Debian Bug report logs - #882085
cowsay: should not recommend cowsay-off

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Felicia Hummel <felicia@drachenkatze.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:10:20 +0100

Package: cowsay
Version: 3.03+dfsg2-3
Severity: critical

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The package cowsay includes an ASCII representation of Zoophilia. The
file in question is /usr/share/cowsay/cows/sodomized-sheep.cow

This is a legal issue in many countries. Even if it's not well-defined
by law if ASCII representations of Zoophilia are legal or not, I'd
rather prefer not to take a chance being involved in a lawsuit when such
a file could be found on my computer.

Please remove the file from the packages as soon as possible. Thank you.

All the best
Felicia
--- System information. ---
Architecture: Kernel:       Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64

Debian Release: buster/sid
  500 testing         www.deb-multimedia.org   500 testing
ftp2.de.debian.org   500 testing         devel.alephobjects.com   500
stable          repository.spotify.com   500 stable
repos.fds-team.de   500 stable          repo.skype.com   500 stable
    repo.adminlounge.org   500 stable          dl.google.com   500
stable          deb.dovetail-automata.com   500 oldstable
ftp2.de.debian.org   100 jessie-backports ftp.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends                     (Version) | Installed
=====================================-+-===========
libtext-charwidth-perl                | 0.04-7.1
perl:any                              |

Recommends      (Version) | Installed
=========================-+-===========
cowsay-off                | 3.03+dfsg2-3


Suggests      (Version) | Installed
=======================-+-===========
filters                 |

Message #10 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 12:48:52 +0100

Hi,
you tested it? And you read and understand the description of cowsay-off
carefully?

Explicit: the sheep is not part of the cowsay package - it is part of
cowsay-off which is described as:
>  This package contains cows which some may consider to be offensive.
>  Please do not install this package if you or your users are easily
> offended.
Ok, it is a little bit tasteless - but no one is forced to install this
package.

My 2¢

Alf

Message #15 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Felicia Hummel <felicia@drachenkatze.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:46:26 +0100

> Explicit: the sheep is not part of the cowsay package - it is part of
> cowsay-off which is described as:
> >  This package contains cows which some may consider to be offensive.
> >  Please do not install this package if you or your users are easily
> > offended.
> Ok, it is a little bit tasteless - but no one is forced to install this
> package.

It's not about whether I find this package tasteless or offensive. It's
about a legal issue outlined in my initial bug report.

In fact, the package was installed since I have turned on install
suggests. If this was done on purpose or accident is not open for debate.

All the best
Felicia

Message #20 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tehnic <tehnic@take3.ro>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:35:48 +0200

Hi,

here are my 2¢:

> Hi,
> you tested it? And you read and understand the description of cowsay-
off
> carefully?
> 
> Explicit: the sheep is not part of the cowsay package - it is part of
> cowsay-off which is described as:

> Ok, it is a little bit tasteless - but no one is forced to install
this
> package.

Unfortunatly cowsay-off is a recommended package of cowsay, this is
definitely questionable (i would consider it to be a bug)!

About the legal issues:

There are countries in which the possession of certain content is
enough to be sentenced, in particular for example child pornography but
also zoophilia. No distribution or "usage" is required.

My suggestion:

Make cowsay-off only suggested and ask for confirmation on install.

Message #25 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Dominik George <nik@naturalnet.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:54:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

> In fact, the package was installed since I have turned on install
> suggests. If this was done on purpose or accident is not open for debate.

It is. I'm sorry, but in fact, your concern should be that you are obviously unable to control what you install on your system. You can read a handbook on this topic - but please leave unrelated maintainers alone - they are not the support crew for your personal system's administration.

The fix is to purge the package and look and think next time you install packages.

-nik

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #30 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Felicia Hummel <felicia@drachenkatze.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:07:01 +0100

> Make cowsay-off only suggested and ask for confirmation on install.

I believe this is a reasonable course of action. I also have to
apologize: I was under the impression that the Zoophilia representation
was in cowsay, when in reality it was in cowsay-off.

All the best
Felicia

Message #35 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Elisa Pfeifer <sebastian.pfeifer@unicorncloud.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:17:23 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Morning!

> There are countries in which the possession of certain content is
> enough to be sentenced, in particular for example child pornography but
> also zoophilia. No distribution or "usage" is required.

Debian Mirror Operator here. This could bring some legal problems for
some of us, since we do not only possess it, but also distribute the
package.. I know this is highly theoretical, but only because law
enforcement in most countries probably don't know about Debian (<-- as a
figure of speech of course).

