Debian Bug report logs - #831965
asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:29:02 +0200

Source: asciidoc
Version: 8.6.9-3
Severity: important
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160720 qa-ftbfs qa-indep
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.  This rebuild was done by building only the architecture-independent
packages.  At the same time, a normal build succeeded, which points the
problem specifically to build-indep/binary-indep targets.

If all the arch-independent packages are dummy transitional packages
released with jessie, the easy fix is to drop them now. If not, debian/rules
should be modified so that the build-indep and binary-indep target generates
the architecture independent packages (and only those).

After checking that both "dpkg-buildpackage -A" and "dpkg-buildpackage -B" work
properly, this package will be suitable to be uploaded in source-only form if
you wish.

I file this bug as severity: important, but Santiago Vila, who led this
effort (kudos to him), got approval from the release team to consider those
bugs RC for stretch. The severity will be increased to 'serious' shortly.
See #830997 for details.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
> dh_install
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./asciidoc.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook45.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./help.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./html4.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./html5.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-cs.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-de.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-el.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-en.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-es.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-fr.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-hu.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-it.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-nl.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-pt-BR.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-ro.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-ru.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./lang-uk.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./latex.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./slidy.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./text.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./xhtml11-quirks.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./xhtml11.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./tests/data/ debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a .//images/icons debian/asciidoc//usr/share/asciidoc/
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./asciidocapi.py debian/asciidoc//usr/share/asciidoc/
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./dblatex debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	install -d debian/asciidoc//usr/share/vim/registry
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./debian/asciidoc.yaml debian/asciidoc//usr/share/vim/registry/
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/chunked.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/common.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/epub.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/fo.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/htmlhelp.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/manpage.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/text.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./docbook-xsl/xhtml.xsl debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/docbook-xsl//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./filters/code debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/filters//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./filters/graphviz debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/filters//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./filters/latex debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/filters//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./filters/music debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/filters//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./filters/source debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/filters//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./images debian/asciidoc//usr/share/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./javascripts debian/asciidoc//usr/share/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/asciidoc.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/docbook-xsl.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/pygments.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/slidy.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/toc2.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./stylesheets/xhtml11-quirks.css debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc/stylesheets//
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./tests/testasciidoc.conf debian/asciidoc//etc/asciidoc//
> 	install -d debian/asciidoc//usr/share/vim/addons/syntax/
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a ./vim/syntax/asciidoc.vim debian/asciidoc//usr/share/vim/addons/syntax//
> rm debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/a2x
> mv debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/a2x.py debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/a2x
> rm debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/asciidoc
> mv debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/asciidoc.py debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/asciidoc
> install -m0755 tests/testasciidoc.py debian/asciidoc/usr/bin/testasciidoc
> cp -aL examples/website/ debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/examples/
> cp -aL doc/ debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/
> rm debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/doc/*.1
> ./asciidoc.py  -b xhtml11 -a iconsdir=/usr/share/asciidoc/images/icons \
> 	-o debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/userguide.html doc/asciidoc.txt
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
>    dh_installdocs -i
> 	cp --reflink=auto -a README debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc
> 	chown -R 0:0 debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc
> 	chmod -R go=rX debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc
> 	chmod -R u\+rw debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc
> 	install -p -m0644 debian/README.Debian debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/README.Debian
> 	install -p -m0644 debian/copyright debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/copyright
>    dh_installchangelogs -i
> 	install -p -m0644 debian/changelog debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/changelog.Debian
> 	install -p -m0644 debian/NEWS debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/NEWS.Debian
> 	install -p -m0644 ./CHANGELOG.txt debian/asciidoc/usr/share/doc/asciidoc/changelog
>    dh_installman -i
> 	install -p -m0644 doc/asciidoc.1 debian/asciidoc/usr/share/man/man1/asciidoc.1
> 	install -p -m0644 doc/a2x.1 debian/asciidoc/usr/share/man/man1/a2x.1
> doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.
> debian/rules:81: recipe for target 'binary-indep' failed
> make: *** [binary-indep] Error 2

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2016/07/20/asciidoc_8.6.9-3_unstable_archallonly.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

Message #10 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Debian BTS <control@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:45:29 +0200 (CEST)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 831965 + patch
thanks

The "build-indep" target is missing.

