Debian Bug report logs -
#826428
ITA: gcompris-qt -- Educational games for small children - Qt rewrite
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, bruno.coudoin@gcompris.net, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:57:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Yann Dirson <ydirson@free.fr>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bruno.coudoin@gcompris.net, wnpp@debian.org.
(Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:57:13 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the gcompris-qt package.
The package description is:
A large collection of educational games for small children, designed
to be a unified interface to integrate more educational games.
.
This is the rewrite of GCompris using Qt Quick technology.
My children have grown up and don't use GCompris any more; the Qt
variant has quite active development which makes it quite
time-consuming to work on.
Biggest task of the moment is to find a way to deal with the copyright
info of the collection of data files coming from various sources -
upstream being open to suggestions as to how to deal with it.
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:12:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org.
(Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:12:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Control: retitle -1 ITA: gcompris-qt -- Educational games for small children - Qt rewrite
Control: owner -1 tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
I would like to adopt this package.
Changed Bug title to 'ITA: gcompris-qt -- Educational games for small children - Qt rewrite' from 'O: gcompris-qt -- Educational games for small children - experimental Qt rewrite'.
Request was from Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>
to 826428-submit@bugs.debian.org.
(Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:12:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Owner recorded as tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
Request was from Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>
to 826428-submit@bugs.debian.org.
(Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:12:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Wed, 06 Dec 2017 14:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Wed, 06 Dec 2017 14:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #19 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi Simon,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 21:01:02 +0000 Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 ITA: gcompris-qt -- Educational games for small children - Qt rewrite
> Control: owner -1 tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
>
> I would like to adopt this package.
Any progress on this?
Also I think it would make sense to merge the gcompris and gcompris-qt
source packages (the distinction is no longer relevant).
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Wed, 06 Dec 2017 22:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #24 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
On 12/06/2017 08:18 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Any progress on this?
Yep, I've been busy, but I've gotten to the point where I just have to
do a copyright sweep and it should be good.
Here's a link:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/qt-extras/gcompris-qt.git
> Also I think it would make sense to merge the gcompris and gcompris-qt
> source packages (the distinction is no longer relevant).
Sure, you're more than welcome to make any commits to that repo that you
feel would be relevant.
Thanks for checking in,
--
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:15:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:15:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #29 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> On 12/06/2017 08:18 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > Any progress on this?
>
> Yep, I've been busy, but I've gotten to the point where I just have to
> do a copyright sweep and it should be good.
>
> Here's a link:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/qt-extras/gcompris-qt.git
Thanks, good to know that you’ve made progress.
> > Also I think it would make sense to merge the gcompris and gcompris-qt
> > source packages (the distinction is no longer relevant).
>
> Sure, you're more than welcome to make any commits to that repo that you
> feel would be relevant.
Here is how I would do the transition:
- keep the source package name "gcompris-qt"
- but rename the binary packages to "gcompris" and "gcompris-data"
respectively, therefore taking over the binary packages currently provided by
src:gcompris
- since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher than the new
one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use 1:0.81-1).
- a transition package "gcompris-qt" (depending on "gcompris") should be provided
for current users of the -qt version
- finally, after uploading these changes, removal of the older src:gcompris
source package should be requested.
Does that sound good to you?
If yes, I am willing to implement this change in the git.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #34 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I've just realized that an alternative transition plan has been described in
#875912, so I'm cc'ing that bug too and its participants. Below is the
transition plan that I had in mind and some additional comments.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> > > Also I think it would make sense to merge the gcompris and gcompris-qt
> > > source packages (the distinction is no longer relevant).
> >
> > Sure, you're more than welcome to make any commits to that repo that you
> > feel would be relevant.
>
> Here is how I would do the transition:
>
> - keep the source package name "gcompris-qt"
>
> - but rename the binary packages to "gcompris" and "gcompris-data"
> respectively, therefore taking over the binary packages currently provided by
> src:gcompris
>
> - since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher than the new
> one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use 1:0.81-1).