All the best
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian Elisa Pfeifer

Cyber Perikarp - Verein z. Förderung d. Netzkultur
Wassertalweg 56   |   8670 Krieglach   |   AUSTRIA

Vereinsregisternummer:                   712531114
Datenverarbeitungsregister:                4016968
PGP Key ID:                     0x923719A753677B95
EU-Transparenz-Registernummer:     334990728439-25
D-U-N-S® Nummer:                         300530810

Phone:                             +43 3855 289 10
Fax:                          +43 3855 289 10 - 10
Mobile:                         +43 677 623 144 11
Jabber:                          deadda7a@fsfe.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #40 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Richard Wiedenhöft <richard@wiedenhoeft.xyz>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RE: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:19:33 +0100

> Look and think next time you install packages

A name like "cowsay-off" doesn't imply it contains obscene content. Executing apt-cache show on all packages you install is impractical.

I suggest
* Changing the name of the package to "cowsay-obscene"
* Removing it from suggested packages for cowsay

~Richard

Message #45 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Felicia Hummel <felicia@drachenkatze.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:41:52 +0100

> Debian Mirror Operator here. This could bring some legal problems for
> some of us, since we do not only possess it, but also distribute the
> package.. I know this is highly theoretical, but only because law
> enforcement in most countries probably don't know about Debian (<-- as a
> figure of speech of course).

I agree. Whilst the content of the file in question is debatable, the
file name itself is not. In fact, "sodomized-sheep.cow" leaves no bug
room for interpretation of the ASCII representation itself.

A note to all those who try to troll me or the bug report because they
read about it on fefe: It was created to protect unknowingly of legal
actions, especially mirror operators or those who have install suggests
and recommends on.

If you find that "You're wasting the time of the maintainers", please
refer to the Debian Code of Conduct [1], which includes, but is not
limited to, those sections:

- Be respectful
- Assume good faith
- Be open

All the best
Felicia

[1] https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct

Message #50 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Johannes Schriewer <hallo@dunkelstern.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:36:00 +0100

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:54:34 +0100 Dominik George wrote:
> > In fact, the package was installed since I have turned on install
> > suggests. If this was done on purpose or accident is not open for debate.
> 
> It is. I'm sorry, but in fact, your concern should be that you are obviously unable to control what you install on your system. You can read a handbook on this topic - but please leave unrelated maintainers alone - they are not the support crew for your personal system's administration.

So what about mirrors in countries, where this is illegal (like germany), that get all packages automatically? Is there a way to exclude this illegal package? Wouldn’t it be easier to just remove that file and be done with it?

> The fix is to purge the package and look and think next time you install packages.

Will you inform the mirrors in countries that this is illegal?

> 
> -nik

Message #59 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "S.B." <boesl_stefan@yahoo.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:51:54 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

This depiction of a sodomised cow is not illigal in germany, because it is a work of art and so it is even protected by german law. 

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #64 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "J. R. Schmid" <jrs@weitnahbei.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:10:22 +0100

You people are beyond me. Why in the world would you want a picture of a 
sheep (?) being forced (??) into sex (???) it quite likely does not want 
(????) in a distribution of computer programs (?????) even if there was 
no legal issue whatsoever. If you can judge by the number of question 
marks, this is a serious question. I'm looking forward to the attempt of 
a serious answer.

Message #69 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:21:57 +0100

Reluctantly commenting since this was brought to my attention, I think
the following is useful to consider for this discussion:

> Richard Wiedenhöft: A name like "cowsay-off" doesn't imply it contains
> obscene content.

I don't disagree, but the reason it's called *-off is because there was
a long-standing fortunes-off package with "offensive" fortunes. See
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769194 for the
discussion on splitting out cowsay-off.

I don't care what it's called, but whatever naming convention is used
should be consistent across all of Debian.

> J. R. Schmid: Why in the world would you want a picture of a sheep (?)[...]

     _________________________________________
    / You do realize you're talking about a   \
    | program that allows an ASCII elephant   |
    | to talk to you from inside a snake? The |
    | whole thing is created to be silly. I'm |
    | a user of one of these cowsay-off       |
    | 'cows'. It's displayed on login along   |
    \ with a quote as a type of potty humor.  /
     -----------------------------------------
           \
            \  ....
              .    ........
              .            .
              .             .
        .......              .........
        ..............................
    Elephant inside ASCII snake

> J. R. Schmid: being forced (??) into sex (???)

