Debian Bug report logs - #827061
transition: openssl

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>

Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:03:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: confirmed

Done: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:03:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:03:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:59:53 +0200
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html

I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.

If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
transition?  Are there things you want me to do?


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #10 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:31:17 +0200
On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> 
> I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.

405 packages failed to build during your test rebuild AFAICS. That's going to
take some time to sort out...

> If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> transition?  Are there things you want me to do?

Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.

We will also need bugs filed, with severity important for now.

Also it may be useful if you can get us the intersection between the packages
that failed to build and the key packages[1] (see "Final list of 3302 key source
packages" in that file).

Cheers,
Emilio

[1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.cgi



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #15 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:42:59 +0200
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> > soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> > 
> > I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> > like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> > after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> 
> 405 packages failed to build during your test rebuild AFAICS. That's going to
> take some time to sort out...
> 
> > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
> 
> Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.

It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
need to look at that.

> We will also need bugs filed, with severity important for now.

Sure, I'll start on that if I find the time.

> Also it may be useful if you can get us the intersection between the packages
> that failed to build and the key packages[1] (see "Final list of 3302 key source
> packages" in that file).

That actually seem to be 3247 source package.  Anyway, the list is
below.


Kurt


bind9
clamav
curl
cyrus-sasl2
freebsd-utils
freerdp
gsoap
gst-plugins-bad1.0
kde4libs
kdelibs4support
kopete
krb5
libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl
libevent
libexosip2
libmicrohttpd
libmsn
libnet-ssleay-perl
libssh
links2
m2crypto
mariadb-client-lgpl
neon27
net-snmp
nghttp2
nginx
nmap
nodejs
ntp
openhpi
openipmi
opensc
openssh
openvpn
opusfile
php5
pkcs11-helper
postfix
postgresql-9.5
pulseaudio
pypy
python-cryptography
qca2
qt4-x11
qtbase-opensource-src
rdesktop
ruby2.3
sendmail
serf
socat
spamassassin
spdylay
spice
spice-gtk
stunnel4
tcpdump
transmission
unbound
uw-imap
vde2
virtualbox
virtuoso-opensource
wget
wpa
xmlsec1
xmms2




Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 827068 Request was from Daniel Stender <stender@debian.org> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 11 Jun 2016 20:54:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828082 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:06:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828083 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 24 Jun 2016 19:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828127 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:33:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828139 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:00:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828142 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:21:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 814600 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:06:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 809271 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 13:27:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 822380 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:00:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 808669 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:00:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828228 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828229 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828230 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828231 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828232 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:30 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828233 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828234 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828235 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828236 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:24:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828237 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828238 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828239 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828240 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828241 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828242 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828243 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828244 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828245 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:25:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828246 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:00 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828247 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828248 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828249 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828250 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828251 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828252 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828253 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828254 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828255 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:26:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828256 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828257 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828258 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828259 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828260 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828261 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828262 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828263 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828264 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:27:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828265 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828266 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828267 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828268 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828269 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828270 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:33 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828271 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828272 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828273 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828274 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:28:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828275 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828276 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828277 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828278 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828279 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828280 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828281 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828282 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828283 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828284 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:29:58 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828285 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828286 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828287 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828288 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828289 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828290 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828291 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828292 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:30:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828293 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828294 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828295 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828296 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828297 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828298 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828299 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828300 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828301 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:31:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828302 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828303 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828304 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828305 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828306 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828307 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828308 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828309 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:32:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828310 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828311 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828312 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828313 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828314 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828315 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828316 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828317 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828318 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:33:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828319 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:00 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828320 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828321 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828322 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828323 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828324 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828325 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828326 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828327 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828328 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:34:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828329 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828330 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828331 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828332 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828333 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828334 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828335 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:40 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828336 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828337 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828338 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:35:58 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828339 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828340 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828341 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828342 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828343 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828344 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828345 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828346 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828347 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:36:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828348 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828349 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828350 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828351 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828352 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828353 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828354 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828355 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828356 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:37:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828357 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:00 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828358 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828359 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828360 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828361 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828362 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828363 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828364 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828365 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:38:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828366 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828367 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828368 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828369 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828370 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828371 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:40 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828372 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828373 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:39:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828374 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828375 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828376 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828377 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828378 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828379 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828380 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828381 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828382 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:40:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828383 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828384 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828385 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828386 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:30 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828387 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828388 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828389 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828390 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:41:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828391 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828392 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828393 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828394 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828395 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828396 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828397 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828398 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:42:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828399 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828400 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828401 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828402 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828403 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828404 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828405 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828406 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:43:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828407 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828408 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828409 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828410 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828411 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828412 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828413 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828414 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828415 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:44:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828416 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828417 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828418 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828419 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828420 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828421 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828422 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828423 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828424 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:45:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828425 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828426 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828427 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828428 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828429 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828430 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828431 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828432 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828433 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:46:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828434 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828435 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828436 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828437 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828438 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828439 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828440 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828441 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:47:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828442 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828443 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828444 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828445 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828446 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828447 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828448 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828449 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828450 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:48:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828451 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828452 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828453 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828454 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828455 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828456 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828457 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828458 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828459 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828460 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:49:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828461 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828462 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828463 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828464 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828465 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828466 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828467 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828468 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828469 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:50:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828470 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:00 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828471 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828472 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828473 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828474 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828475 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828476 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:51:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828477 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828478 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828479 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828480 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828481 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828482 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828483 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828484 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:52:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828485 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828486 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828487 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828488 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828489 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828490 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828491 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828492 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828493 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828494 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:53:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828495 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828496 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828497 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828498 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828499 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828500 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828501 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828502 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828503 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:54:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828504 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828505 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828506 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828507 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828508 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828509 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:33 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828510 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828511 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828512 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828513 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:55:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828514 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828515 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828516 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828517 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828518 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828519 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828520 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828521 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828522 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:56:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828523 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828524 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828525 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828526 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828527 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828528 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828529 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:40 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828530 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828531 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828532 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:57:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828533 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828534 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828535 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828536 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828537 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828538 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828539 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828540 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828541 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:58:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828542 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:00 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828543 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828544 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828545 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828546 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828547 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828548 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828549 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828550 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828551 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 10:59:55 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828552 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828553 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828554 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828555 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828556 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828557 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:33 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828558 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828559 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828560 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828561 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:00:58 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828562 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828563 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828564 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828565 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828566 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828567 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828568 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828569 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:01:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828570 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828571 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828572 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828573 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828574 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828575 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828576 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:02:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828577 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828578 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828579 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828580 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828581 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828582 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:33 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828583 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828584 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828585 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828586 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:03:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828587 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828588 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828589 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828590 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828591 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828592 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828593 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828594 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828595 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:04:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828596 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828597 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828598 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828599 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828600 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828601 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828602 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828603 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828604 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828605 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:05:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828606 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828607 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828608 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828609 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828610 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828611 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828612 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828613 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:46 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828614 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:52 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828615 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:06:58 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828616 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:07:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828617 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:07:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828618 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:07:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828619 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:07:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828620 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 11:07:30 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 827076 Request was from Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 26 Jun 2016 17:15:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 829452 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 03 Jul 2016 13:00:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 829465 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 03 Jul 2016 14:48:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828245 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:30:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Reply sent to Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:46:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:46:26 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #834 received at 827061-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com>
To: 827061-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#827061: fixed in ginkgocadx 3.8.3-1
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 22:44:40 +0000
Source: ginkgocadx
Source-Version: 3.8.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ginkgocadx, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 827061@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com> (supplier of updated ginkgocadx package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 19:55:54 +0000
Source: ginkgocadx
Binary: ginkgocadx
Architecture: source
Version: 3.8.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team <debian-med-packaging@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com>
Description:
 ginkgocadx - Medical Imaging Software and complete DICOM Viewer
Closes: 827061
Changes:
 ginkgocadx (3.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release, Closes:  #827061
   * d/rules: enable new hardening flags
   * d/copyright: remove deleted files from list
Checksums-Sha1:
 78b2a61f41e4711ba28059475393a8e42656e02c 2007 ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.dsc
 2685f56da0068b46544bb4b652a784506a8f9569 5496448 ginkgocadx_3.8.3.orig.tar.gz
 a0a7d1d4e4d93ee6ef3fdedf9db80c1b64938867 8684 ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 59cbd2ae57f22d175692ff37ec6b73a0154a580d8db0cd403501045af6f2eae4 2007 ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.dsc
 32ee7098da276ac6aed44ca73e67d042fa46f5f7ede88b979d2dcdd9007a367a 5496448 ginkgocadx_3.8.3.orig.tar.gz
 9eb97cc66ec1628885857599d6f7e3877fad447867618cc1597b2e540593438e 8684 ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 2f16a90e51606562db3965bb0fb0d62e 2007 science optional ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.dsc
 1cc97a8cf754de3d84a2850965dde075 5496448 science optional ginkgocadx_3.8.3.orig.tar.gz
 d01c2a55ab0a42e2b399a2587921a8d0 8684 science optional ginkgocadx_3.8.3-1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXeXTWAAoJEPgeNoubJquYwmwH/0LIDTMZpFqob/3wHkMWEKsm
GQ/u7UzfdLZIbB1c9gCDBSwzogEWZRU37/94W7Kt59ccW1PuC/tukSw8XEIr5qd0
/ivB6906J2+eHt/aJKyz6/lBNz+r22qWAI65EekSLGX4J8z9LIc9ZFOqgorxHb2k
3mig0hcxJc31RKwCV7db2WCiIzhM5w8+EhtNYzsDIKHvWvfxEmPnPlmBJpVsXumQ
fX6JjVLmzQDJAh07jZhtQTkAUoS4/8C7XoBs8r0YGf0lUZ93TEWdEaDvpVzAwMnP
ChPynAjihnxj4bDmZAf3TsF9dMZn7/f6AXX9CHoxB5IcsteuW5q13iiyn3CICmk=
=U9fR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #839 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
To: Gert Wollny <gw.fossdev@gmail.com>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: marked as done (transition: openssl)
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2016 10:10:09 +0200
Control: reopen -1

On Sun, 2016-07-03 at 22:46 +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
>  ginkgocadx (3.8.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * New upstream release, Closes:  #827061

Nope. That's the tracking bug for the whole transition, not whatever bug
might be specific to your individual package.

Regards,

Adam




Bug reopened Request was from "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> to 827061-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


No longer marked as fixed in versions ginkgocadx/3.8.3-1. Request was from "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> to 827061-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jul 2016 08:12:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828348 Request was from Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:15:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835549 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 26 Aug 2016 23:51:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835585 Request was from Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:33:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835793 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:30:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835794 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:30:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828476 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:33:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835785 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835786 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835790 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835796 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835797 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835798 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835799 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835800 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835801 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835804 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 12:18:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 13:33:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835811 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 28 Aug 2016 14:00:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 836419 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 02 Sep 2016 20:09:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:48:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #884 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 23:44:42 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-06-11 <20160611194259.GA6864@roeckx.be>
> > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > > transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
> > 
> > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
> 
> It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
> on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
> need to look at that.

Hi,

do you expect the transition to be done for stretch?

I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to
add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 ..
9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now.

(Alternatively, would stretch have OpenSSL 1.0 next to 1.1? This seems
unlikely, but just to confirm?)

