Debian Bug report logs - #644519
ITP: drush-make -- drupal source code deployment tool

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@koumbit.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: ITP: drush-make -- drupal source code deployment tool

Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 10:29:55 -0400

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Antoine Beaupré" <anarcat@koumbit.org>

* Package name    : drush-make
  Version         : 2.3
  Upstream Author : Dmitri Gaskin
* URL             : https://drupal.org/project/drush_make
* License         : GPL2+
  Programming Lang: PHP
  Description     : drupal source code deployment tool

Drush make is an extension to drush that can create a ready-to-use
drupal site, pulling sources from various locations. It does this by
parsing a flat text file (similar to a drupal .info file) and
downloading the sources it describes. In practical terms, this means
that it is possible to distribute a complicated Drupal distribution as
a single text file.

Among drush make's capabilities are:

 * Downloading Drupal core, as well as contrib modules from
   drupal.org.
 * Checking code out from CVS, SVN, git, and bzr repositories.
 * Getting plain .tar.gz and .zip files (particularly useful for
   libraries that can not be distributed directly with drupal core or
   modules).
 * Fetching and applying patches.
 * Fetching modules, themes, and installation profiles, but also
   external libraries.
 * Drush make does not turn modules on automatically: it only
   assembles Drupal directories -- it does not touch any database.

Message #10 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Initial build

Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:03:36 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I've been working on this today, and appear to have a working .deb. This is
my first Debian packaging though, so I've been working through the "Debian
New Maintainers' Guide". I'm not convinced I've done this properly, so I'd
appreciate a review, and some guidance.

This package basically just requires dropping some files in place, so I did
all that with an 'install' file, and so didn't put anything in 'rules'. I
*think* I've registered the various docs in the right places, but I haven't
completed the man page yet. I'm also not sure about whether to just include
just the principal developer in the 'copyright' file, or also add the
various other maintainers and contributors.

Anyway, let's just say it's a work in progress. I've posted this up on
github (https://github.com/ergonlogic/drush-make/tree/debian/debian) for
now, pending potentially moving it over to the main Drush Make repo at
http://drupalcode.org/project/drush_make.git.

Thanks in advance for your input, C

-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build1_all.deb (application/x-debian-package, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build1.debian.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build1_i386.changes (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build1.dsc (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

Message #15 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Cleaned up Lintian warnings/errors

Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:26:44 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello again,

I've run Lintian on the generated .deb, and then cleaned up the resulting
warnings and errors. It now passes (silently).

I spun up a local repo (using reprepro) and tested installing it through
apt-get, and everything appears to work fine.

I've found that I now have a patch generated by running 'dpkg-buildpackage
-us -uc', but it's the reverse of what I would have expected:

--- drush-make-2.3.orig/drush_make.drush.inc
+++ drush-make-2.3/drush_make.drush.inc
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ function drush_make_move_build($build_pa
 }

 function drush_make_version() {
-  return '2.0-dev';
+  return '2.3';
 }

I might have repackaged things incorrectly... anyway, I'm not too sure how
to manage the 'upstream' git repo yet.


-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build2_i386.changes (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build2_all.deb (application/x-debian-package, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build2.dsc (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build2.debian.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

Message #20 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Manpages

Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:16:06 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi again,

I've begun work on a manpage for the drush-make command, but it occurs to me
that Drush Make also has a specific file-format. So, I believe I'll also
need to create a drush-make(5) manpage to document it.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards, C

-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #25 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Ready to go

Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:06:55 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hello,

I fixed up the manpage quite a bit, and I believe it's acceptable now. I
looked for inspiration in some section 5 manpages to see about adding one
for the makefile format, but I haven't been able to find a good example. So,
I've just pointed to the README.txt and EXAMPLE.make files from within the
manpage. I'm not sure that this is kosher, but it seems a lot easier than
trying to keep two sets of docs (in very different formats) in sync.

I signed it with my gpg key this time during `dpkg-buildpackage`, and
Lintian continues not to complain about anything. I've been including the
various generated files, along with the orig.tar.gz, but I'm not sure this
is necessary. As usual, I'm pushing my updates to
https://github.com/ergonlogic/drush-make.

As far as I can tell, this package is ready to go. So I'll probably need
feedback from someone with some actual experience at this, if I'm going to
be able to improve it any further.

