Debian Bug report logs - #749887
ITP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Display info messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: nodiscc <nodiscc@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: RFP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:26:33 +0200

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : syncthing
  Version         : 0.8.12
  Upstream Author : Jakob Borg <jakob@nym.se>
* URL             : http://syncthing.net/
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Go
  Description     : decentralized file synchronization tool

Syncthing replaces Dropbox and BitTorrent Sync with something open, trustworthy and decentralized. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third party and how it's transmitted over the Internet.

Using syncthing, that control is returned to you

 * Private. None of your data is ever stored anywhere else than on your computers. There is no central server that might be compromised, legally or illegally.
 * Encrypted. All communication is secured using TLS. The encryption used includes perfect forward secrecy to prevent any eavesdropper from ever gaining access to your data.
 * Authenticated. Every node is identified by a strong cryptographic certificate. Only nodes you have explicitly allowed can connect to your cluster
 * Web GUI. Configure and monitor Syncthing via a responsive and powerful interface accessible via your browser.
 * Portable. Works on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris. Run it on your desktop computers and synchronize them with your server for backup.
 * Simple. Syncthing doesn't need IP addresses or advanced configuration: it just works, over LAN and over the Internet. Every machine is identified by an ID. Just give your ID to you friends, share a folder and watch: uPnP will do if you don't want to port forward or you don't know how.
 * Powerful. Synchronize as many folders as you need with different people. 

Discussion: http://discourse.syncthing.net/
Docs: http://discourse.syncthing.net/category/documentation
Sources: http://github.com/calmh/syncthing

Message #10 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Federico Ceratto <federico.ceratto@gmail.com>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:21:27 +0100

Hi,

The project name, URL and license has been changed:

* Package name    : pulse
  Version         : 0.10.0
* URL             : https://ind.ie/pulse/
* License         : GPL


Thanks,

-- 
Federico Ceratto

Message #15 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Teemu Ikonen <tpikonen@gmail.com>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 23:02:34 +0200

I made a provisional packaging of syncthing, it's at
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/syncthing.git/

It is in a state where it works for me. The motivation for the
packaging was getting syncthing to compile in platforms which are not
supported by golang, which it does, as long as one has gccgo-go
installed (see #765841). Builds with golang-go also work.

What is left to do is to make a real copyright check, try to fix the
many lintian warnings and errors, and find a sponsor to upload it to
the archive. I probably will not do these in the near future, so help
with the package would be appreciated.

Message #20 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Sargent <paul.sargent@ericsson.com>

To: "749887@bugs.debian.org" <749887@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: RFP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:45:54 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:21:27 +0100 Federico Ceratto <federico.ceratto@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The project name, URL and license has been changed:
>
> * Package name    : pulse
>   Version         : 0.10.0
> * URL             : https://ind.ie/pulse/
> * License         : GPL


Pulse is a fork, not a renaming.

https://discourse.syncthing.net/t/syncthing-is-still-syncthing/1372

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #25 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tianon Gravi <admwiggin@gmail.com>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool

Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:55:40 +0000

Dependencies are going to be fun, too:
https://github.com/syncthing/syncthing/blob/master/Godeps/Godeps.json
(since there are a few).

It's worth noting that at least "github.com/calmh/osext" is a fork (no
idea if more of them are).  The only addition I can see on the fork is
Solaris support, which has since been added upstream, so I think it's
likely worth trying to get syncthing to switch to using upstream
directly there.

♥,
- Tianon
  4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36  4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

Message #30 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Retitle

Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 20:31:14 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Control: retitle -1 ITP: syncthing -- decentralized file synchronization tool
thanks

I will continue Teemus work and try to get this into Debian. Teemu gave
me permission to take over his work and use the collab-maint repo he
started.

Cheers
Andreas Noteng

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=lWEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #39 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Status update

Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 22:27:52 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Working on making the package DFSG compliant by manually repacking the
included javascripts.
Work is currently on pause until I deliver my last exam next week.

Andreas

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #44 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: anarcat <anarcat@debian.org>

To: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Status update

Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:10:03 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ping! Any progress here? 

When can we hope to see this in NEW or mentors?

Should we be reviewing the package?