>
> - a transition package "gcompris-qt" (depending on "gcompris") should be provided
> for current users of the -qt version
>
> - finally, after uploading these changes, removal of the older src:gcompris
> source package should be requested.
>
> Does that sound good to you?
>
> If yes, I am willing to implement this change in the git.
Compared to the plan described in #875912 (keeping two separate source package,
and making "gcompris" a transitional package depending on "gcompris-qt), my
plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for a transitional *source*
package, and keeps the binary package "gcompris" as the main binary package
which is probably better from a user point of view; its drawback is that it
requires an epoch bump.
I am basically fine with both options, so please weigh in if you have a strong
case for either of the two scenarios.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Jeremy Bicha <jbicha@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:21:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #39 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
>> - since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher than the new
>> one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use 1:0.81-1).
There is an interesting hack where only the old package names need the
epoch bump.
See for instance
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/fonts-ubuntu.git/commit/?id=046b11af
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:45:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 13:45:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #44 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:18:52AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> >> - since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher than the new
> >> one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use 1:0.81-1).
>
> There is an interesting hack where only the old package names need the
> epoch bump.
>
> See for instance
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/fonts-ubuntu.git/commit/?id=046b11af
Thanks for sharing. That hack would actually open the door to a 3rd transition
scheme:
- keeping only the gcompris-qt source package (src:gcompris can be immediately
removed)
- keeping gcompris-qt as the main binary package
- having gcompris as a transitional package, generated by src:gcompris-qt, and
would be the only binary package with an epoch number
That scheme looks like a good compromise to me.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #49 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hello,
On December 7, 2017 7:40:15 AM CST, "Sébastien Villemot" <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:18:52AM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Sébastien Villemot
><sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 04:26:10PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
>> >> - since the version number of the old series (15.10-1) is higher
>than the new
>> >> one (0.81-1), the epoch needs to be bumped (i.e. we should use
>1:0.81-1).
>>
>> There is an interesting hack where only the old package names need
>the
>> epoch bump.
>>
>> See for instance
>>
>https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-fonts/fonts-ubuntu.git/commit/?id=046b11af
>
>Thanks for sharing. That hack would actually open the door to a 3rd
>transition
>scheme:
>- keeping only the gcompris-qt source package (src:gcompris can be
>immediately
> removed)
>- keeping gcompris-qt as the main binary package
>- having gcompris as a transitional package, generated by
>src:gcompris-qt, and
> would be the only binary package with an epoch number
>
>That scheme looks like a good compromise to me.
Agreed, I'm +1 on this. Feel free to make the changes in Git, otherwise I can do it this afternoon US time.
A full copyright review would also be great if you have the chance, but my plan is to do that later as well if nobody gets to it.
Thanks,
Simon Quigley
(sent from mobile, please excuse formatting mistakes)
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:03:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:03:07 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #54 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:29:25AM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> On December 7, 2017 7:40:15 AM CST, "Sébastien Villemot" <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
> >Thanks for sharing. That hack would actually open the door to a 3rd
> >transition
> >scheme:
> >- keeping only the gcompris-qt source package (src:gcompris can be
> >immediately
> > removed)
> >- keeping gcompris-qt as the main binary package
> >- having gcompris as a transitional package, generated by
> >src:gcompris-qt, and
> > would be the only binary package with an epoch number
> >
> >That scheme looks like a good compromise to me.
>
> Agreed, I'm +1 on this. Feel free to make the changes in Git, otherwise I can do it this afternoon US time.
I don’t have write permission on the repository, so I am attaching a patch to
this message (and also an unrelated patch that fixes a small issue).
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[0001-Fix-versioned-Recommends-of-gcompris-qt-data-on-gcom.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[0002-Add-a-transitional-gcompris-package-with-an-epoch-in.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:33:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #59 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 05:01:42PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> I don’t have write permission on the repository, so I am attaching a patch to
> this message (and also an unrelated patch that fixes a small issue).
