Debian Bug report logs - #923438
tinc: breaks after upgrading libssl1.1 to v1.1.1b-1

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gian Piero Carrubba <gpiero@rm-rf.it>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: tinc: breaks after upgrading libssl1.1 to v1.1.1b-1

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:27:18 +0100

Package: tinc
Version: 1.1~pre17-1.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

after having upgraded libssl1.1 to 1.1.1b-1 (currently in sid), tinc
breaks with:

> Error while decrypting: error:060A7094:digital envelope routines:EVP_EncryptUpdate:invalid operation

Downgrading libssl1.1 to 1.1.1a-1 solves the issue.
Please feel free to reassign to libssl1.1 if you think it should be
fixed on their side.

Thanks,
Gian Piero.

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages tinc depends on:
ii  libc6           2.28-7
ii  liblzo2-2       2.10-0.1
ii  libminiupnpc17  2.1-1+b1
ii  libncurses6     6.1+20181013-2
ii  libreadline7    7.0-5
ii  libssl1.1       1.1.1a-1
ii  libtinfo6       6.1+20181013-2
ii  zlib1g          1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

tinc recommends no packages.

tinc suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/default/tinc changed:
LIMITS="-l 32768 -n 512"


-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 923438@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Lo Nigro <lists@d.sb>

To: 923438@bugs.debian.org

Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:55:07 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I'm also hitting this issue on Debian Buster/Testing, after installing the
Tinc package from experimental. I'd like to use Tinc 1.1, but had to
downgrade to the Tinc 1.0 package in Buster for it to work properly.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #15 received at 923438@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

To: 923438@bugs.debian.org

Subject: NMU to fix SSL issue in tinc experimental

Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 16:10:24 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I've just made an upload to delay-3 to address the SSL issue. Debdiff
attached. Let me know if I should delete the upload.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

"You know," said Arthur, "it's at times like this, when I'm trapped in
a Vogon airlock with a man from Betelgeuse, and about to die from
asphyxiation in deep space that I really wish I'd listened to what my
mother told me when I was young."
"Why, what did she tell you?"
"I don't know, I didn't listen."
 –- Douglas Adams _The Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy_

[nmu_upload_fix_923438.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #20 received at 923438-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

To: 923438-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#923438: fixed in tinc 1.1~pre17-1.2

Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 23:35:12 +0000

Source: tinc
Source-Version: 1.1~pre17-1.2
Done: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tinc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 923438@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> (supplier of updated tinc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 May 2020 15:11:34 -0700
Source: tinc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1~pre17-1.2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
Changed-By: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
Closes: 923438
Changes:
 tinc (1.1~pre17-1.2) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add patch to fix EVP_DecryptUpdate issue. Closes: #923438
Checksums-Sha1:
 b0e0b39f55d3fe3e09815ee29938692b712e1faf 1822 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.dsc
 8d260f6b8a0deb71fc5d1f2d7aefea0ee1ef7b82 11120 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.debian.tar.xz
 f5918f756d268c59ea379c63d4defc29d74af75f 6597 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 aa86fd4646558cf49d921fe88bcebe00a494310df24f05d5b81c5123aabf2138 1822 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.dsc
 ebebc0afd9e7cb332bade714e958e7daa02c37450840bc0f525ed4b69cf28e7f 11120 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.debian.tar.xz
 3c4309b82756719652a8a7113a55f742d918f62660fd4278237f027e34747323 6597 tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 0e91aff082c04b0675cc24c20b2cbddd 1822 net optional tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.dsc
 8e626baf37a81b43ec773273546ba201 11120 net optional tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2.debian.tar.xz
 ee4cd93778568e5dd7385ad0ed49e0d9 6597 net optional tinc_1.1~pre17-1.2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=OSoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.