Debian Bug report logs - #668996
O: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control

version graph

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>

Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:06:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Fixed in version 0.103.0+bzr792-3+rm

Done: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:06:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org. (Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:06:15 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:02:08 +0200
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the bzr-gtk package.

The package description is:
 bzr-gtk provides GTK+ interfaces to the Bazaar (bzr) source code management
 tool.
 .
 This package adds the following commands to the bzr command line
 tool: gannotate, gbranch, gcheckout, gcommit, gconflicts, gdiff, gloom,
 gmissing, gpreferences, gpush, gstatus, visualise.




Changed Bug title to 'O: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' from 'RFA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' Request was from Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 28 May 2012 22:57:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Changed Bug title to 'ITA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar' from 'O: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' Request was from Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Owner recorded as Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. Request was from Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:36:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Changed Bug title to 'ITA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' from 'ITA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar' Request was from Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:36:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Wed, 22 May 2013 12:03:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. (Wed, 22 May 2013 12:03:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #18 received at 668996@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
To: 668996@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Still intent on adopting bzr-gtk?
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:49:54 +0200
The last update to this bug report was almost a year ago. Are you still intent
on adopting the bzr-gtk package?



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Thu, 23 May 2013 16:45:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. (Thu, 23 May 2013 16:45:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #23 received at 668996@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
To: 668996@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Still intent on adopting bzr-gtk?
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 18:43:50 +0200
Hi JosÃ,

You expressed interest in taking over maintenance of bzr-gtk almost a year ago. Would you still like to adopt it?

Cheers,

Jelmer



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:36:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. (Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:36:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #28 received at 668996@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
To: 668996@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Still intent on adopting bzr-gtk?
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:26:58 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Hi Jos�,
> 
> You expressed interest in taking over maintenance of bzr-gtk almost a year ago. Would you still like to adopt it?

Since I haven't heard back from Jose, bzr-gtk FTBFS, it has no active
upstream and has been owned by the QA team for a while now, I'm going
to request its removal from the archive.

Cheers,

Jelmer
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:21:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. (Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:21:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #33 received at 668996@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
To: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>, 668996@bugs.debian.org
Cc: pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#668996: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Still intent on adopting bzr-gtk?
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:17:49 +0200
Hi,

Jelmer Vernooij wrote on Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:26:58 +0000:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > Hi José,
> > 
> > You expressed interest in taking over maintenance of bzr-gtk
> > almost a year ago. Would you still like to adopt it?
> 
> Since I haven't heard back from Jose, bzr-gtk FTBFS, it has no active
> upstream

There seems a newer upstream release, 0.104.0, from April 2012
according to https://launchpad.net/bzr-gtk. Not sure if that would
help against the FTBFS -- at least the changelog doesn't seem to
mention something in that direction.

> and has been owned by the QA team for a while now, I'm going to
> request its removal from the archive.

I already thought about that, too. From a QA point of view it's
probably the best.

Since the package bzr-gtk itself is maintained in bzr (according to
the still present Vcs-* headers), it would need someone who is
familiar with bzr to fix the outstanding issues even if they
themselves may not need bzr knowledge. (At least the fact that it's
maintained in bzr holds me back from having a closer look.)

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `-    |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5



Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>:
Bug#668996; Package wnpp. (Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:51:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. (Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:51:10 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #38 received at 668996@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
To: 668996@bugs.debian.org, pkg-bazaar-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org, Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Bug#668996: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Still intent on adopting bzr-gtk?
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:47:56 +0200
Hi Axel!

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:17:49PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote on Sun, 11 Aug 2013 15:26:58 +0000:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 06:43:50PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > > Hi Jos?,
> > > 
> > > You expressed interest in taking over maintenance of bzr-gtk
> > > almost a year ago. Would you still like to adopt it?
> > 
> > Since I haven't heard back from Jose, bzr-gtk FTBFS, it has no active
> > upstream
> 
> There seems a newer upstream release, 0.104.0, from April 2012
> according to https://launchpad.net/bzr-gtk. Not sure if that would
> help against the FTBFS -- at least the changelog doesn't seem to
> mention something in that direction.

Yeah, that release won't help with this FTBFS (note that I did that upstream
release).  The FTBFS should be fairly easy to fix though.

> > and has been owned by the QA team for a while now, I'm going to
> > request its removal from the archive.
> 
> I already thought about that, too. From a QA point of view it's
> probably the best.
> 
> Since the package bzr-gtk itself is maintained in bzr (according to
> the still present Vcs-* headers), it would need someone who is
> familiar with bzr to fix the outstanding issues even if they
> themselves may not need bzr knowledge. (At least the fact that it's
> maintained in bzr holds me back from having a closer look.)
I don't think that's an unreasonable situation for a package that's inherently
related to bzr. :-)

Even with a QA upload now, I doubt this package would have a long life in the
archive unless somebody steps up to take over upstream maintenance.

I filed a RM request here a while ago:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719658

Cheers,

Jelmer



Changed Bug title to 'O: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' from 'ITA: bzr-gtk -- provides graphical interfaces to Bazaar (bzr) version control' Request was from Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <asb@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:33:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Jose Ernesto Davila Pantoja <josernestodavila@ubuntu.com>. Request was from Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <asb@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:33:16 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:45:59 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:45:59 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #47 received at 668996-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
To: 556200-done@bugs.debian.org,616416-done@bugs.debian.org,713081-done@bugs.debian.org,718958-done@bugs.debian.org,668996-done@bugs.debian.org,
Cc: bzr-gtk@packages.debian.org, bzr-gtk@packages.qa.debian.org
Subject: Bug#719658: Removed package(s) from unstable
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:43:59 +0000
Version: 0.103.0+bzr792-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package bzr-gtk has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/719658

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)



Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:45:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Apr 18 16:14:50 2014; Machine Name: buxtehude.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.