Debian Bug report logs - #672546
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Version: 1:0.2.904+svn1050-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd

Hi,

currently, xserver-xorg-video-openchrome does not build on GNU/Hurd.

The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI
support is enabled (and indeed there seems to be only libdrm usage in
the DRI-related code).

Attached there are patches to fix this:
- no-libdrm.diff:
  do not check for libdrm among the base Xorg packages; libdrm will be
  searched later as mandatory requirement if the DRI support is enabled
- debian.diff:
  disable the libdrm-dev build dependency on Hurd architectures

Thanks,
-- 
Pino

[no-libdrm.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[debian.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:50:05 +0200

Hello,

Pino Toscano, le Sat 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200, a écrit :
> The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
> buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI
> support is enabled (and indeed there seems to be only libdrm usage in
> the DRI-related code).
> 
> Attached there are patches to fix this:

I guess we could eventually make an NMU to fix this?

Samuel

Message #17 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org, 706889@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 22:00:51 +0100

Samuel Thibault, le Sun 30 Jun 2013 11:50:05 +0200, a écrit :
> Pino Toscano, le Sat 12 May 2012 00:18:41 +0200, a écrit :
> > The problem is that libdrm is considered an hard requirement (by the
> > buildsystem and the Debian packaging), while it is only if the DRI
> > support is enabled (and indeed there seems to be only libdrm usage in
> > the DRI-related code).
> > 
> > Attached there are patches to fix this:
> 
> I guess we could eventually make an NMU to fix this?

Well, in the meanwhile the source code has changed, and would need
to be fixed to be buildable without libdrm, see via_memmgr.c having
a lot of unconditional uses of DRM_*.  Perhaps we should rather give
up with porting openchrome without libdrm, and remove it from hurd's
video-all, as proposed in bug 706889?  I'll probably make a binNMU in
that direction sooner or later.

Samuel

Message #22 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:55:08 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 10:00:51PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Well, in the meanwhile the source code has changed, and would need
> to be fixed to be buildable without libdrm, see via_memmgr.c having
> a lot of unconditional uses of DRM_*.  Perhaps we should rather give
> up with porting openchrome without libdrm, and remove it from hurd's
> video-all, as proposed in bug 706889?  I'll probably make a binNMU in
> that direction sooner or later.

Attached debdiff integrates Pino's patch and some ifdef'ed DRM code.


--
G..e

[debdiff (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #27 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:57:53 +0200

Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 16:55:08 +0200, a écrit :
> +diff --git a/src/via_memmgr.c b/src/via_memmgr.c
> +index 5d4cc3f..e174771 100644
> +--- a/src/via_memmgr.c
> ++++ b/src/via_memmgr.c
> +@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ drm_bo_alloc_surface(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
> +     struct buffer_object *obj = NULL;
> +     int pitch;
> + 
> ++#ifdef HAVE_DRI
> +     switch (format) {
> +     case DRM_FORMAT_C8:
> +         pitch = width;
> +@@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ drm_bo_alloc_surface(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, unsigned int width, unsigned int height,
> +         pitch = width * 4;
> +         break;
> +     }
> ++#endif
> + 
> +     pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);

Err, this can not work: "pitch" becomes completely undefined...

Samuel

Message #32 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > +     pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
> 
> Err, this can not work: "pitch" becomes completely undefined...

Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)

Attached new workaround.

--
G..e

[debdiff2 (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #37 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:12:28 +0200

Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > +     pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
> > 
> > Err, this can not work: "pitch" becomes completely undefined...
> 
> Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)

Well, submitting a patch usually means one thinks that it will work, not
just build...

> - libdrm-dev (>> 2.0),
> + libdrm-dev (>> 2.0) [!hurd-any],

> +--- a/src/via_driver.c
> ++++ b/src/via_driver.c
> +@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> + 
> + #ifdef HAVE_DRI
> + #include "dri.h"
> ++#else
> ++#include "drm_fourcc.h"
> + #endif
> + 

I don't see how that can build: drm_fourcc.h is part of libdrm-dev...

Samuel

Message #42 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 18:14:37 +0200

And again, see what I wrote: considering how drm seems to be stuffed
into its source code, I don't think we want to spend more time on the
openchrome driver; the dependency was already dropped from the xorg
package, we can just ask ftpmaster to drop the remaining previous
binaries.

