Debian Bug report logs - #856603
RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

Subject: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 21:11:32 +0000

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc-theme"

 * Package name    : arc-theme
   Version         : 20170302-1
   Upstream Author : horst3180 <email is hidden>
 * URL             : https://github.com/horst3180/arc-theme
 * License         : GPL-3+
   Section         : misc

  It builds those binary packages:

    arc-theme  - Flat theme with transparent elements

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/arc-theme


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/arc-theme/arc-theme_20170302-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

   * New upstream release
    - Cinnamon 3.2 fixes
    - Fix frame borders with GTK+3.22.9
    - Small bugfixes
  * Packaging Changes
    - update copyright year from 2016 to 2016-2017

Notes:
  I see that sid contains GTK+3.22.9 whereas stretch (testing) is
currently carrying GTK+3.22.8

I presume that stretch will update to upstream's recommended
GTK+3.22.9 version shortly (Ubuntu 17.04 is similarly making this move
shortly) - as such, as soon as Debian Stretch does, arc-theme will
then be visually broken due to this issue:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779005

'After upgrading to GTK 3.22.9 frame border style should be applied to
frame.flat > border instead of frame > border.flat.' The Adwaita theme
was updated for these requirements too:

https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk%2B/commit/?id=0c20604932f

I can confirm that this release of arc-theme works with GTK+3.22.8 as
well as GTK+3.22.9


  Regards,
   David Mohammed

Message #10 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

To: David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, 856603@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 06:20:36 +0100

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:11:32PM +0000, David Mohammed wrote:
>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arc-theme"
> 
>  * Package name    : arc-theme
>    Version         : 20170302-1

>   Changes since the last upload:
> 
>    * New upstream release
>     - Cinnamon 3.2 fixes
>     - Fix frame borders with GTK+3.22.9
>     - Small bugfixes
>   * Packaging Changes
>     - update copyright year from 2016 to 2016-2017

These changes are in no way fit for a freeze exception.

> Notes:
>   I see that sid contains GTK+3.22.9 whereas stretch (testing) is
> currently carrying GTK+3.22.8
> 
> I presume that stretch will update to upstream's recommended
> GTK+3.22.9 version shortly (Ubuntu 17.04 is similarly making this move
> shortly) - as such, as soon as Debian Stretch does, arc-theme will
> then be visually broken due to this issue:
> 
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779005
> 
> 'After upgrading to GTK 3.22.9 frame border style should be applied to
> frame.flat > border instead of frame > border.flat.' The Adwaita theme
> was updated for these requirements too:
> 
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk%2B/commit/?id=0c20604932f
> 
> I can confirm that this release of arc-theme works with GTK+3.22.8 as
> well as GTK+3.22.9

On the other hand, gtk+3.0 has, likewise, changes that don't look
appropriate for a freeze exception either.  It's a mess, actually:

testing has 3.22.8-1.

3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
unrelated packages.  As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
gtk-3 using programs as well.

Then there's 3.22.9-2 which is a targetted RC bug fix... atop of bad
3.22.9-1 rather than testing's 3.22.8-1.  Ie, exactly the reason why
uploading random changes to unstable during freeze is a bad idea.

I see that gtk+3.0's maintainers will need to make a separate upload to
testing-proposed-updates with a 3.22.8-2.

However, the migration status at the PTS vs tracker.d.o looks wrong: the
former mentions an unblock request while the latter says it's (as expected)
frozen.  As there's no unblock bug on release.debian.org, I assume the PTS
once again shows stale data.

CC-ing debian-release -- could you guys please clarify what's amiss?

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Meow!
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Collisions shmolisions, let's see them find a collision or second
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ preimage for double rot13!

Message #17 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

To: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, 856603@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:32:14 +0100

On 03/03/17 06:20, Adam Borowski wrote:
> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
> unrelated packages.  As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
> gtk-3 using programs as well.

That's not usual for point releases, in this case a bad change slipped through.
That has been fixed in 3.22.9-3.