Thanks,
Christoph
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 837960 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:51:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:48:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 16 Sep 2016 05:48:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #891 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 07:45:49 +0200
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:44:42PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-06-11 <20160611194259.GA6864@roeckx.be>
> > > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > > > transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
> > > 
> > > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
> > 
> > It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
> > on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
> > need to look at that.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> do you expect the transition to be done for stretch?

I really would like to have it in stretch.  I don't want to have
the same situtation like we had with 1.0.2 that didn't make it it
to jessie.

> I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to
> add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 ..
> 9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now.

I guess they want to provide binaries for all their releases on
apt.postgresql.org?  

> (Alternatively, would stretch have OpenSSL 1.0 next to 1.1? This seems
> unlikely, but just to confirm?)

This is not my plan.


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:42:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #894 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:38:01 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Re: Kurt Roeckx 2016-09-16 <20160916054549.2wjl4xzb2eyg6v5q@roeckx.be>
> > do you expect the transition to be done for stretch?
> 
> I really would like to have it in stretch.  I don't want to have
> the same situtation like we had with 1.0.2 that didn't make it it
> to jessie.

Nod, thanks for confirming.

> > I'm asking because the PostgreSQL people want to know if they need to
> > add support for OpenSSL 1.1 in the older release branches (9.2 ..
> > 9.4), or if patching 9.5 .. 10 is enough for now.
> 
> I guess they want to provide binaries for all their releases on
> apt.postgresql.org?

That's exactly the reason, yes. (And "they" is me ;)

Christoph
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:36:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:36:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #899 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 21:33:43 +0200
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> > > soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> > > 
> > > I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> > > like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> > > after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> > 
> > 405 packages failed to build during your test rebuild AFAICS. That's going to
> > take some time to sort out...
> > 
> > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > > transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
> > 
> > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
> 
> It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
> on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
> need to look at that.
> 
> > We will also need bugs filed, with severity important for now.
> 
> Sure, I'll start on that if I find the time.
> 
> > Also it may be useful if you can get us the intersection between the packages
> > that failed to build and the key packages[1] (see "Final list of 3302 key source
> > packages" in that file).
> 
> That actually seem to be 3247 source package.  Anyway, the list is
> below.

So OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released about 3 weeks ago.  Since then we've
been working on the key packages, to get them to build with
OpenSSL 1.1.0.  You can see that status of that at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans-keypkg;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org

Most of the packages are really trivial to fix, but some do
require that you fix the same issues in many different places and
it can take some time to fix it.

I would like to motivate more people to work on this by either
marking those bugs as RC, or uploading it to unstable.


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #904 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:35:31 +0200
On 2016-09-18 21:33:43 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> 
> So OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released about 3 weeks ago.  Since then we've
now a month and a few days now.

> been working on the key packages, to get them to build with
> OpenSSL 1.1.0.  You can see that status of that at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans-keypkg;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org

22 are tagged patch.

> Most of the packages are really trivial to fix, but some do
> require that you fix the same issues in many different places and
> it can take some time to fix it.

yup.

> I would like to motivate more people to work on this by either
> marking those bugs as RC, or uploading it to unstable.

besides the above status for the key packages there is also
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org

which covers all of them.

> Kurt

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 12 Oct 2016 20:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #909 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:47:32 +0200
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:33:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > > OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> > > > soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> > > > 
> > > > I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> > > > like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> > > > after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> > > 
> > > 405 packages failed to build during your test rebuild AFAICS. That's going to
> > > take some time to sort out...
> > > 
> > > > If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> > > > transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
> > > 
> > > Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
> > 
> > It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
> > on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
> > need to look at that.
> > 
> > > We will also need bugs filed, with severity important for now.
> > 
> > Sure, I'll start on that if I find the time.
> > 
> > > Also it may be useful if you can get us the intersection between the packages
> > > that failed to build and the key packages[1] (see "Final list of 3302 key source
> > > packages" in that file).
> > 
> > That actually seem to be 3247 source package.  Anyway, the list is
> > below.
> 
> So OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released about 3 weeks ago.  Since then we've
> been working on the key packages, to get them to build with
> OpenSSL 1.1.0.  You can see that status of that at:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans-keypkg;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> Most of the packages are really trivial to fix, but some do
> require that you fix the same issues in many different places and
> it can take some time to fix it.
> 
> I would like to motivate more people to work on this by either
> marking those bugs as RC, or uploading it to unstable.

Ping.


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:54:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:54:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #914 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:52:31 +0200
Hi Kurt,

On 12/10/16 22:47, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 09:33:43PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:42:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 09:31:17PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>>>> OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
>>>>> soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
>>>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
>>>>> like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
>>>>> after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
>>>>
>>>> 405 packages failed to build during your test rebuild AFAICS. That's going to
>>>> take some time to sort out...
>>>>
>>>>> If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
>>>>> transition?  Are there things you want me to do?
>>>>
>>>> Please upload to experimental first and let us know when that's happened.
>>>
>>> It's in experimental already.  The test suite only fails
>>> on hurd, for some reason it's not finding the engine.  I still
>>> need to look at that.
>>>
>>>> We will also need bugs filed, with severity important for now.
>>>
>>> Sure, I'll start on that if I find the time.
>>>
>>>> Also it may be useful if you can get us the intersection between the packages
>>>> that failed to build and the key packages[1] (see "Final list of 3302 key source
>>>> packages" in that file).
>>>
>>> That actually seem to be 3247 source package.  Anyway, the list is
>>> below.
>>
>> So OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released about 3 weeks ago.  Since then we've
>> been working on the key packages, to get them to build with
>> OpenSSL 1.1.0.  You can see that status of that at:
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans-keypkg;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>> Most of the packages are really trivial to fix, but some do
>> require that you fix the same issues in many different places and
>> it can take some time to fix it.
>>
>> I would like to motivate more people to work on this by either
>> marking those bugs as RC, or uploading it to unstable.
> 
> Ping.

I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
transition when Stretch gets released.

Cheers,
Emilio



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:48:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:48:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #919 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:44:08 +0200
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
> approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
> I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
> some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
> the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
> transition when Stretch gets released.

Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?

I could upload an openssl102 source package that provides an
libssl1.0.2-dev package, so that packages that aren't ready to
move to the 1.1.0 version can build-depend on that instead.


Kurt




Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 841635; removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828417, 828502, 828384, 828571, 828452, 828597, 835800, 828510, 828261, 828299, 828414, 835785, 828536, 828530, 828283, 828260, 828593, 828266, 828561, 828520, 828604, 828309, 828346, 828327, 828347, 828611, 828243, 828491, 828435, 828615, 828250, 828255, 828244, 828531, 828402, 828306, 828497, 828466, 828479, 828516, 828464, 828365, 828258, 828421, 828241, 828575, 828442, 828249, 828359, 828581, 828328, 828554, 828526, 828262, 828272, 828486, 828600, 828540, 835585, 828459, 828296, 822380, 828415, 828567, 828289, 828614, 828424, 828457, 828447, 828572, 828558, 828325, 829452, 828382, 828139, 828583, 828310, 835786, 828420, 828432, 828367, 828264, 828509, 828387, 828547, 828353, 828288, 828541, 828443, 828390, 828445, 828383, 828396, 828446, 828577, 828352, 828492, 828312, 828329, 828361, 828550, 828431, 828416, 828388, 828439, 828532, 828508, 828349, 828397, 828400, 828267, 828280, 828230, 828274, 828606, 828341, 828578, 828256, 828259, 828444, 828471, 828324, 828368, 828251, 828326, 828533, 828576, 828599, 828603, 828364, 835549, 835799, 827076, 828273, 828499, 828515, 828549, 828483, 828522, 828294, 828539, 835790, 828562, 828505, 835801, 828358, 828565, 828228, 828462, 828237, 828407, 828503, 828582, 828422, 828318, 808669, 828557, 828142, 828542, 828270, 828448, 828570, 828336, 828343, 828480, 828590, 828545, 828594, 828566, 828357, 828378, 828437, 828339, 828308, 828598, 828463, 828401, 828487, 828501, 828253, 828553, 828313, 828391, 828485, 828362, 835796, 828298, 828393, 828394, 828376, 828300, 828489, 828454, 828596, 828286, 828468, 828610, 828410, 828612, 828404, 828455, 828617, 828620, 828423, 828608, 828232, 828568, 828083, 828500, 828519, 828333, 828482, 828535, 835804, 828438, 828488, 828441, 828307, 828389, 828405, 828354, 828511, 828330, 828240, 814600, 828320, 828303, 828229, 828589, 828453, 828460, 828484, 828507, 828239, 828304, 828293, 828323, 828314, 828297, 828373, 828363, 828372, 828595, 828426, 828498, 828277, 828514, 828601, 828337, 828470, 828344, 828573, 828379, 828263, 828334, 828257, 828411, 828231, 828285, 828616, 828340, 828513, 828287, 828618, 828381, 828425, 828278, 828587, 828552, 836419, 828356, 828473, 828591, 828465, 828560, 828403, 828311, 828395, 828543, 835793, 828375, 828427, 828419, 828592, 828268, 828350, 828322, 828413, 828315, 828386, 828281, 828467, 828512, 828518, 809271, 828369, 828248, 828504, 828461, 828521, 828450, 828527, 828490, 828399, 828355, 828412, 828371, 828538, 835797, 828275, 828580, 828551, 828619, 828586, 828574, 828366, 828418, 828398, 828377, 828493, 828269, 828295, 828613, 828588, 828433, 828534, 828477, 828569, 828430, 828563, 828555, 828317, 828284, 828319, 828246, 828517, 828472, 828495, 828428, 828409, 828235, 828392, 828607, 828360, 828523, 828316, 827068, 828564, 828276, 828579, 828254, 828548, 828524, 828605, 828342, 828247, 828302, 828380, 828370, 828408, 835811, 828242, 828559, 828082, 828436, 828602, 812166, 828481, 828305, 828321, 828528, 828609, 828529, 828345, 828440, 828556, 828290, 828544, 829465, 828279, 828494, 828265, 828233, 828496, 828374, 828456, 828469, 828238, 828351, 828271, 828506, 828301, 828451, 837960, 828478, 828429, 828234, 828458, 828584, 835798, 828236, 828331, 828449, 828475, 828252, 828291, 828474, 828585, 828434, 828338, 828537, 835794, 828282, 828292, 828546, 828127, 828406, 828385, 828335, 828332, and 828525 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:12:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #926 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:09:06 +0200
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > 
> > I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
> > approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
> > I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
> > some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
> > the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
> > transition when Stretch gets released.
> 
> Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?

We've discussed this within the security team and we'd be fine with
a one-time exception to have two openssl releases in stretch; the API
changes are clearly too invasive to cover the entire Debian archive,
but 1.1 also carries sufficiently important new features (like support
for chacha20/poly1305) to warrant the extra complexity.

(It's the release team's call of course).

Cheers,
        Moritz



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:57:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:57:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #931 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:55:19 +0200
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 25/10/16 20:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
>>> approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
>>> I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
>>> some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
>>> the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
>>> transition when Stretch gets released.
>>
>> Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?
> 
> We've discussed this within the security team and we'd be fine with
> a one-time exception to have two openssl releases in stretch; the API
> changes are clearly too invasive to cover the entire Debian archive,
> but 1.1 also carries sufficiently important new features (like support
> for chacha20/poly1305) to warrant the extra complexity.
> 
> (It's the release team's call of course).