Can't wait! :)

-- 
Every one of us is, in the cosmic perspective, precious. If a human
disagrees with you, let him live. In a hundred billion galaxies, you
will not find another.  - Carl Sagan

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #49 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org, anarcat@debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Status update

Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:08:57 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 17. mars 2016 00:10, anarcat wrote:
> Ping! Any progress here? 
> 
> When can we hope to see this in NEW or mentors?
> 
> Should we be reviewing the package?
> 
> Can't wait! :)
> 

I'm sorry. I god stuck on trying to make the package uphold the DFSG
(minified javascrips), and real life got in the way of finishing the
package. I will change the bug to RFP. What little spare time I have is
better spent improving the packages I allready maintain. If nobody
continues the work I might pick it up again later.

Andreas

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #58 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: syncthing 0.12.22 packaging

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:04:53 +0200

I had a go at packaging the current version of syncthing (0.12.22), and
have an approximately working package.

I've built the package and dependencies in a xenial PPA [1], but
hopefully there should be minimal delta to unstable. Packaging is in git
(gbp with pristine-tar) [2].

At least the following new dependencies are needed:

 * angular-translate.js
 * golang-github-bkaradzic-go-lz4
 * golang-github-calmh-du
 * golang-github-calmh-luhn
 * golang-github-calmh-xdr
 * golang-github-thejerf-suture
 * golang-github-vitrun-qart

Most of these are at least simple libraries with no further dependencies
which dh-make-golang handled with minimal fuss.

This build patches out most of the vendored javascript/css and uses
system copies. The resulting interface seems to work, although since the
versions aren't exact matches there might be subtle regressions.

However, while I'm quite keen on seeing this built in debian (I'm
currently using upstream's deb packages), introducing and maintaining
all these packages is probably a certain amount of work, so I'm a bit
dubious about taking this on alone (especially since I don't have a huge
amount of experience with golang yet). Any takers?

Gordon

[1]: https://launchpad.net/~chronitis/+archive/ubuntu/syncthing
[2]: https://git.chronitis.net/syncthing.git/

Message #63 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>

To: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>, 749887@bugs.debian.org, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: syncthing 0.12.22 packaging

Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:32:21 -0400

On 2016-04-13 12:04:53, Gordon Ball wrote:

[...]

> However, while I'm quite keen on seeing this built in debian (I'm
> currently using upstream's deb packages), introducing and maintaining
> all these packages is probably a certain amount of work, so I'm a bit
> dubious about taking this on alone (especially since I don't have a huge
> amount of experience with golang yet). Any takers?

Did you talk to the golang team about it? Maybe those libraries could be
group-maintained...

A.
-- 
I would defend the liberty of consenting adult creationists to practice
whatever intellectual perversions they like in the privacy of their own
homes; but it is also necessary to protect the young and innocent.
                        - Arthur C. Clarke

Message #68 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Willing to package Go dependencies

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:54:28 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I am a member of the Golang Packaging team and I would be willing to
package all of the Go dependencies.

If I do that. Would you move foward with the packaging? I am impatient
to see Syncthing in Debian as I consider that this is a very important
project.

An equivalent for BitTorrent Sync is listed in the FSF high priority
project list:
 - https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/priority-projects/

Debian should do its part, take action and distribute such a tool to our
users as soon as possible.

Cheers,

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #73 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <alexandre@alexandreviau.net>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Cc: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: ITP: golang-github-vitrun-qart -- Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:48 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

* Package name    : golang-github-vitrun-qart
  Version         : 0.0~git20140420.0.ccb109c-1
  Upstream Author : vitrun
* URL             : https://github.com/vitrun/qart
* License         : Apache-2.0
  Programming Lang: Go
  Description     : Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes.


This is needed for Syncthing

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #78 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: ITP: golang-github-vitrun-qart -- Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 12:31:34 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

On 13/05/16 12:29 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> You should file a separate ITP ("reportbug wnpp"), and link it to the
> syncthing ITP as a blocking bug.

Humm, I am doing exactly that. As you can see, submit@bugs.debian.org
was in the "to" field.

I just put the bug in CC so that the owner knows I am taking action.

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #83 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>

To: Alexandre Viau <alexandre@alexandreviau.net>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: ITP: golang-github-vitrun-qart -- Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:29:57 +0200

Hi Alexandre,

Le 13/05/2016 18:03, Alexandre Viau a écrit :
> * Package name    : golang-github-vitrun-qart
>   Version         : 0.0~git20140420.0.ccb109c-1
>   Upstream Author : vitrun
> * URL             : https://github.com/vitrun/qart
> * License         : Apache-2.0
>   Programming Lang: Go
>   Description     : Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes.
> 
> 
> This is needed for Syncthing

You should file a separate ITP ("reportbug wnpp"), and link it to the 
syncthing ITP as a blocking bug.