Patch attached.

Thanks.

[asciidoc.patch.txt (text/plain, ATTACHMENT)]

--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -13,8 +13,11 @@ include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make
 export DH_VERBOSE=0
 
 
+build: build-arch build-indep
 
-build: patch-stamp
+build-arch:
+
+build-indep: patch-stamp
 
 clean: unpatch
 	-rm config.log

Message #19 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Asciidoc: patch integrated

Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:32:39 -0700

Control: tags -1 + pending

Hi Lucas, Santiago,

Sorry I just noticed this bug.
Thanks Santiago, I tested and added your patch to the git repository.
As I don't have upload rights in Debian, Alexander Wirt will have a
look when he has some time.
There are a lot of changes since the last release in 2014, so it might
take some time to be pushed.

Thanks for your help,
Joseph

Message #26 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Subject: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 18:01:58 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

what's the status of this upload? If you need a sponsor, I could 
probably help out.

With the freeze approaching, it would be good to fix this RC bug. 
Unfortunately, I could not find the git repo you've mentioned in the 
previous mail, it seems to have gone from alioth.

Regards,
Tobias

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #31 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 08:54:07 -0800

Hi Tobias,

Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems
pretty tight.
Last time I asked Alexander about the fact that the anonscm were not
available he checked and wasn't able to figure out why.
Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the
only other member.
I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll
have more luck.

Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python
maintainers team to make the collaborative maintenance easier.
What do you think?

Joseph

Message #36 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>, 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 14:16:22 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am 02.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Joseph Herlant:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems
> pretty tight.
> Last time I asked Alexander about the fact that the anonscm were not
> available he checked and wasn't able to figure out why.
> Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the
> only other member.
> I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll
> have more luck.
>
> Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python
> maintainers team to make the collaborative maintenance easier.
> What do you think?

Hi Joseph,

maybe collab-maint would be best, but it's your call. Do you still have 
the git repository locally available? If so, we could import the history 
into collab-maint.

Regards,
Tobias

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #41 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@formorer.de>

To: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 18:46:08 +0100

Am 04.12.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer:
> Am 02.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Joseph Herlant:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems
>> pretty tight.
>> Last time I asked Alexander about the fact that the anonscm were not
>> available he checked and wasn't able to figure out why.
>> Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the
>> only other member.
>> I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll
>> have more luck.
>>
>> Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python
>> maintainers team to make the collaborative maintenance easier.
>> What do you think?
>
> Hi Joseph,
>
> maybe collab-maint would be best, but it's your call. Do you still 
> have the git repository locally available? If so, we could import the 
> history into collab-maint.
Sorry, I fucked this up. I will get joseph an admin tomorrow.

Alex

Message #46 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>

To: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 07:14:58 +0100

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote:

> 
> 
> Am 04.12.2016 um 14:16 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer:
> > Am 02.12.2016 um 17:54 schrieb Joseph Herlant:
> > > Hi Tobias,
> > > 
> > > Currently the permissions on the pkg-asciidoc group in alioth seems
> > > pretty tight.
> > > Last time I asked Alexander about the fact that the anonscm were not
> > > available he checked and wasn't able to figure out why.
> > > Only Fredrik Steen and Alexander Wirt have admin access and I'm the
> > > only other member.
> > > I've not been able to get in touch with them in a while. Maybe you'll
> > > have more luck.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we should have this package moved to collab-maint or python
> > > maintainers team to make the collaborative maintenance easier.
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > Hi Joseph,
> > 
> > maybe collab-maint would be best, but it's your call. Do you still have
> > the git repository locally available? If so, we could import the history
> > into collab-maint.
> Sorry, I fucked this up. I will get joseph an admin tomorrow.
You two already were admins. 

I also fixed the repo permissions (which could have been done by every admin
too). 

Alex

Message #51 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>

To: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 19:52:32 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am 05.12.2016 um 07:14 schrieb Alexander Wirt:
> On Sun, 04 Dec 2016, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> Sorry, I fucked this up. I will get joseph an admin tomorrow.
> You two already were admins.
>
> I also fixed the repo permissions (which could have been done by every admin
> too).