19:46 <  nthykier> pochu: seen jmm_ reply to the libssl thread?
19:46 <  jcristau> adsb: yay for binary debdiffs in q-v!  thanks a bunch.
19:46 <     pochu> yep
19:47 <     pochu> nthykier: so my concern was there was a big risk that we
wouldn't finish the transition intime, delaying the release. but if the security
team is fine with (potentially, as I'll try not to) shipping both, then we
should be fine, and I think I'll ack it
19:48 <     pochu> of course we'll still try to get rid of the old one
19:48 <  nthykier> ack, I think that just made me pro on doing that as well
19:48 <     pochu> cool, good to see we're on the same page

So let's do this. Let's try to get it finished and only ship openssl 1.1. We
still have three months until the full freeze, and depending on how many
packages (and which ones, for risk management etc) are left to be fixed after
that, I may be happy to grant exceptions. But worst case we just ship both.

But please, wait a little bit so that we can sort out the PIE fallout. You can
start preparing the updates and upload to experimental to clear NEW if you want.
We'll let you know once it's ok to upload to sid.

BTW I noticed Fedora has started this transition as well, so they may have some
patches that we are missing in the BTS.

Also, please bump all the bugs to serious.

Cheers,
Emilio



Added tag(s) confirmed. Request was from Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> to 827061-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:57:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828384 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828340, 828347, 828261, 828478, 828368, 835800, 828429, 828585, 828362, 828257, 828272, 828533, 828534, 828440, 828528, 828591, 828418, 828234, 828421, 829465, 828515, 828518, 828303, 828451, 828513, 828615, 828279, 828233, 828354, 828573, 828437, 828454, 828548, 835811, 828379, 828325, 828529, 828332, 828270, 828365, 828263, 828577, 828274, 828485, 828313, 828472, 828406, 828457, 828594, 828521, 828317, 828388, 828550, 828311, 828538, 828420, 828353, 828545, 828394, 828319, 828540, 828544, 828341, 828278, 828271, 828487, 828588, 828308, 828310, 828456, 828294, 828287, 828315, 828360, 828296, 828565, 828267, 828536, 828505, 828614, 828578, 812166, 828607, 828542, 828339, 828516, 828082, 828563, 828361, 828344, 828572, 828376, 828351, 828240, 828530, 828473, 828370, 828570, 828314, 828318, 828289, 828514, 835794, 828510, 828385, 828520, 828558, 828415, 828346, 828431, 835798, 828410, 828419, 828460, 828328, 828595, 828608, 828372, 828562, 828606, 828390, 828241, 828527, 828357, 828255, 828387, 828302, 828535, 828286, 828239, 828298, 828541, 828413, 814600, 835799, 828462, 828598, 828484, 837960, 828359, 828396, 828405, 828336, 828522, 828453, 828316, 828580, 828592, 828323, 828400, 835785, 828600, 828468, 828582, 828407, 828601, 828301, 809271, 828374, 828441, 828377, 828293, 828292, 828616, 828532, 828525, 828561, 828411, 828366, 808669, 835801, 828236, 828491, 828350, 828458, 828439, 828435, 828262, 828254, 828523, 828268, 828329, 828503, 828243, 828500, 828539, 828364, 828469, 828526, 828555, 828266, 828309, 828391, 828424, 828519, 828566, 828251, 828489, 835804, 828575, 828331, 828459, 828449, 828247, 828509, 828571, 828564, 828445, 827076, 828447, 828443, 828470, 828246, 828610, 828321, 828275, 828416, 828455, 828590, 828436, 828501, 828492, 828358, 828290, 828543, 835790, 828552, 828581, 828371, 828584, 828335, 828399, 828450, 828277, 828493, 828471, 828356, 828502, 827068, 828531, 828508, 828142, 828412, 828483, 828596, 828282, 828083, 828486, 835796, 828373, 828139, 828554, 828517, 828414, 836419, 828326, 828269, 828378, 828299, 828467, 828265, 828297, 828464, 828506, 828300, 828488, 828363, 828549, 828235, 828428, 828569, 828609, 828466, 828327, 828556, 828320, 828495, 828477, 828586, 835786, 828475, 828273, 828244, 828448, 828349, 828494, 828504, 828604, 828259, 828337, 828312, 828295, 828546, 828579, 828284, 828334, 828291, 828229, 828603, 828355, 828613, 828305, 828231, 828557, 828551, 828553, 828583, 828232, 828479, 828605, 828306, 828597, 828382, 828352, 828511, 828452, 828248, 828499, 828242, 828474, 828438, 828333, 828324, 828427, 828559, 828127, 828264, 828237, 828403, 828547, 828343, 828612, 828392, 828383, 828524, 828422, 828434, 828380, 828283, 828618, 828395, 828417, 828260, 828253, 828285, 828398, 828401, 828496, 828620, 828375, 828599, 828481, 835585, 828426, 828430, 828537, 828442, 828330, 828276, 828498, 828611, 828238, 828280, 828304, 828281, 828444, 828389, 835797, 828409, 835793, 828393, 828345, 828252, 828567, 828250, 828497, 828228, 828342, 828230, 828369, 828338, 828465, 828381, 828602, 835549, 828568, 828322, 822380, 828507, 828589, 828587, 828574, 828408, 828423, 828256, 829452, 828593, 828576, 828367, 828288, 828258, 828617, 828480, 828463, 828490, 828446, 828386, 828512, 828619, 828425, 828482, 828433, 828560, 828397, 828402, 828249, 828432, 828404, 828307, and 828461 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835789, 828245, 828348, and 828476 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:27:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 18:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #944 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:53:56 +0200
On 26/10/16 10:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 25/10/16 20:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
>>>> approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
>>>> I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
>>>> some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
>>>> the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
>>>> transition when Stretch gets released.
>>>
>>> Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?
>>
>> We've discussed this within the security team and we'd be fine with
>> a one-time exception to have two openssl releases in stretch; the API
>> changes are clearly too invasive to cover the entire Debian archive,
>> but 1.1 also carries sufficiently important new features (like support
>> for chacha20/poly1305) to warrant the extra complexity.
>>
>> (It's the release team's call of course).
> 
> 19:46 <  nthykier> pochu: seen jmm_ reply to the libssl thread?
> 19:46 <  jcristau> adsb: yay for binary debdiffs in q-v!  thanks a bunch.
> 19:46 <     pochu> yep
> 19:47 <     pochu> nthykier: so my concern was there was a big risk that we
> wouldn't finish the transition intime, delaying the release. but if the security
> team is fine with (potentially, as I'll try not to) shipping both, then we
> should be fine, and I think I'll ack it
> 19:48 <     pochu> of course we'll still try to get rid of the old one
> 19:48 <  nthykier> ack, I think that just made me pro on doing that as well
> 19:48 <     pochu> cool, good to see we're on the same page
> 
> So let's do this. Let's try to get it finished and only ship openssl 1.1. We
> still have three months until the full freeze, and depending on how many
> packages (and which ones, for risk management etc) are left to be fixed after
> that, I may be happy to grant exceptions. But worst case we just ship both.
> 
> But please, wait a little bit so that we can sort out the PIE fallout. You can
> start preparing the updates and upload to experimental to clear NEW if you want.
> We'll let you know once it's ok to upload to sid.
> 
> BTW I noticed Fedora has started this transition as well, so they may have some
> patches that we are missing in the BTS.
> 
> Also, please bump all the bugs to serious.

Adrian Bunk asked whether mixing both OpenSSL versions into the same address
space works fine. Is OpenSSL using symbol versioning? Is this situation
supported or should we expect things to break? This can easily happen if an app
links against a library libA which uses openssl 1.0, and against libB which uses
openssl 1.1.

Cheers,
Emilio



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:33:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:33:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #949 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:31:26 +0200
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 08:53:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> 
> Adrian Bunk asked whether mixing both OpenSSL versions into the same address
> space works fine. Is OpenSSL using symbol versioning?

Yes, and all symbols have a different version name in 1.0.2 and
1.1.0. (What is actually the important thing.)

> Is this situation
> supported or should we expect things to break? This can easily happen if an app
> links against a library libA which uses openssl 1.0, and against libB which uses
> openssl 1.1.

When linking you actually get a warning.

As far as I know, it should only break when they use dlopen().
They most likely won't be using dlvsym() in that case and then it
can pick any version. It could of course also break if they do
very weird things.

But I guess we'll have to see if something breaks or not.


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:06:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:06:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #954 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:05:19 +0200
On 2016-10-26 21:31:26 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Is this situation
> > supported or should we expect things to break? This can easily happen if an app
> > links against a library libA which uses openssl 1.0, and against libB which uses
> > openssl 1.1.
> 
> When linking you actually get a warning.
> 
> As far as I know, it should only break when they use dlopen().
> They most likely won't be using dlvsym() in that case and then it
> can pick any version. It could of course also break if they do
> very weird things.

One of the weird things would be probably if libA allocate a SSL pointer
and passes it to libB.

> Kurt

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:18:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Tino Mettler <tino.mettler@tikei.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 27 Oct 2016 07:18:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #959 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tino Mettler <tino.mettler@tikei.de>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:15:32 +0200
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:55:19 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

> So let's do this. Let's try to get it finished and only ship openssl 1.1. We
> still have three months until the full freeze

Hi,

packages that currently FTBFS will be removed from testing in 2 weeks. 
The freeze deadline for re-entry is January 5th.  With the migration
delay the fixed package should be uploaded until the end of December,
where may people will be on holiday I guess (both Debian and Upstream
developers).

So I think it's desirable for many maintainers to have a fixed package
in Sid before Christmas or they will have to ask for a freeze
exception. I'd be glad if this is announced more prominent, e.g on the
debian-devel-announce mailing list.

Regards,
Tino



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:15:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:15:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #964 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:12:55 +0300
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 08:09:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
> > > approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
> > > I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
> > > some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
> > > the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
> > > transition when Stretch gets released.
> > 
> > Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?
> 
> We've discussed this within the security team and we'd be fine with
> a one-time exception to have two openssl releases in stretch; the API
> changes are clearly too invasive to cover the entire Debian archive,
> but 1.1 also carries sufficiently important new features (like support
> for chacha20/poly1305) to warrant the extra complexity.

What are actually the exact technical benefits of 1.1 that are relevant 
for the software in stretch?

Which new features are desirable for all OpenSSL-using software,
and for which new features is it a good option that only software
using these features opts in to using 1.1?

The only way to make chacha20/poly1305 available for all OpenSSL-using 
code in stretch would be to patch 1.0.2. Patches are available and 
LibreSSL ships this since the original release in July 2014, so that 
should be doable.

Improvements to the defaults like #728504 (disable RC4 by default) can 
be backported to 1.0.2 even more easily. And these are things that 
really should be done in any case, unless stretch ships without 1.0.2

What is the situation regarding other important 1.1 features?

