Debian Bug report logs - #653233
tuxcmd-modules: Fix build failure using libarchive 3.0.2

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: tuxcmd-modules: Fix build failure using libarchive 3.0.2

Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 12:56:33 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: tuxcmd-modules
Version: 0.6.70+ds-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

I am getting ready for an upload of the latest stable release of libarchive
version 3.0.2 to unstable. Because of a SONAME bump, this requires packages
using libarchive to be rebuilt. I found that tuxcmd-modules fails to build using
libarchive 3.0.2. Attached is a patch that will allow tuxcmd-modules to be built
with either the current version of libarchive in unstable (2.8.5) or the latest
version of libarchive (3.0.2).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

[libarchive-3.0.2_fix.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 653233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>

To: Andres Mejia <mcitadel@gmail.com>, 653233@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#653233: tuxcmd-modules: Fix build failure using libarchive 3.0.2

Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 22:56:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi Andres

On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:56:33PM -0500, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Package: tuxcmd-modules
> Version: 0.6.70+ds-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
> 
> I am getting ready for an upload of the latest stable release of libarchive
> version 3.0.2 to unstable. Because of a SONAME bump, this requires packages
> using libarchive to be rebuilt. I found that tuxcmd-modules fails to build using
> libarchive 3.0.2. Attached is a patch that will allow tuxcmd-modules to be built
> with either the current version of libarchive in unstable (2.8.5) or the latest
> version of libarchive (3.0.2).

Thanks for your report! I will have a look at it right now.

Regards
Salvatore

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #15 received at 653233-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>

To: 653233-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#653233: fixed in tuxcmd-modules 0.6.70+ds-2

Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:18:19 +0000

Source: tuxcmd-modules
Source-Version: 0.6.70+ds-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxcmd-modules, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/tuxcmd-modules/tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.debian.tar.gz
tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.dsc
  to main/t/tuxcmd-modules/tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.dsc
tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2_amd64.deb
  to main/t/tuxcmd-modules/tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 653233@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> (supplier of updated tuxcmd-modules package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:44:42 +0100
Source: tuxcmd-modules
Binary: tuxcmd-modules
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.6.70+ds-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Description: 
 tuxcmd-modules - VFS modules for tuxcmd file manager
Closes: 653233
Changes: 
 tuxcmd-modules (0.6.70+ds-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Email change: Salvatore Bonaccorso -> carnil@debian.org
   * Bump Debhelper compat level to 8.
     Adjust Build-Depends on debhelper to (>= 8).
   * Refresh debian/copyright file.
     Update format to revision 174 of DEP5 for machine-readable copyright
     file information.
     Adjust copyright years for debian/* packaging
   * Drop DM-Upload-Allowed field in debian/control
   * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2
   * Add Fix-FTBFS-because-removal-of-ARCHIVE_LIBRARY_VERSION.patch patch.
     Fix build failure because of removal of ARCHIVE_LIBRARY_VERSION. Use
     ARCHIVE_VERSION_STRING instead.
     Thanks to Andres Mejia <amejia@debian.org> for the bugreport and patch.
     (Closes: #653233)
   * Refresh debian/tuxcmd-modules.lintian-overrides.
     Adjust override string to new tag name 'embedded-library'.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b9b013a34830077fe5aad0c1b2ac24ff5a57bfed 1865 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.dsc
 a750eaa51bb3bba4664a4235099233355bb61a62 5149 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.debian.tar.gz
 36a629a37b2df902eb2790f4f233f901ad8626c4 180728 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c6bef3a32062b4da0774080f1324ea456680eaa60f73dff463a04160b3a87d4f 1865 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.dsc
 4ed6dae51e601454ce6de0e3b745a318ec0588948da485ce2d955f27302a04cd 5149 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.debian.tar.gz
 28b56ed904df430b38ebb2e383346fd30a95d22c3e3aaa5f84a0305e0ab1c951 180728 tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 f278a90d80f27a6faebdc56bfc198546 1865 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.dsc
 16983cc0be4512b1fe5ae1761acea768 5149 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2.debian.tar.gz
 ebfda2e4af2005ddba6970d979992d80 180728 utils optional tuxcmd-modules_0.6.70+ds-2_amd64.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=Wwp4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.