Debian Bug report logs - #730876
pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz

Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:28:09 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Subject: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz
Package: pristine-tar
Version: 1.30
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz under debian unstable.

Reproduction works under both:
- i386 debian stable with tar 1.26-dfsg-0.1, pristine-tar 1.25+deb7u1
- amd63 ubuntu 13.04 with tar 1.26-dfsg5, pristine-tar 1.26

The below is output from the pristine-tar failing under debian unstable:

user@debian:~/antpm$ pristine-tar -vdk checkout antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz
pristine-tar: git archive --format=tar
c2a3df1f2ea0686a4276facb73ba0e56f2aaf942 | (cd
'/tmp/pristine-tar.hfvN6LMyRh' && tar x)
pristine-tar: tar xf /tmp/pristine-tar.rOykflrD2U/tmpin -C
/tmp/pristine-tar.0QNqWhyZZD
pristine-tar: set subdir to .travis.yml
pristine-tar: found file not in subdir .travis.yml: LICENSE
pristine-tar: mv /tmp/pristine-tar.hfvN6LMyRh
/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/workdir
pristine-tar: tar cf /tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball --owner 0
--group 0 --numeric-owner -C /tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/workdir
--no-recursion --mode 0644 --files-from
/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/manifest
pristine-tar: xdelta patch /tmp/pristine-tar.0QNqWhyZZD/delta
/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball
/tmp/pristine-tar.yitFG16I0j/antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz.tmp
xdelta: expected from file (/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball)
of length 2856960 bytes
pristine-tar: tar cf /tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball --owner 0
--group 0 --numeric-owner -C /tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/workdir
--no-recursion --mode 0644 --files-from
/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/manifest
pristine-tar: xdelta patch /tmp/pristine-tar.0QNqWhyZZD/delta
/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball
/tmp/pristine-tar.yitFG16I0j/antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz.tmp
xdelta: expected from file (/tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/recreatetarball)
of length 2856960 bytes
pristine-tar: set subdir to .travis.yml
pristine-tar: found file not in subdir .travis.yml: LICENSE
pristine-tar: mv /tmp/pristine-tar.S3a_fNeIj3/workdir
/tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/workdir
pristine-tar: tar cf /tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/recreatetarball --owner 0
--group 0 --numeric-owner -C /tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/workdir
--no-recursion --mode 0644 --files-from
/tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/manifest -H gnu
pristine-tar: xdelta patch /tmp/pristine-tar.0QNqWhyZZD/delta
/tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/recreatetarball
/tmp/pristine-tar.yitFG16I0j/antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz.tmp
xdelta: expected from file (/tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/recreatetarball)
of length 2856960 bytes
pristine-tar: set subdir to .travis.yml
pristine-tar: found file not in subdir .travis.yml: LICENSE
pristine-tar: mv /tmp/pristine-tar.gWVKlPjddY/workdir
/tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/workdir
pristine-tar: tar cf /tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/recreatetarball --owner 0
--group 0 --numeric-owner -C /tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/workdir
--no-recursion --mode 0644 --files-from
/tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/manifest -H posix
pristine-tar: xdelta patch /tmp/pristine-tar.0QNqWhyZZD/delta
/tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/recreatetarball
/tmp/pristine-tar.yitFG16I0j/antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz.tmp
xdelta: expected from file (/tmp/pristine-tar.CkBGKHNiCU/recreatetarball)
of length 2856960 bytes
pristine-tar: Failed to reproduce original tarball. Please file a bug
report.
pristine-tar: failed to generate tarball


antpm sources are available under
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-running/antpm.git;a=summary

Maybe this is similar to debian bug #726963 ?



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages pristine-tar depends on:
ii  libbz2-1.0    1.0.6-5
ii  libc6         2.17-97
ii  perl-modules  5.18.1-4
ii  tar           1.27-3
ii  xdelta        1.1.3-9
ii  zlib1g        1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

Versions of packages pristine-tar recommends:
ii  bzip2     1.0.6-5
ii  pbzip2    1.1.8-1
ii  xz-utils  5.1.1alpha+20120614-2

pristine-tar suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #10 received at 730876@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

To: 730876@bugs.debian.org, 730876-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz

Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:20:24 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:28:09 +0100 "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com> wrote:
> Subject: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz
> Package: pristine-tar
> Version: 1.30
> Severity: important
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> I cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz under debian unstable.
> 
> Reproduction works under both:
> - i386 debian stable with tar 1.26-dfsg-0.1, pristine-tar 1.25+deb7u1
> - amd63 ubuntu 13.04 with tar 1.26-dfsg5, pristine-tar 1.26
> 
> The below is output from the pristine-tar failing under debian unstable:
[...]

Hi, I know this bug report is somewhat old, but I would need a copy of
the actual tarball in order to investigate. Do you still have one lying
around by any chance?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #18 received at 730876@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com>

To: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>, 730876-quiet@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 730876@bugs.debian.org, 730876-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#730876: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz

Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:09:38 +0200

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:28:09 +0100 "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Subject: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz
>> Package: pristine-tar
>> Version: 1.30
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> I cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz under debian unstable.
>>
>> Reproduction works under both:
>> - i386 debian stable with tar 1.26-dfsg-0.1, pristine-tar 1.25+deb7u1
>> - amd63 ubuntu 13.04 with tar 1.26-dfsg5, pristine-tar 1.26
>>
>> The below is output from the pristine-tar failing under debian unstable:
> [...]
>
> Hi, I know this bug report is somewhat old, but I would need a copy of
> the actual tarball in order to investigate. Do you still have one lying
> around by any chance?

The problem was in the end related to how the scripts generated the
original tar file, not with pristine-tar. If I recall it correctly
there was an empty subfolder stored in the hand crafted tar file.
Sorry for the false alarm. From my side the tracker could be closed.

Message #31 received at 730876-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>

To: "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com>, 730876-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#730876: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz

Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 09:31:52 -0300

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 06:09:38PM +0200, kristof.ralovich@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:28:09 +0100 "kristof.ralovich@gmail.com" <kristof.ralovich@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Subject: pristine-tar: cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz
> >> Package: pristine-tar
> >> Version: 1.30
> >> Severity: important
> >>
> >> Dear Maintainer,
> >>
> >> I cannot reproduce antpm_1.12.orig.tar.xz under debian unstable.
> >>
> >> Reproduction works under both:
> >> - i386 debian stable with tar 1.26-dfsg-0.1, pristine-tar 1.25+deb7u1
> >> - amd63 ubuntu 13.04 with tar 1.26-dfsg5, pristine-tar 1.26
> >>
> >> The below is output from the pristine-tar failing under debian unstable:
> > [...]
> >
> > Hi, I know this bug report is somewhat old, but I would need a copy of
> > the actual tarball in order to investigate. Do you still have one lying
> > around by any chance?
> 
> The problem was in the end related to how the scripts generated the
> original tar file, not with pristine-tar. If I recall it correctly
> there was an empty subfolder stored in the hand crafted tar file.
> Sorry for the false alarm. From my side the tracker could be closed.

Thanks

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.