Debian Bug report logs - #685998
RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package

Package: sponsorship-requests; Maintainer for sponsorship-requests is Debian Mentors <package-sponsorship-requests@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:21:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Done: Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, talex5@gmail.com, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:21:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to talex5@gmail.com, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:21:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFS: 0install/1.11-1 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:17:26 +0100
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear Mentors,

I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. I have split it into
separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless servers. Could someone
check it and approve the new package names? My previous mentor (Jens Peter
Secher) is no longer a DD.

It now builds these binary packages:

  0install-core (contains the code)
  0install (metapackage that depends on 0install-core and GTK)
  zeroinstall-injector (transitional package so that using the old
package name still works)

I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now
"0install".

To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc

 More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net.


Regards,

 T. Leonard



Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' Request was from Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:51:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #12 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
To: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>, 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 15:42:50 +0000
Hi Peter,

The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
http://0install.net/install-source.html
http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2

Regards,

Bart Martens



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 16:48:35 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sep 2, 2012 4:42 PM, "Bart Martens" <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
> http://0install.net/install-source.html
>
http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart Martens

Hi Bart. I'm the upstream maintainer (as well as the Debian packager) so
there's no problem with renaming it. I can rename the upstream tarball too
if it helps.

Thanks,
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:54:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 02 Sep 2012 15:54:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
To: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 15:51:37 +0000
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Peter,

Sorry, my mistake, this should have been "Hi Thomas".

Regards,

Bart Martens



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #27 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:25:12 +0100
On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>
> Sorry, my mistake, this should have been "Hi Thomas".

Hi Bart,

No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename?

Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of
dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a
minimal system (with Python).

Thanks,


-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:42:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:42:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
To: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:38:55 +0000
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >
> > Sorry, my mistake, this should have been "Hi Thomas".
> 
> Hi Bart,
> 
> No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename?
> 
> Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of
> dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a
> minimal system (with Python).

Hi Thomas,

The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
http://0install.net/install-source.html
http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2

I have not yet looked any further than that.

Regards,

Bart Martens



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:45:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #37 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:44:07 +0100
On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 10:25:12AM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
>> On 2 September 2012 16:51, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 03:42:50PM +0000, Bart Martens wrote:
>> >> Hi Peter,
>> >
>> > Sorry, my mistake, this should have been "Hi Thomas".
>>
>> Hi Bart,
>>
>> No problem. Are there any issues with the package split and rename?
>>
>> Splitting the package really helps on servers. e.g. ~100 MB of
>> dependencies for zeroinstall-injector vs ~1 MB for 0install-core on a
>> minimal system (with Python).
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
> http://0install.net/install-source.html
> http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2
>
> I have not yet looked any further than that.

I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream),
but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does
it?

Note that this bug is linked from the front page of
http://0install.net ("we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the
change") if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the
rename.

Thanks,


-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #42 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
Cc: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:57:49 +0100
On 7 September 2012 16:44, Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7 September 2012 16:38, Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> wrote:
[...]
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The upstream source package name is still zeroinstall-injector.
>> http://0install.net/install-source.html
>> http://downloads.sf.net/project/zero-install/injector/1.11/zeroinstall-injector-1.11.tar.bz2
>>
>> I have not yet looked any further than that.
>
> I can rename it if necessary (1.12 will have the new name upstream),
> but I don't think this needs to hold up the Debian package split, does
> it?
>
> Note that this bug is linked from the front page of
> http://0install.net ("we need a sponsor from Debian to approve the
> change") if you need confirmation that upstream agrees with the
> rename.

Hi Bart,

Just to clarify: are you dealing with this package rename request, or
do I need to ask on the mentors list?

Thanks,


-- 
Dr Thomas Leonard        http://0install.net/
GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6  8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1
GPG: DA98 25AE CAD0 8975 7CDA  BD8E 0713 3F96 CA74 D8BA



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#685998; Package sponsorship-requests. (Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:45:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #47 received at 685998@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>
To: 685998@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#685998: RFS: 0install/1.11-1
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:40:56 +0100
Dear Mentors,

I am a DM, maintaining the zeroinstall-injector package. In August, I
split it into separate packages to avoid pulling in GTK on headless
servers. This saves around 100 Mb when deploying to a fresh server.
This change was requested by several users, e.g.

  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.zero-install.devel/6108/focus=6110

Could someone check it and approve the new package names? My previous
mentor (Jens Peter Secher) is no longer a DD.

It now builds these binary packages:

  0install-core (contains the code)
  0install (metapackage that depends on 0install-core and GTK)
  zeroinstall-injector (transitional package so that using the old
package name still works)

I updated the name as "injector" is no longer used, and the main command is now
"0install".

The upstream project will use the new package name in the 1.12
release. This bug is linked from the project's news page, if
confirmation is needed that we approve of this change:

  http://0install.net/news.html

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/0install

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/0/0install/0install_1.11-1.dsc

 More information about 0install can be obtained from http://0install.net.


Regards,

 T. Leonard



Changed Bug title to 'RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package' from 'RFS: 0install/1.11-1 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package' Request was from Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:06:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Thomas Leonard <talex5@gmail.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:24:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #54 received at 685998-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Bart Martens <bartm@quantz.debian.org>
To: 685998-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing RFS: 0install/1.12-2 [ITP] -- rename zeroinstall-injector package
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:20:34 +0000
Package 0install has been removed from mentors.



Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 17 Mar 2013 07:27:39 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Apr 18 11:51:52 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.