Debian Bug report logs - #746394
Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:38:34 +0200

Package: docker.io
Version: 0.9.1~dfsg1-2
Severity: wishlist

Hi dear docker.io maintainers,

please consider shipping Debian docker.io pre-built images in proper Debian
packages. Having "stable" pre-built images in Debian packages ensures a trust
link within the distribution. I'm not happy with the increasing incentive to
download distribution images across untrusted links (although index.docker.io
at least runs over HTTPS).

One possibility would be to build docker.io images similarly to what is done
for debian-installer-netboot-images: download packages in a trusted way and
make sure they get listed in the Built-Using field; then of course make sure
they get (bin)NMUed at each stable release update.

Opinions?

Cheers,

OdyX

Message #10 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>

To: Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>, 746394@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 13:46:44 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:38:34PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Hi dear docker.io maintainers,

Heyya Didier!

> please consider shipping Debian docker.io pre-built images in proper Debian
> packages. Having "stable" pre-built images in Debian packages ensures a trust
> link within the distribution. I'm not happy with the increasing incentive to
> download distribution images across untrusted links (although index.docker.io
> at least runs over HTTPS).

I totally agree. I've been pushing for docker upstream to adopt OpenPGP
signatures on images, but it looks like they want to go with SSL Certs.
Once those are in place, I'm happy to provide a pseudo-official image.

However, a better and more sustainable solution here is to ship a script
to create a Debian image via debootstrap. Something small and auditable.

I'd been considering a script to take an sbuild tarball => docker image.
I've not done it yet, but this bug is good motiviation.

I'll see if there's something I can do to help :)

> One possibility would be to build docker.io images similarly to what is done
> for debian-installer-netboot-images: download packages in a trusted way and
> make sure they get listed in the Built-Using field; then of course make sure
> they get (bin)NMUed at each stable release update.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> OdyX

Thanks, OdyX!
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>  |   Proud Debian Developer
: :'  : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'`  http://people.debian.org/~paultag
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org>

To: 746394@bugs.debian.org, Didier Raboud <odyx@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:59:49 +0200

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Am 29.04.2014 19:46, schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:38:34PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
>> please consider shipping Debian docker.io pre-built images in
>> proper Debian packages. Having "stable" pre-built images in
>> Debian packages ensures a trust link within the distribution. I'm
>> not happy with the increasing incentive to download distribution
>> images across untrusted links (although index.docker.io at least
>> runs over HTTPS).
> 
> However, a better and more sustainable solution here is to ship a
> script to create a Debian image via debootstrap. Something small
> and auditable.
> 
> I'd been considering a script to take an sbuild tarball => docker
> image. I've not done it yet, but this bug is good motiviation.

Did you have a look into
/usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
your own image via debootstrap.

Cheers, Jan.
- -- 
Never write mail to <waja@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-
PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
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=vvLZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #20 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <odyx@debian.org>

To: Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>, 746394@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Jan Wagner <waja@cyconet.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:33:59 +0200

Le mardi, 29 avril 2014, 13.46:44 Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:38:34PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> > please consider shipping Debian docker.io pre-built images in proper
> > Debian packages. Having "stable" pre-built images in Debian
> > packages ensures a trust link within the distribution. I'm not
> > happy with the increasing incentive to download distribution images
> > across untrusted links (although index.docker.io at least runs over
> > HTTPS).
> 
> I totally agree. I've been pushing for docker upstream to adopt
> OpenPGP signatures on images, but it looks like they want to go with
> SSL Certs. Once those are in place, I'm happy to provide a
> pseudo-official image.

Well, sorry to nitpick, but having Debian's docker.io package ship a 
public key to trustfully download non-free distribution images wouldn't 
make it overly better. Debian users have a trust link with the Debian 
binary packages as shipped in the distro, but there's no good reason to 
extend that trust to what docker.io upstream built: we're talking about 
_big_ archives full of _binaries_ (for which there is strictly no 
freeness or trustworthiness warranties!) that then run on our machines!

Similar to what we do for debian-installer-netboot-images, I was 
thinking we could have (at least for Debian docker.io containers) 
something like:

	# apt install docker.io-image-debian-wheezy

This package would contain a docker.io image built on buildds, updated 
on point-releases.

> However, a better and more sustainable solution here is to ship a
> script to create a Debian image via debootstrap. Something small and
> auditable.

Le mardi, 29 avril 2014, 21.59:49 Jan Wagner a écrit :
> Did you have a look into
> /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
> your own image via debootstrap.

There's that, at least. It should get it's .sh postfix removed, get 
updated to support more than amd64 and be shipped as /usr/bin/docker.io-
mkimage-debootstrap for example.

