Debian Bug report logs - #834780
tuxpaint-config: please make the build reproducible

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: tuxpaint-config: please make the build reproducible

Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 01:06:39 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Source: tuxpaint-config
Version: 0.0.13-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi,

Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], I noticed
that tuxpaint-config could not be built reproducibly.

Patch attached.

 [0] https://reproducible-builds.org/


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

[tuxpaint-config.diff.txt (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 834780@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

To: 834780@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#834780: tuxpaint-config: please make the build reproducible

Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:54:55 +0100

Dear Maintainer,

> Source: tuxpaint-config
> Version: 0.0.12-2
> Tags: patch

There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 59 days, in which
time the Reproducible Builds effort has come on a long way. :)

Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Message #15 received at 834780-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

To: 834780-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#834780: fixed in tuxpaint-config 0.0.13-2

Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 00:05:29 +0000

Source: tuxpaint-config
Source-Version: 0.0.13-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxpaint-config, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 834780@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuxpaint-config package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 01:48:06 +0200
Source: tuxpaint-config
Binary: tuxpaint-config
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0.13-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Description:
 tuxpaint-config - Configuration tool for Tux Paint
Closes: 834780
Changes:
 tuxpaint-config (0.0.13-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group. (see #848989)
   * Add patch from Chris Lamb to make the build reproducible.
     (Closes:  #834780)
Checksums-Sha1:
 bd277c58b12d88081c6d60fe855df51d351d8ce8 1805 tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.dsc
 45e00991db94f9b64fabec9bd3adcaa1861a1ab1 3796 tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 b72a0a233e97665de2f2cafe4501bc8ed5c9140c9362a66269a9e9e170141dda 1805 tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.dsc
 b118b2be24916dcb906090e6dc093e73bf6e88f4abe20832108078f2bb2438de 3796 tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 aa5d58fa6b7bf960ae53b727dba61eaf 1805 graphics optional tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.dsc
 ec2dbbe35fb3821c12a44813ac6dc500 3796 graphics optional tuxpaint-config_0.0.13-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=BYPm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.