Debian Bug report logs - #748386
Dependency on osmgpsmap

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Dependency on osmgpsmap

Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 21:24:45 +0200

Package: subsurface
Version: 4.0.3-2

Hi,

I have started working in the Debian GIS Team on the osm-gps-map package.

At the moment, both the old library and the new library of osmgpsmap are 
being provided due to subsurface depending on the old one (also for 
building). It seems that subsurface is the only package left in testing 
that needs it.

After checking the subsurface upstream repositories to see if they were 
working on switching to the new osmgpsmap (which is gtk3 instead of 
gtkt2), it looks as if they have already switched to QT and no longer 
list osmgpsmap as a required dependency in any of the README/INSTALL 
documentation.

I see that the latest subsurface has been imported into Alioth ready for 
packaging. When you begin work on that, could you check whether the 
dependency on osmgpsmap is still actually required?

Regards,

Ross

Message #14 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>

To: 748386@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Drop build-depend on libosmgpsmap-dev

Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 21:52:24 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

severity 748386 important
tags 748386 patch
thanks

Hi,

It has been a couple of months now, and this issue is preventing
osmgpsmap from migrating to testing. Therefore I am raising the severity
to important.

I have just tested that I can build subsurface 4.0.3 with
libosmgpsmap-dev removed from d/control (see attached patch) and with
libosmgpsmap2 removed. Subsurface then installs fine and I can rotate
and scroll the "globe" and view an imported dive location on the map.

Unfortunately, when I tried building the new version of subsurface that
has been imported and pushed to alioth (4.1), the build failed with the
vanilla "dh" in d/rules and I did not try to investigate further (I have
no experience with qmake/cmake).

If you are really busy, would you be opposed to an NMU to allow
osmgpsmap through to testing? I would have to seek sponsorship, so it
won't be that fast anyway.

Alternatively, with a little help and guidance I could try and package
the latest version.

Regards,

Ross

[without_osmgpsmap.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #19 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>

To: 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Subsurface - Implementing Release Team advise to allow osmgpsmap transition

Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 17:27:22 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

severity 748386 serious
thanks

Hi,

On the advice of the release team, I am bumping this bug to serious.
Then I will prepare an NMU to remove osmgpsmap as a dependency for
subsurface, so that subsurface does not get affected by the transition.

Regards,

Ross Gammon

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #26 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>

To: 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: NMU waiting on mentors.net for sponsorship

Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:08:55 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I have prepared an NMU and it has been uploaded to mentors.net.

The debiff is attached so that it can be incorporated in your next
upload (should it get sponsored).

Regards,

Ross

[subsurface_nmu.diff (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #31 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>

To: 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: subsurface: diff for NMU version 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 22:30:24 +0200

tags 748386 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards.
diff -Nru subsurface-4.0.3/debian/changelog subsurface-4.0.3/debian/changelog
--- subsurface-4.0.3/debian/changelog	2014-05-05 15:21:27.000000000 +0200
+++ subsurface-4.0.3/debian/changelog	2014-08-11 20:29:05.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+subsurface (4.0.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Remove osmgpsmap as dependency (Closes: #748386)
+
+ -- Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>  Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:25:14 +0200
+
 subsurface (4.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Make sure subsurface builds on all archs (Closes: #738438)
diff -Nru subsurface-4.0.3/debian/control subsurface-4.0.3/debian/control
--- subsurface-4.0.3/debian/control	2014-02-27 11:55:36.000000000 +0100
+++ subsurface-4.0.3/debian/control	2014-08-11 20:27:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
                libdivecomputer-dev (>= 0.3.0),
 	       libqt4-dev,
                libqtwebkit-dev,
-               libosmgpsmap-dev,
                libgconf2-dev,
                libtool,
                libxml2-dev,

Message #38 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>, 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#748386: subsurface: diff for NMU version 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:19:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Quoting Tobias Frost (tobi@debian.org):
> tags 748386 + pending
> thanks
> 
> Dear maintainer,
> 
> I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.


Thanks for your work (as pkg-running team member, I leave priority to
Sylvestre Ledru, who is probably busy elsewhere...which explains why
nothing happened with that issue).