     ________________________________________
    / And while we're on the subject it's a  \
    | sodomized sheep, there's no suggestion |
    | that it's unconsensual. Just as this   |
    | sheep on fire could have lit itself on |
    | fire. I tried to find out more but the |
    | sheep being made out of a bunch of     |
    | ASCII characters was unavailable for   |
    \ comment                                /
     ----------------------------------------
      \            .    .     .
       \      .  . .     `  ,
        \    .; .  : .' :  :  : .
         \   i..`: i` i.i.,i  i .
          \   `,--.|i |i|ii|ii|i:
               UooU\.'@@@@@@`.||'
               \__/(@@@@@@@@@@)'
                    (@@@@@@@@)
                    `YY~~~~YY'
                     ||    ||

Signed, A user of cowsay who just wants to get the upstream package
*ahem* unmolested by Debian installed on his system (even if that means
it's split into two).

Message #74 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "J. R. Schmid" <jrs@weitnahbei.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:33:38 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Ævar (cool name btw!) and thanks for pointing out the two
inaccuracies in my first comment. I still would like to know why a
project like Debian (used ostensibly by every kind of human on the
planet, across ages, sexes, political and religious divides and whatnot)
feels like it needs to include anything that's as you state yourself (a)
silly and (b) as such not really useful or necessary for anything in any
way while it /will/ (c) be clear to /any/one within the "large and
diverse community of users and developers"
(https://wiki.debian.org/Community) that pictures of sheep being
sodomized, voluntarily so or not, may cause very real troubles of
various sorts for an unknowable number of members of the that diverse
community.

Unfortunately Felicia took a step back saying this is not about
tastelessness or offensiveness, but only about possible legal issues.
I'll kindly ask you to yourself come up with examples of where all three
of these occur at once, it isn't going to take you very long to do so.

Since I was asked, outside this forum, what, in my opinion should happen:

Felicia, I agree it's a reasonable course of action to ask for user
confirmation on install of cowsay-off and possible other packages like
it. I also agree with you, Ævar, "whatever naming convention is used
should be consistent across all of Debian". I'll go one step further
though and say that the naming convention should be "-offensive". In
addition to that, I /really, /please, want to hear from a member of
Debian as to what the reasoning is for including such imagery in the
biggest and oldest distribution of the largest non-commercial operating
system in the world. I'd further like to ask for that statement to be
well thought-through and non-humorous in nature. That's all the things
that, in my opinion, should happen.

Cheers, Jonathan

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #79 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Dan Snider <dan@dephekt.net>

To: "882085@bugs.debian.org" <882085@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Legal red herring?

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:26:01 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

There are (relatively) well-defined legal tests established in many countries which define this. For example, in the United States I understand this would need to be considered a *realistic* depiction of beastiality or meet all three criterion of the Miller test or three pronged obscenity test, which I do not believe it does in either case.

Part of this test is whether people in general would find the image of prurient interest in sex, as in, was it intended to be a realistic erotic depiction with the intent to arouse the viewer? I argue it's not of prurient interest to sex, as the application itself is clearly of a comedic purpose, it has little to no capability (or intent) to be sexually gratifying to anyone.

Also, the entire "work" as a whole must be taken into consideration. Despite the fact the packages are split up as packaged in Debian, I could argue for the developer and say cowsay and cowsay-off are actually a singular work. When taking the sheep image into consideration with the rest of the cowsay application, it becomes apparent, to me, it's neither serving an erotic purpose and that the intention of the program as a whole is purely comical.

I feel it would be an extremely far-fetched scenario for someone to bring charges to a mirror operator based on this very crudely-made ASCII depiction in a relatively obscure package which clearly had no sexual intent, but is specifically intended as a comedic work of art which automatically gains free speech protections (at least in many countries) unless it fails well-defined legal tests as to why it should not be.

Also, obviously my arguments here are specific to US law. As another mentioned, most EU countries have similar free speech protections which take precedence except, again, in well-defined legal circumstances.

I do wholly support changing -off to -offensive, as in cowsay-offensive and that being standard naming practice. I agree with Felicia that the average person could easily install both packages without necessarily realizing cowsay-off stands for "offensive." One argued that it's the users responsibility to know what software they are installing and I don't entirely disagree, but changing the package name would, I think, satisfy the arguments against that stance.

