Debian Bug report logs - #649905
blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:00:05 -0500

Source: blackbox
Version: 0.70.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blackbox, builds of
blackbox on 32-bit architectures have been failing because
libbt0.symbols only matches libbt.so.0's actual symbols on 64-bit
architectures (amd64, ia64, and kfreebsd-amd64).  Could you please
account for architecture-specific variation?

Thanks!

Message #10 received at 649905@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: d+deb@vdr.jp

To: control@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 649905@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:34:19 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 649905 + pending
thanks

fix package uploaded to mentors.
-- 
Regards,
	dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 649905@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

To: 649905@bugs.debian.org, HIGUCHI Daisuke <d+deb@vdr.jp>

Subject: Re: Bug#649905: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:45:29 +0100

* Aaron M. Ucko <ucko@debian.org>, 2011-11-24, 13:00:
>Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blackbox, builds of 
>blackbox on 32-bit architectures have been failing because 
>libbt0.symbols only matches libbt.so.0's actual symbols on 64-bit 
>architectures (amd64, ia64, and kfreebsd-amd64).

May I ask you what was the point on introducing symbol files in the 
first place?

-- 
Jakub Wilk

Message #22 received at 649905@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: d+deb@vdr.jp

To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Cc: 649905@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#649905: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 02:10:25 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blackbox,
> >builds of blackbox on 32-bit architectures have been failing
> >because libbt0.symbols only matches libbt.so.0's actual symbols on
> >64-bit architectures (amd64, ia64, and kfreebsd-amd64).
> 
> May I ask you what was the point on introducing symbol files in the
> first place?

I introduced symbol files to eliminate lintian warning.
But should I use override better than using symbol files?
-- 
Regards,
	dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #27 received at 649905@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: d+deb@vdr.jp

To: control@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 649905@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#649905: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:06:37 +0900

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 649905 - pending
tags 649905 + patch
thanks

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:10:25AM +0900, d+deb@vdr.jp wrote:
> > >Per https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=blackbox,
> > >builds of blackbox on 32-bit architectures have been failing
> > >because libbt0.symbols only matches libbt.so.0's actual symbols on
> > >64-bit architectures (amd64, ia64, and kfreebsd-amd64).
> > 
> > May I ask you what was the point on introducing symbol files in the
> > first place?
> 
> I introduced symbol files to eliminate lintian warning.
> But should I use override better than using symbol files?

For the present, patch to symbol files attached.
It is too complex, should I use override instead of symbol files?
-- 
Regards,
	dai

GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E 42E6 B765 B8D8 EA50 7839 619D D439 668E

[649905.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #36 received at 649905@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

To: d+deb@vdr.jp, 649905@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#649905: blackbox: FTBFS: libbt0.symbols 64-bit specific

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:11:02 +0100

On Thu, Dec  1, 2011 at 14:06:37 +0900, d+deb@vdr.jp wrote:

> For the present, patch to symbol files attached.
> It is too complex, should I use override instead of symbol files?

I think you should use neither.

Cheers,
Julien

Message #43 received at 649905-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) <debian@vdr.jp>

To: 649905-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#649905: fixed in blackbox 0.70.1-5

Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:02:15 +0000

Source: blackbox
Source-Version: 0.70.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
blackbox, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

blackbox_0.70.1-5.debian.tar.gz
  to main/b/blackbox/blackbox_0.70.1-5.debian.tar.gz
blackbox_0.70.1-5.dsc
  to main/b/blackbox/blackbox_0.70.1-5.dsc
blackbox_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
  to main/b/blackbox/blackbox_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
libbt-dev_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
  to main/b/blackbox/libbt-dev_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
libbt0_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
  to main/b/blackbox/libbt0_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
libbt_0.70.1-5_all.deb
  to main/b/blackbox/libbt_0.70.1-5_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 649905@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) <debian@vdr.jp> (supplier of updated blackbox package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:09:41 +0900
Source: blackbox
Binary: blackbox libbt-dev libbt0 libbt
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.70.1-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) <debian@vdr.jp>
Description: 
 blackbox   - Window manager for X
 libbt      - transitional package for libbt0
 libbt-dev  - Blackbox - development library
 libbt0     - Blackbox - shared library
Closes: 649905 650411 650511
Changes: 
 blackbox (0.70.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/libbt0.symbols: add architecture-specific tag
     (Closes: #649905)
   * debian/rules: switch to dh7, built libbt by binary-indep
     (Closes: #650411)
   * debian/control: add Replaces/Breaks: libbt (<< 0.70.1-4) to libbt0
     (Closes: #650511)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b816c15f03be52fb918e2e348d34650498417211 1943 blackbox_0.70.1-5.dsc
 cfd9b947744eaea0a4e51902fb5af940df21f4c3 21647 blackbox_0.70.1-5.debian.tar.gz
 331551f2e4649daab0e402a789a24d3752859049 251952 blackbox_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 22e35ffecb5900028197712e685cfd9944eb8c63 137242 libbt-dev_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 e45108cd7c9951b5a9aee77b9a9c8e2d2389eb69 108368 libbt0_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 f51d755bfc6e285b9fe8eec035f0fb19d00ec050 780 libbt_0.70.1-5_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 7aec256feeca548716bd0c2531f5ebe1daaaa5486b363ad1497fc35944e48d68 1943 blackbox_0.70.1-5.dsc
 efa3a8cd9ab07141e57031768a0e879a95e67c9947631074096ca80c802e9951 21647 blackbox_0.70.1-5.debian.tar.gz
 caf1d19c856697162f102c7e9069cf6e92f72ccc99240d0650049d174cd29350 251952 blackbox_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 c99ad0a8e4bd98ab85eb77428be2c2c3ae15269f94983a015af91f92264a352c 137242 libbt-dev_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 8f11e9bf5d44eb5c9f944dfaeb2b01baaf014db2cbfd926d2034b28b5892e8d5 108368 libbt0_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 2ee327bcc70bf98af7571e2b4df474bab0f2f451deea6fd2bd937cc4ef007fb6 780 libbt_0.70.1-5_all.deb
Files: 
 51aa0692bbf5aa907a344b6a9711cfab 1943 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-5.dsc
 01976eea8b6cd92c3a2b7db124d03584 21647 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-5.debian.tar.gz
 e1213f1de5d1c7e01c861ed2578e490e 251952 x11 optional blackbox_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 c70eb8756bc27b6d6333ba010ba7d02e 137242 libdevel optional libbt-dev_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 64d38281a1ad15ea4ea0f00ebe235438 108368 libs optional libbt0_0.70.1-5_amd64.deb
 0862bb9e616ac29a98b48b10853b7f0e 780 oldlibs extra libbt_0.70.1-5_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=9u9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.