Debian Bug report logs - #643023
texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:16:08 +0200

Subject: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2009-13
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Currently debian has 2009.  Is there any reason not to have 2011
release?

Cheers,
Eugen

Message #10 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

To: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>, 643023@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:53:41 +0900

On Mo, 26 Sep 2011, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> Currently debian has 2009.  Is there any reason not to have 2011
> release?

Time? Anyone willing to help?
I already prepared preliminary packages but nobody took a look at it.

Best wishes

Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining            preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan                                 TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BURWASH
The pleasurable cool sloosh of puddle water over the toes of your
gumboots.
			--- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

Message #15 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>

To: 643023@bugs.debian.org, Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:01:38 +0200

On 26/09/11 18:53, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mo, 26 Sep 2011, Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> Currently debian has 2009.  Is there any reason not to have 2011
>> release?
>
> Time? Anyone willing to help?
> I already prepared preliminary packages but nobody took a look at it.

If you think they are good (they work for you and have done basic 
checks), push them to experimental maybe?

Cheers,
-- 
Eugen

Message #20 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

To: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>

Cc: 643023@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:03:38 +0900

On 09/27/2011 02:01 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> If you think they are good (they work for you and have done basic
> checks), push them to experimental maybe?

Far from functional, not even installable. But still people *could*
take a look at it.

Then there are patches that have to be updated, converison of features
due to the replacement of a shell script with a perl script, tousands of
things and me alone packaging 2011. It will take time.

If you need it now, just install it from the normal TeX Live and use
tlmgr. On the tug pages there is also an explanation how to build
an equivs package.

Norbert

Message #25 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>

To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>

Cc: 643023@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:07:06 +0200

On 26/09/11 19:03, Norbert Preining wrote:
>
>
> On 09/27/2011 02:01 AM, Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> If you think they are good (they work for you and have done basic
>> checks), push them to experimental maybe?
>
> Far from functional, not even installable. But still people *could*
> take a look at it.
>
> Then there are patches that have to be updated, converison of features
> due to the replacement of a shell script with a perl script, tousands of
> things and me alone packaging 2011. It will take time.

Ok, we wait then :o)

> If you need it now, just install it from the normal TeX Live and use
> tlmgr. On the tug pages there is also an explanation how to build
> an equivs package.

-- 
Eugen

Message #30 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@gmail.com>

To: 643023@bugs.debian.org

Subject: git or other vcs?

Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:47:41 +0100

Is there any vcs for texlive available?
What about having it on git.debian.org, for example?

Thanks
Anton

Message #35 received at 643023@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

To: Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@gmail.com>

Cc: 643023@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: git or other vcs?

Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:06:08 +0100

Anton Gladky <gladky.anton@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is there any vcs for texlive available?

http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-tex/texlive2009/

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)

Message #40 received at 643023-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

To: Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>, 643023-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#643023: texlive-base: Any reason not to package 2011 release?

Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:54:41 +0200

Version: 2011.20120322-1

On 26.09.11 Eugen Dedu (Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr) wrote:

> Currently debian has 2009.  Is there any reason not to have 2011
> release?
> 
TL 2011 has been uploaded to unstable.

H.
-- 
sigmentation fault

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.