Also, I agree that if a system administrator is installing recommendations and suggested packages by default without reviewing them specifically, that's a failure of that individual administrator and is in my opinion a poor practice to get in a habit of for a variety of reasons, one of which has already been illustrated herein.

As to whether the image is tasteless or funny is entirely subjective as it's comedic art and that should, in my opinion, not be the deciding factor on whether it's included in Debian or not. I have seen comedic depictions of bestiality in popular movies and TV shows where it was protected art, so I feel the comedic and artistic nature here is self-evident.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #84 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Rainer Müller <raimue@codingfarm.de>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 18:52:19 +0100

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:21:57 +0100 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
> Signed, A user of cowsay who just wants to get the upstream package
> *ahem* unmolested by Debian installed on his system (even if that means
> it's split into two).

It might help the discussion to know that sodomized-sheep.cow is not
part of the upstream source tarball, but was added only to the Debian
package in a local patch [1].

Which means your argument could be read to be in favor of actually
removing it from the Debian package. In any case, removing this cow,
which can even only be found in Debian, will not make cowsay as a whole
less useful.

Rainer

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=326063

Message #89 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gregor Jasny <gjasny@googlemail.com>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Also in screenshots.d.o

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:45:55 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Dear maintainers,

In case you'll remove the image, please also take care of replacing the
package screenshot at
https://screenshots.debian.net/package/cowsay-off

Thanks,
Gregor

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #94 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alf Gaida <agaida@siduction.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:57:14 +0100

From a technical pov it would be wise to downgrade cowsay-off to
suggests (or just remove the recommends) as mentioned here. That would
exactly fit the reason for splitting out cowsay-off - it makes absolutly
no sense to split out offensive content and then install it as a 'soft'
dependency. Recommends are to strong, installed by default in debian and
cowsay is recommend by games-toys and junior-games-text. Second: The cow
(sheep) is not part of the official tar-ball, so it could be removed
without further discussion about upstream if the maintainer think that's
needed.

I don't want to judge filename or content, at least cowsay-off might not
(will not) exactly fit for games-toys or junior-games-text.

Message #99 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: maltouzes <maltouzes@gmail.com>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug: 882085

Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 20:22:24 +0100

Hi,

I will use the Suggets field instead of the Recommends field.

Unfortunately i'm really busy right now but be sure i will  fix this as soon as i can.

Tony

Message #104 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Horsti <horst@vable.ch>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:02:09 +0100 (CET)

On Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:10:20  0100 Felicia Hummel <felicia@drachenkatze.org> wrote:
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> The package cowsay includes an ASCII representation of Zoophilia. The
> file in question is /usr/share/cowsay/cows/sodomized-sheep.cow
> 
> This is a legal issue in many countries. Even if it's not well-defined
> by law if ASCII representations of Zoophilia are legal or not, I'd
> rather prefer not to take a chance being involved in a lawsuit when such
> a file could be found on my computer.
> 
> Please remove the file from the packages as soon as possible. Thank you.

all,

since it belongs to cowsay-off and IMHO 'off' stands for 'offensive' I would suggest that mirrors in bourgeois countries just shouldn't replicate packages named *-off.

just my 5ct

Horsti

Message #109 received at 882085@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Elisa Pfeifer <sebastian.pfeifer@unicorncloud.org>

To: 882085@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [cowsay] Package includes ASCII representation of Zoophilia

Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:01:20 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:02:09 +0100 (CET) Horsti <horst@vable.ch> wrote:
> since it belongs to cowsay-off and IMHO 'off' stands for 'offensive' I would suggest that mirrors in bourgeois countries just shouldn't replicate packages named *-off.

It is not recommended (possible?) to exclude single packages from a mirror.

@Dan:
We have mirrors in countries that are not that fond on things like free
speech or human rights. I know the issue is highly theoretical (as
stated before), but assuming that people who mirror Debian are often
also people who are active in (net-) politics, this is a possible risk
for them if the executive forces or government want to create a crime.

As I live in Austria where it is now illegal to use a scarf at
temperatures over 0°C and "preparing to touch" a policemen is a worse
crime than manslaughter on multiple people I am rather sensible to that.

I just don't see a point in patching a file in a package that is not in
the upstream source and that could become a problem for people who
volunteer their time and money to create a mirror. Even if it is decided
to keep this image, a warning on the "How to mirror Debian" concerning
this issue would be good.