> I'd been considering a script to take an sbuild tarball => docker
> image. I've not done it yet, but this bug is good motiviation.

Yay.

> I'll see if there's something I can do to help :)

Yay².


Cheers,
OdyX

Message #25 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org>

To: 746394@bugs.debian.org

Cc: debian-cloud@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 15:21:14 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> 
> Did you have a look into
> /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
> your own image via debootstrap.

And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)

I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
maintained and signed images?

I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.



1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/

-- 
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #30 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Fordham <chris@fordham-nagy.id.au>

To: 746394@bugs.debian.org, debian-cloud <debian-cloud@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 08:59:17 +1000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Personally, I'd prefer that we use packer instead of bootstrap-vz (
https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz) to build official Debian images of
which should be published on http://cdimage.debian.org or the more
appropriate file server for users to download.


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> >
> > Did you have a look into
> > /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
> > your own image via debootstrap.
>
> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)
>
> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
> maintained and signed images?
>
> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.
>
>
>
> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/
>
> --
> Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
> secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
>
> http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9
> "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #35 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Anders Ingemann <anders@ingemann.de>

To: Chris Fordham <chris@fordham-nagy.id.au>

Cc: 746394@bugs.debian.org, debian-cloud <debian-cloud@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 01:32:08 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 1 May 2014 00:59, Chris Fordham <chris@fordham-nagy.id.au> wrote:

> Personally, I'd prefer that we use packer instead of bootstrap-vz (
> https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz) to build official Debian images
> of which should be published on http://cdimage.debian.org or the more
> appropriate file server for users to download.
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org>wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> >
>> > Did you have a look into
>> > /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
>> > your own image via debootstrap.
>>
>> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)
>>
>> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
>> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
>> maintained and signed images?
>>
>> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
>> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
>> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
>> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/
>>
>> --
>> Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
>> secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
>>
>> http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9
>> "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
>>
>
>
Could you elaborate on *why* you prefer packer? What are the advantages
over bootstrap-vz?
As I see it right now, I'd like to ask the question whether you could send
packer via email or whether it would fit on a floppy (if you catch my
drift<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SricpmKQd3U>
).

Anders

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #40 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Brian Gupta <brian.gupta@brandorr.com>

To: debian-cloud <debian-cloud@lists.debian.org>

Cc: 746394@bugs.debian.org, Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 20:38:27 -0400

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
>>
>> Did you have a look into
>> /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
>> your own image via debootstrap.
>
> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)
>
> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
> maintained and signed images?
>
> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.
>
> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/

Not a docker user yet, but from what I understand it probably fits in
with what we debian-cloud folks are doing and I, for one, would be
happy to hear what you are doing.

However, I would make sure to collaborate with paultag and the other
docker.io package maintainers as I suspect.

At this point, I guess finding a reliable safe distribution channel is
the big open question. (This goes back to a trusted/official cloud
image listing service I had proposed earlier. Sigh.. I need to follow
up on that.)

-Brian

Message #45 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>

To: debian-cloud@lists.debian.org

Cc: 746394@bugs.debian.org, obergix@debian.org

Subject: Docker provider for bootstrap-vz Was: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:23:31 +0200

Hi.

Is anyone working on adding Docker provider for bootstrap-vz
(i.e. building Docker.io images containing a Debian install, ready to
run in a docker container) ?

It seems a GSOC 2014 was proposed for this [0], but I can't find
evidence that anyone is working on it.

If someone is, please respond in [1] with appropriate details ;)

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2014/Projects/bootstrap-vz
[1] https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz/issues/128
Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> 
>> Did you have a look into
>> /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
>> your own image via debootstrap.
>
> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)
>
> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
> maintained and signed images?
>
> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.
>
>
>
> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/

-- 
Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> - OpenPGP: 5819D7E8
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF - T&MSP (http://www.it-sudparis.eu)

Message #50 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>

To: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

Cc: debian-cloud@lists.debian.org, 746394@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:30:01 +0200

Hi.

Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:

> One reason why bootstrap-vz exists is that broader frameworks such as
> Debian-Installer have more constraints and are harder to learn and maintain.
> In particular, Debian-Installer does not run as a simple command that prepares
> a tarball on a user's hard drive; it is a minimal Debian system that runs
> by itself.
>
> But I think that attempts to build larger frameworks than bootstrap-vz will end
> up re-inventing an installer for Debian.  So for a Grand Unification I
> recommend to work on Debian-Installer directly.
>

With respect to docker (in the context of #746394), I think that the
providing of images should be much lighter than what the Debian
installer usually does.