> (It's the release team's call of course).
> 
> Cheers,
>         Moritz

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 29 Oct 2016 00:30:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #969 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 02:28:12 +0200
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:55:19AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 25/10/16 20:09, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:44:08PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:52:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry but I'm going to have to nack this for Stretch, as much as I like to
> >>> approve transitions and get new stuff in. I have looked at the opened bugs and
> >>> I'm afraid this still is too disruptive. I have noticed that you have forwarded
> >>> some of them and sent patches, and I appreciate that. We can do this early in
> >>> the Buster cycle, so let's look at the status of this and prepare for the
> >>> transition when Stretch gets released.
> >>
> >> Is having 2 version of OpenSSL in Stretch an option?
> > 
> > We've discussed this within the security team and we'd be fine with
> > a one-time exception to have two openssl releases in stretch; the API
> > changes are clearly too invasive to cover the entire Debian archive,
> > but 1.1 also carries sufficiently important new features (like support
> > for chacha20/poly1305) to warrant the extra complexity.
> > 
> > (It's the release team's call of course).
> 
> 19:46 <  nthykier> pochu: seen jmm_ reply to the libssl thread?
> 19:46 <  jcristau> adsb: yay for binary debdiffs in q-v!  thanks a bunch.
> 19:46 <     pochu> yep
> 19:47 <     pochu> nthykier: so my concern was there was a big risk that we
> wouldn't finish the transition intime, delaying the release. but if the security
> team is fine with (potentially, as I'll try not to) shipping both, then we
> should be fine, and I think I'll ack it
> 19:48 <     pochu> of course we'll still try to get rid of the old one
> 19:48 <  nthykier> ack, I think that just made me pro on doing that as well
> 19:48 <     pochu> cool, good to see we're on the same page
> 
> So let's do this. Let's try to get it finished and only ship openssl 1.1. We
> still have three months until the full freeze, and depending on how many
> packages (and which ones, for risk management etc) are left to be fixed after
> that, I may be happy to grant exceptions. But worst case we just ship both.
> 
> But please, wait a little bit so that we can sort out the PIE fallout. You can
> start preparing the updates and upload to experimental to clear NEW if you want.
> We'll let you know once it's ok to upload to sid.

So it has been suggested that we keep the libssl-dev package at
the 1.0.2 package and create a new -dev package for the 1.1
version. We could then lower the severity of the bugs to important
again, and only the packages wanting to make use of 1.1 could
switch then.

I think the most important new security feature in the 1.1.0
version is the extended master secret support. There are also a
bunch of others like the chacha20-poly1305 and x25519, but they're
less important. All TLS using applications really should start
ussing the EMS, not just a few that want to switch to 1.1.


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #974 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:18:32 +0200
Disclaimer:
I am not a member of the release team, and I am only speaking for myself.

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 02:28:12AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>...
> I think the most important new security feature in the 1.1.0
> version is the extended master secret support. There are also a
> bunch of others like the chacha20-poly1305 and x25519, but they're
> less important. All TLS using applications really should start
> ussing the EMS, not just a few that want to switch to 1.1.

This implies that OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch has to support EMS.

Reality is that a significant part of the archive will likely
use 1.0.2 in stretch, and planning should not be based on the
unlikely case that everything compiles and works smoothly with 1.1.0

The soft freeze is only 2 months away, and therefore a complete 
transition to 1.1.0 in stretch would imply that libssl1.0.2 must be 
removed from testing in November if it should not delay the whole 
release - I'd expect there will be plenty of runtime bugs in both 
OpenSSL itself and the 1.1.0 support of various users that will
require debugging and fixing, and runtime testing of everything
has to start ASAP.

If everything that is important in 1.1.0 should be used by all
users of OpenSSL in stretch, then the best solution for stretch
is to ship only 1.0.2 and add all desired features there.

1.0.2 is also LTS, and has upstream security support for an additional 
16 months after upstream support for 1.1.0 has ended.

I am aware that this is not a nice solution, but since there does not 
seem to be a realistic 1.1.0-only solution without impact on the release 
schedule it might be the best among the available options.

> Kurt

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #979 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 21:42:12 +0100
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:18:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> If everything that is important in 1.1.0 should be used by all
> users of OpenSSL in stretch, then the best solution for stretch
> is to ship only 1.0.2 and add all desired features there.

And I guess you're going to add all those features, and support
them?


Kurt




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:21:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:21:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #984 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
To: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 11:16:38 -0400
My understanding of the current plan is that we're adding openssl 1.1.0
to unstable, but will make a decision about whether to drop libssl1.0.2
later.

That's really frustrating for the rest of the ecosystem--our users and
our upstreams, and I'd ask the release team to commit now to 1.0.2 being
available for stretch.


At least one of the clusters of packages I'm involved in--shibboleth and
moonshot will require some real upstream porting effort.
That's under way in a time scale that will work for  buster, but is very
unlikely to meet the stretch freeze timeline.

It's possible that resources could be reprioritized and that with a
fairly agressive scramble, we could get things working with OpenSSL 1.1
in time for stretch.
However money and time are finite.
That would take away from other priorities and would have significant
risks in terms of stability.

Debian matters in the larger ecosystems, and we owe it to our upstreams
and our users to decide now whether we're asking people to make those
sort of mad scrambles.
I think we should not.  Regardless, decisions now matter.

Thanks for your consideration,

--Sam



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #989 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:26:11 +0100
On 2016-10-31 11:16:38 [-0400], Sam Hartman wrote:

> At least one of the clusters of packages I'm involved in--shibboleth and
> moonshot will require some real upstream porting effort.
> That's under way in a time scale that will work for  buster, but is very
> unlikely to meet the stretch freeze timeline.

Do you want me to look into moonshot-gss-eap? The other moonshot-* package
with the RC bug won't be part of current testing. I didn't find anything that
matches shibboleth.

> --Sam

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:51:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:51:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #994 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, wferi@niif.hu
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:46:36 -0400
>>>>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> writes:

    Sebastian> On 2016-10-31 11:16:38 [-0400], Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> At least one of the clusters of packages I'm involved
    >> in--shibboleth and moonshot will require some real upstream
    >> porting effort.  That's under way in a time scale that will work
    >> for buster, but is very unlikely to meet the stretch freeze
    >> timeline.

    Sebastian> Do you want me to look into moonshot-gss-eap? The other
    Sebastian> moonshot-* package with the RC bug won't be part of
    Sebastian> current testing. I didn't find anything that matches
    Sebastian> shibboleth.

Hi.
I'm really sorry I didn't get a chance to respond earlier. I was
traveling.
Shibboleth comprises opensaml, xmltooling, heavily depends on
xml-security-c and shibboleth-sp2.
Ferenc Wágner (copied) has been handling the Shibboleth packaging and
has an understanding of where the upstream efforts are.  There's been
discussion on pkg-shibboleth-dev@lists.alioth.debian.org.
The area that I tdon't think anyone has examined in the moonshot cluster
is libradsec, which also depends on libevent fairly heavily.



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 02 Nov 2016 02:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #999 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, wferi@niif.hu
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:30:46 -0700
Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:

> Shibboleth comprises opensaml, xmltooling, heavily depends on
> xml-security-c and shibboleth-sp2.

> Ferenc Wágner (copied) has been handling the Shibboleth packaging and
> has an understanding of where the upstream efforts are.  There's been
> discussion on pkg-shibboleth-dev@lists.alioth.debian.org.

Shibboleth upstream has said that they believe the porting effort to be
substantial, since Shibboleth (specifically the lower-level libraries)
heavily use OpenSSL key management and manipulation APIs that are very
affected by the API change, and because (as security software) the
consequences of making a small error in the API change can be very high.

Upstream is working on the changes and on comprehensive tests to ensure
that the port was done correctly, but their timeline doesn't line up well
with our release freeze.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>



Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828475 Request was from Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> to 828475-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 05 Nov 2016 16:33:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828613 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to 828613-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 05 Nov 2016 17:09:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1008 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 21:59:27 +0100
On 2016-10-26 10:55:19 [+0200], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> So let's do this. Let's try to get it finished and only ship openssl 1.1. We
> still have three months until the full freeze, and depending on how many
> packages (and which ones, for risk management etc) are left to be fixed after
> that, I may be happy to grant exceptions. But worst case we just ship both.

I've been playing with ben. I tried a few things and this is the best I
was able to achieve [0]:

title = "openssl 1.0";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl1.0-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1.0.2/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1.1/;

And

title = "openssl 1.1";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1\.1/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1\.0\.2/;

The first one will keep a list of all packages that want to stay with
1.0.2. The bad state of the second tracker should keep track of
everything that needs action.
You might also want to add [1] if you think it is usefull here.

I noticed that people close the bug referenced in [1] and stay with
1.0.2. Shouldn't they just unblock this transition bug and downgrade
severity to important?

[0] it seems ben can't match something like ".build-depends ~
    /libssl-dev/ & .depends ~ /libssl1.0.2/" but this would allow to
    keep everything in one page.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=openssl-1.1-trans;users=pkg-openssl-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org

> Cheers,
> Emilio

Sebastian



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 843532 Request was from Ondřej Surý <ondrej@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:33:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835801 Request was from Andreas Henriksson <andreas@fatal.se> to 835801-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:15:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828236 Request was from Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 12 Nov 2016 06:48:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Marked as found in versions 0.30-1. Request was from gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:39:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