All the best
Sebastian

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #114 received at 882085-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tony Maillefaud <maltouzes@gmail.com>

To: 882085-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#882085: fixed in cowsay 3.03+dfsg2-4

Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:20:21 +0000

Source: cowsay
Source-Version: 3.03+dfsg2-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cowsay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 882085@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Tony Maillefaud <maltouzes@gmail.com> (supplier of updated cowsay package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:17:38 +0100
Source: cowsay
Binary: cowsay cowsay-off
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.03+dfsg2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Tony Maillefaud <maltouzes@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Tony Maillefaud <maltouzes@gmail.com>
Description:
 cowsay     - configurable talking cow
 cowsay-off - configurable talking cow (offensive cows)
Closes: 882085
Changes:
 cowsay (3.03+dfsg2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Cowsay-off
    - Use suggests field instead of Recommends (closes: #882085)
   * Change standards-version (4.1.1)
Checksums-Sha1:
 07e280357c4a0e310ab4a0c694883dcc4ea5e2d2 2145 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.dsc
 603f2bc2ded998568f7ca536e779145aab38f8c9 12776 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.debian.tar.xz
 030787db968432f3fd434a133d4ba0b9441ef4c8 7952 cowsay-off_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 0eafd46534720b2fc4272845b5afffec8e8d837f 20120 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 ebc034d04083c43dd636c5ce2b57f319b487b246 5845 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 3c1c8dec5985dd8fb0723ce7154e3b30ee32224088bbe93c482c6f11edf8921d 2145 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.dsc
 ac131935e8d2452b23f71c4881feca52cf489790ec0ef33a733d8a7781632c16 12776 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.debian.tar.xz
 95bb6a1af6f8f2188dc160cfaf2cd1bb435a80bf0e8e4b0e2054c0942d544619 7952 cowsay-off_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 22fd6b53e9bb0d1b584cebb46b270b5138d779ada07eee22ad4c464b35b6d991 20120 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 8a16ba8d308236bf4ebaac72d535b63c877dffc2dc7a91d945a2aa7cc58c3445 5845 cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 3dcbdabc091cbb85e5dd605bacb11f1a 2145 games optional cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.dsc
 d41b4e694d50b872b6eac0cfd1dab419 12776 games optional cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4.debian.tar.xz
 a673b7a006bc52350f54e08346664506 7952 games optional cowsay-off_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 9d28f240bfde85383a04978a56ccb04d 20120 games optional cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_all.deb
 46ca8bea9724a652e03aa56cf11fcecd 5845 games optional cowsay_3.03+dfsg2-4_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEjEcLKgsxVo4RDUMlFigfLgB8mNEFAloVvHVfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDhD
NDcwQjJBMEIzMTU2OEUxMTBENDMyNTE2MjgxRjJFMDA3Qzk4RDEACgkQFigfLgB8
mNEZng//ZUhWVwxYgAl7+lfo7/Lh2qIBwIVi9dT6ELmMonlbwjiIaQL4vuMKmsWX
SwmFATEfJubPwL8O6XAMXIUNEOUJtFsiz5chB5ycSvfzxsgJpMxc/ZWBPWOBnjOV
QAjYntbmPoE/Amx7StvGzzb3PqksoJ9mWvGDfYNAyg025MmZ2tQvb9816rZ3h2Ga
xDpsreGwkwORbBtO0Gai46vvUgxdXSyeP2V0wtpqoypE1ElGP8tZLF3WjGd70IjW
2s3K7HvYblGxqbcdxksMH6QQL9iR4lrIpjV0ZTdV6O27cLXi5+aLgv3PKpkBU/sW
XVg3S3gyYRDV6k5BSM6LQAv/QSy86FTZYinL9WDz98IreEEOv4N9yDurO2QK5fSw
h29jMGD2JCZfnqhKLYRb7Gl2oGMpSNxh3wwzG+1OajSC3evmZi82+pDbVzfTlp8y
b1OEZsYhRHY3hQIecxmHEHuiDOwijO5xgdU8h3cN3X7VhiU7vnMcKCPxsyKK3+Tx
k+p1hCjfA8AS2r5HniHF1tdaD2rWnpLiZKF3/FQWSsc+0BMH4CxH/P5E/EIcwem3
kJfKEccepKWgZu83n7jWusUEY59oBaTT4FlhKhHpmkfkqBhyhwaIbsZpz9WTHlmF
VWoaOLd6Wy3eci5yWkj90i0m3aLJIX+BxoWgkJ0yz3uE0OFK/Ck=
=ipv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.