Debian Bug report logs - #854951
ITP: gnome-recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>

To: submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: ITP: recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 07:55:18 -0500

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Package Name: recipes
Version: 0.12-1
Upstream Author: Matthias Clasen
URL: https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Recipes
License: GPL-3+
Description: Recipe application for GNOME
GNOME Recipes is an easy-to-use application that will help you to discover
what to cook for today, tomorrow, the rest of the week, and your special
occasions.

GNOME Recipes comes with a collection of recipes that have been collected
by GNOME contributors from all over the world. It also lets you store your
own recipes, and share them with your friends.

I am a Debian Maintainer and I intend to package this within the
Debian GNOME Packaging Team.

https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnome/recipes.git

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Message #10 received at 854951@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

To: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>, 854951@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#854951: ITP: recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:22:52 +0000

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 07:55:18 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Package Name: recipes

I think this is too generic. The upstream name is Recipes, and that name is
fine within the context of GNOME (particularly when its machine-readable
name is actually org.gnome.Recipes), but within Debian/Ubuntu it would
seem more reasonable to call it gnome-recipes.

(Alternatively, you could consider packaging it as org.gnome.recipes?
But that's probably too unconventional within Debian.)

My usual rule of thumb is that non-indicative "brand names" like Evince,
Nautilus and Leafpad are fine without a prefix, but generic names like
(GNOME) Builder, (GNOME) Terminal and (lx)launcher need a namespace prefix.

    S

Message #15 received at 854951@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>

To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

Cc: 854951@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#854951: ITP: recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:44:53 -0500

Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/778531

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote:
> I think this is too generic. The upstream name is Recipes, and that name is
> fine within the context of GNOME (particularly when its machine-readable
> name is actually org.gnome.Recipes), but within Debian/Ubuntu it would
> seem more reasonable to call it gnome-recipes.

Thanks. I requested that the developer change the name to gnome-recipes.

Jeremy Bicha

Message #22 received at 854951@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

To: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>

Cc: 854951@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#854951: ITP: recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:30:04 +0000

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 09:44:53 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote:
> > I think this is too generic. The upstream name is Recipes, and that name is
> > fine within the context of GNOME
> 
> Thanks. I requested that the developer change the name to gnome-recipes.

That isn't actually what I said. As an upstream name, in context,
Recipes is fine. In an OS distribution that isn't particularly GNOME-centric,
it isn't. Mapping between the two is part of the OS distributor job.

Analogous: we call GNU Make "make" because we're a GNU/Linux
distribution[1], so the assumption should be that things with a GNU
version are the GNU version unless otherwise stated. The BSDs call it
"gmake", short for GNU Make, because they are not primarily GNU
distributions.

Similarly, I wouldn't be surprised if a more GNOME-centric OS distribution
like Fedora was happy to release recipes-*.rpm, but in Debian it should
be gnome-recipes_*.{dsc,deb}.

If upstream don't want to rename it, combining a renamed source
and binary package with ./configure --program-prefix=gnome-
and some trivial patches to desktop files and D-Bus and/or systemd
services should be reasonably straightforward.

    S

[1] or a GNU/{Linux,kFreeBSD,Hurd} distribution if you count
    non-release ports

Message #27 received at 854951@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>

To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

Cc: 854951@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#854951: ITP: recipes -- Recipe application for GNOME

Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:26:50 -0500

Control: rename -1 ITP: gnome-recipes: Recipe application for GNOME

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 09:44:53 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote:
>> > I think this is too generic. The upstream name is Recipes, and that name is
>> > fine within the context of GNOME
>>
>> Thanks. I requested that the developer change the name to gnome-recipes.
>
> That isn't actually what I said. As an upstream name, in context,
> Recipes is fine. In an OS distribution that isn't particularly GNOME-centric,
> it isn't. Mapping between the two is part of the OS distributor job.

The rename is done. The upstream project is still named 'recipes' but
the binary and data directories are named gnome-recipes. The Debian
source and binary package are named gnome-recipes too.

Force-pushed since it's a new repo and I didn't know how to make
gbp/pristine-tar handle the rename:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-gnome/gnome-recipes.git

Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha

Message #42 received at 854951-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>

To: 854951-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#854951: fixed in gnome-recipes 1.6.2-1

Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 15:00:13 +0000

Source: gnome-recipes
Source-Version: 1.6.2-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnome-recipes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 854951@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com> (supplier of updated gnome-recipes package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:53:11 -0400
Source: gnome-recipes
Binary: gnome-recipes gnome-recipes-data
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.6.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@ubuntu.com>
Description:
 gnome-recipes - Recipe application for GNOME
 gnome-recipes-data - Recipe application for GNOME (data files)
Closes: 854951
Changes:
 gnome-recipes (1.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #854951) (LP: #1663875)
Checksums-Sha1:
 703988c9b28155e7a774fdfb363c572d6679a746 2279 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.dsc
 b4d41b64180eaf95d36e3a64836c611385167777 17906144 gnome-recipes_1.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 3021ec9aebe35d8c95eaf6d161dd54a888b50729 2892 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 73a5dfb5c71d9499c02b674be3f21db04422e406 8885354 gnome-recipes-data_1.6.2-1_all.deb
 957035d561a6cb988f22031c76b248246e2f5040 833604 gnome-recipes-dbgsym_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
 9f2d6e063b5814c7ecff3b0bbed318f841a85114 14471 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
 852fd35b9393c040ea61ce13cb1ee345f1c6a144 434322 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 01727de0df3f8fb69b648911f3b442f6072711c97547719c25b49540b8f41411 2279 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.dsc
 8a11ed483b422dbbedb10237dac8b47fe94d76d40cac87ae6d19292942c94f9c 17906144 gnome-recipes_1.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 9242e13fe660cffd43fe315cc82d75243172079ec890402de10e30c4a9aacbb1 2892 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 2516b8fbda63534a17d3b48a395ae5fd15f498fc0e9474c6573cd74eb7ef4170 8885354 gnome-recipes-data_1.6.2-1_all.deb
 7fec80482eaf8858b1be45ec576a0c8f175f641874d8d6548da02707549676d0 833604 gnome-recipes-dbgsym_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
 1c05b0a0ec44c062b24875b087bb4b61dac887ba0c2e8087855d357fcb033b93 14471 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
 9c618d54804c82432377b8bf18bfd74c2c2b7dc4ae573c20c64d4c46e32127c0 434322 gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 5464a88a06bbb515d4330371ff733d2b 2279 gnome optional gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.dsc
 c2f9aba5d795d0e252d21eb6f9475755 17906144 gnome optional gnome-recipes_1.6.2.orig.tar.xz
 fb83611d5bc1101795b9b784739be16b 2892 gnome optional gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 0dee3bb317c618017559dac15e60be93 8885354 gnome optional gnome-recipes-data_1.6.2-1_all.deb
 492213674372346695e240f714c4628b 833604 debug extra gnome-recipes-dbgsym_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb
 f91ac2d6b450bb732aec5bcef910a3b3 14471 gnome optional gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.buildinfo
 d5b9ce9b895e3f47bf69c16bd4bfe352 434322 gnome optional gnome-recipes_1.6.2-1_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YoiU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.