears to be an issue:

  https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/apophenia.html

The vast majority of builds since mid-2020 appear to be reproducible.

The two builds on i386 and armhf in bookworm appear to be an unrelated
issue (possibly in our test infrastructure).

live well,
  vagrant

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.