Hi Alexander,

yes, Joseph and I were given the admin role just a few hours before you 
tried to do this, Fredrik did that.

However, there's a misunderstanding: I don't want to be admin of this 
project, as I don't use and know the package. I'm just in the loop 
because I've asked about bug #831965 -- it's RC and has a trivial fix, 
so I wondered what's the status of a new upload is.

I'd be happy to sponsor Joseph's upload, but there are many changes to 
the package, including a split into more binary packages, so I think it 
might be best if either you or Fredrik could do the upload, because 
you're familiar with the package.

Anyway, thanks for your prompt answer!

Regards,
Tobias

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #56 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>

To: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org, Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 23:51:23 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am 05.12.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer:
> I'd be happy to sponsor Joseph's upload, but there are many changes to
> the package, including a split into more binary packages, so I think it
> might be best if either you or Fredrik could do the upload, because
> you're familiar with the package.

Hi all,

just another gentle reminder ... If you don't upload a fixed package in 
the next couple of days, I'm afraid it won't be released with Stretch. 
Regarding the rather high popcon, that would be a pity.

Regards,
Tobias

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #61 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 02:51:12 +0100

* Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> [161219 01:50]:
> tags 831965 + patch
> 
> The "build-indep" target is missing.
> Patch attached.

Now in DELAYED/2.

-- 
christian hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

Message #66 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>, "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, Vincent CHENG <vcheng@debian.org>, hertzog@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:18:28 -0800

Hi,

@Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to
Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the
package changed that happened since last upload in 2014?

Thanks
Joseph

Message #71 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:20:16 -0800

Hi Christian,

Did you upload al the last changes that happened to the repo since
2014 or only this particular patch?

Thanks


On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> wrote:
> * Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> [161219 01:50]:
>> tags 831965 + patch
>>
>> The "build-indep" target is missing.
>> Patch attached.
>
> Now in DELAYED/2.
>
> --
> christian hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
>

Message #76 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>, "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, Vincent CHENG <vcheng@debian.org>, hertzog@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:24:14 +0100

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to
> Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the
> package changed that happened since last upload in 2014?
I am currently very very busy and won't have time to review a complete
repackaging. Given that asciidoc is somewhat obsolete and even upstream
says it is replaced by asciidoctor I am also not very keen on investing my
little spare time. 

sorry
Alex

Message #81 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>, "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, Vincent CHENG <vcheng@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:24:36 +0100

Hi Joseph,

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to
> Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the
> package changed that happened since last upload in 2014?

I can sponsor the package but given that Alexander is no longer
interested, I guess he has no reason to oppose a switch to "3.0 (quilt)"
and drop dpatch.

Once you have done that, I'm willing to review and upload your package.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Message #86 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>

To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, 831965@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>, Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>, "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>, Vincent CHENG <vcheng@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:28:13 +0100

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Raphael Hertzog wrote:

> Hi Joseph,
> 
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> > @Alexander, @Fredrik, if you don't have time, do you mind if I ask to
> > Vincent or Raphael if they can have a look and maybe review the
> > package changed that happened since last upload in 2014?
> 
> I can sponsor the package but given that Alexander is no longer
> interested, I guess he has no reason to oppose a switch to "3.0 (quilt)"
> and drop dpatch.
> 
> Once you have done that, I'm willing to review and upload your package.
Most of my package are on 3.0 (quilt) too.

Alex

Message #91 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: asciidoc: FTBFS with dpkg-buildpackage -A: doc/testasciidoc.1: No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 131.

Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:05:06 +0100

* Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com> [161219 19:21]:
> Did you upload al the last changes that happened to the repo since
> 2014 or only this particular patch?

Just that patch to sort out this severity serious bug. I'm not sure
what else is in git, etc. If you need a sponsor for those changes, I
could take a look though.

-- 
christian hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

Message #96 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:11:34 -0800

Thanks Christian and Raphael,

>> I can sponsor the package but given that Alexander is no longer
>> interested, I guess he has no reason to oppose a switch to "3.0 (quilt)"
>> and drop dpatch.
>>
>> Once you have done that, I'm willing to review and upload your package.

I'll try to push the change about getting rid of dpatch tonight. I'll
let you know when it's done.

> Just that patch to sort out this severity serious bug. I'm not sure
> what else is in git, etc. If you need a sponsor for those changes, I
> could take a look though.

