Debian Bug report logs - #828244
bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 12:21:06 +0200

Source: bacula
Version: 7.4.0+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/bacula_7.4.0+dfsg-1_amd64-20160529-1407

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt

Message #16 received at 828244@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>

To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Cc: 828244@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 10:56:34 +0200

Hi Kurt,

> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/bacula_7.4.0+dfsg-1_amd64-20160529-1407
[...]
> If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.

I've just got feedback from upstream:

> From what they write, it seems unlikely we will want to support the
> newer version for some time. This is because of the comment that if
> you do support the new version, old versions will not compile. This is
> not an option for us.

> What distro is currently using OpenSSL 1.1?"

Is the plan still to have OpenSSL 1.1 in stretch? There were several
concerns raised in the thread following your announcement in June.

Are upstreams concerns valid?

The upstream bug report is at (use anonymous/anonymous for read only
access):

http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2247

 - Carsten

Message #21 received at 828244@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

To: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>

Cc: 828244@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:29:07 +0200

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Hi Kurt,
> 
> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> > OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/bacula_7.4.0+dfsg-1_amd64-20160529-1407
> [...]
> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
> 
> I've just got feedback from upstream:
> 
> > From what they write, it seems unlikely we will want to support the
> > newer version for some time. This is because of the comment that if
> > you do support the new version, old versions will not compile. This is
> > not an option for us.

The patch should make it support both old and new version of OpenSSL.

> > What distro is currently using OpenSSL 1.1?"
> 
> Is the plan still to have OpenSSL 1.1 in stretch? There were several
> concerns raised in the thread following your announcement in June.

Yes it is. I don't really know of any raised concerns.


Kurt

Message #26 received at 828244@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>

To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Cc: 828244@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:35:58 +0200

Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:

>> Is the plan still to have OpenSSL 1.1 in stretch? There were several
>> concerns raised in the thread following your announcement in June.
>
> Yes it is. I don't really know of any raised concerns.

I'm referring to the subthread starting with this message:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00501.html

 - Carsten

Message #33 received at 828244@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>

To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Cc: 828244@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:25:52 +0200

Control: tag -1 + help

> There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
> snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.
>
> If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.

As adapting openssl-related code is not my speciality, I'll have to
depend on someone else providing a patch to make this work.

 - Carsten

Message #40 received at 828244@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Carsten Leonhardt <leo@debian.org>

To: 828244@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 18:22:34 +0100

Control: severity -1 important

bacula 7.4.4+dfsg-3 switched to using libssl1.0-dev, so the release
critical severity no longer applies.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.