AFAIU, docker containers are meant to be very lightweight, compared to
installing on real hardware, and whereas it would be sad to reinvent the
wheels the d-i is already providing, I think that much of its work is to
detect hardware and configure appropriately, which is completely useless
in the context of docker, since there's no hardware emulation, no real
virtual machine, just a chroot-like container (LXC based), at least in
the usual use of docker containers based on LXC running over Linux.

So bootstrap-vz running debootstrap is probably much of what we need for
a bootstrap-vz Docker provider, I guess (and the devil which is in the
details).

Hope this makes sense.

Best regards,
-- 
Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> - OpenPGP: 5819D7E8
Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF - T&MSP (http://www.it-sudparis.eu)

Message #55 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Anders Ingemann <anders@ingemann.de>

To: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>

Cc: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>, debian-cloud <debian-cloud@lists.debian.org>, 746394@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:59:46 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On 29 July 2014 15:30, Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>
wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> writes:
>
> > One reason why bootstrap-vz exists is that broader frameworks such as
> > Debian-Installer have more constraints and are harder to learn and
> maintain.
> > In particular, Debian-Installer does not run as a simple command that
> prepares
> > a tarball on a user's hard drive; it is a minimal Debian system that runs
> > by itself.
> >
> > But I think that attempts to build larger frameworks than bootstrap-vz
> will end
> > up re-inventing an installer for Debian.  So for a Grand Unification I
> > recommend to work on Debian-Installer directly.
> >
>
> With respect to docker (in the context of #746394), I think that the
> providing of images should be much lighter than what the Debian
> installer usually does.
>
> AFAIU, docker containers are meant to be very lightweight, compared to
> installing on real hardware, and whereas it would be sad to reinvent the
> wheels the d-i is already providing, I think that much of its work is to
> detect hardware and configure appropriately, which is completely useless
> in the context of docker, since there's no hardware emulation, no real
> virtual machine, just a chroot-like container (LXC based), at least in
> the usual use of docker containers based on LXC running over Linux.
>
> So bootstrap-vz running debootstrap is probably much of what we need for
> a bootstrap-vz Docker provider, I guess (and the devil which is in the
> details).
>
> Hope this makes sense.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> - OpenPGP: 5819D7E8
> Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF - T&MSP (http://www.it-sudparis.eu)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-cloud-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/871tt4z412.fsf@olivierberger.com
>
>
> So bootstrap-vz running debootstrap is probably much of what we need for
> a bootstrap-vz Docker provider, I guess (and the devil which is in the
details).

I agree. Also a note about lightweightness, using --variant=minbase in a
little bootstrap-vz test scenario I was to get the base install down to
98MB (this includes networking and all the basics). It would be interesting
to see if people know some tricks on how to get that number down even
further.

Anders

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #60 received at 746394@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: olivier sallou <olivier.sallou@gmail.com>

To: Chris Fordham <chris@fordham-nagy.id.au>

Cc: 746394@bugs.debian.org, debian-cloud <debian-cloud@lists.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#746394: Please consider shipping pre-built images in Debian packages

Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:15:57 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

2014-05-01 0:59 GMT+02:00 Chris Fordham <chris@fordham-nagy.id.au>:

> Personally, I'd prefer that we use packer instead of bootstrap-vz (
> https://github.com/andsens/bootstrap-vz) to build official Debian images
> of which should be published on http://cdimage.debian.org or the more
> appropriate file server for users to download.
>

One of the "issue" with Packer, at least for EC2 (Ocean, GCE,  ..?) is it
creates an image from an existing EC2 instance. So you need to get an EC2
account and use some "minimal" Amazon resources to build an image.
With bootstrap-vz, you build your images only locally on your computer, no
need of remote account/resource.

Olivier

>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Miguel Landaeta <nomadium@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:59:49PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
>> >
>> > Did you have a look into
>> > /usr/share/docker.io/contrib/mkimage-debootstrap.sh? You can generate
>> > your own image via debootstrap.
>>
>> And what debian-cloud team? (CCing them)
>>
>> I don't know if that it's outside of the tasks of the team (what do you
>> think guys?) but it would be nice if you can provide properly
>> maintained and signed images?
>>
>> I'm a member of that team (I'm almost inactive although) but maybe we
>> can contribute with that. For example, I have a very simple image in my
>> web page[1] generated with debootstrap and signed with my key since is
>> the only one I trust so far to play around with docker.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. http://people.debian.org/~nomadium/docker/images/
>>
>> --
>> Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
>> secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at
>>
>> http://db.debian.org/fetchkey.cgi?fingerprint=4CB7FE1E280ECC90F29A597E6E608B637D8967E9
>> "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
>>
>
>


-- 

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)

Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.