Thanks, 2 pairs of eyes are better than 1! ;)

I'll let you know when the migration to 3.0 (quilt) is pushed to git
so the review is ready.

Thanks! :)

Message #101 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: 831965@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 19:32:12 -0800

Hi guys,

I migrated the package from dpatch to quilt and cut the tag.
I don't know if you prefer to work directly from the repo or from
mentors, so I uploaded it to mentors too:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/asciidoc
Any feedback appreciated.

Thanks
Joseph

Message #106 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:54:21 +0100

Hi,

On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> I migrated the package from dpatch to quilt and cut the tag.
> I don't know if you prefer to work directly from the repo or from
> mentors, so I uploaded it to mentors too:
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/asciidoc
> Any feedback appreciated.

I reviewed your git commits and I found that I often have changes
unrelated to what you describe in your git commit. This makes reviewing
really painful. If you have to reformat some files (to align columns, to
better wrap, etc.) please do it in a separate commit.

Here when I review 7a7b6fa57981a1ff081c5ec0579ce65191162c82 I don't want
to see so many changes on debian/asciidoc.install. I want only the vim
line dropped and see it added in the new package.

Now reviewing the split (c93478fd9be3ad2f9841df973eb7b09d312bd699) I did
not check in details the files repartition but I noticed this:
* epubcheck is in suggests everywhere but I guess it's not usefull for all
  backends, it probably makes sense only in asciidoc-base.
* source-highlight is also mentionned everywhere but since ascidoc-base is
  required, it's enough to be on that package.
* When you split packages in a fine-grained level, you should move the
  optional "Recommends" into a required "Depends". asciidoc-fop without
  fop doesn't make sense, thus fop and docbook-utils should be Depends
  and not Recommends. Same with "dblatex" and docbook-utils in
  asciidoc-dblatex.

Looking at your clean target in debian/rules, you can replace it entirely
with a "debian/clean" file (that said I wonder why some of those "rm" are
there, what creates debian/asciidoc.1.xml, etc?).

Last detail, lintian reports this informational tag (on all binary packages):
I: asciidoc-fop: debian-news-entry-uses-asterisk
N:
N:   The latest entry in NEWS.Debian appears to use asterisks to present
N:   changes in a bulleted list, similar to the normal changelog syntax.
N:   The Debian Developer's Reference recommends using regular paragraphs
N:   in NEWS.Debian rather than a bulleted list.
N:   
N:   Refer to Debian Developer's Reference section 6.3.4 (Supplementing
N:   changelogs with NEWS.Debian files) for details.
N:   
N:   Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible
N:   
N:   Check: changelog-file, Type: binary
N:

Can you clean up those little details quickly?

How long have you been using your updated packages already?

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Message #111 received at 831965-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

To: 831965-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#831965: fixed in asciidoc 8.6.9-3.1

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:03:30 +0000

Source: asciidoc
Source-Version: 8.6.9-3.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asciidoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 831965@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> (supplier of updated asciidoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:42:50 +0000
Source: asciidoc
Binary: asciidoc
Architecture: source
Version: 8.6.9-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
Description:
 asciidoc   - Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
Closes: 831965
Changes:
 asciidoc (8.6.9-3.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Add build-indep target, patch from Santiago Vila. (Closes: #831965)
Checksums-Sha1:
 c5eff5ab094bed8a691fab51ece468480870526d 1960 asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.dsc
 79eed45475decd8b8b52fcfeaac2b50ae427199d 13190 asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 deea32dbd80f8c80eed21e112605a9e42bf2798ea98a9cc95e000d30332dcb6b 1960 asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.dsc
 32d9556411fb45f9cf7679ccac558eb207512aa928742ca06b53a2d905b1eb15 13190 asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.diff.gz
Files:
 70d7b022842599e8878dc872aae36c3e 1960 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.dsc
 ba01894ee5e564fa8a10b241c5ef8f26 13190 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-3.1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/MN9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #116 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:31:44 -0800

Hi Raphael,

Thanks a lot for the review.

> Here when I review 7a7b6fa57981a1ff081c5ec0579ce65191162c82 I don't want
> to see so many changes on debian/asciidoc.install. I want only the vim
> line dropped and see it added in the new package.