Samuel

Message #47 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 23:50:40 +0200

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
>> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > > +     pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
>> >
>> > Err, this can not work: "pitch" becomes completely undefined...
>>
>> Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)
>
> Well, submitting a patch usually means one thinks that it will work, not
> just build...
>
>> - libdrm-dev (>> 2.0),
>> + libdrm-dev (>> 2.0) [!hurd-any],
>
>> +--- a/src/via_driver.c
>> ++++ b/src/via_driver.c
>> +@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>> +
>> + #ifdef HAVE_DRI
>> + #include "dri.h"
>> ++#else
>> ++#include "drm_fourcc.h"
>> + #endif
>> +
>
> I don't see how that can build: drm_fourcc.h is part of libdrm-dev...

Not this one:
http://sources.debian.net/src/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/1:0.3.3-1/src/drm_fourcc.h


-- 
G..e

Message #52 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 00:13:09 +0200

Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 23:50:40 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> > Gabriele Giacone, le Mon 05 May 2014 18:02:34 +0200, a écrit :
> >> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> > > +     pitch = ALIGN_TO(pitch, alignment);
> >> >
> >> > Err, this can not work: "pitch" becomes completely undefined...
> >>
> >> Only said it would have built, not also worked ;)
> >
> > Well, submitting a patch usually means one thinks that it will work, not
> > just build...
> >
> >> - libdrm-dev (>> 2.0),
> >> + libdrm-dev (>> 2.0) [!hurd-any],
> >
> >> +--- a/src/via_driver.c
> >> ++++ b/src/via_driver.c
> >> +@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> >> +
> >> + #ifdef HAVE_DRI
> >> + #include "dri.h"
> >> ++#else
> >> ++#include "drm_fourcc.h"
> >> + #endif
> >> +
> >
> > I don't see how that can build: drm_fourcc.h is part of libdrm-dev...
> 
> Not this one:
> http://sources.debian.net/src/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome/1:0.3.3-1/src/drm_fourcc.h

Oh, sorry, I didn't notice that.

This indeed looks like something that would work.

Samuel

Message #57 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
embedded drm header. Cleaner?
I'd update upstream bug as well.

Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?

--
G..e

[debdiff3 (text/plain, attachment)]

Message #62 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org, Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 17:13:23 +0200

Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
> Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
> embedded drm header. Cleaner?

copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just including a header.

> Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?

If the inclusion just works, then it's good.

That being said, I checked in the changelog why the drm_fourcc.h header
exists at all.  It is there just for distributions which do not have it
yet, it's not meant as a replacement for the non-DRI case.

At any rate, such changes should very probably be discussed with
upstream directly.

Samuel

Message #67 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org, Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 17:34:06 +0200

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
>> Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
>> embedded drm header. Cleaner?
>
> copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just including a header.
>
>> Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?
>
> If the inclusion just works, then it's good.
>
> That being said, I checked in the changelog why the drm_fourcc.h header
> exists at all.  It is there just for distributions which do not have it
> yet, it's not meant as a replacement for the non-DRI case.
>
> At any rate, such changes should very probably be discussed with
> upstream directly.

I'll update upstream bug which could be ignored as it's been so far.
In the meantime, how about applying it or as asked above, removing
hurd from build archs?

-- 
G..e

Message #72 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org, Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 18:03:18 +0200

Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:34:06 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> > Gabriele Giacone, le Tue 06 May 2014 17:00:34 +0200, a écrit :
> >> Attached another version with needed #defines instead of including
> >> embedded drm header. Cleaner?
> >
> > copy/pasting code is usually never cleaner than just including a header.
> >
> >> Or do we want simply not to build it on hurd anymore?
> >
> > If the inclusion just works, then it's good.
> >
> > That being said, I checked in the changelog why the drm_fourcc.h header
> > exists at all.  It is there just for distributions which do not have it
> > yet, it's not meant as a replacement for the non-DRI case.
> >
> > At any rate, such changes should very probably be discussed with
> > upstream directly.
> 
> I'll update upstream bug which could be ignored as it's been so far.

Make sure to also raise the question on the X development mailing lists.

> In the meantime, how about applying it

It's up to X maintainers to decide.

Samuel

Message #77 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 19:13:30 +0200

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 06:03:18PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > In the meantime, how about applying it
>
> It's up to X maintainers to decide.

Pino didn't get any feedback from neither Debian nor upstream for 2
years, at least that's what bug trackers say.
No mail on openchrome mailing list since December.

