Debian Bug report logs -
#859708
unblock: kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2
Reported by: balint@balintreczey.hu
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 09:24:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: confirmed, moreinfo
Done: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#859708; Package release.debian.org.
(Thu, 06 Apr 2017 09:24:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to balint@balintreczey.hu:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Thu, 06 Apr 2017 09:24:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Current kodi version in Stretch is 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 but upstream
already released Kodi 17.1 which is available from experimental
as 2:17.1+dfsg1-1.
Among many other bugfixes it fixes #847701 which made kodi unusable on
many slower i386 machines.
I believe 17.1 would be a better fit for Stretch, while the diff
between 17.0 and 17.1 contains quite a lot bug fixes:
https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/compare/a10c5048f2487bd9b2dc1f35d2fee48a2594...fc1619b118f6d503f920a49cf4ac4afcd0dd6b41
At the moment 2:17.1+dfsg1-1 is uploaded to experimental only and I
would like to upload 2:17.0+dfsg1-2 with no new changes to
unstable if it would be allowed to migrate to testing.
Otherwise I will just triage and add the fix for #847701 to
2:17.0+dfsg1-3 and upload that minimal change to unstable as
2:17.0+dfsg1-4, but would prefer going th 17.1 way.
Please share your opinion about the options.
The attached patch contains the packaging changes only because the full debdiff is ~400k.
Cheers,
Balint
unblock kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2
[kodi_2:17.1+dfsg1-1.debdiff (text/plain, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#859708; Package release.debian.org.
(Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:42:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:42:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 859708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:20:25 +0200 Balint Reczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Current kodi version in Stretch is 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 but upstream
> already released Kodi 17.1 which is available from experimental
> as 2:17.1+dfsg1-1.
>
> Among many other bugfixes it fixes #847701 which made kodi unusable on
> many slower i386 machines.
>
> I believe 17.1 would be a better fit for Stretch, while the diff
> between 17.0 and 17.1 contains quite a lot bug fixes:
>
> https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/compare/a10c5048f2487bd9b2dc1f35d2fee48a2594...fc1619b118f6d503f920a49cf4ac4afcd0dd6b41
>
> At the moment 2:17.1+dfsg1-1 is uploaded to experimental only and I
> would like to upload 2:17.0+dfsg1-2 with no new changes to
> unstable if it would be allowed to migrate to testing.
>
> Otherwise I will just triage and add the fix for #847701 to
> 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 and upload that minimal change to unstable as
> 2:17.0+dfsg1-4, but would prefer going th 17.1 way.
>
> Please share your opinion about the options.
>
> The attached patch contains the packaging changes only because the full debdiff is ~400k.
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
>
> unblock kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2
>
Ack, please go ahead and let us know once it has been uploaded and
compiled on all relevant architectures.
Thanks,
~Niels
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
to 859708-submit@bugs.debian.org.
(Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:42:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#859708; Package release.debian.org.
(Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:33:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to balint@balintreczey.hu:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>.
(Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:33:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #17 received at 859708@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi Niels,
2017-04-12 19:37 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 11:20:25 +0200 Balint Reczey <balint@balintreczey.hu>
> wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: unblock
>>
>> Dear Release Team,
>>
>> Current kodi version in Stretch is 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 but upstream
>> already released Kodi 17.1 which is available from experimental
>> as 2:17.1+dfsg1-1.
>>
>> Among many other bugfixes it fixes #847701 which made kodi unusable on
>> many slower i386 machines.
>>
>> I believe 17.1 would be a better fit for Stretch, while the diff
>> between 17.0 and 17.1 contains quite a lot bug fixes:
>>
>> https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/compare/a10c5048f2487bd9b2dc1f35d2fee48a2594...fc1619b118f6d503f920a49cf4ac4afcd0dd6b41
>>
>> At the moment 2:17.1+dfsg1-1 is uploaded to experimental only and I
>> would like to upload 2:17.0+dfsg1-2 with no new changes to
>> unstable if it would be allowed to migrate to testing.
>>
>> Otherwise I will just triage and add the fix for #847701 to
>> 2:17.0+dfsg1-3 and upload that minimal change to unstable as
>> 2:17.0+dfsg1-4, but would prefer going th 17.1 way.
>>
>> Please share your opinion about the options.
>>
>> The attached patch contains the packaging changes only because the full debdiff is ~400k.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Balint
>>
>> unblock kodi/2:17.1+dfsg1-2
>>
>
> Ack, please go ahead and let us know once it has been uploaded and
> compiled on all relevant architectures.
Thanks! Done and built.
Cheers,
Balint
Reply sent
to Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Notification sent
to balint@balintreczey.hu:
Bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #22 received at 859708-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Bálint Réczey:
> Hi Niels,
>
> 2017-04-12 19:37 GMT+02:00 Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
>> [...]
>>
>> Ack, please go ahead and let us know once it has been uploaded and
>> compiled on all relevant architectures.
>
> Thanks! Done and built.
>
> Cheers,
> Balint
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
Bug archived.
Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org>
to internal_control@bugs.debian.org.
(Sat, 13 May 2017 07:25:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Wed Jan 10 13:18:44 2018;
Machine Name:
beach
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.