Sorry about that. I'm not able to split that commit as I can't push
with --force, so is it ok for this time? I'll try to be more careful
in the future.

> Now reviewing the split (c93478fd9be3ad2f9841df973eb7b09d312bd699) I did
> not check in details the files repartition but I noticed this:
> * epubcheck is in suggests everywhere but I guess it's not usefull for all
>   backends, it probably makes sense only in asciidoc-base.

Well, epubcheck makes sense on the packages that can actually generate
epubs which are asciidoc-dblatex and asciidoc-fop. I'll remove it from
asciidoc as it depends on asciidoc-dblatex. I don't think it needs to
be on asciidoc-base as it is not able to generate any epub format
without fop or dblatex.

> * source-highlight is also mentionned everywhere but since ascidoc-base is
>   required, it's enough to be on that package.

Right. Sorry for that. removing it from everywhere else than asciidoc-base.

> * When you split packages in a fine-grained level, you should move the
>   optional "Recommends" into a required "Depends". asciidoc-fop without
>   fop doesn't make sense, thus fop and docbook-utils should be Depends
>   and not Recommends. Same with "dblatex" and docbook-utils in
>   asciidoc-dblatex.

Good point. Changed that.
I left xmlto in the recommends as you can generate man pages without
xmlto if you use -L / --no-xmllint (This package brings dblatex, so
sometimes you just want to have a way to have asciidoc without it).
The add of this package to recommends was discussed in #692274.

> Looking at your clean target in debian/rules, you can replace it entirely
> with a "debian/clean" file (that said I wonder why some of those "rm" are
> there, what creates debian/asciidoc.1.xml, etc?).

Moved them to a debian/clean file.
Those file are created by the call to a2x -f manpage calls from the
Makefile(.in) if I recall correctly.

> Last detail, lintian reports this informational tag (on all binary packages):
> I: asciidoc-fop: debian-news-entry-uses-asterisk
> N:
> N:   The latest entry in NEWS.Debian appears to use asterisks to present
> N:   changes in a bulleted list, similar to the normal changelog syntax.
> N:   The Debian Developer's Reference recommends using regular paragraphs
> N:   in NEWS.Debian rather than a bulleted list.
> N:
> N:   Refer to Debian Developer's Reference section 6.3.4 (Supplementing
> N:   changelogs with NEWS.Debian files) for details.
> N:
> N:   Severity: wishlist, Certainty: possible
> N:
> N:   Check: changelog-file, Type: binary
> N:
>
> Can you clean up those little details quickly?

Done.

I also got rid of the following other lintian info messages:
vcs-field-not-canonical,  vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri and
duplicate-short-description.

> How long have you been using your updated packages already?

I used the -base version for about 8 months and then I reinstalled my
computer so I took the package from the distro.

I pushed the changing to the git repo and to mentors.

Thanks
Joseph

Message #121 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:25:05 +0100

Hi,

On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> > Here when I review 7a7b6fa57981a1ff081c5ec0579ce65191162c82 I don't want
> > to see so many changes on debian/asciidoc.install. I want only the vim
> > line dropped and see it added in the new package.
> 
> Sorry about that. I'm not able to split that commit as I can't push
> with --force, so is it ok for this time? I'll try to be more careful
> in the future.

Sure, I was just pointing out what to avoid in the future.

> I also got rid of the following other lintian info messages:
> vcs-field-not-canonical,  vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri and
> duplicate-short-description.

Good. Note that for Vcs-Browser the canonical URL starts
with /cgit/ and not /git/ (but it works due some automatic redirection
setup by Alioth admins).

> I pushed the changing to the git repo and to mentors.

I just uploaded a package built out of the git repository.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Message #126 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:11:08 -0800

Hi Raphael,

Thanks a lot for the upload. Unfortunately there were misses in the
copyright file.
I fixed that, retagged and pushed to the git repo and to mentors.
Let me know if you find anything else that need to be fixed.

Thanks!
Joseph

Message #131 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 09:31:34 +0100

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the upload. Unfortunately there were misses in the
> copyright file.
> I fixed that, retagged and pushed to the git repo and to mentors.
> Let me know if you find anything else that need to be fixed.

Yes, I think you went too far by marking files licensed under GPL version
1 only.