> Then there's 3.22.9-2 which is a targetted RC bug fix... atop of bad
> 3.22.9-1 rather than testing's 3.22.8-1.  Ie, exactly the reason why
> uploading random changes to unstable during freeze is a bad idea.
> 
> I see that gtk+3.0's maintainers will need to make a separate upload to
> testing-proposed-updates with a 3.22.8-2.

That bug was introduced in 3.22.9, it doesn't affect 3.22.8. So no, nothing
needs to go through tpu.

BTW thanks for the notice about this regression.

Cheers,
Emilio

Message #22 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>

To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>

Cc: "debian-release@lists.debian.org" <debian-release@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:57:18 +0000 (UTC)

Hello,


>> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
>> unrelated packages.  As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
>> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
>> gtk-3 using programs as well.
>
>That's not usual for point releases, in this case a bad change slipped through.
>That has been fixed in 3.22.9-3.
>That bug was introduced in 3.22.9, it doesn't affect 3.22.8. So no, nothing
>needs to go through tpu.
>
>BTW thanks for the notice about this regression.


so, now that 3.22.11 is going to go in testing... can we upload this one?

G.

Message #32 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

To: Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>

Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>, "debian-release@lists.debian.org" <debian-release@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:39:35 +0200

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 16:57:18 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> 
> >> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
> >> unrelated packages.  As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
> >> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
> >> gtk-3 using programs as well.
> >
> >That's not usual for point releases, in this case a bad change slipped through.
> >That has been fixed in 3.22.9-3.
> >That bug was introduced in 3.22.9, it doesn't affect 3.22.8. So no, nothing
> >needs to go through tpu.
> >
> >BTW thanks for the notice about this regression.
> 
> 
> so, now that 3.22.11 is going to go in testing... can we upload this one?
> 
If something was not appropriate 2 months ago, it is even less so now...

Cheers,
Julien

Message #37 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>

To: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>

Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>, David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>, "debian-release@lists.debian.org" <debian-release@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:44:41 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am 30.04.2017 um 18:39 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 16:57:18 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>>> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
>>>> unrelated packages.  As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
>>>> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
>>>> gtk-3 using programs as well.
>>>
>>> That's not usual for point releases, in this case a bad change slipped through.
>>> That has been fixed in 3.22.9-3.
>>> That bug was introduced in 3.22.9, it doesn't affect 3.22.8. So no, nothing
>>> needs to go through tpu.
>>>
>>> BTW thanks for the notice about this regression.
>>
>>
>> so, now that 3.22.11 is going to go in testing... can we upload this one?
>>
> If something was not appropriate 2 months ago, it is even less so now...

I want to add, that the relevant changes in gtk have been reverted
upstream as well in 3.22.10. So no changes should be necessary for
arc-theme.


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #42 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>

To: David Mohammed <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:47:09 +0000 (UTC)

David,


> If something was not appropriate 2 months ago, it is even less so now...


please go for experimental and remove moreinfo when done.

G.

Message #47 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David <davidmohammed@gmail.com>

To: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>

Cc: "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 23:13:05 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 856603 - moreinfo

Hi Gianfranco,

 I've uploaded to mentors a rebuild of the same package - this time 
I've changed from unstable to experimental.

Thanks

David

On Sun, 30 Apr, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna 
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> David,
> 
> 
>>  If something was not appropriate 2 months ago, it is even less so 
>> now...
> 
> 
> please go for experimental and remove moreinfo when done.
> 
> G.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #52 received at 856603-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>

To: 856603-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 03:32:44 +0200

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 11:13:05PM +0100, David wrote:
>  I've uploaded to mentors a rebuild of the same package - this time I've
> changed from unstable to experimental.

✔

-- 
Don't be racist.  White, amber or black, all beers should be judged based
solely on their merits.  Heck, even if occasionally a cider applies for a
beer's job, why not?
On the other hand, corpo lager is not a race.

Message #57 received at 856603@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>

To: David <davidmohammed@gmail.com>, "856603@bugs.debian.org" <856603@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#856603: RFS: arc-theme/20170302-1

Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 08:14:34 +0000 (UTC)

>  I've uploaded to mentors a rebuild of the same package - this time I've changed from unstable to experimental.


somebody (thanks) already sponsored it, I sync'd it in Ubuntu.

G.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.