Debian Bug report logs - #874708
libanthy0: Package libanthy0 1:0.3-5 missing from unstable repository.

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: libanthy0: Package libanthy0 1:0.3-5 missing from unstable repository.

Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 07:22:38 +0800

Package: libanthy0
Version: 1:0.3-5
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * I would like to install ibus-anthy fom the unstable repository.
   * Pacakge dependecies are preventing me from installing this package.
   * I am unable to install ibus-anthy.

The problem appears to me to be caused by libanthy0 1:0.3-5 is missing from the
unstable repository.

libanthyinput0 and libanthy0 come from same source package, but libanthy0 is
built from an older source package in the unstable repository, and
libanthyinput0 breaks this older version of libanthy0.

I think if libanthy0 is built with the new source 1:0.3-5 and added to the
unstable repository then my problem may be fixed.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.12.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_AU:en (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libanthy0 depends on:
pn  anthy-common  <none>
ii  libc6         2.24-17

libanthy0 recommends no packages.

libanthy0 suggests no packages.

Message #18 received at 874708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>

To: Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>, Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

Cc: 874708@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: libanthy0: Package libanthy0 1:0.3-5 missing from unstable repository.

Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:28:13 -0500

Control: tags -1 +moreinfo

What exactly is the problem the missing library causes? This sounds
like a normal library transition that Debian does all the time. The
old library (libanthy0) is removed because everything in Debian will
build against the new library (libanthy1).

Osamu, can we lower the severity of this bug so that this package can
migrate to testing?

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Message #25 received at 874708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

To: 878270@bugs.debian.org, 874708@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>, Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>, NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp>, dai@debian.org

Subject: anthy (EUCJP->UTF-8) and *-anthy packages

Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:44:45 +0900

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:28:13AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
>
> What exactly is the problem the missing library causes? This sounds
> like a normal library transition that Debian does all the time. The
> old library (libanthy0) is removed because everything in Debian will
> build against the new library (libanthy1).

No ABI change is involved.  Data passed from library call is now encoded
in UTF-8 instead of EUCJP by the new library (or I should say the new
library use new data in anthy-common in UTF-8)

> Osamu, can we lower the severity of this bug so that this package can
> migrate to testing?

See below.

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 07:04:54PM +0900, dai@debian.org wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> 1:0.3-6 has been uploaded. Can we close this bug?

Actually, we may need to upload few manually updated packages.

One package just uploaded with such manual patch by NOKUBI Takatsugu.

  ibus-anthy_1.5.9-2.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED unstable

So at least anthy is usable with ibus now in unstable.

Are *-anthy packages uploaded to cope with this new anthy just like ibus-anthy?
 fcitx-anthy
 hime-anthy
 scim-anthy
 uim-anthy

Otherwise, they are broken in unstable now. (I did not have time to test
them yet)

Even these are updated with manual patches, all these updated package
needs to move together from unstable to testing.  I am not very familiar
with this ABI breaking library update.  We may need to add BREAKS: to
anthy to ensure this.  (I am not sure)  That may reqire to upload -7 for
anthy.

Anyway, these need to be properly coordinated.

Jeremy, your guidance is highly appreciated.

Osamu

Message #30 received at 874708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: dai@debian.org

To: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

Cc: 878270@bugs.debian.org, 874708@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: anthy (EUCJP->UTF-8) and *-anthy packages

Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:47:44 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:44:45PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Are *-anthy packages uploaded to cope with this new anthy just like ibus-anthy?
>  fcitx-anthy
>  hime-anthy
>  scim-anthy
>  uim-anthy

They are rebuild with new anthy (libanthy1).

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-anthy.html

- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/fcitx-anthy (0.2.3-1)
- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/gcin-anthy (2.8.5+dfsg1-4+b1)
- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/hime-anthy (0.9.10+git20170427+dfsg1-2+b1)
- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/ibus-anthy (1.5.9-2.1)
- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/scim-anthy (1.2.7-6+b2)
- https://packages.debian.org/unstable/uim-plugins (1:1.8.6+gh20161003.0.d63dadd-8)

> Otherwise, they are broken in unstable now. (I did not have time to test
> them yet)

At least, I tested uim-anthy a little, it looks well.

> Even these are updated with manual patches, all these updated package
> needs to move together from unstable to testing.  I am not very familiar
> with this ABI breaking library update.  We may need to add BREAKS: to
> anthy to ensure this.  (I am not sure)  That may reqire to upload -7 for
> anthy.

I am not familiar and not sure, too.
-- 
Regards,
	dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #35 received at 874708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

To: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>, 874708@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>, Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>, NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp>, dai@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#874708: anthy (EUCJP->UTF-8) and *-anthy packages

Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:20:31 +0200

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:44:45PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>...
> Even these are updated with manual patches, all these updated package
> needs to move together from unstable to testing.

Not necessarily - the old library will can kept in testing until all 
reverse dependencies have migrated.

> I am not very familiar
> with this ABI breaking library update.  We may need to add BREAKS: to
> anthy to ensure this.  (I am not sure)  That may reqire to upload -7 for
> anthy.
> 
> Anyway, these need to be properly coordinated.
>...

It might be enough to just close this bug - this bug is currently the 
main blocker for the testing migration.

> Osamu

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Message #40 received at 874708-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

To: 874708-done@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>, Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>, NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp>, dai@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#874708: anthy (EUCJP->UTF-8) and *-anthy packages

Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:40:03 +0200

I'm closing this bug to give anthy a chance to migrate to testing.

cu
Adrian


On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:20:31PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:44:45PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >...
> > Even these are updated with manual patches, all these updated package
> > needs to move together from unstable to testing.
> 
> Not necessarily - the old library will can kept in testing until all 
> reverse dependencies have migrated.
> 
> > I am not very familiar
> > with this ABI breaking library update.  We may need to add BREAKS: to
> > anthy to ensure this.  (I am not sure)  That may reqire to upload -7 for
> > anthy.
> > 
> > Anyway, these need to be properly coordinated.
> >...
> 
> It might be enough to just close this bug - this bug is currently the 
> main blocker for the testing migration.
> 
> > Osamu
> 
> cu
> Adrian

Message #45 received at 874708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

To: 874708@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>, Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>, Marc Bonnor <mabo5184@gmail.com>, NOKUBI Takatsugu <knok@daionet.gr.jp>, dai@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#874708: anthy (EUCJP->UTF-8) and *-anthy packages

Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 11:15:08 +0200

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:20:31PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> It might be enough to just close this bug - this bug is currently the 
> main blocker for the testing migration.

An update on the situation:

The problem is now that gcin/hime/uim that are part of the anthy  
transition are also part of a Qt transition that is blocked by
problems in mariadb.

From an anthy point of view that means just wait until this has
been sorted out.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.