Thorsten asked to add the GFDL and the MIT license to appropriate files,
he did not ask to mark files under GPL v1 only. And I doubt that the
author intended to put files under GPL v1 only when the global license
states GPL-2+.

Furthermore your "GPL" license entry has a pointer to
"/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2" instead of
"/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL" (if you really want to keep that
reference to GPL v1 only).

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Message #136 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 15:30:55 -0800

Sorry for that.

I removed the GPL v1 license additions and put all the license owners
for GPL and GPL-2 under the same paragraph.
I pushed it to git and mentors and re-tagged.

Joseph

Message #141 received at 831965@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

Cc: 831965@bugs.debian.org, zeha@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#831965: Status of asciidoc upload?

Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:26:39 +0100

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> I removed the GPL v1 license additions and put all the license owners
> for GPL and GPL-2 under the same paragraph.
> I pushed it to git and mentors and re-tagged.

Uploaded.

-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/

Message #146 received at 831965-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>

To: 831965-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#831965: fixed in asciidoc 8.6.9-4

Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:00:11 +0000

Source: asciidoc
Source-Version: 8.6.9-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asciidoc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 831965@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com> (supplier of updated asciidoc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 18:38:46 -0800
Source: asciidoc
Binary: asciidoc vim-asciidoc asciidoc-doc asciidoc-common asciidoc-base asciidoc-dblatex asciidoc-fop asciidoc-tests
Architecture: source all
Version: 8.6.9-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Fredrik Steen <stone@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joseph Herlant <herlantj@gmail.com>
Description:
 asciidoc   - Highly configurable text format for writing documentation
 asciidoc-base - Minimal version of asciidoc not suitable for pdf
 asciidoc-common - Basic data and configuration files for asciidoc
 asciidoc-dblatex - Asciidoc package including dblatex dependencies
 asciidoc-doc - Examples and documentation for asciidoc
 asciidoc-fop - Asciidoc package including fop dependencies
 asciidoc-tests - Test framework for asciidoc
 vim-asciidoc - Vim syntax highlighting files for asciidoc
Closes: 637006 692274 729242 752455 753561 762003 777177 831965
Changes:
 asciidoc (8.6.9-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Joseph Herlant ]
   * Adding lintian override about dpatch.
   * Updating copyright file to fit dep5
   * Splitting to new vim-asciidoc package (Closes: #729242)
   * Adding epubcheck to the suggests of asciidoc (Closes: #753561)
   * Adding upquote package to default dblatex sty file (Closes: #752455)
   * Moving prerm, postrm and postinst to maintscript
     upgrading to debhelper 9 and updating version number
     in asciidoc.maintscript for the files to be removed (Closes: #762003)
   * asciidoc split into several smaller packages.
     The asciidoc package has been split into
     several other packages to bring more flexibility
     and to lower the dependencies for people using
     only man pages and/or html files generation.
     The asciidoc binary package is now a meta package
     that brings asciidoc-dblatex and others packages
     to keep the current behavior. (Closes: #692274, #637006)
   * Updating adding_testasciidoc_manpage patch
     to latest version proposed in upstream pull request.
 .
   [ Alexander Wirt ]
   * Don't add footer to generated documentation, that makes the build
     reproducible. (Closes: #777177)
 .
   [ Joseph Herlant ]
   * Update changelog to reflect all the changes happened since last release
   * Add missing build-indep target.
     Thanks to Santiago Vila (Closes: #831965)
   * Update changelog
   * Migrating from dpatch to 3.0 (quilt)
Checksums-Sha1:
