Debian Bug report logs - #798122
user/usertag don't work in pseudoheaders

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: user/usertag don't work in Control: pseudoheaders

Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 22:26:29 +0100

Package: bugs.debian.org

I attempted to set a gcc5 transition usertag with Control: 
pseudo-headers to nnn@b.d.o 
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797944#10), but it 
was rejected with "Unknown command or malformed arguments to command" 
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/09/msg00243.html).  The 
same usertag worked when sent to control@b.d.o 
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/09/msg00244.html).

Message #10 received at 798122-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

To: 798122-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#798122: user/usertag don't work in Control: pseudoheaders

Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2015 19:21:22 -0700

On Sat, 05 Sep 2015, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: 
> I attempted to set a gcc5 transition usertag with Control: pseudo-headers to
> nnn@b.d.o (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797944#10), but
> it was rejected with "Unknown command or malformed arguments to command"
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/09/msg00243.html).  The same
> usertag worked when sent to control@b.d.o
> (https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/09/msg00244.html).

That's correct.

Use User: and Usertag: not the Control: psuedoheaders.

-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

Message #15 received at 798122@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>

To: 798122@bugs.debian.org

Subject: user/usertag don't work in Control: pseudoheaders

Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:33:10 +0100

Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 user/usertag don't work in pseudoheaders
Usertag: this-is-a-test-did-you-mean-usertags-or-usertag

On existing bugs (not new ones), User:/Usertags: doesn't work either: 
here's the receipt I got for 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794935#17 (totally 
missing user/usertag, and failed to place the bug in the Transition 
Tracking category, 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=release.debian.org#_2_18_4).

Also, the documentation for Control: 
(https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control) says "any of the 
commands", not "any of the commands that don't have their own 
pseudo-header", so should be changed if this is intentional.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#794935: llvm-toolchain-3.5 - upload != 
transition done
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 21:27:13 +0000
From: Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org>
To: Rebecca N. Palmer <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>
CC: pkg-llvm-team@lists.alioth.debian.org, 
debian-bugs-forwarded@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #794935 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>} 
[src:llvm-toolchain-3.5] llvm-toolchain-3.6: library transition is 
needed when GCC 5 is the default
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions llvm-toolchain-3.5/1:3.5.2-2.
> block -1 by 790756
Bug #794935 [src:llvm-toolchain-3.5] llvm-toolchain-3.6: library 
transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default
794935 was not blocked by any bugs.
794935 was blocking: 794626
Added blocking bug(s) of 794935: 790756
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #794935 [src:llvm-toolchain-3.5] llvm-toolchain-3.6: library 
transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reassigned from package 'src:llvm-toolchain-3.5' to 
'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions llvm-toolchain-3.5/1:3.5.2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #794935 to the same 
values previously set
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-llvm-toolchain-3.5.html
Bug #794935 [release.debian.org] llvm-toolchain-3.6: library transition 
is needed when GCC 5 is the default
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-llvm-toolchain-3.5.html'.
> retitle -1 llvm-toolchain-3.5: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug #794935 [release.debian.org] llvm-toolchain-3.6: library transition 
is needed when GCC 5 is the default
Changed Bug title to 'llvm-toolchain-3.5: library transition is needed 
when GCC 5 is the default' from 'llvm-toolchain-3.6: library transition 
is needed when GCC 5 is the default'

-- 
794935: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=794935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Message #24 received at 798122@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

To: "Rebecca N. Palmer" <rebecca_palmer@zoho.com>, 798122@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#798122: user/usertag don't work in Control: pseudoheaders

Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 16:02:55 -0700

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> Also, the documentation for Control:
> (https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#control) says "any of the commands",
> not "any of the commands that don't have their own pseudo-header", so should
> be changed if this is intentional.

user and usertag are not control commands, they are request@ commands.

control@ just happens to be a superset which also supports request@
commands.


-- 
Don Armstrong                      http://www.donarmstrong.com

Message #29 received at 798122@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>

To: 798122@bugs.debian.org

Subject: user/usertag via control:...

Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 20:49:46 +0900

Hi,

I found this bug report.  Let me add a comment.

It seems BTS rejected 2 intuitive pathes to set user/usertag.

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804597#5 for such
a failed attempt.   We can not use intuitive pseudoheaders in the initial
bug report to submit@bugs.debian.org .  What ever the reason, it is nice
to support this path for consistency.

Then the following attempt to NNNN@bugs.debian.org
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804597#10
failed and now I understand this is a feature.  But it is more
consistent to accept this style if possible.

Of course, I eventuarlly set user/usertag via control@bugs.debian.org as
I expected.

Osamu

Message #34 received at 798122@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <798122@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: user/usertag don't work in pseudoheaders

Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:33:52 -0400

Package: bugs.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #798122

Hi, Don.

I periodically bump into this limitation (and the somewhat related
limitation #582171) in the course of reporting or following up on
architecture-specific build failures.  I acknowledge that workarounds
are possible, but would still appreciate a more convenient way to
supply additional usertags short of explicitly copying control@, which
yields uglier e-mail IMO and isn't usefully possible when sending an
initial report to submit@.

Thanks!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, x32

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Message #39 received at 798122@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>

To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 894779@bugs.debian.org, 798122@bugs.debian.org, 582171@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#894779: debbugs: usertags don't work with Control: pseudoheaders

Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:03:34 -0700

reassign 582171 debbugs
reassign 798122 debbugs
forcemerge 582171 798122 894779
retitle 582171 Allow specifying user/usertags in Control: (move it to control@ from request@)
severity 582171 wishlist
user debbugs@packages.debian.org
usertag 582171 service
thanks

On Wed, 04 Apr 2018, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
> Control: user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Control: usertag -1 + rm
> Control: tag -1 + jessie

Yeah; that's because usertag and user are part of the request@
interface, not the control@ interface. That said, there have been enough
requests for this feature, that I'm going to change it. I just have to
think of the right way to do it.


-- 
Don Armstrong                      https://www.donarmstrong.com

6: I'm human. I have a thousand flaws. I break down. I get up or I
don't get up. I get lost. I make the same mistakes over and over. I
have scars and wounds. Sometimes when I can't bear them anymore, I
drink. You can't fix me. You can't fix any of us. You can't make us
perfect.
 -- "The Prisoner (2009 Miniseries)" _Checkmate_

Message #50 received at 582171-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

To: 582171-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: bugs.debian.org: Can't set multiple users' usertags during submission

Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 08:07:53 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Version: 2020-03-16

On Tue, 18 May 2010 22:56:30 +0200 Stefano Rivera wrote:

> While Usertags can be set on submission (as described in Bug #327591),
> attempting to set tags for different users fails.

This has been implemented using this commit and these two bug fixes:

https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/f13b9b4b919d80e6e90acf905452f8788e2b8c40
https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/2c25f8427ad4939a1ee2926b8fe8a743b47fee8d
https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/debbugs/6dca132834a08e345a3c7a7c92bc021627e423c3

This has been documented using this commit:

https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/commit/46222f8a99f52e4997810245f166ed864253d73f

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.