Debian Bug report logs - #675976
transition: libguac

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: yoh@onerussian.com

Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 17:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, mike.jumper@guac-dev.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#675976; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:21:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to yoh@onerussian.com:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to mike.jumper@guac-dev.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 17:21:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: transition: libguac
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 13:17:37 -0400
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Actually all dependent packages are part of the same 'guacamole' project and
there is no 3rd party dependees (yet). libguac 0.6.0-1 provides libguac3 binary
package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be built/uploaded
whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:

libguac-client-vnc
guacd


Affected: .build-depends ~ /libguac-dev/
Good: .depends ~ /libguac3/
Bad: .depends ~ /libguac2/

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental'), (100, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#675976; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:00:12 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:00:12 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 675976@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
To: yoh@onerussian.com, 675976@bugs.debian.org, Michael Jumper <zhangmaike@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#675976: transition: libguac
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:59:10 +0200
On 2012-06-04 19:17, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> [...]

Hi,

I am CC'ing Michael Jumper (maintainer of libguac).  We have a wiki page
describing how to request transition slots[1], just in case either of
you haven't seen it.

In the given case, I see Michael is the maintainer of all involved
packages, which is half the reason why I am okay with starting the
transition[2].

> 
> Actually all dependent packages are part of the same 'guacamole' project and
> there is no 3rd party dependees (yet). libguac 0.6.0-1 provides libguac3 binary
> package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be built/uploaded
> whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:
> 
> libguac-client-vnc
> guacd
> 
> 
> Affected: .build-depends ~ /libguac-dev/
> Good: .depends ~ /libguac3/
> Bad: .depends ~ /libguac2/
> 
> [...]
> 
> 

Tracker is at [3].  Just to be on the same page, I read "built/uploaded"
as you were going to upload a new version.  This is perfectly fine if
you do so, I just need to know what packages (if any) that needs binNMUs.

~Niels

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions

[2] The other half is that the transition does not appear to have any
conflicts.

[3] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libguac.html





Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#675976; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:09:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:09:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 675976@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
To: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Cc: 675976@bugs.debian.org, Michael Jumper <zhangmaike@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#675976: transition: libguac
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:04:14 -0400
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am CC'ing Michael Jumper (maintainer of libguac).

I thought I have added him into CC while reporting the bug... or I
thought I did ;) thanks for the CC

> In the given case, I see Michael is the maintainer of all involved
> packages, which is half the reason why I am okay with starting the
> transition[2].

yes -- I am just a mentor/sponsor

> > package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be built/uploaded
> > whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:

> > libguac-client-vnc
> > guacd


> Tracker is at [3].  Just to be on the same page, I read "built/uploaded"
> as you were going to upload a new version.  This is perfectly fine if
> you do so, I just need to know what packages (if any) that needs binNMUs.

Since they depend on current version of libguac (which is in NEW) --
imho there is no reason to upload new versions until libguac becomes
part of sid.  And then I guess there would be no need for binNMUs (i.e.
less work for you ;-) )

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Postdoctoral Fellow,   Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#675976; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:30:13 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:30:14 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 675976@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
To: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>, 675976@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>, Michael Jumper <zhangmaike@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#675976: transition: libguac
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:25:21 +0100
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:04 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be built/uploaded
> > > whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:
[...]
> > Tracker is at [3].  Just to be on the same page, I read "built/uploaded"
> > as you were going to upload a new version.  This is perfectly fine if
> > you do so, I just need to know what packages (if any) that needs binNMUs.
> 
> Since they depend on current version of libguac (which is in NEW) --
> imho there is no reason to upload new versions until libguac becomes
> part of sid.  And then I guess there would be no need for binNMUs (i.e.
> less work for you ;-) )

libguac 0.6.0-1 has been in unstable since Monday evening.  Will the
r-deps be uploaded soon?

Regards,

Adam





Added tag(s) pending. Request was from Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 09 Jun 2012 11:30:26 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#675976; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:00:39 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:00:39 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #27 received at 675976@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@onerussian.com>
To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>,Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>,675976@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>,Michael Jumper <zhangmaike@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#675976: transition: libguac
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:38:57 -0400
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:04 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> > > package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be
>built/uploaded
>> > > whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:
>[...]
>> > Tracker is at [3].  Just to be on the same page, I read
>"built/uploaded"
>> > as you were going to upload a new version.  This is perfectly fine
>if
>> > you do so, I just need to know what packages (if any) that needs
>binNMUs.
>>
>> Since they depend on current version of libguac (which is in NEW) --
>> imho there is no reason to upload new versions until libguac becomes
>> part of sid.  And then I guess there would be no need for binNMUs
>(i.e.
>> less work for you ;-) )
>
>libguac 0.6.0-1 has been in unstable since Monday evening.  Will the
>r-deps be uploaded soon?
>
>Regards,
>
>Adam

Yes
They are built and are going through the review for sponsorship in spare time
--
Sent from a phone which beats iPhone.




Reply sent to Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:00:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to yoh@onerussian.com:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 21 Jun 2012 07:00:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 675976-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: yoh@onerussian.com, 675976-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#675976: transition: libguac
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:58:43 +0200
On Mon, Jun  4, 2012 at 13:17:37 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Actually all dependent packages are part of the same 'guacamole' project and
> there is no 3rd party dependees (yet). libguac 0.6.0-1 provides libguac3 binary
> package and thus in NEW queue atm.  All dependees will be built/uploaded
> whenever libguac gets into sid and gets built across platforms:
> 
All done now, closing.

Cheers,
Julien




Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 19 Jul 2012 07:33:51 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sun Apr 20 06:55:05 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.