 7061aedb0e931866bfd78275465706d0abd66aeb 2075 asciidoc_8.6.9-4.dsc
 b7a8e2133c22828f3d200f6a70e3d710f0e65fd8 13160 asciidoc_8.6.9-4.debian.tar.xz
 4b052418633276ae39066a4506ec1cde8dcac438 132742 asciidoc-base_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 5442b10f16b90a2d8d2fdca8a8ed2a64dfea62f8 281340 asciidoc-common_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 2a61155202910f66362257e340fb19e59d00cab9 57726 asciidoc-dblatex_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 c09e16f6c40a8379744e3c6c67b778734463c12d 514846 asciidoc-doc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 dc41e55ccd74515fc54607f0e2afb3dd5ff426f1 55824 asciidoc-fop_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 6d42964c37a478fcbdbd81cef277a6a26b1292eb 77474 asciidoc-tests_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 9e5756d837db8a7fdf4af9243ab25d3b9446651c 56248 asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 f2a2ed96ac13b1fef413a2bbae9c4f054ba1d878 7181 asciidoc_8.6.9-4_amd64.buildinfo
 388b07bc1e5a5da1e4456297168fc24e78434155 59144 vim-asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 438fee5217ae9d442684e28ccf13539e3476a4e6f5140aea04212c33a422ea4f 2075 asciidoc_8.6.9-4.dsc
 43579d4e21a6134c57bb6122563749365b44a1788747841280b1088bd108efdf 13160 asciidoc_8.6.9-4.debian.tar.xz
 df9e155cb2811f3d80914fbca178ff97297754e6202fbdf0375ec1ce1582a9a1 132742 asciidoc-base_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 b01cb13e35847c9a5830d18c41820051e9dd9b2747687b7818e036ea02114605 281340 asciidoc-common_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 6b3ee74f5850266d0ee5ef9b6069ca1a3b1e9d7da3deaf8aa9bbcff693466bb7 57726 asciidoc-dblatex_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 1e33c9701419ce0dd84b02356e575ef6126587f15d46f8e997521985b5c4f5ce 514846 asciidoc-doc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 efd9b9c898418aec22c5a17043b30602d01fafa861f9032f47145b4b6d7dafe2 55824 asciidoc-fop_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 2679de67eb959b3b4a8278120b7b868f33ffd8ac27ab8cc5d3d3a6694ac6ee91 77474 asciidoc-tests_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 c4c57a489e48b33bfa652a80190adb4c07951b99570437e873325aacbbf4c115 56248 asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 4d5e0ad7dea628dd1f07eb7a4ce9d9b0d535f08e5e9283ab84c5e6ac264d46a0 7181 asciidoc_8.6.9-4_amd64.buildinfo
 6b96365aa3940b4deeda27d70f17a121123c526c8bf6531f02d73266390cb3a6 59144 vim-asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
Files:
 0273a227a6965c2a525318a365389de2 2075 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-4.dsc
 233b94985e5689de3cd84a2c5f2f9ab6 13160 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-4.debian.tar.xz
 b9cfc6a91cb2a30e6f4a8de7c6f48ae1 132742 text optional asciidoc-base_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 09644a09fb171a3c2d670a3489606183 281340 text optional asciidoc-common_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 7ad900ff3ce70e338532d296b8e72301 57726 text optional asciidoc-dblatex_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 626bb956364a45f0aaed6dca3c75f05e 514846 doc optional asciidoc-doc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 66948f2d51ff163fa74a6bd1c3754ede 55824 text optional asciidoc-fop_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 33d08056b8a69bd565b63ce33ae2e446 77474 text optional asciidoc-tests_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 ac283035e0c4137d43dabb13d4eaa5e5 56248 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb
 ddec2c83a85bbcf2c028cd21196dc387 7181 text optional asciidoc_8.6.9-4_amd64.buildinfo
 2cff633847788288f4371b3629d82da4 59144 text optional vim-asciidoc_8.6.9-4_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Signed by Raphael Hertzog

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE1823g1EQnhJ1LsbSA4gdq+vCmrkFAlheW0EACgkQA4gdq+vC
mrl/sAf9EsLX7hFOYYQGO5hGhStG6OXuDsDyPk9nrDJ3Ruefdol2MU5Z1bZDcqcy
og4+F8ZiJORG0K4Jg6Np5ZPTApX565Yj1piRuMXivSyeQmbQLcb99wCONzMLpuOK
abWbQLmxgdBbI08Mz+ARensqhP8yUn+TSakIEOHi8IP8riVXUriyeS2uukhF4Y56
2HBMEywbDJWtQa7eUpXyr/NgeBJiv6IO+226SRg5Z8WZ80YKlwu71PfaTVQwqDLr
eDHwcTDqYWO5AbZSU825mJiLs6e/PaFAYNCl2hzKXXihpxt/5hw1KdoHvBzLK8zg
KiuEFFlrCZ6UtK2jDJoFCzRG+76q3Q==
=vH65
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.