No longer marked as found in versions 0.30-1. Request was from gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:45:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828408 Request was from gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 12 Nov 2016 20:45:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828247 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Nov 2016 06:18:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 843988 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Nov 2016 08:15:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828613 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Nov 2016 10:00:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844254 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Nov 2016 20:21:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828299 Request was from kurt@roeckx.be (Kurt Roeckx) to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Nov 2016 20:27:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844345; removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828245, 828479, 829452, 828463, 828317, 828316, 828616, 828252, 828503, 828372, 828244, 828401, 828518, 828619, 828530, 828237, 828482, 828230, 828595, 828488, 828302, 844254, 828283, 828436, 843988, 828509, 828233, 828583, 828618, 828490, 828552, 828506, 828562, 836419, 828493, 828610, 828241, 828142, 828338, 828229, 828500, 828507, 828519, 828434, 828375, 828385, 828246, 828569, 828487, 828294, 828443, 828354, 828418, 828388, 828521, 828334, 828402, 828597, 822380, 828355, 828291, 828259, 828510, 828582, 828399, 828494, 828273, 828466, 828576, 828456, 828566, 828281, 828472, 828348, 828429, 828378, 828551, 828570, 828228, 828481, 828376, 828280, 828421, 828312, 828250, 828373, 828303, 828416, 828269, 827076, 828558, 828451, 828290, 828256, 828442, 828363, 828431, 828403, 828370, 835800, 828533, 828346, 828331, 828314, 828420, 828565, 835811, 828339, 828393, 828255, 828271, 828497, 828300, 828238, 828541, 828254, 828428, 828382, 835785, 828465, 828381, 828243, 828353, 828417, 835549, 828426, 828563, 828460, 828607, 828547, 828612, 828359, 829465, 828332, 814600, 828531, 828358, 835804, 828535, 828318, 828580, 828325, 828505, 828608, 828268, 828260, 828430, 828540, 828529, 828352, 828361, 828349, 828435, 828603, 828305, 828491, 828347, 828379, 828409, 828606, 828467, 828520, 828422, 828585, 828532, 828411, 828413, 828450, 828555, 828380, 827068, 828611, 828545, 828319, 828248, 828083, 828323, 828613, 828343, 828326, 828557, 828282, 828538, 828335, 828474, 828249, 828438, 828313, 828553, 828357, 828311, 835796, 828498, 828550, 828528, 835797, 828405, 828257, 828389, 828544, 828377, 828526, 828356, 828286, 828333, 828448, 828251, 828384, 835789, 828455, 828253, 828367, 828586, 828309, 828307, 828513, 812166, 828412, 828298, 828277, 828452, 828620, 828512, 828321, 828508, 828468, 828304, 828396, 828483, 828235, 835798, 828527, 835585, 828584, 828560, 828292, 828601, 828453, 828447, 828484, 828539, 828549, 828264, 828615, 828554, 828588, 828459, 828499, 828564, 828278, 828139, 828471, 828476, 828534, 835794, 835786, 828444, 828263, 828596, 828600, 828446, 828289, 828495, 828605, 828477, 828262, 828458, 828232, 828324, 828567, 828502, 828470, 828604, 828577, 828454, 828573, 828516, 828478, 828295, 828511, 828240, 828329, 828579, 841635, 828609, 828485, 828315, 828536, 828279, 828337, 828297, 828265, 828445, 828275, 828082, 828424, 828599, 835793, 828441, 828365, 828242, 828306, 828575, 828590, 828340, 828395, 828449, 828266, 828328, 828515, 828568, 828127, 828457, 828383, 828574, 828320, 828602, 828276, 828360, 828523, 828617, 828414, 828556, 828410, 828437, 828296, 828561, 828407, 828546, 828270, 828351, 828578, 828394, 828350, 828390, 809271, 828504, 828404, 828571, 835790, 828537, 828287, 828592, 828342, 828461, 828341, 828598, 828591, 828336, 828371, 828330, 828517, 828397, 828293, 828368, 828425, 828548, 828464, 828415, 828386, 828433, 828614, 828327, 828234, 828496, 828542, 837960, 828285, 828374, 828440, 828344, 828587, 828406, 828439, 828267, 828392, 828261, 843532, 828231, 828427, 828522, 828489, 828473, 828581, 828284, 828387, 828469, 828525, 828301, 828572, 828239, 828345, 828366, 828501, 828593, 835799, 828589, 828524, 828364, 828432, 828398, 828362, 828492, 828391, 828288, 828258, 828480, 828310, 828322, 828543, 828419, 828274, 828308, 828594, 828559, 828272, 828369, 828462, 828423, 828400, 808669, 828514, and 828486 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:03:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844345 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:06:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844271, 844345, 844347, and 844311 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828381, 828460, 835549, 828238, 828497, 828472, 828551, 835796, 828562, 828252, 828283, 828290, 828417, 828331, 828607, 828518, 828428, 828565, 828479, 828426, 828271, 828509, 844254, 828533, 828338, 828388, 828500, 828507, 828403, 828610, 828358, 828618, 828465, 828348, 835800, 828420, 828443, 828376, 828583, 828487, 828416, 828576, 828442, 828294, 828393, 828378, 828300, 828434, 828451, 828481, 828259, 828281, 828458, 843532, 828541, 828230, 829452, 828312, 828490, 828431, 828370, 828334, 822380, 828382, 828506, 828256, 828597, 828318, 828482, 828250, 828466, 828612, 827076, 828570, 828510, 828375, 828418, 828582, 828245, 828291, 828429, 828373, 828317, 828244, 835785, 828354, 828353, 828241, 828463, 828401, 828619, 828558, 828503, 828329, 828254, 828547, 828314, 828493, 828456, 828595, 828269, 828233, 828402, 828521, 828229, 828355, 828346, 828302, 828363, 843988, 828616, 828339, 828530, 836419, 828316, 828142, 828566, 828399, 828332, 828273, 828372, 828280, 828359, 828228, 814600, 828255, 828563, 835804, 828552, 828246, 828385, 828243, 828519, 828237, 828535, 828421, 828569, 828436, 828488, 829465, 828531, 828494, 835811, and 828303 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:54:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828580, 828608, 828505, 828430, 828260, 828529, 828268, 828352, 828325, and 828540 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828435, 828347, 828491, 828361, 828606, 828349, 828603, 828305, 828409, and 828379 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828411, 828532, 828413, 828555, 828450, 828520, 828467, 828585, 828380, and 828422 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 827068, 828545, 828319, 828323, 828083, 828326, 828613, 828611, 828343, and 828248 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828474, 828249, 828438, 828282, 828335, 828357, 828557, 828538, 828553, and 828313 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:35 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828311, 828550, 828544, 828528, 828257, 828389, 828405, 835797, and 828498 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828292, 828560, 835798, 828601, 828453, 828447, 835585, 828584, 828484, and 828527 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828365, 828441, 835793, 828445, 828265, 828599, 828297, 828275, 828082, 828424, and 828276 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:44 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828549, 828499, 828264, 828539, 828459, 828588, 828615, 828564, 828278, and 828554 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828306, 828449, 828340, 828395, 828328, 828515, 828575, 828590, 828266, and 828242 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835790, 828350, 828390, 828351, 828578, 828394, 828404, 828504, 809271, and 828571 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:57 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 837960, 828433, 828285, 828542, 828440, 828234, 828327, 828496, 828614, and 828374 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:00:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828473, 828572, 828301, 828489, 828284, 828525, 828469, 828581, 828387, and 828522 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828386, 828517, 828464, 828293, 828548, 828425, 828368, 828397, 828330, and 828415 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828559, 828274, 828462, 828419, 828272, 828369, 828308, 828423, 828400, and 828594 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 808669, 828514, and 828486 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828477, 828289, 828605, 828262, 828446, 828324, 828232, 828567, and 828495 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828356, 828526, 828455, 828286, 828333, 828476, 828251, 828448, 835789, 828377, and 828384 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828600, 828534, 828263, 828444, 835786, 828471, 835794, 828596, and 828139 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:01:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828304, 828468, 828483, 828235, 828512, 828396, 828620, 828508, 828452, and 828321 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828587, 828267, 828439, 828392, 828406, 828344, 828261, 828231, and 828427 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828337, 828315, 828536, 828485, 828240, 841635, 828609, 828279, and 828579 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828568, 828457, 828383, 828360, 828523, 828574, 828127, 828320, and 828602 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828287, 828591, 828592, 828598, 828537, 828341, 828342, 828336, 828461, and 828371 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828617, 828407, 828414, 828270, 828296, 828556, 828561, 828437, 828546, and 828410 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828577, 828454, 828295, 828516, 828573, 828511, 828478, 828470, 828604, and 828502 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 835799, 828345, 828589, 828432, 828593, 828501, 828239, 828364, 828524, and 828366 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828398, 828362, 828480, 828288, 828258, 828322, 828391, 828310, 828543, and 828492 Request was from Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 14 Nov 2016 23:09:46 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1101 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>, <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, <827061@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:16:22 +0000
Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
> Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
...
> Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307

812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.

Did you get the wrong bug ?

Ian.



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:42:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1106 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Apollon Oikonomopoulos <apoikos@debian.org>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>, pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:39:25 +0100
Hi Ian,

On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> > 
> > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
> > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> ...
> > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
> 
> 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> 
> Did you get the wrong bug ?

I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
#812166 was previously a blocker[1].

On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
#827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].

Regards,
Apollon

[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=877 
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=1032
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061;mbox=yes;msg=921



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:27:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:27:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1111 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:25:44 +0100
On 2016-11-15 12:39:25 [+0100], Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> Hi Ian,
Hi,

> On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> > 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> > I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> > 
> > Did you get the wrong bug ?
> 
> I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
> accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
> #812166 was previously a blocker[1].

Xen (#812166) is (was) listed as a blocker because it depends on
`openssl' and according to the bug it can't be build. It could be
possible that Xen fails to build due to incompatible changes in the
openssl binary. The rebuild also included the linux package which passed
(so it is possible that Xen passes, too).

> On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].
The blocker are removed due to #820044.

> Regards,
> Apollon

Sebastian



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844301 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:27:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1118 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: <pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, <827061@bugs.debian.org>, <812166@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:33:02 +0000
Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc3-0exp1
Control: fixed 812166 4.8.0~rc5-1
Control: unblock 827061 by 812166
Control: clone 812166 -2
Control: retitle -2 consider dropping libssl-dev build-dep
Control: severity -2 normal

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes ("Re: Bug#827061: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> Xen (#812166) is (was) listed as a blocker because it depends on
> `openssl' and according to the bug it can't be build. It could be
> possible that Xen fails to build due to incompatible changes in the
> openssl binary. The rebuild also included the linux package which passed
> (so it is possible that Xen passes, too).

Thanks for looking at this.  What you say make sense.

I see that Xen does indeed Build-Depend on libssl-dev.  However, none
of the binary packages Depend on anything containing `ssl'.  I think
the libssl check in configure.ac and the corresponding libssl-dev
build-dep is cruft.  I'm investigating.

So in fact I think, despite appearances, neither src:xen nor any of
the binaries it generates is entangled with openssl.

Anyway, #812166 was fixed upstream in 4.7.0 anyway, so is fixed in
sid/stretch.  I'm closing that bug with this message.

Thanks,
Ian.



Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166 Request was from Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> to 827061-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:36:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166 Request was from Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com> to 812166-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to owner@bugs.debian.org:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1127 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>, pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:28:55 -0600
On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:

> Hi Ian,
> 
> On 11:16 Tue 15 Nov     , Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Debian Bug Tracking System writes ("Processed (with 1 error): block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277"):
> > > Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> > > 
> > > > block 827061 with 828253 828367 828586 828309 828307 828513 812166 828412 828298 828277
> > > Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
> > ...
> > > Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 812166, 828586, 828277, 828367, 828298, 828253, 828309, 828412, 828513, and 828307
> > 
> > 812166 is nothing to do with openssl AFAICT.
> > I don't think Xen is involved with the openssl transition.
> > 
> > Did you get the wrong bug ?
> 
> I'm terribly sorry for this mess. I re-added the block that was 
> accidentally removed after cloning(!) #828286, and it appears that 
> #812166 was previously a blocker[1].
> 
> On a side note, I have no idea why the BTS removed all blocking bugs on 
> #827061 after cloning just one of them, and it turns out it did so on 
> two occasions, my clone[2] and Adrian's one[3].

Hrm; that's not supposed to happen.

Let me check that out and see if I can fix it.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

Information wants to be free to kill again.
 -- Red Robot http://www.dieselsweeties.com/archive.php?s=1372



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844031 Request was from Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:12:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844031 Request was from Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844534 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844503 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 17 Nov 2016 19:48:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844664 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 843871 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844663 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:09:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844706 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:30:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844366 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:27:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844303 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to 844303-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 843682 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844213 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 18 Nov 2016 20:00:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844949 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:03:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844926 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:03:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844948 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:04:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844945 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:04:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844947 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:04:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844951 Request was from Filip Pytloun <filip@pytloun.cz> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 09:04:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844906 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:51:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844916 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:51:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844920 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:51:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844904 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:51:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844833 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 13:57:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828353 Request was from Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff-webhosting.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:09:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828545 Request was from Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff-webhosting.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:21:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828545 Request was from Jörg Frings-Fürst <debian@jff-webhosting.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844907 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:36:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844234 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:36:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 845106, 845016, and 845030 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:54:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 01:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 01:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1190 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org>
To: 827061@bugs.debian.org, 827061-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: transition: openssl - will both 1.0.x and 1.1.x be in Stretch?
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 17:15:26 -0800
Hi,

I'm maintaining two packages affected by this transition. So far, I've
just been monitoring the situation, as I share many of the concerns that
have been raised on -devel.

