Debian Bug report logs -
#687016
Upstart support
Reply or subscribe to this bug.
Toggle useless messages
Report forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>:
Bug#687016; Package src:zabbix.
(Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Christian Kampka <chris@emerge-life.de>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>.
(Sat, 08 Sep 2012 12:45:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: src:zabbix
Version: 1:2.0.2+dfsg-5
Ubuntu uses Upstart instead of SysVInit to run the init process.
Attached debdiff includes upstart scripts that will allow Upstart to
start/stop all zabbix daemon components. Installation of the scripts
will happen automatically using Ubuntus Upstart debhelper scripts,
Debian will simply ignore them.
I am aware that Debian will benefit little from these, especially since
its Upstart version is quite old. Nevertheless, I believe it's
reasonable to get the patch to enter Ubuntus repositories through
upstream Debian.
Cheers,
Christian
[upstart-support.debdiff (text/plain, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Mon, 10 Sep 2012 01:27:12 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>:
Bug#687016; Package src:zabbix.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:00:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:00:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #12 received at 687016@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
tags 687016 wontfix
--
I welcome improvements for Debian and derivatives.
However if there is no benefit for Debian I can't justify the maintenance time
needed for this.
Thanks for sharing but for now let's keep non-Debian customisation out of
Debian.
Regards,
Dmitry.
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org>
to control@bugs.debian.org.
(Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:00:04 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>:
Bug#687016; Package src:zabbix.
(Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Dmitrijs Ledkovs <xnox@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>.
(Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:21:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #19 received at 687016@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
Dear zabbix maintainer,
Upstart is an init system that can be used on debian instead of sysvinit.
Many other packages already provide support for systemd and upstart in Debian.
Since upstart integration has improved in Debian recently, upstart
jobs in your package is a benefit on Debian. [1]
Can you please reconsider your position and remove wontfix tag?
[1] http://web.dodds.net/~vorlon/wiki/blog/Upstart_in_Debian/
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
Information forwarded
to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>:
Bug#687016; Package src:zabbix.
(Mon, 03 Dec 2012 06:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Acknowledgement sent
to Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob@member.fsf.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org>.
(Mon, 03 Dec 2012 06:18:03 GMT) (full text, mbox, link).
Message #24 received at 687016@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:17:55 Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Upstart is an init system that can be used on debian instead of sysvinit.
> Many other packages already provide support for systemd and upstart in
> Debian. Since upstart integration has improved in Debian recently, upstart
> jobs in your package is a benefit on Debian. [1]
> Can you please reconsider your position and remove wontfix tag?
Reconsideration requires motivation and time. At the moment I posses neither
of them. I know little about upstart and I will not reconsider until I learn
more, which is not a priority for now.
> [1] http://web.dodds.net/~vorlon/wiki/blog/Upstart_in_Debian/
This link reaffirmed my position to avoid integrating upstart for now.
The article mention a little decrease in boot time which is nice
however by itself probably is not enough to justify the work needed to
introduce upstrat support.
More important the same essay says that OpenSUSE switched from upstart to
systemd which I interpret as evidence that upstart may not be suitable because
of some problems with it. (Otherwise why would they stop using it?)
Finally Ubuntu's decision to use upstart could be politically motivated and
therefore we have to think twice about the pros and cons for Debian.
So far I've seen upstart advocacy only from people affiliated with Ubuntu.
Is there are any independent reviews made by people (preferably by DDs)
without obvious connections to Ubuntu?
Regards,
Dmitry.
Send a report that this bug log contains spam.
Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>.
Last modified:
Fri Jan 12 08:39:16 2018;
Machine Name:
buxtehude
Debian Bug tracking system
Debbugs is free software and licensed under the terms of the GNU
Public License version 2. The current version can be obtained
from https://bugs.debian.org/debbugs-source/.
Copyright © 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson,
2005-2017 Don Armstrong, and many other contributors.