Also, you forgot to close the present O/ITA bug in the changelog.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Tue, 26 Dec 2017 02:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Tue, 26 Dec 2017 02:27:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #64 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello!
On 12/07/2017 10:01 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:29:25AM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
>
>> On December 7, 2017 7:40:15 AM CST, "Sébastien Villemot" <sebastien@debian.org> wrote:
>
>>> Thanks for sharing. That hack would actually open the door to a 3rd
>>> transition
>>> scheme:
>>> - keeping only the gcompris-qt source package (src:gcompris can be
>>> immediately
>>> removed)
>>> - keeping gcompris-qt as the main binary package
>>> - having gcompris as a transitional package, generated by
>>> src:gcompris-qt, and
>>> would be the only binary package with an epoch number
>>>
>>> That scheme looks like a good compromise to me.
>>
>> Agreed, I'm +1 on this. Feel free to make the changes in Git, otherwise I can do it this afternoon US time.
>
> I don’t have write permission on the repository, so I am attaching a patch to
> this message (and also an unrelated patch that fixes a small issue).
Thanks for the patches (applied), and apologies for the delay in getting
back to you on this (holidays get kinda busy :/).
Tonight or tomorrow I'll get this ready for a review (I don't have
upload access to Debian so I'll need someone to review/sponsor).
Thanks again!
--
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:24:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #69 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:23:55PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> Tonight or tomorrow I'll get this ready for a review (I don't have
> upload access to Debian so I'll need someone to review/sponsor).
Great! Just let me know when it’s ready, I’ll be happy to sponsor you.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:12:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Simon Quigley <tsimonq2@ubuntu.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Wed, 27 Dec 2017 01:12:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #74 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,
On 12/26/2017 02:21 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:23:55PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
>
>> Tonight or tomorrow I'll get this ready for a review (I don't have
>> upload access to Debian so I'll need someone to review/sponsor).
>
> Great! Just let me know when it’s ready, I’ll be happy to sponsor you.
Should be good now, could you please check it over?
--
Simon Quigley
tsimonq2@ubuntu.com
tsimonq2 on freenode and OFTC
5C7A BEA2 0F86 3045 9CC8
C8B5 E27F 2CF8 458C 2FA4
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com:
Bug#826428; Package wnpp.
(Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:27:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, tsimonq2@ubuntu.com.
(Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:27:02 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #79 received at 826428@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:08:18PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> On 12/26/2017 02:21 AM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:23:55PM -0600, Simon Quigley wrote:
> >
> >> Tonight or tomorrow I'll get this ready for a review (I don't have
> >> upload access to Debian so I'll need someone to review/sponsor).
> >
> > Great! Just let me know when it’s ready, I’ll be happy to sponsor you.
>
> Should be good now, could you please check it over?
Thanks. Actually there are a few issues:
1) I get the following lintian messages which signal problems in
debian/copyright:
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/flower_bad.png (paragraph at line 37)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/flower_good.png (paragraph at line 37)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/smiley_bad.png (paragraph at line 37)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/smiley_good.png (paragraph at line 37)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/tux_good.png (paragraph at line 45)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/core/resource/bonus/tux_bad.png (paragraph at line 45)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright src/activities/chess/resource/background.svg (paragraph at line 69)
I: gcompris-qt source: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright gcompris.appdata.xml (paragraph at line 128)
I: gcompris-qt source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 128
I: gcompris-qt source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 37
I: gcompris-qt source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 45
I: gcompris-qt source: unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 69
2) The Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser fields point to Ubuntu packaging, which is
probably not what you want.
BTW, it looks like there are currently two git repositories on Alioth: one
in collab-maint (the most up-to-date) and one in pkg-kde-extras. I guess you
should decide which one to keep and delete the other one (and if you opt for
pkg-kde-extras, please finalize the changelog and add the debian git tag,
since I don't have write access to it).
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Wed Jan 10 06:23:51 2018;
Machine Name:
beach
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.