Debian Bug report logs -
#783491
security-tracker: document what needs to be done on releases and other archive changes
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:09:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 13:09:06 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
package: security-tracker
severity: wishlist
Hi,
3fa31ab2a22a7e6db606899ca3ee6cb45a7884d1 / svnr33868 is commit showing what
needs to be done on upgrades, specifically these files need to be updated:
Makefile # search for release-names
bin/tracker_data.py # search for release-names
bin/tracker_service.py # search for release-names and "-backports"
lib/python/debian_support.py # search for release-names
lib/python/dist_config.py # search for release-names
lib/python/security_db.py # search for release-names
This should be documented in doc/README.releases. (And now I have this I'm
pondering to just do and not file this bug... but that's 5 more minutes,
so...)
And also rather obviously, this could (+should) be trimmed down by refactoring
- or a rewrite ;-)
cheers,
Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:42:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:42:09 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #10 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:07:34 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
> 3fa31ab2a22a7e6db606899ca3ee6cb45a7884d1 / svnr33868 is commit showing what
> needs to be done on upgrades
Hi Holger,
I am sorry to ask, but... is this commit supposed to be already live?
I am asking since I still see a tracker situation inconsistent with the
release of jessie.
For instance the testing [1] status page lists, among several other
vulnerabilities:
chromium-browser CVE-2015-1237 high** yes fixed in testing-security
but the corresponding page [2] states that the security issue is fixed
in jessie (security), stretch, and sid.
[1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/testing
[2] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1237
I am under the impression that the testing [1] status page is still
actually talking about jessie, rather than stretch...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:03:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #15 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Francesco,
On Montag, 27. April 2015, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > 3fa31ab2a22a7e6db606899ca3ee6cb45a7884d1 / svnr33868 is commit showing
> I am sorry to ask, but... is this commit supposed to be already live?
yes it is.
> I am asking since I still see a tracker situation inconsistent with the
> release of jessie.
I'd suggest to let this post-release situation resolve itself a bit (eg I also
see inconsistencies on packages.qa.d.o and tracker.d.o), do some jessie
installations or upgrades (+file bugs there if you encounter them), be happy
about the release and look at again at the security-tracker in a day or two.
cheers,
Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Fri, 01 May 2015 09:24:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Fri, 01 May 2015 09:24:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #20 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:59:16 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote:
[..]
> On Montag, 27. April 2015, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > I am asking since I still see a tracker situation inconsistent with the
> > release of jessie.
>
> I'd suggest to let this post-release situation resolve itself a bit (eg I also
> see inconsistencies on packages.qa.d.o and tracker.d.o)
[...]
> and look at again at the security-tracker in a day or two.
The tracker situation still seems to be broken to me...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Mon, 04 May 2015 22:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Mon, 04 May 2015 22:45:05 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #25 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Fri, 1 May 2015 11:20:26 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> The tracker situation still seems to be broken to me...
Still broken...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to lose! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 04:51:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 04:51:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #30 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi
I think two more changes were actually needed to get the testing
status view show the correct information: r34072 and 34073.
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/testing
should look better now.
Regards,
Salvatore
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 09:09:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 09:09:10 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #35 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Salvatore,
On Dienstag, 5. Mai 2015, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> I think two more changes were actually needed to get the testing
> status view show the correct information: r34072 and 34073.
good catch, thanks!
cheers,
Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 21:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Francesco Poli <invernomuto@paranoici.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Tue, 05 May 2015 21:33:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #40 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, 5 May 2015 06:49:32 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/status/release/testing
>
> should look better now.
Yes, it seems to be much more plausible! ;-)
Thanks a lot.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to lose! To the laboratory!
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#783491; Package security-tracker.
(Fri, 08 May 2015 17:15:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Security Tracker Team <debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org>.
(Fri, 08 May 2015 17:15:08 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #45 received at 783491@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Hi all,
FTR/for documentation: I as well reverted a change to
bin/add-dsa-needed.sh since it otherwise looked as well at
oldoldstable and generated "wrong" suggestions for addition to
dsa-needed.txt. (r34131)
Reference is added as well in
https://wiki.debian.org/SuitesAndReposExtension#secure-testing
Regards,
Salvatore
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Thu Jan 11 03:50:48 2024;
Machine Name:
bembo
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.