Debian Bug report logs - #844421
rpmlint: FTBFS (failing tests)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: rpmlint: FTBFS (failing tests)

Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:12:11 +0000

Package: src:rpmlint
Version: 1.9-4
Severity: serious

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with python2
   dh_testdir -i
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_auto_configure -i
   debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
rm -f __version__.py
rm -f __isocodes__.py
ISO_3166_1_URL="file:///usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_3166-1.json" \
ISO_639_3_URL="file:///usr/share/iso-codes/json/iso_639-3.json" \
dh_auto_build
	make -j1

[... snipped ...]

test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_name_screwed_up PASSED
test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_forbidden_folders PASSED
test/test_scl.py::TestSCLBinary::test_scl_macros_outside_of_build PASSED

========================== 30 passed in 7.59 seconds ===========================
flake8 tests
./Config.py:84:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Config.py:98:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Config.py:112:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Config.py:133:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Config.py:143:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./PostCheck.py:194:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./FilesCheck.py:314:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./FilesCheck.py:1003:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./ConfigCheck.py:33:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./BinariesCheck.py:282:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./BinariesCheck.py:554:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./SignatureCheck.py:41:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Pkg.py:69:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Pkg.py:144:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./Pkg.py:198:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./RpmFileCheck.py:37:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./PamCheck.py:31:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./AbstractCheck.py:108:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./SpecCheck.py:40:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./SpecCheck.py:610:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./ZipCheck.py:26:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./NamingPolicyCheck.py:72:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./LSBCheck.py:43:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./I18NCheck.py:161:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./FHSCheck.py:53:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./MenuXDGCheck.py:66:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./SourceCheck.py:46:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck.py:34:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck2.py:20:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./test/test.Pkg.py:33:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./test/test.SpecCheck3.py:20:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./test/test.PamCheck.py:25:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
Makefile:60: recipe for target 'check' failed
make[2]: *** [check] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
debian/rules:18: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
debian/rules:21: recipe for target 'build-indep' failed
make: *** [build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep gave error exit status 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The relevant part of the build log is included above.

I'm building on stretch.
This started failing for me on 2016-11-14.
Before 2016-11-08, it built ok:

[...]
Status: successful  rpmlint_1.9-4_amd64-20161108T145316Z
Status: failed      rpmlint_1.9-4_amd64-20161114T151128Z
[...]

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and affects,
so that this is still visible in the page for this package.

Thanks.

Message #10 received at 844421@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>

To: 844421@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

Subject: Re: [Pkg-rpm-devel] Bug#844421: rpmlint: FTBFS (failing tests)

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:00:00 +0100

On 15 November 2016 at 16:12, Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: src:rpmlint
> Version: 1.9-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear maintainer:
>
> I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
> (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
> but it failed:
>

Know issue, already discussed with upstream [0].

[0] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/issues/82

Message #21 received at 844421@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>

To: 844421@bugs.debian.org

Subject: reassign to pycodestyle

Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:10:52 +0100

Hi,

upstream reports this is an issue with pycodestyle which is used by flake8.
I'm doing the reassign now.

Message #26 received at 844421-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>

To: 844421-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#844421: fixed in pycodestyle 2.2.0-1

Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:34:13 +0000

Source: pycodestyle
Source-Version: 2.2.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pycodestyle, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 844421@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org> (supplier of updated pycodestyle package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:08:59 +0100
Source: pycodestyle
Binary: pycodestyle python-pycodestyle python3-pycodestyle
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team <python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>
Description:
 pycodestyle - Python style guide checker (formerly called pep8)
 python-pycodestyle - Python style guide checker (formerly called pep8) - Python 2.x
 python3-pycodestyle - Python style guide checker (formerly called pep8) - Python 3.x
Closes: 844421
Changes:
 pycodestyle (2.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #844421)
Checksums-Sha1:
 9e8d8ea2a6f04a18f2b7aa3759014edeabf2a668 2193 pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.dsc
 6385a1565f99b2ab6d4587a2d2ee235d0d87d9af 85811 pycodestyle_2.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 d6f42e0730c24493058ba3d183397ccaaf13beae 3640 pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 d4f237a5c83ba8cff08942b8a59f4f7244e3a38a0be9d7214f4fce32a13c0769 2193 pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.dsc
 df81dc3293e0123e2e8d1f2aaf819600e4ae287d8b3af8b72181af50257e5d9a 85811 pycodestyle_2.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 42d260a87f532e1f68326986715a3cc6b9bb5c210640dc2ef22803d3b63260e4 3640 pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 b9b10695581bf18ac8494b282b4c4672 2193 python optional pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.dsc
 642c31fc2a72a55a4acdf8ac46d5fb64 85811 python optional pycodestyle_2.2.0.orig.tar.gz
 11d19f9da1b4d32eba3ea94f045b5174 3640 python optional pycodestyle_2.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=upBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #31 received at 844421-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>

