Debian Bug report logs - #654174
Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>

Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 08:15:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#654174; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:15:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 02 Jan 2012 08:15:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:13:29 +0100
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu gxine_0.5.906-1+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu gjs_1.30.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu gnome_shell_3.2.1-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gjs rebuilt against libmozjs9d"
nmu edbrowse_3.4.8-1+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu couchdb_1.1.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
nmu python-xpcom_1:8.0~hg20111006-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#654174; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:27:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:27:24 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 654174@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
To: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>, 654174@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#654174: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 10:21:53 +0100
On Mon, Jan  2, 2012 at 09:13:29 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:

> nmu gjs_1.30.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu gnome_shell_3.2.1-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gjs rebuilt against libmozjs9d"

Won't work, gjs fails to build against the new mozjs.

Cheers,
Julien




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#654174; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 654174@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>, 654174@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#654174: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:24:33 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org> (02/01/2012):
> nmu gjs_1.30.0-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu gnome_shell_3.2.1-8 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against gjs rebuilt against libmozjs9d"

already done independently when src:mozjs was introduced.

> nmu openvrml_0.18.8-5 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu libproxy_0.3.1-4+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu gxine_0.5.906-1+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu edbrowse_3.4.8-1+b1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu dehydra_0.9.hg20110609-2+b3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu couchdb_1.1.1-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"
> nmu python-xpcom_1:8.0~hg20111006-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libmozjs9d"

Looking at the transition page[1], concentrating on packages in testing,
for dependency level 1, a local binNMU build led to the following
results:
| couchdb                build OK, deps OK.
| dehydra                #655779
| edbrowse               build OK, deps OK.
| firetray               #653290
| gecko-mediaplayer      build OK, no deps.
| gnash                  build OK, no deps.
| gnome-chemistry-utils  #657273
| gtk-vnc                build OK, no deps.
| icedtea-web            build OK, no deps.
| libjdic-java           #631039 or similar.
| libproxy               build OK, recommends OK.
| libreoffice            not tried (ETOOBIG), no deps.
| openvrml               #652790 (second message)
| packagekit             build OK, no deps.
| pyxpcom                #654613

 1. http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/iceweasel9.html

Do we want to trigger binNMUs for packages in the unknown state anyway?
(Where there are no runtime build dependencies)

Mraw,
KiBi.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#654174; Package release.debian.org. (Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Wed, 25 Jan 2012 02:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 654174@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>, 654174@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#654174: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:46:57 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
(Still learning the ropes.)

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (25/01/2012):
> Looking at the transition page[1], concentrating on packages in testing,
> for dependency level 1, a local binNMU build led to the following
> results:
> | couchdb                build OK, deps OK.
> | dehydra                #655779
> | edbrowse               build OK, deps OK.
> | openvrml               #652790 (second message)
> | pyxpcom                #654613

I guess we may need to remove the 3 FTBFSing packages from testing. dak
rm -Rn -s testing says:
 - happy with removing dehydra,
 - happy with removing openvrml,
 - not happy with removing pyxpcom:
| # Broken Depends:
| sugar-browse-activity-0.84: sugar-browse-activity-0.84
| sugar-browse-activity-0.86: sugar-browse-activity-0.86
| sugar-hulahop: python-hulahop [amd64 armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc]
| 
| # Broken Build-Depends:
| sugar-hulahop: python-xpcom (>= 1.9~rc2)

One would need to investigate what to do with sugar-*.

In the meanwhile, I scheduled binNMUs for couchdb and edbrowse (and
dehydra, oops).

Mraw,
KiBi.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#654174; Package release.debian.org. (Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:57:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:57:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 654174@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>, 654174@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#654174: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:53:57 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Mike.

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (25/01/2012):
> I guess we may need to remove the 3 FTBFSing packages from testing.
> dak rm -Rn -s testing says:
>  - happy with removing dehydra,
>  - happy with removing openvrml,
>  - not happy with removing pyxpcom:
> | # Broken Depends:
> | sugar-browse-activity-0.84: sugar-browse-activity-0.84
> | sugar-browse-activity-0.86: sugar-browse-activity-0.86
> | sugar-hulahop: python-hulahop [amd64 armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc]
> | 
> | # Broken Build-Depends:
> | sugar-hulahop: python-xpcom (>= 1.9~rc2)
> 
> One would need to investigate what to do with sugar-*.
> 
> In the meanwhile, I scheduled binNMUs for couchdb and edbrowse (and
> dehydra, oops).

Those are ready, like pyxpcom which you uploaded yesterday. My hints
file currently says:
| # 2012/01/26 - iceweasel 9 transition (#654174)
| remove autofill-forms/0.9.8.3-3
| age-days 5 uppity/1.5.8-3
| age-days 0 pyxpcom/1:9.0~hg20111212-1
| easy iceweasel/9.0.1-1 gxine/0.5.906-2 oolite/1.76-1 pyxpcom/1:9.0~hg20111212-1 uppity/1.5.8-3 -autofill-forms/0.9.8.3-3

dehydra and openvrml don't seem to require any special handling for the
moment, so I left them alone for now.

According to my dry-run tests, that should let iceweasel migrate during
the next run, provided nothing from others' hint files interfere with
the above one (I'm starting little, so I only ran the dry-run tests with
my tiny hints file).

Once that's done, I'll see what to do with the old binaries in testing.

Mraw,
KiBi.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:21:17 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:21:20 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #30 received at 654174-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>, 654174-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#654174: Multiple binnmus for iceweasel 9
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:19:26 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (26/01/2012):
> dehydra and openvrml don't seem to require any special handling for the
> moment, so I left them alone for now.
> 
> According to my dry-run tests, that should let iceweasel migrate during
> the next run, provided nothing from others' hint files interfere with
> the above one (I'm starting little, so I only ran the dry-run tests with
> my tiny hints file).

kibi@franck:~$ dak ls iceweasel -s testing
 iceweasel |    9.0.1-1 |       testing | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc

> Once that's done, I'll see what to do with the old binaries in testing.

That remains, but the binNMUs part being done, I'm closing this bug
report. (I'll get the old binaries removed before (re)moving the .ben
file for iceweasel on http://release.debian.org/transitions/)

Mraw,
KiBi.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:40:51 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Thu Apr 24 20:43:24 2014; Machine Name: buxtehude.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.