Is it an acceptable solution to instead build-depend on libbsl1.0-dev,
downgrade the severity of the FTBFS with 1.1.0 bug to important, and
unblock the transition by it?

Many thanks and regards
Afif

-- 
Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
http://afif.ghraoui.name



Message sent on to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Bug#827061. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 01:18:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844975 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to 844975-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:42:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844936 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to 844936-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:45:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844877 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:51:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844931 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:09:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844928 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to 844928-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844909 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:45:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844845 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:09:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844018, 843852, 844800, 844838, and 844870 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828557 Request was from Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> to 828557-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:36:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828481 Request was from Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org> to 828481-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828312 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to 828312-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:06:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828329 and 827076 Request was from Afif Elghraoui <afif@debian.org> to 828329-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:39:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1222 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: Please commit to OpenSSL 1.0.2 in stretch now not constantly re-evaluateing
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 07:35:00 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Sam Hartman:
> 
> My understanding of the current plan is that we're adding openssl 1.1.0
> to unstable, but will make a decision about whether to drop libssl1.0.2
> later.
> 
> That's really frustrating for the rest of the ecosystem--our users and
> our upstreams, and I'd ask the release team to commit now to 1.0.2 being
> available for stretch.
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> Debian matters in the larger ecosystems, and we owe it to our upstreams
> and our users to decide now whether we're asking people to make those
> sort of mad scrambles.
> I think we should not.  Regardless, decisions now matter.
> 
> Thanks for your consideration,
> 
> --Sam
> 

Hi Sam,

openssl/1.0.2 will remaining in stretch and will be available to the
subset of packages that are infeasible to port to openssl/1.1 in time
for stretch.  All parties promoting ssl1.1 as default for stretch assume
that there will be packages left requiring ssl1.0.2.

We still urge people to support openssl/1.1 where it is feasible and
reasonable to port their packages.  openssl/1.0.2 is in the low/old end
of "modern cryptography" and the openssl maintainers are not willing to
deviate from upstream supported features on that aspect.

Thanks,
~Niels



[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 845729 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 26 Nov 2016 09:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 846113 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:51:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828327 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to 828327-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828413 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:30:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 30 Nov 2016 18:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1235 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:43:36 +0100
On 2016-11-05 21:59:27 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I've been playing with ben. I tried a few things and this is the best I
> was able to achieve [0]:
> 
> title = "openssl 1.0";
> is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl1.0-dev/;
> is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1.0.2/;
> is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1.1/;
> 
> And
> 
> title = "openssl 1.1";
> is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl-dev/;
> is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1\.1/;
> is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1\.0\.2/;

This does not cover packages which link against 1.0.2 but do not depend
on libssl-dev (but inherit their dependencies).
So it is up to you what you setup but something should be done because
the auto tracker is gone.

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:57:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:57:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1240 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 00:52:59 +0200
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 07:43:36PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-11-05 21:59:27 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I've been playing with ben. I tried a few things and this is the best I
> > was able to achieve [0]:
> > 
> > title = "openssl 1.0";
> > is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl1.0-dev/;
> > is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1.0.2/;
> > is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1.1/;
> > 
> > And
> > 
> > title = "openssl 1.1";
> > is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libssl-dev/;
> > is_good = .depends ~ /libssl1\.1/;
> > is_bad = .depends ~ /libssl1\.0\.2/;
> 
> This does not cover packages which link against 1.0.2 but do not depend
> on libssl-dev (but inherit their dependencies).
> So it is up to you what you setup but something should be done because
> the auto tracker is gone.

Wouldn't "depends on libssl1.0.2 and does not build-depend on libssl1.0-dev"
give a reasonably small superset of all packages that need a binNMU?

> Sebastian

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed




Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844303 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 06:48:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828142 Request was from Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 07:15:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1249 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 21:15:44 +0100
On 2016-12-01 00:52:59 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Wouldn't "depends on libssl1.0.2 and does not build-depend on libssl1.0-dev"
> give a reasonably small superset of all packages that need a binNMU?

Do you mean something like
 is_affected = .depends ~ /libssl1\.0\.2/ & ! .build-depends ~ /libssl1.0-dev/;

which results in [0] ? This gives you all packages with a B-D libssl-dev
and D libssl1.0.2 like [1] but also lists package which do not depend on
libssl-dev.
Otherwise please give a ben config and will add it.

[0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-trans/html/openssl_need_upload.html
[1] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-trans/html/openssl.html

> cu
> Adrian

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 21:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1254 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:08:09 +0200
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:15:44PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-12-01 00:52:59 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Wouldn't "depends on libssl1.0.2 and does not build-depend on libssl1.0-dev"
> > give a reasonably small superset of all packages that need a binNMU?
> 
> Do you mean something like
>  is_affected = .depends ~ /libssl1\.0\.2/ & ! .build-depends ~ /libssl1.0-dev/;
> 
> which results in [0] ? This gives you all packages with a B-D libssl-dev
> and D libssl1.0.2 like [1] but also lists package which do not depend on
> libssl-dev.
>...

Yes, that's what I had in mind.

Note that this is a superset of all packages requiring binNMUs,
and it is not expected to become all-green in stretch.

> Sebastian

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed




Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828245 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828498 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 01 Dec 2016 22:39:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828483 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:03:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828522 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 07 Dec 2016 22:27:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828266 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 09 Dec 2016 20:42:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:12:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:12:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1269 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl: Unrelated updates to rdep packages?
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 14:08:02 +0100
Hi,

On 10/26/2016 10:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed

I have a quick question now that the transition is ongoing: is it OK
for me to upload a new version of open-isns (B-D: libssl-dev) that's
unrelated to this transition? (New upstream version, some debconf
translations; all severity <= normal.) Both OpenSSL 1.1 and 1.0 have
migrated to testing a while back, and open-isns compiles with either
one of those (though it hasn't been binNMU'd yet), so I don't think
this will cause any problems - but the text in the package tracker
says I should wait with unrelated uploads until the transition is
completed, so I thought I'd ask first.

Thanks!

Regards,
Christian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 10 Dec 2016 14:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 10 Dec 2016 14:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1274 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl: Unrelated updates to rdep packages?
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 15:17:36 +0100
On 10/12/16 14:08, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/26/2016 10:55 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> I have a quick question now that the transition is ongoing: is it OK
> for me to upload a new version of open-isns (B-D: libssl-dev) that's
> unrelated to this transition? (New upstream version, some debconf
> translations; all severity <= normal.) Both OpenSSL 1.1 and 1.0 have
> migrated to testing a while back, and open-isns compiles with either
> one of those (though it hasn't been binNMU'd yet), so I don't think
> this will cause any problems - but the text in the package tracker
> says I should wait with unrelated uploads until the transition is
> completed, so I thought I'd ask first.

Yes, that is fine.

We should probably update the transition trackers so they aren't exported and
the PTS doesn't show that warning (export = false in the .ben files).

Cheers,
Emilio



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844836 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 11 Dec 2016 00:21:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 844815 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 11 Dec 2016 00:27:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828477 Request was from Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <agi@inittab.org> to 828477-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828513 Request was from Hilmar Preuße <hille42@web.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:57:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 846769 Request was from Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 14 Dec 2016 18:00:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828471 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to 828471-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 17 Dec 2016 20:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 848680 Request was from Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:06:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 848681 Request was from Sam Hartman <hartmans@mit.edu> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:06:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850882, 850880, 850883, and 850881 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:51:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850886 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:03:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850886 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:03:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850888 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:06:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850888 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:06:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850890 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:21:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850890 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:21:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828560 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:21:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828520 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:33:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828273 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:33:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850894 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:36:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850894 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:36:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850895 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:39:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850895 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:39:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828441 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:39:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850896 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:45:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850896 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828425 and 828332 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:45:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850897 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:48:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850897 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:48:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850898 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 850898 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:51:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 848680 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 10 Jan 2017 21:51:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851054 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:21:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851054 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:21:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851073 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851073 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851074 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851074 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851075 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851075 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:36 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851076 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851076 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851077 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851077 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:09:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851080 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:10:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851081 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:10:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851082 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:10:37 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851083 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:10:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851084 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:10:58 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851085 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851086 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851087 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851088 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851089 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:49 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851090 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:11:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851091 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:12:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851092 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2017 23:12:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851084 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828451 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828486 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851080 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851081 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851082 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851083 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851085 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851086 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851087 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851088 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851089 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851091 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:23 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851092 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828572 Request was from Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:06:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851424 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:15:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851424 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:15:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851090 Request was from Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 15 Jan 2017 11:36:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:39:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 28 Jan 2017 18:39:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1427 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 19:37:09 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 20:59:53 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> 
> I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> 
At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast.
With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big
risk for the stretch release.

I believe we should cut our losses, go back to shipping libssl-dev as
1.0.2 for stretch, and rebuild the world.  I think this is 1) less work
than actually getting ourselves out of the current mess, and 2) likely
to get us to a better state for stretch users, who won't have to deal
with half the archive's -dev package indirectly conflicting with the
other half.

I'm willing to prepare a new openssl1.0 package to take over libssl-dev
and openssl binaries.

Cheers,
Julien
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 853778 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:45:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 853778 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:45:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 848681 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 19:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828449 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to 828449-submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 853782 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 853782 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:33:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:09:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:09:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1444 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
To: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 19:04:28 +0100
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:37:09PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 20:59:53 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> 
> > OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> > soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> > 
> > I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> > like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> > after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> > 
> At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast.
> With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big
> risk for the stretch release.

Why? The last time I saw it status it was down to something like
five packages in question.

What new RC bugs related to the transition?

Cheers,
        Moritz



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:21:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 01 Feb 2017 21:21:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1449 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:18:07 +0100
On 2017-01-28 19:37:09 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote:
> At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast.
> With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big
> risk for the stretch release.

I rebuild testing, with the subset of:
 grep-dctrl -FDepends libssl1.0.2 Packages -sSource -n | awk '{print $1}' > List
 grep-dctrl -FDepends libssl1.1 Packages -sSource -n | awk '{print $1}' >> List
 grep-dctrl -FDepends openssl Packages -sSource -n | awk '{print $1}' >> List
 grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep -w libssl-dev -o -w openssl Sources -sPackage -n >> List
 grep-dctrl -FBuild-Depends,Build-Depends-Indep -w libssl1.0-dev Sources -sPackage -n >> List

as of today. The result is at [0]. Let me go over results of the failed
packages:
- bind9 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10.1
  1.1 issue, unstable has 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-11 with libssl1.0-dev

- boxbackup_0.11.1~r2837-4
  parallel issue?

- clamav 0.99.2+dfsg-5
  #852894, curl related

- erlang 1:19.2.1+dfsg-1
  parallel issue?

- gridsite 2.3.2-2
  /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgridsite
  unstable has newer version

- gvpe 2.25-3
  missing zlib-dev, #850983, unstable has fixed version

- httest 2.4.8-1.1
  1.1 issue, unstable has 2.4.18-1.1 with libssl1.0-dev

- kamailio 4.4.4-1
  missing dependcy, #852905, unstable has fixed version

- kannel 1.4.4-4 
  parallel issue?

