Debian Bug report logs -
#863031
RM: nikola -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy, outdated
Reported by: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 13:06:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, kwpolska@gmail.com, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#863031; Package release.debian.org.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:06:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to kwpolska@gmail.com, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:06:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
The current version in stable is almost 2 years old. Bug#801796 has
been tracking the requests for new versions to be packaged. However,
the maintainer hasn't engaged. Upstream co-maintainer Chris Warrick
has made it clear in #801796 that they'd rather not have nikola in
Debian, than an ancient version that annoys people and causes them
spurious bug reports.
Given how nobody has put in any work on nikola in almost 2 years,
I think we should have the decency to remove the package from
stretch and sid before the release.
nikola has no reverse dependencies, so…
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64
(x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
[digital_signature_gpg.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#863031; Package release.debian.org.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:48:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Chris Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:48:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 863031@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I confirm that the current situation is undesirable to us. There were
attempts by other Debian devs to fix this (last in January), but nothing
changed. Having to say that the package is unsupported every once in a
while gets tiring quickly.
Since there aren't that many users, and a manual install with pip is easy
to do, dropping this package won't be much of a problem in my opinion. (Of
course, if there is a substantial possibility of getting something more
modern in Debian repos, that would be even better.)
--
Chris Warrick <https://chriswarrick.com/>
On 20 May 2017 15:06, "martin f krafft" <madduck@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> The current version in stable is almost 2 years old. Bug#801796 has
> been tracking the requests for new versions to be packaged. However,
> the maintainer hasn't engaged. Upstream co-maintainer Chris Warrick
> has made it clear in #801796 that they'd rather not have nikola in
> Debian, than an ancient version that annoys people and causes them
> spurious bug reports.
>
> Given how nobody has put in any work on nikola in almost 2 years,
> I think we should have the decency to remove the package from
> stretch and sid before the release.
>
> nikola has no reverse dependencies, so…
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 9.0
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64
> (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
>
> --
> .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
> : :' : proud Debian developer
> `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
> `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
>
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#863031; Package release.debian.org.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 13:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 863031@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Sat, 2017-05-20 at 15:04 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> The current version in stable is almost 2 years old. Bug#801796 has
> been tracking the requests for new versions to be packaged. However,
> the maintainer hasn't engaged. Upstream co-maintainer Chris Warrick
> has made it clear in #801796 that they'd rather not have nikola in
> Debian, than an ancient version that annoys people and causes them
> spurious bug reports.
>
> Given how nobody has put in any work on nikola in almost 2 years,
> I think we should have the decency to remove the package from
> stretch and sid before the release.
>
> nikola has no reverse dependencies, so…
As this request includes removal from unstable, it needs to be handled
by the ftp team; re-assigning.
Regards,
Adam
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian FTP Master <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>:
Bug#863031; Package ftp.debian.org.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 14:30:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Dererk <dererk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian FTP Master <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 14:30:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #22 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Dear reader,
Just to clarify on this matter and to serve as a confirmation, there has
been several attempts to upload most modern versions of this packages
(the collab-maint doesn't lie).
Unfortunately, we faced several times upload after upload, by some way
or the other, crashing over the current JS & CSS Debian's archive
policy, around several dozens symlinks (literally speaking), that made
totally both impractical and a total f^$%# mess to maintain.
Nikola also is a fast evolving software that usually force us (the
maintainers of nikola), to upload a couple of new dependences after new
upstream release. This is totally awesome from the standpoint of
upstream, since they reuse lots of code from other projects, but also
render maintaining nikola on debian a little bit more lag behind too.
We both (tin@ and myself) support RM of nikola, maybe in the future
efforts would match, currently thats not the case.
Cheers,
Dererk
On behalf of nikola maintainers
PS: sucks to have been delaying this so much, my sincere apologies.
On 20/05/17 10:04, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> The current version in stable is almost 2 years old. Bug#801796 has
> been tracking the requests for new versions to be packaged. However,
> the maintainer hasn't engaged. Upstream co-maintainer Chris Warrick
> has made it clear in #801796 that they'd rather not have nikola in
> Debian, than an ancient version that annoys people and causes them
> spurious bug reports.
>
> Given how nobody has put in any work on nikola in almost 2 years,
> I think we should have the decency to remove the package from
> stretch and sid before the release.
>
> nikola has no reverse dependencies, so…
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 9.0
> APT prefers unstable
> APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64
> (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
>
>
--
There's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes and dead
armadillos.
-- Jim Hightower, Texas Agricultural Commissioner
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian FTP Master <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>:
Bug#863031; Package ftp.debian.org.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 14:30:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Dererk <dererk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian FTP Master <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>.
(Sat, 20 May 2017 14:30:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Changed Bug title to 'RM: nikola -- RoQA; unmaintained, buggy, outdated' from 'RM: nikola/7.6.4-1'.
Request was from Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Fri, 30 Jun 2017 13:57:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Reply sent
to Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 16:30:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 01 Jul 2017 16:30:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #34 received at 863031-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
nikola | 7.6.4-1 | source, all
------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; unmaintained, buggy, outdated
----------------------------------------------
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.
Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.
We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 863031@bugs.debian.org.
The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/863031
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sun, 30 Jul 2017 07:28:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Wed Jan 10 10:53:59 2018;
Machine Name:
beach
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.