Debian Bug report logs - #636949
gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:22:35 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: gnutls26
Version: 2.12.7-4
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd

Hi,

currently[1], gnutls26 does not compile on hurd-i386.

The problem is the use of PATH_MAX, which is not defined on Hurd.
The attached patch fixes the issue, making use of dynamic memory
allocation to build the path string. All the test suites pass.

[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnutls26&arch=hurd-i386&ver=2.12.7-4&stamp=1312709718

Thanks,
-- 
Pino

[21_path_max.diff (text/x-c, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 636949@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

To: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>, 636949@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#636949: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:15:35 +0200

On 2011-08-07 Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: gnutls26
> Version: 2.12.7-4
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> User: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: hurd

> Hi,

> currently[1], gnutls26 does not compile on hurd-i386.

> The problem is the use of PATH_MAX, which is not defined on Hurd.
> The attached patch fixes the issue, making use of dynamic memory
> allocation to build the path string. All the test suites pass.

> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gnutls26&arch=hurd-i386&ver=2.12.7-4&stamp=1312709718

Hello,
gnutls 2.12.8 has switched to p11-kit from the forked included copy of
pakchois. (The latter is the part of code your patch changes). Since
p11-kit built successfully on hurd I expect that gnutls26 2.12.8 will build
successfully on hurd. I will probably wait until p11-kit is in testing
before updating gnutls.
cu andreas

Message #15 received at 636949@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>, 636949@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Pino Toscano <pino@debian.org>

Subject: Re: Bug#636949: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:43:08 +0200

Hello,

Andreas Metzler, le Wed 17 Aug 2011 09:15:35 +0200, a écrit :
> gnutls 2.12.8 has switched to p11-kit from the forked included copy of
> pakchois. (The latter is the part of code your patch changes). Since
> p11-kit built successfully on hurd I expect that gnutls26 2.12.8 will build
> successfully on hurd. I will probably wait until p11-kit is in testing
> before updating gnutls.

libgrypt now breaks the old version of gnutls, thus leading to build
dependencies issues. I see that p11-kit is now in testing, could you
update gnutls?

Samuel

Message #20 received at 636949@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

To: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>, 636949@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#636949: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 17:07:27 +0200

On 2011-09-02 Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler, le Wed 17 Aug 2011 09:15:35 +0200, a écrit :
> > gnutls 2.12.8 has switched to p11-kit from the forked included copy of
> > pakchois. (The latter is the part of code your patch changes). Since
> > p11-kit built successfully on hurd I expect that gnutls26 2.12.8 will build
> > successfully on hurd. I will probably wait until p11-kit is in testing
> > before updating gnutls.

> libgrypt now breaks the old version of gnutls, thus leading to build
> dependencies issues. I see that p11-kit is now in testing, could you
> update gnutls?

Hello,

I have just uploaded 2.12.10. I guess you'll need to build this
manually (with libgcryp11 1.4.6), as libgnutls' build-depends include
libgnutls26 (via gtk-doc-tools -> ... --> git) which I have made
uninstallable on gnu-hurd.

I am very sorry for causing you additionall work, I should have
uploaded the new gnutls before gcrypt. (There were some other good
arguments for pushing gcrypt first, but I forgot about hurd.)

cu andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Message #25 received at 636949@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org>

To: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

Cc: 636949@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#636949: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 17:12:57 +0200

Andreas Metzler, le Sat 03 Sep 2011 17:07:27 +0200, a écrit :
> I am very sorry for causing you additionall work,

That's fine, we have seen way bigger bootstraping issues :)

Thanks,
Samuel

Message #30 received at 636949-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org>

To: 636949-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#636949: gnutls26: FTBFS on hurd-i386

Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:01:31 +0200

Version: 2.12.10-1

On 2011-09-03 Andreas Metzler <ametzler@downhill.at.eu.org> wrote:
[...]
> I have just uploaded 2.12.10. I guess you'll need to build this
> manually (with libgcryp11 1.4.6), as libgnutls' build-depends include
> libgnutls26 (via gtk-doc-tools -> ... --> git) which I have made
> uninstallable on gnu-hurd.

[...]

It was built successfully. Closing.

cu andreas

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.