- kannel-sqlbox 0.7.2-4 
  parallel issue?

- lcmaps-plugins-verify-proxy 1.5.4-2
  1.1 issue, unstable has fixed version

- lcmaps-plugins-voms 1.6.2-2
  1.1 issue, unstable has fixed version

- m2crypto 0.24.0-1
  1.1 issue, no fix yet (#827068)

- mailsync 5.2.2-3.1
  parallel?

- mongodb 1:3.2.11-2
  testsuite killed

- netkit-telnet-ssl 0.17.41+0.2-2
  parallel?

- nmh 1.6-16 
  most of testsuite fails?

- nova 2:14.0.0-3
  testsuite fails?

- ntp 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2
  not openssl related, fixed in unstable, #851803

- openvswitch 2.6.2~pre+git20161223-3 
  testsuite failure, probably due to br0 on the test box.

- php7.0 7.0.14-2
  curl check, unstable has the fixed version

- postfix 3.1.4-3
  parallel?

- pure-ftpd 1.0.43-3
  parallel?

- pyrit 0.4.0-7
  parallel? testsuite

- python-asyncssh
  testsuite, X?

- qtwebsockets-opensource-src 5.7.1~20161021-4
  testsuite failed

- r-cran-rsclient 0.7-3-2 
  parallel?

- rserve 1.7-3-3
  parallel?

- ruby2.3 2.3.3-1
  parallel?, testsuite failure, maybe harmless

- sbsigntool 0.6-3.1 
  linker failre, unstable has fixed, #842446

- swi-prolog 7.2.3+dfsg-5
  fails the testsuite, #852892

- sx 2.0+ds-3 
  fails the testsuite, #852888 

- krat 1:2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6.1
  parallel?

- tpm-tools 1.3.8-2
  1.1 related, looks like two RC bugs related

- vde2 2.3.2+r586-2.1
  parallal?

- wpa 2.5-2+v2.4-3
  1.1 related, unstable should be fixed.

Currently I am rebuilding testing with the same set of package against
libssl-dev provided by libssl1.0-dev. After that I retry the failed
packages above where I am not sure why they failed (mostly I suspect the
parallel) case.
Do you want a complete testing rebuild or another set of packages?
 
[0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing/

> Cheers,
> Julien

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:57:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1454 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:54:08 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:18:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> - boxbackup_0.11.1~r2837-4
>   parallel issue?
> - erlang 1:19.2.1+dfsg-1
>   parallel issue?
> - kannel 1.4.4-4 
>   parallel issue?
> - kannel-sqlbox 0.7.2-4 
>   parallel issue?
> - mailsync 5.2.2-3.1
>   parallel?
> - netkit-telnet-ssl 0.17.41+0.2-2
>   parallel?
> - postfix 3.1.4-3
>   parallel?
> - pure-ftpd 1.0.43-3
>   parallel?
> - pyrit 0.4.0-7
>   parallel? testsuite
> - r-cran-rsclient 0.7-3-2 
>   parallel?
> - rserve 1.7-3-3
>   parallel?
> - krat 1:2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6.1
>   parallel?
 
I'm surprised to see that many packages failing to build in parallel, as we're
building everything in parallel and I dont remember such failures recentl.y

You can go to http://reproducible.debian.net/$srcpkgname and see for yourself
whether they build fine in our environment. If they do, you can rule out
"parallel" as causing this…


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:12:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1459 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:09:56 +0100
On 2017-02-02 16:54:08 [+0000], Holger Levsen wrote:
>  
> I'm surprised to see that many packages failing to build in parallel, as we're
> building everything in parallel and I dont remember such failures recentl.y

So retried them with -j1 [0] and:
- passed:
 boxbackup 0.11.1~r2837-4
 erlang 19.2.1+dfsg-1
 gridsite 2.3.2-3
 kannel-sqlbox 0.7.2-4
 kannel 1.4.4-4
 mailsync 5.2.2-3.1
 netkit-telnet-ssl 0.17.41+0.2-2
 nmh 1.6-16
 postfix 3.1.4-3
 pure-ftpd 1.0.43-3
 qtwebsockets-opensource-src 5.7.1~20161021-4
 r-cran-rsclient 0.7-3-2
 rserve 1.7-3-3
 vde2 2.3.2+r586-2.1

- still failing:
 mongodb 3.2.11-2
 nova 14.0.0-3
 openvswitch 2.6.2~pre+git20161223-3
 pyrit 0.4.0-7
 python-asyncssh 1.8.1-2
 ruby2.3 2.3.3-1

and the failing ones do not look obvious.

[0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-retry/

> You can go to http://reproducible.debian.net/$srcpkgname and see for yourself
> whether they build fine in our environment. If they do, you can rule out
> "parallel" as causing this…

I see. I looked at kannel. The -j1 version:

|sed "s/#FIGTYPE#/.png/;s/#VERSION#/1.4.4/;s/#DATE#/2016-12-03/;s/#DRAFTS#/IGNORE/" doc/wtls/wtls.xml > doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
|openjade -V nochunks -t sgml -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/html/docbook.dsl /usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl doc/wtls/wtls.tmp > doc/wtls/wtls.html
|rm -f doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
…
|sed "s/#FIGTYPE#/.ps/;s/#VERSION#/1.4.4/;s/#DATE#/2016-12-03/;s/#DRAFTS#/IGNORE/" doc/wtls/wtls.xml > doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
|cd `dirname doc/wtls/wtls.xml` && openjade -o `basename doc/wtls/wtls`.rtf -t rtf -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl /usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl `basename doc/wtls/wtls`.tmp
|rm -f doc/wtls/wtls.tmp

and the -j16:
|sed "s/#FIGTYPE#/.png/;s/#VERSION#/1.4.4/;s/#DATE#/2016-12-03/;s/#DRAFTS#/IGNORE/" doc/wtls/wtls.xml > doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
|openjade -o doc/wtls/wtls.tex -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl /usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
|openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/dbttlpg.dsl:2722:6:E: flow object not accepted by port; only display flow objects accepted
|openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/dbttlpg.dsl:2722:6:E: flow object not accepted by port; only display flow objects accepted
|openjade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/dbttlpg.dsl:2722:6:E: flow object not accepted by port; only display flow objects accepted
|rm -f doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
|openjade -o doc/alligata/alligata.tex -t tex -d /usr/share/sgml/docbook/stylesheet/dsssl/modular/print/docbook.dsl /usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl doc/alligata/alligata.tmp
|rm -f doc/wtls/wtls.tmp
…
|ranlib libwmlscript.a
|openjade:E: cannot find "doc/wtls/wtls.tmp"; tried "doc/wtls/wtls.tmp", "/usr/local/share/sgml/doc/wtls/wtls.tmp", "/usr/share/sgml/doc/wtls/wtls.tmp"
|openjade:/usr/share/xml/declaration/xml.dcl:190:1:E: end of document in prolog
|rm -f doc/wtls/wtls.tmp

That "flow object not accepted by port" seems not to be the issue but
the fact, that wtls.tmp is reused and probably removed too early.

> -- 
> cheers,
> 	Holger

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:30:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:30:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1464 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:26:35 +0200
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:09:56PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>...
> > You can go to http://reproducible.debian.net/$srcpkgname and see for yourself
> > whether they build fine in our environment. If they do, you can rule out
> > "parallel" as causing this…
> 
> I see. I looked at kannel. The -j1 version:
>...
> That "flow object not accepted by port" seems not to be the issue but
> the fact, that wtls.tmp is reused and probably removed too early.

The kannel package does not claim to support parallel building.

If you attempt parallel building on that,
then any build failures are your fault.

> Sebastian

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 02 Feb 2017 20:51:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1469 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:49:15 +0100
On 2017-02-02 22:26:35 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The kannel package does not claim to support parallel building.
> 
> If you attempt parallel building on that,
> then any build failures are your fault.

what is wrong with passing -j16 to sbuild? Other packages, that do not
support parallel building, don't do it.

> cu
> Adrian

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 00:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1474 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 00:22:55 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:49:15PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> what is wrong with passing -j16 to sbuild? Other packages, that do not
> support parallel building, don't do it.

yeah, exactly.


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 12:48:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 12:48:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1479 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:45:11 +0100
On 2017-02-01 22:18:07 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Currently I am rebuilding testing with the same set of package against
> libssl-dev provided by libssl1.0-dev. After that I retry the failed
> packages above where I am not sure why they failed (mostly I suspect the
> parallel) case.
> Do you want a complete testing rebuild or another set of packages?

it is at [0] and a retry of all failed with -j1 at [1]. I had just a
quick look:
- perl fails in the test suite but that ist "okay". It builds against
  1.0 but it B-D are built against 1.1 and perl exposes the openssl ABI
  as-is. So rebuilding it in the right order should avoid it.

- a few packages like cfengine3, ldns, freelan, duo-unix, dogecoin,
  dsniff and cyrus-sasl2 seem like they compile with 1.1 but do not
  compile against 1.0 since they expect 1.1 functions to be around.
  There may be more, I had a quick look. The build succeeded with 1.1
  earlier.

- some of globus-* and lcmaps-* packages fail and I am not sure if they
  can't deal with 1.0 anymore or if it is similar to perl where
  everything has to be moved to 1.0 in the right order.

[0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0/
[1] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0-retry/

> > Cheers,
> > Julien

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 03 Feb 2017 14:09:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1484 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:08:08 +0100
JFTR cyrus-sasl2 should not fail with openssl 1.0, so I'll fix that
quickly if needed.

O.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
Knot Resolver (https://www.knot-resolver.cz/) – secure, privacy-aware,
fast DNS(SEC) resolver
Vše pro chleba (https://vseprochleba.cz) – Mouky ze mlýna a potřeby pro
pečení chleba všeho druhu

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017, at 13:45, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-02-01 22:18:07 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Currently I am rebuilding testing with the same set of package against
> > libssl-dev provided by libssl1.0-dev. After that I retry the failed
> > packages above where I am not sure why they failed (mostly I suspect the
> > parallel) case.
> > Do you want a complete testing rebuild or another set of packages?
> 
> it is at [0] and a retry of all failed with -j1 at [1]. I had just a
> quick look:
> - perl fails in the test suite but that ist "okay". It builds against
>   1.0 but it B-D are built against 1.1 and perl exposes the openssl ABI
>   as-is. So rebuilding it in the right order should avoid it.
> 
> - a few packages like cfengine3, ldns, freelan, duo-unix, dogecoin,
>   dsniff and cyrus-sasl2 seem like they compile with 1.1 but do not
>   compile against 1.0 since they expect 1.1 functions to be around.
>   There may be more, I had a quick look. The build succeeded with 1.1
>   earlier.
> 
> - some of globus-* and lcmaps-* packages fail and I am not sure if they
>   can't deal with 1.0 anymore or if it is similar to perl where
>   everything has to be moved to 1.0 in the right order.
> 
> [0]
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0/
> [1]
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-rebuild/2017-02-01-rebuild-testing-against-openssl1.0-retry/
> 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Julien
> 
> Sebastian



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854253 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 05 Feb 2017 14:03:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854257 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 05 Feb 2017 14:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854468 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:36:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854470 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:45:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854583 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:45:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 854583 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:45:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 846908 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 08 Feb 2017 19:18:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 855007 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 13 Feb 2017 07:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1505 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: "Package Development List for OpenSSL packages." <pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:28:33 +0100
On 2017-01-28 19:37:09 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote:
> At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast.
> With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big
> risk for the stretch release.

