Debian Bug report logs - #765120
monogame: support monodevelop 5

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: David Suárez <david.sephirot@gmail.com>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: monogame: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependency: monodevelop (< 4.0.12.) but 5.5.0.227-1 is to be installed

Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 19:51:56 +0200

Source: monogame
Version: 2.5.1+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141012 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Install monogame build dependencies (apt-based resolver)                     │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-monogame-dummy : Depends: monodevelop (< 4.0.12.) but 5.5.0.227-1 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/10/12/monogame_2.5.1+dfsg-4_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

Message #20 received at 765120@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher James Halse Rogers <raof@ubuntu.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <765120@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: monogame: support monodevelop 5

Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:09:54 +1100

Package: monogame
Followup-For: Bug #765120

Alright. So, monogame 2.5.1 (from 2012) doesn't build at all against Monodevelop 5. A new upstream version, Monogame 3.2, doesn't build against the version of tao-framework in Jessie (also from 2012, project deprecated in favour of libopentk, for which Jessie also has a 2012 snapshot). 

It's probably time to either start maintaining these or drop them from the archive.

Message #27 received at 765120@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>

To: 765120@bugs.debian.org, Christopher James Halse Rogers <raof@ubuntu.com>

Subject: Re: monogame: support monodevelop 5

Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:29:10 +0200

On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:09:54 +1100 Christopher James Halse Rogers
<raof@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Package: monogame
> Followup-For: Bug #765120
> 
> Alright. So, monogame 2.5.1 (from 2012) doesn't build at all against Monodevelop 5. A new upstream version, Monogame 3.2, doesn't build against the version of tao-framework in Jessie (also from 2012, project deprecated in favour of libopentk, for which Jessie also has a 2012 snapshot). 
> 
> It's probably time to either start maintaining these or drop them from the archive.

So what's it gonna be? This has been blocking monodevelop from migrating for a
long time:

monodevelop (4.0.12+dfsg-6 to 5.5.0.227-1)
    Maintainer: Debian CLI Applications Team
    222 days old (needed 5 days)

Emilio

Message #32 received at 765120@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Mirco Bauer <meebey@debian.org>

To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 765120@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 765120-maint@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [pkg-cli-libs-team] Bug#765120: monogame: support monodevelop 5

Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:46:37 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Am 20.05.2015 15:41 schrieb "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort" <pochu@debian.org>:
>
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:09:54 +1100 Christopher James Halse Rogers
> <raof@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > Package: monogame
> > Followup-For: Bug #765120
> >
> > Alright. So, monogame 2.5.1 (from 2012) doesn't build at all against
Monodevelop 5. A new upstream version, Monogame 3.2, doesn't build against
the version of tao-framework in Jessie (also from 2012, project deprecated
in favour of libopentk, for which Jessie also has a 2012 snapshot).
> >
> > It's probably time to either start maintaining these or drop them from
the archive.
>
> So what's it gonna be? This has been blocking monodevelop from migrating
for a
> long time:
>
> monodevelop (4.0.12+dfsg-6 to 5.5.0.227-1)
>     Maintainer: Debian CLI Applications Team
>     222 days old (needed 5 days)

Ouch, if monogame is this problematic then monodevelop should either drop
the monogame build-dep or monodevelop needs a source pkg just for monogame
so it doesn't block transitions.

>
> Emilio
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-cli-libs-team mailing list
> pkg-cli-libs-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cli-libs-team

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #37 received at 765120@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jo Shields <directhex@apebox.org>

To: Mirco Bauer <meebey@meebey.net>

Cc: 765120@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [pkg-cli-libs-team] Bug#765120: monogame: support monodevelop 5

Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 11:55:27 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

You're right, I haven't seen this discussion.

I think the downsides to dropping are lower than they used to be - the
MD addin is available from the MD addin repository, MG is in NuGet.

I think maintaining an ancient Tao/OpenTK forever is sorta dumb, though.

I'm open to spending some time on getting the dep chain updated, but I
want a modern MD (5.9 is current) in the archive to work against, which
targets Mono 4, so we'd need that.

On 21/05/15 11:50, Mirco Bauer wrote:
>
> Not sure if you have received this. Whats your opinion on this?
>
> ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
> Von: "Mirco Bauer" <meebey@debian.org <mailto:meebey@debian.org>>
> Datum: 21.05.2015 12:46
> Betreff: Re: [pkg-cli-libs-team] Bug#765120: monogame: support
> monodevelop 5
> An: "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort" <pochu@debian.org
> <mailto:pochu@debian.org>>, <765120@bugs.debian.org
> <mailto:765120@bugs.debian.org>>
> Cc: <765120-maint@bugs.debian.org <mailto:765120-maint@bugs.debian.org>>
>
>
> Am 20.05.2015 15:41 schrieb "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort" <pochu@debian.org
> <mailto:pochu@debian.org>>:
> >
> > On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:09:54 +1100 Christopher James Halse Rogers
> > <raof@ubuntu.com <mailto:raof@ubuntu.com>> wrote:
> > > Package: monogame
> > > Followup-For: Bug #765120
> > >
> > > Alright. So, monogame 2.5.1 (from 2012) doesn't build at all
> against Monodevelop 5. A new upstream version, Monogame 3.2, doesn't
> build against the version of tao-framework in Jessie (also from 2012,
> project deprecated in favour of libopentk, for which Jessie also has a
> 2012 snapshot).
> > >
> > > It's probably time to either start maintaining these or drop them
> from the archive.
> >
> > So what's it gonna be? This has been blocking monodevelop from
> migrating for a
> > long time:
> >
> > monodevelop (4.0.12+dfsg-6 to 5.5.0.227-1)
> >     Maintainer: Debian CLI Applications Team
> >     222 days old (needed 5 days)
>
> Ouch, if monogame is this problematic then monodevelop should either
> drop the monogame build-dep or monodevelop needs a source pkg just for
> monogame so it doesn't block transitions.
>
> >
> > Emilio
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pkg-cli-libs-team mailing list
> > pkg-cli-libs-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
> <mailto:pkg-cli-libs-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> >
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cli-libs-team
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.