Debian Bug report logs -
#827115
netpbm: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to allow reproducible output
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>:
Bug#827115; Package netpbm.
(Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Alexis Bienvenüe <pado@passoire.fr>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>.
(Sun, 12 Jun 2016 12:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: netpbm
Version: 2:10.0-15.3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that some packages (like latex2html) use one of the netpbm utilities in
their process, leading to unreproducible output (due to the use of the
random generator, seeded from a time() call).
To solve this kind of issues, it would be nice to make netpbm support
the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable [2].
See the attached patch for a proposed solution.
Regards,
Alexis Bienvenüe.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
[2] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/
[netpbm-free_10.0-15.3_source_date_epoch.diff (text/x-patch, attachment)]
Added indication that bug 827115 blocks 827187
Request was from Alexis Bienvenüe <pado@passoire.fr>
to submit@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:27:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>:
Bug#827115; Package netpbm.
(Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
(Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #12 received at 827115@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Control: tags -1 - patch
Hi,
thanks a lot for your effort to enable reproducible builds, which I
really like to support. Unfortunately your patch remained unapplied
by the Maintainers of this package. I recently moved the package to
the Debian Phototools team and try to have a look *from time to time*
(=I do not feel like a responsible Uploader due to time constraints
but I'd volunteer to do team uploads for reasons I consider important
and reproducible builds belong to this.)
I tried to apply your patch to the latest upstream version which I just
uploaded. Unfortunately every single chunk of the patch is rejected. I
had a quick look and realised that the code changed in a way that it is
really hard to adapt the patches and I gave up. I'd happily upload a
package quickly if you could come up with a new patch. Feel free to
ping me about this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Removed tag(s) patch.
Request was from Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
to 827115-submit@bugs.debian.org.
(Thu, 07 Apr 2022 05:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Wed May 17 11:49:41 2023;
Machine Name:
bembo
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.