Best regards, C

-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build3.dsc (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build3_i386.changes (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build3_all.deb (application/x-debian-package, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3-0~build3.debian.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

[drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz (application/x-gzip, attachment)]

Message #30 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Redundant?

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:27:15 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Seeing as how there appears to be an active push to include Drush Make into
Drush core, I believe this issue has become redundant.

-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #35 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: issue link

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:29:45 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Oops, I'd meant to include the link to the issue tracking this:
http://drupal.org/node/1310130

-- 
Christopher Gervais  :|:  Principal,  Ergon Logic Enterprises
514.945.6442  :|:  christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #40 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@koumbit.org>

To: Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com>, 644519@bugs.debian.org, 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#644519: Redundant?

Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:41:03 -0400

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:27:15 -0400, Christopher Gervais <christopher.gervais@ergonlogic.com> wrote:
> Seeing as how there appears to be an active push to include Drush Make into
> Drush core, I believe this issue has become redundant.

This may not happen in Drush 4, I think the packaging is still a good idea.

-- 
Pour marcher au pas d'une musique militaire, il n'y a pas besoin de
cerveau, une moelle épinière suffit.
                        - Albert Enstein

Message #45 received at 644519@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@koumbit.org>

To: 644519@bugs.debian.org

Subject: fixes and upload

Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:57:38 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

I have uploaded a modified version of the package to
http://debian.aegirproject.org/ - i think this is ready for deployment,
but it's still in the unstable repository for now.

The summary of my changes can be seen here:

http://drupalcode.org/project/drush_make.git/shortlog/7126988

I am waiting for my NM application to go through (or a sponsor) before
uploading this to debian itself.

A.

-- 
À force de ne jamais réfléchir, on a un bonheur stupide
                        - Jean Cocteau

[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #56 received at 644519-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christopher Gervais <chris@ergonlogic.com>

To: 644519-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#644519: fixed in drush-make 2.3-1

Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 15:47:09 +0000

Source: drush-make
Source-Version: 2.3-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
drush-make, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

drush-make_2.3-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/d/drush-make/drush-make_2.3-1.debian.tar.gz
drush-make_2.3-1.dsc
  to main/d/drush-make/drush-make_2.3-1.dsc
drush-make_2.3-1_all.deb
  to main/d/drush-make/drush-make_2.3-1_all.deb
drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz
  to main/d/drush-make/drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 644519@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christopher Gervais <chris@ergonlogic.com> (supplier of updated drush-make package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2011 22:07:08 -0400
Source: drush-make
Binary: drush-make
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christopher Gervais <chris@ergonlogic.com>
Changed-By: Christopher Gervais <chris@ergonlogic.com>
Description: 
 drush-make - Drupal source code deployment tool
Closes: 644519
Changes: 
 drush-make (2.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #644519)
   * This is my first Debian package.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2a2ee2004a41400bb6439781b4721a9b53047296 1883 drush-make_2.3-1.dsc
 4085ae9e17d3a82d9188c5eef3b6bc59355d5ee4 37558 drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz
 8fbe0b8e2a40d0bf15490fe7bce90bcad0934828 4386 drush-make_2.3-1.debian.tar.gz
 4917afdaff52c5b9483e17d02ca63cba5eef0910 42014 drush-make_2.3-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 89fffd9b282f7cb0d2975fa3172fd1bc967b6640e419dfb96736a3c61222f3d3 1883 drush-make_2.3-1.dsc
 eaeda98f142532d7c9fca3c318b56bbbd64b342a3a711cd6bf6e66dbf4f51e1a 37558 drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz
 dbfb6490b86f47cf40ac6b7da9d694256b7e4517b803028060535e8cef225e49 4386 drush-make_2.3-1.debian.tar.gz
 085f9547ff0d9e9891ba3f7139f83273709ad339980e8fadf6a1b99efc69de4c 42014 drush-make_2.3-1_all.deb
Files: 
 868508d4119ea085d1f3b465a9156153 1883 php optional drush-make_2.3-1.dsc
 cba689d27f3610a6b4fffcbab646c5f9 37558 php optional drush-make_2.3.orig.tar.gz
 9dd3f29d6ff18ab1f996136ddbf4d47c 4386 php optional drush-make_2.3-1.debian.tar.gz
 c2bbdd6155f0c3e93d71bbbffca7bd35 42014 php optional drush-make_2.3-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
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=ehjZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.