To: 844421-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#844421 marked as pending

Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 13:18:29 +0000

tag 844421 pending
thanks

Hello,

Bug #844421 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

    http://git.debian.org/?p=python-modules/packages/pycodestyle.git;a=commitdiff;h=4a83f33

---
commit 4a83f33aa66411aff0fecde9549ccec2211b3049
Author: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>
Date:   Thu Nov 17 14:07:31 2016 +0100

    New upstream release (Closes: #844421)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0fc4670..72bda00 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+pycodestyle (2.2.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * New upstream release (Closes: #844421)
+
+ -- Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>  Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:03:46 +0100
+
 pycodestyle (2.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release

Message #36 received at 844421@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

To: Ondřej Nový <onovy@debian.org>

Cc: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>, 844421@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#844421: it's really fixed in pycodestyle 2.2.0-1 ?

Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:09:15 +0100 (CET)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

affects 844421 = src:rpmlint
found 844421 2.2.0-2
thanks

Hello. Sorry for the reopening but this does not seem fixed.

This bug is claimed to be the reason rpmlint does not build.
However, a build of rpmlint using pycodestyle 2.2.0-2 still fails,
so either this was fixed in 2.2.0-1 and then unfixed in 2.2.0-2, or
this was not really fixed, ot the bug was not in pycodestyle after all,
or maybe I'm missing anything.

I attach a build log.

Thanks.

[rpmlint_1.9-4_amd64-20161128T175453Z.gz (application/gzip, attachment)]

Message #49 received at 844421-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>

To: 844421-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#844421 marked as pending

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:09:43 +0000

tag 844421 pending
thanks

Hello,

Bug #844421 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:

    http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-rpm/rpmlint.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec16499

---
commit ec16499b24b8ef4bf116f371f2e3c15af89e14ce
Author: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>
Date:   Tue Nov 29 11:09:14 2016 +0100

    d/changelog: generate entry for 1.9-5 unstable
    
    Using gbp dch.
    
    Git-Dch: Ignore
    Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e76028b..219912f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+rpmlint (1.9-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Evgeni Golov ]
+  * [7951e47] rpmlint: fix bash-completion installing into wrong directory
+    (Closes: #841725)
+
+  [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ]
+  * [3acdf65] d/: run wrap-and-sort
+  * [1a00af4] rpmlint: disable tests at build time (Closes: #844421)
+
+ -- Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>  Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:05:32 +0100
+
 rpmlint (1.9-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * [d573ab0] d/patches: delete nano .swp control file

Message #54 received at 844421-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>

To: 844421-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#844421: fixed in rpmlint 1.9-5

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:34:40 +0000

Source: rpmlint
Source-Version: 1.9-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rpmlint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 844421@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org> (supplier of updated rpmlint package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:05:32 +0100
Source: rpmlint
Binary: rpmlint
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.9-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: RPM packaging team <pkg-rpm-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo@debian.org>
Description:
 rpmlint    - RPM package checker
Closes: 841725 844421
Changes:
 rpmlint (1.9-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Evgeni Golov ]
   * [7951e47] rpmlint: fix bash-completion installing into wrong directory
     (Closes: #841725)
 .
   [ Arturo Borrero Gonzalez ]
   * [3acdf65] d/: run wrap-and-sort
   * [1a00af4] rpmlint: disable tests at build time (Closes: #844421)
Checksums-Sha1:
 1367102f561585bdd181c131c0c4758912bab482 2118 rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 b75bde9c8f440c1ef943ded0fd5381a0e4eb30d5 4632 rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 362beaf8ab9521eb8a25733a706438a3940cf93d 85600 rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 fa7f4b0eaa4362c3020f3af5a2ff2f190a371a0bd1e2e8e396dfe110830587b3 2118 rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 761c437b5f1ffdff17f7d388081fddc99807d12d13fa36835060c547f8440d3a 4632 rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 e2a9743cf63de9824142ae47f154b411dba36f19b4cfc288382432fada424b64 85600 rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb
Files:
 82005b996cc5a2cc21c430393b57b1c5 2118 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5.dsc
 1549ba375941850c3aee89c8689a6df6 4632 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5.debian.tar.xz
 2e923fde28accf76d7e331f99f348171 85600 admin extra rpmlint_1.9-5_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kSuX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.