Debian Bug report logs - #666307
htp: FTBFS: snprintf.c:856:2: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'va_list' from type 'struct __va_list_tag *'

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: htp: FTBFS: snprintf.c:856:2: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'va_list' from type 'struct __va_list_tag *'

Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:14:51 +0200

Source: htp
Version: 1.16-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages
(binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a newer dpkg that uses the
build-arch target if available.
Also, only the Build-Depends were installed, not the Build-Depends-Indep.

Relevant part:
> gcc -c -Wall -O2 -DHAVE_SNPRINTF -DHAVE_PIPE -DHAVE_STPCPY -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -o snprintf.o snprintf.c
> snprintf.c: In function 'vasprintf':
> snprintf.c:856:2: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'va_list' from type 'struct __va_list_tag *'
> snprintf.c:864:2: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'va_list' from type 'struct __va_list_tag *'
> make[2]: *** [snprintf.o] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/30/htp_1.16-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.

Message #10 received at 666307@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl>

To: 666307@bugs.debian.org

Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:35:44 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello maintainers,

I've working a bit on this bug and I concluded upgrade to 1.17 fixes 
FTBFS (including refreshed patches etc.). If you want to fix it, let's 
upgrade it. If you don't have time, I'm going to go on with NMU.

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #15 received at 666307@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <diegoe@gnome.org>

To: Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl>, 666307@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#666307: (no subject)

Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:11:21 -0500

Hi Artur,

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl> wrote:
> Hello maintainers,
>
> I've working a bit on this bug and I concluded upgrade to 1.17 fixes FTBFS
> (including refreshed patches etc.). If you want to fix it, let's upgrade it.
> If you don't have time, I'm going to go on with NMU.

Since a long time now htp was in the to-be-removed list and just a few
days ago I got an email that it had been officially removed from
testing.

Considering that I don't use it anymore and that popcon always says
there are -1 users... I don't know if it is worth further maintaining.

That said, feel free to take over the package if you use htp or have
an interest in maintaining it.

Thanks for the email :-)

Diego

Message #20 received at 666307@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl>

To: Diego Escalante Urrelo <diegoe@gnome.org>

Cc: 666307@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#666307: (no subject)

Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:21:04 +0200

W dniu 2012-06-07 23:11, Diego Escalante Urrelo pisze:
> Hi Artur,
> Since a long time now htp was in the to-be-removed list and just a few
> days ago I got an email that it had been officially removed from
> testing.
>
> Considering that I don't use it anymore and that popcon always says
> there are -1 users... I don't know if it is worth further maintaining.
>
> That said, feel free to take over the package if you use htp or have
> an interest in maintaining it.
>
> Thanks for the email :-)
>
> Diego
>
I'm not sure whether do I want to adopt this one. Since 1.17 upstream 
tarball is not clear, e.g. there are no pic directory (including all 
.png files) which makes htp a bit ugly. I've sent a question to 
upstream, though.

Could you please then orphan a package?

-- 
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona

Message #25 received at 666307@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Diego Escalante Urrelo <diegoe@gnome.org>

To: Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl>, 666307@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#666307: (no subject)

Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 16:47:37 -0500

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Artur Rona <ari-tczew@tlen.pl> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether do I want to adopt this one. Since 1.17 upstream
> tarball is not clear, e.g. there are no pic directory (including all .png
> files) which makes htp a bit ugly. I've sent a question to upstream, though.
>
> Could you please then orphan a package?

Here it is: http://bugs.debian.org/676574

Thanks for the heads up.

Diego

Message #30 received at 666307-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>

To: 666307-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#666307: fixed in htp 1.16-4

Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:32:36 +0000

Source: htp
Source-Version: 1.16-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
htp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 666307@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated htp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:19:38 +0100
Source: htp
Binary: htp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.16-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description: 
 htp        - An HTML pre-processor
Closes: 666307
Changes: 
 htp (1.16-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload (see O: bug #676574).
   * Set Maintainer to Debian QA Group.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) source format, avoiding confusion between
     build-arch and build targets in debian/rules (closes: #666307).
   * 0003-Makefile-clean-target-fix.patch: Use rm -f to remove tests/fruits.
   * Add hardening flags, using dpkg-buildflags.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 380e2487856e3f4ee6a1a1f5655a70581352cbf1 1695 htp_1.16-4.dsc
 b3d3ef94571a261ee12eb66e4e83d30cead2501d 6596 htp_1.16-4.debian.tar.gz
 78ed54b85fdce75b296899c38579de1a72b9af8f 157514 htp_1.16-4_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 4079e42f61493527ec74009d39342db7dcd5486c90d95aa1b3c6c1c1c14604b9 1695 htp_1.16-4.dsc
 5a4fb70db78753d675e68cdeb2aa8d728678edcf2747794337cf4c354368384a 6596 htp_1.16-4.debian.tar.gz
 3b2546edddbdf9de98b6545b6a5226cac561f6a78d42c16451c97c9c353c7057 157514 htp_1.16-4_i386.deb
Files: 
 a95f8a7c95af58cc352413bed852b483 1695 web optional htp_1.16-4.dsc
 633ef16e3eaf682a48a366923b5c82f1 6596 web optional htp_1.16-4.debian.tar.gz
 87825aa05d78cdc59a8c8f7c2e34c0a3 157514 web optional htp_1.16-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer
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=+2bp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.