Where do we stand on the openssl transition from the perspective of
people who think it is not done yet?

The transition tracker for 1.0 shows three packages red. They depend on
"libssl-dev | libssl1.0-dev" and it builds against 1.1. Do want them to
decide properly?

The transition tracker for 1.1 shows 11 packages. Except for pyrit all
are out of testing and have more than just one RC bug which is not
relevant to the transition. And pyrit just didn't make it on i386.

There are 78 packages in the unkown state. The first few I looked could
actually have their libssl-dev dependency dropped. khtml is the first
one which looked wrong. I will open a bug about that later. I didn't get
any further yet.

> Cheers,
> Julien

Sebastian



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:51:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:51:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1510 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>, 827061@bugs.debian.org, "Package Development List for OpenSSL packages." <pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Cc: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:46:56 +0100
On 22/02/17 00:28, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-01-28 19:37:09 [+0100], Julien Cristau wrote:
>> At this point, it seems clear to me that we're getting nowhere fast.
>> With the freeze looming in a few days, this is growing to be a very big
>> risk for the stretch release.
> 
> Where do we stand on the openssl transition from the perspective of
> people who think it is not done yet?
> 
> The transition tracker for 1.0 shows three packages red. They depend on
> "libssl-dev | libssl1.0-dev" and it builds against 1.1. Do want them to
> decide properly?

I think that's alright.

> The transition tracker for 1.1 shows 11 packages. Except for pyrit all
> are out of testing and have more than just one RC bug which is not
> relevant to the transition. And pyrit just didn't make it on i386.

Hopefully it gets fixed, but otherwise it's not a key package so it will
eventually get dropped from testing.

> There are 78 packages in the unkown state. The first few I looked could
> actually have their libssl-dev dependency dropped. khtml is the first
> one which looked wrong. I will open a bug about that later. I didn't get
> any further yet.

Thanks. Investigating the rest would be good. I guess most of those are just for
build-depends, but if there are any with bad depends (e.g. some -dev package
unnecessarily depending on libssl*-dev) it'd be good to fix that for stretch,
because of the conflicting libssl dev packages.

Sounds like things are under control now. The concern of -dev packages not being
co-installable is a valid one, but I guess we'll have to live with that.

Thanks,
Emilio



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:39:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 24 Feb 2017 08:39:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1515 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, "Package Development List for OpenSSL packages." <pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:34:49 +0100
On 2017-02-22 00:46:56 [+0100], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > There are 78 packages in the unkown state. The first few I looked could
> > actually have their libssl-dev dependency dropped. khtml is the first
> > one which looked wrong. I will open a bug about that later. I didn't get
> > any further yet.
> 
> Thanks. Investigating the rest would be good. I guess most of those are just for
> build-depends, but if there are any with bad depends (e.g. some -dev package
> unnecessarily depending on libssl*-dev) it'd be good to fix that for stretch,
> because of the conflicting libssl dev packages.

We shouldn't have any of those FTBFS in archive so I guess you mean
something outside of the archive. Anyway, if I find something I will
act.

> Sounds like things are under control now. The concern of -dev packages not being
> co-installable is a valid one, but I guess we'll have to live with that.

Both openssl versions provide .pc files. So we could keep 1.1 as-is and
force the libssl1.0-dev users to use what the .pc file(s) says which
would include a different lib to link (say -lssl-1.0) and a different
spot for the header files.
We have 148 1.0 packages and 437 using 1.1 right now. That means we
would have to touch 148 packages for that (and most packages I touched
did not use the .pc file). I'm not sure it is worth it.  Also having
them not co-installable minimizes the risk that someone tries to pass
openssl's struct from one package to the other.

> Thanks,
> Emilio

Sebastian



Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 857199 Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> to submit@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:15:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#827061; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Acknowledgement sent to Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 16 Mar 2017 21:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1522 received at 827061@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
Cc: 827061@bugs.debian.org, "Package Development List for OpenSSL packages." <pkg-openssl-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, team@security.debian.org, openssl@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:16:07 +0100
On 2017-02-22 00:46:56 [+0100], Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Thanks. Investigating the rest would be good. I guess most of those are just for

So I made a list by the time I received that email I just managed to
work through it. I check most of them manually but by the end of it I
hacked something that checked if any of the libssl1.0.2 symbols were
used.
Anyway. Most of them do not use libssl at all. A few use for a
testsuite or load it at runtime. 
As next course of action I would make sure that each libssl1.0-dev
package has a bug to move it back to libssl-dev for Buster.
Is anything that blocks this bug from getting closed?

My protocol:
389-ds-base-1.3.5.15 Seems not to use it, had it from netsmp
alljoyn-gateway-1504-15.04~git20160606 seems not to use it.
alljoyn-services-1504-15.04 seems not to use it.
alljoyn-thin-client-1509-15.09a testsuite only probably
alljoyn-thin-client-1604-16.0 testsuite only probably
autofs-5.1.2 used once, probably no longer, as part of SASL
bro-aux-0.38 seem to check for it but not use it
cacti-spine-0.8.8h recommends openssl, probably for netsnmp reasons, does not user it.
carbon-c-relay-2.5 used libssl-dev for crypto but not is selfcontained. 
citus-6.0.1.PGDG recommends using openssl-devel but does not use opessl
connectome-workbench-1.2.3+git3-g7b83782 Recommends it, but it seems not using it.
cryfs-0.9.6 Depends on it, could use it but does not.
donkey-1.0.1 alt dep
drumgizmo-0.9.11 testsuite only
edbrowse-3.6.1 no longer using
fis-gtm-6.3-000A got disabled, fixed for 1.1, not enabled. #856984 opened
freebsd-utils-10.3~svn296373 #835806, not building at all
gfarm2fs-1.2.9.9 no libssl usage (openssl but no dep)
gnome-commander-1.4.8 seems not to use it
gnutls28-3.5.8 testsuite
guymager-0.8.3 depends on libssl for crypto reasons but use internal
havp-0.92a does not need it
hplip-3.16.11+repack0 looks like it does not use it
httraqt-1.4.8 does not need it, just a frontend for httrack
isc-dhcp-4.3.5: does not use it
isdnutils-3.25+dfsg1: does not user it
iva-1.0.8+ds: seems not to use it
lcmaps-plugins-jobrep-1.5.3 header exports only, no libs functions.
lgogdownloader-3.1 uses libcurl4-gnutls-dev, openssl crypto locks are nops with 1.1
libapache-mod-log-sql-1.100 depends on it, seems not to use it
libasr-1.0.2 includes the header but does not make any use of it.
libdap-3.18.2 seems not to need it, moved to libcurl4-gnutls-dev
libfprint-0.6.0 does not use it, switched to nss
libgwenhywfar-4.15.3 libssl not found due multiarch lib layout.
libpam-ufpidentity-1.0 seems not to use it
libsecp256k1-0.1~20161228 testsuite
linux-grsec-4.9.10 does not look used.
lnav-0.8.1 does not need it
mcabber-1.0.4 does not use it
mitmproxy-0.18.2 uses only openssl, not libssl-dev
mysql++-3.2.2+pristine seems not to use it
mysql-connector-c++_1.1.7 seems not to use it.
openclonk-7.0 seems not to use it.
openntpd seems not use it. Check for arc4random (libbsd) and has builtin sha support
orafce-3.3.1 seems not to use it
percona-xtrabackup-2.2.3 not in testing
phantomjs-2.1.1+dfsg seems not to use it.
pldebugger-9.5.0-10-gd663a19 seems not to use it
profanity-0.5.0 seems not to use it.
pychef-0.2.3 does not user it.
pygresql-5.0.3 seems not to use it
pyopenssl_16.2.0-1 does not need it.
qpid-cpp-0.16 seems not to need it
quassel-0.12.4 maybe not, uses to check if QT supports ssl
quota-4.03 seems not to use it
racket-6.7 loaded at runtime
rhash-1.3.3 optional via dlopen and does not look for 1.0.2 or 1.1.
signond-8.59 seems not to use it
subcommander-2.0.0~b5p2 does not really use it, but prints openssl's version number
telepathy-rakia-0.8.0 seems not to use it
unar-1.10.1 is not using it.
user-mode-linux-4.9-1um: needs it during compile only
vdr-plugin-live-0.3.0+git20160123 seems not to need it
vsearch-2.3.4 does not use it.
websocketpp-0.7.0 ships header files
wget-1.19.1 only udeb
wimlib-1.11.0 could use crypto but does not
wine-1.8.6 seems not to use it.
wine-development-2.0 seems not to use it

> Thanks,
> Emilio

Sebastian



Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858388 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:24:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858436 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:33:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858436 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:33:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858927 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858927 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858928 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858928 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858929 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858929 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858930 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:42 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858930 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858931 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:24:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858931 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:25:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858935 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858935 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858936 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858936 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858937 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858937 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:47 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858938 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:50 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858938 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:09:59 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858939 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:10:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858939 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:10:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858990 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858990 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858991 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:20 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858991 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858992 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858992 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 858993 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:27:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859052 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859052 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859053 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:19 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859053 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859054 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859054 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:41 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859055 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:39:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859055 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:30:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859145 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859145 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:33:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859146 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:33:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859146 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:33:24 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859225 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859225 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:18 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859226 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859226 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:29 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859227 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:32 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859227 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:40 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859228 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859228 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859229 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:45:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859229 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:46:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859232 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:57:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859232 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 31 Mar 2017 19:57:16 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859297 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:30:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859297 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:30:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859367 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:12:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859367 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:12:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859543 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:40:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859543 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859544 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859544 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:14 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859545 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859545 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:27 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859546 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:30 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859546 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:39 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859547 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:53 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859548 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:41:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859548 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859549 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859549 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:17 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859550 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:21 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859550 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:28 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859551 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:31 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859551 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:40 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859552 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:43 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859552 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:51 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859553 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:42:54 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859553 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:01 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859554 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:11 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859555 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:15 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859555 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:22 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859556 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:25 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859556 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:34 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859557 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:38 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859557 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:45 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Added blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859558 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:48 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 859558 Request was from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 04 Apr 2017 19:43:56 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Reply sent to Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:39:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Notification sent to Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:39:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Message #1703 received at 827061-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 827061-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#827061: transition: openssl
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 22:36:52 +0200
On 11/06/16 20:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> OpenSSL will soon release a new upstream version with a new
> soname.  This new version will break various packages, see:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/06/msg00205.html
> 
> I'm currently not sure when the release will be ready.  I would
> like to start this transition as soon as possible, but probably
> after it's actually released.  I don't expect this to take long.
> 
> If I'm ready to upload it to unstable, can I start this
> transition?  Are there things you want me to do?

This happened for stretch and we shipped both 1.0 and 1.1. Let's close this bug
as it's already too long and open a new one to remove 1.0 from buster.

Cheers,
Emilio



Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 24 Jul 2017 07:27:33 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).


Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sat Jan 6 21:25:29 2018; Machine Name: buxtehude

Debian Bug tracking system

Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.

Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson, 2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.