Debian Bug report logs - #741070
josm: Fails to load Bing Sat images

Display info messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <thep@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: josm: Fails to load Bing Sat images

Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 11:32:22 +0700

Package: josm
Version: 0.0.svn6502+dfsg3-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

When trying to load Bing Sat images with "Imagery > Bing Sat" menu,
JOSM pops up an error dialog saying "Input == null!".

There is no other message on the terminal used to invoke it when
the error occurs.

Downgrading to 0.0.svn6502+dfsg1-1 does solve the problem.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=th_TH.utf8, LC_CTYPE=th_TH.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages josm depends on:
ii  ant                              1.9.3-2
ii  jmapviewer                       1.02+dfsg1-1
ii  libandroid-json-org-java         20121204-20090211-1
ii  libcommons-codec-java            1.9-1
ii  libgettext-commons-java          0.9.6-2
ii  libmetadata-extractor-java       2.3.1+dfsg-2
ii  liboauth-signpost-java           1.2.1.2-1.1
ii  libsvgsalamander-java            0~svn95-1
ii  openjdk-7-jre                    7u51-2.4.5-2
ii  openstreetmap-map-icons-classic  1:0.0.svn28731-1

Versions of packages josm recommends:
pn  josm-l10n         <none>
pn  josm-plugins      <none>
ii  webkit-image-gtk  0.0.svn25399-3

josm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>

To: 741070@bugs.debian.org

Subject: note

Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 23:26:08 -0700

FYI, the josm in experimental (0.0.svn6687+dfsg1-1) appears to fix this.

Message #15 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: jason@jasonwoof.com

To: Dima Kogan <dima@secretsauce.net>

Cc: 741070@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#741070: note

Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:03:46 -0400

On 2014-03-20 11:26PM, Dima Kogan wrote:
> FYI, the josm in experimental (0.0.svn6687+dfsg1-1) appears to fix this.

I tried installing josm-0.0.svn6687+dfsg1-1 from experimental. I
purged josm-plugins to get this to install/configure.

I fired up josm and got the rather cryptic dialog:

	JOSM version 6.875 required for plugin notes.
	[Download Plugin]  [Skip Download]

First I tried the [Download Plugin] button. The dialog went away,
but josm never opened another window. I waited a long time (tens of
minutes) and then killed the josm process.

I tried again, running in the terminal. This is the output:

	Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-i386/bin/java to execute josm.
	INFO: Preference setting validator.tests has been removed since it
	is no longer used.
	INFO: Preference setting validator.testsBeforeUpload has been
	removed since it is no longer used.
	INFO: Running plugin update after JOSM upgrade. Automatic update at
	startup is enabled.

Then I got the same dialog described above. This time clicked the
[Skip Download] button. Same thing happened. No additional terminal
output. josm did not show up among the active processes in top.


Please let me know if there's further testing/experimenting I can
do to help with this.

Thank you for your time.

-- 
Jason

Message #20 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Sebastian <msebast2@yahoo.com>

To: "741070@bugs.debian.org" <741070@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#741070: note

Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:55:20 -0700 (PDT)

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I can also confirm installing the version from experimental fixes the problem.
There were several dependency problems I had to work through.


jason@jasonwoof.com: 

You need the josm-plugins package from experimental.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #25 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jason Woofenden <jason@jasonwoof.com>

To: Michael Sebastian <msebast2@yahoo.com>

Cc: "741070@bugs.debian.org" <741070@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#741070: note

Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 22:00:53 -0400

> You need the josm-plugins package from experimental.

There doesn't seem to be a josm-plugins in experimental.

Proof: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/josm-plugins

I'm guessing it wasn't in experimental a month ago when I tried,
I don't know how to check.

The version of josm-plugins in sid breaks josm >= 0.0.svn6503

-- 
Jason

Message #30 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: colliar <colliar4ever@aol.com>

To: 741070@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#741070: note

Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:39:04 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>> You need the josm-plugins package from experimental.

> There doesn't seem to be a josm-plugins in experimental.

> Proof: https://packages.debian.org/experimental/josm-plugins

> I'm guessing it wasn't in experimental a month ago when I tried, I
don't know how to check.

> The version of josm-plugins in sid breaks josm >= 0.0.svn6503

You hit several problems at once.

First, you do not need the josm-plugins package at all. You can install
all plugins manually and there are known problems with JOSM's plugin
update mechanism and this package.

