Debian Bug report logs - #724345
ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:24:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 23:21:48 +0100
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
over.

The package description is:
 Python bindings for the Subversion version control system. The aim of
 these bindings is to be fast, complete and to provide an API that feels native
 to Python programmers.
 .
 This also includes an experimental server-side implementation of the
 Subversion protocol.



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:30:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:30:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
To: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Subject: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:26:32 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Jelmer,

Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> over.

I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
the Maintainer field ;)

Cheers,
Javi
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Changed Bug title to 'ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion' from 'RFA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion' Request was from Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:48:12 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:24:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:24:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
To: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
Cc: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:51:10 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Javi,

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > over.
> 
> I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> the Maintainer field ;)
Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?

What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before.

Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?

Cheers,

Jelmer
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:24:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sat, 22 Mar 2014 20:24:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
To: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
Cc: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:42:09 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Javi,

On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > over.
> 
> I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> the Maintainer field ;)
Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?

What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before.

Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?

Cheers,

Jelmer
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #27 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
To: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Cc: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:52:24 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi Javi,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > > over.
> > 
> > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> > Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> > debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> > the Maintainer field ;)
> Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
> reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?

No, unfortunately it's still svn.  I use git-svn and git-buildpackage
with some packages though.

> What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before.

I meant pybuild.  It's fairly recent.  It's an easy way of making
packages that support multiple versions of python and removes most of
the pyversions "loops" in debian/rules:

https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Pybuild

> Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?

Of course you can be co-maintainer!  Would you mind if I moved it to
the Python Modules Team svn though?

Cheers,
Javi


[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:39:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:39:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
To: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
Cc: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:38:40 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi Javi,
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > > > over.
> > > 
> > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> > > Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> > > debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> > > the Maintainer field ;)
> > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
> > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?
> 
> No, unfortunately it's still svn.  I use git-svn and git-buildpackage
> with some packages though.
> 
> > What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before.
> 
> I meant pybuild.  It's fairly recent.  It's an easy way of making
> packages that support multiple versions of python and removes most of
> the pyversions "loops" in debian/rules:
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Pybuild
> 
> > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?
> 
> Of course you can be co-maintainer!  Would you mind if I moved it to
> the Python Modules Team svn though?

Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer.
I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can
move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git.

Cheers,

Jelmer
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:09:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:09:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #37 received at 724345-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
To: 724345-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing for now
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:07:06 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Closing this for the moment. I'll move the packaging to the
pkg-python-modules team once they migrate to Git.

Cheers,

Jelmer
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#724345; Package wnpp. (Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:21:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:21:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #42 received at 724345@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Javi Merino <vicho@debian.org>
To: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Cc: 724345@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:19:19 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:38:40PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Javi Merino wrote:
> > > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low
> > > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it
> > > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took
> > > > > over.
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules
> > > > Team umbrella.  I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape,
> > > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks!  All I can
> > > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the
> > > > debian/rules .  I may do it just to justify the upload that changes
> > > > the Maintainer field ;)
> > > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems
> > > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days?
> > 
> > No, unfortunately it's still svn.  I use git-svn and git-buildpackage
> > with some packages though.
> > 
> > > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer?
> > 
> > Of course you can be co-maintainer!  Would you mind if I moved it to
> > the Python Modules Team svn though?
> 
> Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer.
> I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can
> move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git.

Ok, so shall we migrate it to git then?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:29:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Thu Apr 24 00:28:07 2014; Machine Name: buxtehude.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.