Debian Bug report logs - #665648
transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:51:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#665648; Package release.debian.org. (Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:51:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:51:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 23:48:06 +0100
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I would like to request a slot for a combined mini transition for
libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.91. I'm filling this as a single transition
because they basically involve a very restricted number of sources
which is mostly the same between the two sources.

The two sources are already in experimental since few days, and so far
compiling nicely (they are simple C/C++ code, so I don't expect
surprises).

The SONAME changes are the following:

* libnova-dev (src:libnova):
    libnova-0.12-1 -> libnova-0.14-0

* libindi-dev (src:libindi):
    libindi0a -> libindi0b

The packages affected by the transition are:

    libnova
    libindi (which uses libnova)
    kstars (which uses libindi)

The latter two compiles fine with the newer versions of the libraries.

Thanks,
-- 
Pino




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#665648; Package release.debian.org. (Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:00:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 665648@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 665648@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#665648: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:56:42 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 23:48:06 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:

> The packages affected by the transition are:
> 
>     libnova
>     libindi (which uses libnova)
>     kstars (which uses libindi)
> 
Sounds ok to me, please go ahead, and yell if you need binNMUs for
kstars.

Cheers,
Julien
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#665648; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:18:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:18:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 665648@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>
To: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Cc: 665648@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#665648: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:15:39 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tag 665648 + pending
thanks

Alle domenica 25 marzo 2012, Julien Cristau ha scritto:
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 23:48:06 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > The packages affected by the transition are:
> >     libnova
> >     libindi (which uses libnova)
> >     kstars (which uses libindi)
> 
> Sounds ok to me, please go ahead, and yell if you need binNMUs for
> kstars.

I've uploaded libnova and libindi yesterday, and they built basically 
everywhere.
Could you please binNMU kstars with a dep-wait on libindi-dev >= 0.9.1?

Thanks,
-- 
Pino Toscano
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Added tag(s) pending. Request was from Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:18:18 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#665648; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:06:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:06:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 665648@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 665648@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#665648: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:04:54 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 13:15:39 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:

> Could you please binNMU kstars with a dep-wait on libindi-dev >= 0.9.1?
> 
On their way.

Cheers,
Julien
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:58:18 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:58:22 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #27 received at 665648-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 665648-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#665648: transition: libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.9.1
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:47:58 +0200
On 03/24/2012 11:48 PM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> 
> I would like to request a slot for a combined mini transition for 
> libnova 0.14.0 + libindi 0.91.

They migrated:

$ dak ls -s testing,unstable libindi libnova
   libindi |    0.9.1-2 |       testing | source
   libindi |    0.9.1-2 |      unstable | source
   libnova |   0.14.0-2 |       testing | source
   libnova |   0.14.0-2 |      unstable | source
$ dak ls -s testing libindi0 libnova-0.12-1
$

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/




Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 04 May 2012 07:38:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Wed Apr 23 09:02:25 2014; Machine Name: buxtehude.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.