Regards,

Stephen

Message #90 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>

To: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

Cc: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: ITP: golang-github-vitrun-qart -- Qart generates not-so-ugly qr codes

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:34:36 +0200

Le 13/05/2016 18:31, Alexandre Viau a écrit :
> Hello,
> 
> On 13/05/16 12:29 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>> You should file a separate ITP ("reportbug wnpp"), and link it to the
>> syncthing ITP as a blocking bug.
> 
> Humm, I am doing exactly that. As you can see, submit@bugs.debian.org
> was in the "to" field.
> 
> I just put the bug in CC so that the owner knows I am taking action.

Ah, I see, sorry — in that case the ideal thing to do is to put the 
synthing ITP in X-Debbugs-Cc instead, so it gets copied on the result of 
the bug submission (with the new ITP bug number).

Regards,

Stephen

Message #95 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>

To: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Willing to package Go dependencies

Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:27:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 13. mai 2016 17:54, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am a member of the Golang Packaging team and I would be willing to
> package all of the Go dependencies.
> 
> If I do that. Would you move foward with the packaging? I am impatient
> to see Syncthing in Debian as I consider that this is a very important
> project.

I can look into it again later. For now my schedule is too busy, at
least until the end of May. If the bug is still open by the time I
finish all of my exams I'll pick it up again.

Andreas

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #108 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: Andreas Noteng <andreas@noteng.no>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Willing to package Go dependencies

Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 12:50:17 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 13/05/16 03:27 PM, Andreas Noteng wrote:
> I can look into it again later. For now my schedule is too busy, at
> least until the end of May. If the bug is still open by the time I
> finish all of my exams I'll pick it up again.

Alright,

Since there is no owner yet, I will take ownership of the bug as I will
have a good amount of time in the next few days to work on it. I can
probably get this done in a matter of a few weeks.

Help is always welcome!

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #127 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:35:14 +0200

Hello Alexandre

I appear to have failed to subscribe to this bug so I missed your
messages. Apologies. Fixed now.

My private packaging repo for syncthing (currently at 0.13.0~beta.4)
should probably be moved to debian git. I'm not sure if it makes more
sense for it to be in pkg-go or collab-maint.

The clone URL for my gitlist instance seems to be broken, but a tarball
of the packaging repository can be found at [1].

The main outstanding question is to what extent the package can get away
with vendored copies of javascript vs packaging. Upstream includes
un-minified libraries, most of which don't precisely match versions
available as libjs-* or are yet unpackaged.

As of syncthing 0.13.0~beta.4
angular 1.2.9 (libjs-angularjs 1.5.3)
angular-dirPagination (unversioned, not in repos)
angular-translate 2.9.0 (not in repos, I made a somewhat messy package
of it)
bootstrap 3.3.5 (libjs-bootstrap 3.3.6)
font-awesome 4.5.0 (fonts-font-awesome 4.6.1)
jquery 2.2.2 (libjs-jquery 1.12)

Anyway, hopefully we can move this forward - thanks for getting the
various go libraries uploaded.

[1]: https://chronitis.net/~gordon/syncthing-packaging.tar.gz

Message #132 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: (no subject)

Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:49:11 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello Gordon,

On 17/05/16 05:35 AM, Gordon Ball wrote:
> My private packaging repo for syncthing (currently at 0.13.0~beta.4)
> should probably be moved to debian git. I'm not sure if it makes more
> sense for it to be in pkg-go or collab-maint.

I have already created a repository in the pkg-go team. I intend to
maintain Syncthing under this umbrella. I have started the packaging
from scratch there.

I'll copying some things over from your packaging, but I am almost done
already.

I just have to clear up some legal stuff like missing licenses and I'll
be ready for an upload.

> The main outstanding question is to what extent the package can get away
> with vendored copies of javascript vs packaging. Upstream includes
> un-minified libraries, most of which don't precisely match versions
> available as libjs-* or are yet unpackaged.

I intend vendor all JS that isn't in Debian. That is jquery and angular
stuff. Fontawesome and bootstrap Debian versions are fine.