If anyone cares, a NMU to DELAYED will make someone raise one hand,
otherwise as I believe, it will be simply ignored.
I'm ok with either applying such patch or removing hurd-any.

--
G..e

Message #82 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4r8o@gmail.com>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 672546@bugs.debian.org, Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#672546: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome: FTBFS on hurd-i386: unconditional libdrm requirement

Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 19:05:34 +0200

On irc, I was told to send patches to xorg-devel@ to get them reviewed.

http://www.x.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/SubmittingPatches/

Then I noticed header I add has already been unconditionally added in
upstream master so my part is useless.

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/openchrome/xf86-video-openchrome/commit/?id=12c4cb9d393e1620bfbf2e5f9ba8c6d30d3dc534

Pino, could you please send yours yourself?
Once applied, we can backport them.

-- 
G..e

Message #87 received at 672546@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>

To: xorg-devel@lists.x.org

Cc: 672546@bugs.debian.org, pino@debian.org, 1o5g4r8o@gmail.com

Subject: [PATCH] openchrome: Do not require libdrm

Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 02:15:59 +0200

We can build without it.

Proper non-fatal finer libdrm detection is already done below this.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index b13cb2c..9e77dc8 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT(XF86DRI, xextproto x11)
 XORG_DRIVER_CHECK_EXT(DPMSExtension, xextproto)
 
 # Checks for pkg-config packages
-PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XORG, [xorg-server xproto fontsproto libdrm glproto $REQUIRED_MODULES])
+PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XORG, [xorg-server xproto fontsproto glproto $REQUIRED_MODULES])
 PKG_CHECK_MODULES(XEXT, [xextproto >= 7.0.99.1],
  HAVE_XEXTPROTO_71="yes"; AC_DEFINE(HAVE_XEXTPROTO_71, 1, [xextproto 7.1 available]),
  HAVE_XEXTPROTO_71="no")

Message #94 received at 672546-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Dylan Aïssi <bob.dybian@gmail.com>

To: 672546-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#672546: fixed in xserver-xorg-video-openchrome 1:0.5.0-1

Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:04:49 +0000

Source: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Source-Version: 1:0.5.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 672546@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Dylan Aïssi <bob.dybian@gmail.com> (supplier of updated xserver-xorg-video-openchrome package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:17:22 +0100
Source: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Binary: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome
Architecture: source
Version: 1:0.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force <debian-x@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Dylan Aïssi <bob.dybian@gmail.com>
Description:
 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome - X.Org X server -- VIA display driver
Closes: 672546 734640 775201 831405
Changes:
 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome (1:0.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release. (LP: #1640787)
   * Update VCS fields.
   * Update lintian overrides.
   * Add debian/source/format file.
   * Architectures:
      - Remove LPIA discontinued.
      - Add x32 (Closes: #775201).
   * Remove libdrm-dev from Build-Depend for Hurd (Closes: #672546).
   * Update debian/watch.
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8:
      - Remove DM-Upload-Allowed field.
   * Update and convert d/copyright to DEP5.
   * Bump debhelper compat to 10.
   * Add a patch to fix a spelling error.
   * Switch from -dbg to -dbgsym package.
   * Bump Build-Depends xserver-xorg-dev to >= 2:1.17.
   * Add a patch to enable reproducible build (Closes: #831405).
   * Enable hardened build (Closes: #734640).
Checksums-Sha1:
 06ff4c38efb70bd4b1a77630817b07ea67e33eff 2569 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.dsc
 fdc640311831096f2e71bfd2e0297ee6e9b302ed 669130 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 97b3880fb09fd1ad6df5dd820cb282a8bd44d4aa 98415 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.diff.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 da2e02a90099113d901f741a45b9ae9c8c66a45db6bd145750caa5fb9712e4dd 2569 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.dsc
 f785a3eb01bf30d54ca136bfcc5b361aec1e213621456a7461b0c8f9cf1cf4c7 669130 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 ba79d0144dc8ab8f711583867b5075acc2e9e111e1d9c677f4a8ad4530656757 98415 xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.diff.gz
Files:
 cfae50e6c1d9f47499a19e9207f24337 2569 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.dsc
 0ead414d14ef74092d609aa2ab5e8397 669130 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz
 c504158fce5d5c9b69e5800d04a2e582 98415 x11 optional xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.5.0-1.diff.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Nppg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.