Second, you can try to move the preference folder ($HOME/.josm) and try
the experimental package though you loose your preferences.

Third, you could export/import your preferences. There is an option in
JOSM preferences dialogue maybe only available in expert mode. Did not
test much the feature, yet, but it seems quite powerful.

Good luck

colliar

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #35 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Achim Schaefer <achim_schaefer@gmx.de>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <741070@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Re: josm: Fails to load Bing Sat images

Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 22:48:05 +0200

Package: josm
Version: 0.0.svn7480+dfsg1-1
Followup-For: Bug #741070

Dear Maintainer,

Still the same with the new version.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages josm depends on:
ii  ant                              1.9.4-1
ii  fonts-droid                      1:4.4.4r2-2
ii  jmapviewer                       1.03+dfsg-1
ii  libandroid-json-org-java         20121204-20090211-1
ii  libcommons-codec-java            1.9-1
ii  libgettext-commons-java          0.9.6-2
ii  libmetadata-extractor-java       2.6.4-2
ii  liboauth-signpost-java           1.2.1.2-1.2
ii  libsvgsalamander-java            0~svn95-1
ii  openjdk-7-jre                    7u65-2.5.2-4
ii  openstreetmap-map-icons-classic  1:0.0.svn28731-1

Versions of packages josm recommends:
ii  josm-l10n         0.0.svn7480+dfsg1-1
pn  josm-plugins      <none>
ii  webkit-image-gtk  0.0.svn25399-3

josm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #40 received at 741070@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Martin Krüger <martin.krueger@gmx.com>

To: 741070@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: josm: Fails to load Bing Sat images

Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 01:23:31 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The bug ist not located in the josm-package but in the jmapviewer package.

I created new bug-report for the affected package : #765421

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #45 received at 741070-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>

To: 741070-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#741070: fixed in josm 0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1

Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:09:23 +0000

Source: josm
Source-Version: 0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
josm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 741070@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> (supplier of updated josm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 18:31:19 +0200
Source: josm
Binary: josm josm-l10n
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
Description:
 josm       - Editor for OpenStreetMap
 josm-l10n  - Editor for OpenStreetMap - translation files
Closes: 708136 741070 764096 764781 765752
Changes:
 josm (0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6, no changes.
   * Remove Java 6 support, JOSM now requires Java 7.
     (closes: #708136)
   * New tested snapshot.
     (closes: #765752, #764781, #764096, #741070)
   * Refresh patches.
   * Add gbp.conf to use pristine-tar by default.
   * Remove josm examples, start.html no longer included.
   * Restructure control file with cme.
   * Switch Maintainer from the Debian OpenStreetMap Team to the Debian
     GIS Project.
   * Add myself to Uploaders.
Checksums-Sha1:
 aefd8bb67cc253c3c2f2ed125fbe93e13d035dc3 2454 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.dsc
 54eb59b2ea3b1b03850be0a1d298c9ccbfa25ef4 17006561 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
 d76987368238ebe4871808698ee3947c40bc7578 26424 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 a70c83a1683c38b3245eea395beb55ac6e9cb51c 5576530 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb
 275a80b1cf1fdd0b988d18124e2bd2a5b3a76ecc 1302050 josm-l10n_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 95017d07136c823f06b64db9dfa13e6ffbc77223cba226b208fe37fc88a81eb7 2454 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.dsc
 771fa2e184a55789d26e9a5e8074509e39c669d7d17002d5ca961ec623f05e2d 17006561 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
 f67e4adf841b334e51492d71b5fed381e32e3568b1134dc49e4a7d941fb70a7a 26424 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 c597b5e9dd2047df865252847b37b38ab676e0ae3d0e2c5fe0502667a70eb342 5576530 josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb
 7133e1a0027604b570ec5d2e6f3cb3811170b8e23e2743fc1aff55169308595a 1302050 josm-l10n_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb
Files:
 537365cc7b949efa61d0afc289f95208 2454 utils extra josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.dsc
 97b3728755802e9c55f66322f23ee140 17006561 utils extra josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
 3ac5bf27b49d1126ed9b39937966f8dc 26424 utils extra josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1.debian.tar.xz
 f1d11dd6b4de1f09585169b19b2a9800 5576530 utils extra josm_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb
 651a4e1937204aa446fb1afdd5c155e3 1302050 localization extra josm-l10n_0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=XKNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.