I'll most likely upload Syncthing to Debian this Sunday.

Thanks,

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #137 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>

To: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: (no subject)

Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 19:08:23 +0200

On 17/05/16 15:49, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello Gordon,
> 
> On 17/05/16 05:35 AM, Gordon Ball wrote:
>> My private packaging repo for syncthing (currently at 0.13.0~beta.4)
>> should probably be moved to debian git. I'm not sure if it makes more
>> sense for it to be in pkg-go or collab-maint.
> 
> I have already created a repository in the pkg-go team. I intend to
> maintain Syncthing under this umbrella. I have started the packaging
> from scratch there.
> 
> I'll copying some things over from your packaging, but I am almost done
> already.
> 
> I just have to clear up some legal stuff like missing licenses and I'll
> be ready for an upload.
> 
>> The main outstanding question is to what extent the package can get away
>> with vendored copies of javascript vs packaging. Upstream includes
>> un-minified libraries, most of which don't precisely match versions
>> available as libjs-* or are yet unpackaged.
> 
> I intend vendor all JS that isn't in Debian. That is jquery and angular
> stuff. Fontawesome and bootstrap Debian versions are fine.
> 
> I'll most likely upload Syncthing to Debian this Sunday.

Good news. Is there anything I can do to help beyond what you can get
from my previous packaging efforts?
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Message #142 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: (no subject)

Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:17:43 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

On 18/05/16 01:08 PM, Gordon Ball wrote:
> Good news. Is there anything I can do to help beyond what you can get
> from my previous packaging efforts?

Thank you for offering but there is nothing to do.

All there is to do for now is wait for some dependencies to be ACCEPTed
from NEW.

I'll be uploading Syncthing no later than 24 hours after those
dependencies make it to the archive.

Cheers,

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #147 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>

To: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org, Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: (no subject)

Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:28:15 -0400

On 2016-05-18 21:17:43, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 18/05/16 01:08 PM, Gordon Ball wrote:
>> Good news. Is there anything I can do to help beyond what you can get
>> from my previous packaging efforts?
>
> Thank you for offering but there is nothing to do.
>
> All there is to do for now is wait for some dependencies to be ACCEPTed
> from NEW.
>
> I'll be uploading Syncthing no later than 24 hours after those
> dependencies make it to the archive.

I may have missed a part of the discussion, but it would be great if the
source package be available somewhere for people to review or use in
case you disappear (which i've seen happen way too often in ITPs :)

a.
-- 
À force de ne jamais réfléchir, on a un bonheur stupide
                        - Jean Cocteau

Message #152 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org, Gordon Ball <gordon@chronitis.net>

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: (no subject)

Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:40:58 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 18/05/16 09:28 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> I may have missed a part of the discussion, but it would be great if the
> source package be available somewhere for people to review or use in
> case you disappear (which i've seen happen way too often in ITPs :)

- https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/syncthing.git

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #157 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Syncthing is in NEW

Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 15:41:02 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

For your information, Syncthing 0.13.2+dfsg1-1 is now in NEW.

Cheers,

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau@debian.org

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #162 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>

To: 749887@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

Subject: Syncthing gone from NEW

Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:33:40 +0200

But no information about it in this bug report.
What happened? TIA.

Message #167 received at 749887@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>

To: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>, 749887@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Syncthing gone from NEW

Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:45:53 +0200

Hi,

W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> But no information about it in this bug report.

Yes, it has been accepted in unstable:

https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syncthing.html
https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/syncthing/news/20160627T200040Z.html

> What happened? TIA.

Two uploads to NEW, only the first had the "Closes: #749887" and hence
wasn't parsed:

http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/s/syncthing/unstable_changelog

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Message #172 received at 749887-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>

To: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle@debian.org>, 749887-done@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Alexandre Viau <aviau@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#749887: Syncthing gone from NEW

Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 13:43:41 +0200

Le 28/06/2016 13:33, W. Martin Borgert a écrit :
> But no information about it in this bug report.
> What happened? TIA.

It's in the archive (see https://tracker.debian.org/syncthing for 
details). I'm guessing the appropriate "-v" option wasn't used on the 
second build which landed in NEW (0.13.4+dfsg1-1 — this bug was closed 
in 0.13.2+dfsg1-1).

I'm closing the bug now. Thanks Alexandre for packaging this!

Regards,

Stephen

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.