I included the NMU changes to our git repository and tagged the
release, so please push the NMU the DELAYED/0......or let's just wait
for 5 days...:-)

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #43 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>

To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

Cc: 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#748386: subsurface: diff for NMU version 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:16:08 +0200

On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 09:19 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Tobias Frost (tobi@debian.org):
> > tags 748386 + pending
> > thanks
> > 
> > Dear maintainer,
> > 
> > I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your work (as pkg-running team member, I leave priority to
> Sylvestre Ledru, who is probably busy elsewhere...which explains why
> nothing happened with that issue).
> 
> I included the NMU changes to our git repository and tagged the
> release, so please push the NMU the DELAYED/0......or let's just wait
> for 5 days...:-)
> 
> 
Ok, just pushed to DELAYED/0.
Thanks for the feeback :)

-- 
tobi

Message #48 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@ledru.info>

To: 748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#748386: subsurface: diff for NMU version 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 11:28:41 +0200

On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:19:49 +0200 Christian PERRIER
<bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
> Quoting Tobias Frost (tobi@debian.org):
> > tags 748386 + pending
> > thanks
> > 
> > Dear maintainer,
> > 
> > I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your work (as pkg-running team member, I leave priority to
> Sylvestre Ledru, who is probably busy elsewhere...which explains why
> nothing happened with that issue).
> 
Well, I am surprised... I didn't receive any email from the BTS and it
is the first time that I see about this bug.

Anyway, thanks for the upload. Just upload it now.
(and please commit the change in the vcs if you can)

Thanks again,
S

Message #53 received at 748386@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Tobias Frost <tobi@frost.de>

To: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>,Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>,748386@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: [Pkg-running-devel] Bug#748386: subsurface: diff for NMU version 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:31:51 +0200

On 12. August 2014 09:19:49 MESZ, Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org> wrote:
>Quoting Tobias Frost (tobi@debian.org):
>> tags 748386 + pending
>> thanks
>> 
>> Dear maintainer,
>> 
>> I've prepared an NMU for subsurface (versioned as 4.0.3-2.1) and
>> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> should delay it longer.
>
>
>Thanks for your work (as pkg-running team member, I leave priority to
>Sylvestre Ledru, who is probably busy elsewhere...which explains why
>nothing happened with that issue).
>
>I included the NMU changes to our git repository and tagged the
>release, so please push the NMU the DELAYED/0......or let's just wait
>for 5 days...:-)

Ok, Just uploaded.

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.

Message #58 received at 748386-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>

To: 748386-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#748386: fixed in subsurface 4.0.3-2.1

Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 12:48:53 +0000

Source: subsurface
Source-Version: 4.0.3-2.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
subsurface, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 748386@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk> (supplier of updated subsurface package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:25:14 +0200
Source: subsurface
Binary: subsurface
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.0.3-2.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian running development group <pkg-running-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ross Gammon <rossgammon@mail.dk>
Description:
 subsurface - Logbook program for scuba divers
Closes: 748386
Changes:
 subsurface (4.0.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Remove osmgpsmap as dependency (Closes: #748386)
Checksums-Sha1:
 aeaace3be237a6a423937af13a6a3dcbf1d972dc 2206 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.dsc
 506a01d229d2cd083d5c77b0ae5d68fc0c8c0786 3776 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.debian.tar.xz
 0a43d8c234fd1281dc7f9cd96baf7d690730a56c 1761972 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 98fe16f1e8cc2764b6fa9a8661b82dc20ee29da0c57020f2b78b10a9fb658764 2206 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.dsc
 49ea2751cd7953361f16c4681e2ef4af71d95bab5f82b40b327a90badf55d7e6 3776 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.debian.tar.xz
 27fbb1f4df9ecedd3afe0fe8e8aa84ef7e77fed54e2cefb61556f1dad4db964a 1761972 subsurface_4.0.3-2.1_amd64.deb
Files:
 6d701c33efcc60a26636ff98cb4c09c3 1761972 utils optional subsurface_4.0.3-2.1_amd64.deb
 556e4b9d0cd6a028276df46aaff3e25f 2206 utils optional subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.dsc
 5644a99afe7a7ac422a9bec6b3a28396 3776 utils optional subsurface_4.0.3-2.1.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=4ACz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.