Debian Bug report logs - #635963
RM: python-django-djblets -- ROM; no longer useful

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RM: python-django-djblets

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:03:53 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove python-django-djblets:

- Out of date
- Sole rdep of reviewboard (removed in March 2011)
- Experimental only


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org
       `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #12 received at 635963@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>, 635963@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#635963: RM: python-django-djblets

Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:08:06 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 635963 + moreinfo
thanks


Il 29/07/2011 22:03, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
> Please remove python-django-djblets:


Not ready yet:

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
pootle: pootle

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #19 received at 635963@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>

To: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

Cc: 635963@bugs.debian.org, nicolas.francois@centraliens.net

Subject: Re: Bug#635963: RM: python-django-djblets

Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:17:41 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Luca Falavigna wrote:

> Not ready yet:
> 
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> # Broken Depends:
> pootle: pootle

D'oh, thanks Luca.

Nicolas, is pootle still active/maintained/useful, etc.? If so, would
you like to take over maintaining python-django-djblets?


Regards,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org
       `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #24 received at 635963@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

To: 635963@bugs.debian.org, Nicolas FRANCOIS <nicolas.francois@centraliens.net>

Cc: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

Subject: Should pootle be removed

Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:33:25 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

clone 635963 -1
reassign -1 src:pootle
found -1 2.0.5-0.3
severity -1 serious
tags -1 - moreinfo
block 635963 by -1
thanks


Let's create a bug to track pootle progresses.

Il 30/07/2011 17:17, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
> Nicolas, is pootle still active/maintained/useful, etc.? If so, would
> you like to take over maintaining python-django-djblets?

Nicolas, are you willing to provide an update for pootle? I see there
are some RC bugs that need fixing. In case you don't/can't, what about
removing it from unstable completely?

( also CCed Christian, who showed interest for pootle in recent past )

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #33 received at 635963@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Christian PERRIER <bubulle@debian.org>

To: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

Cc: 635963@bugs.debian.org, Nicolas FRANCOIS <nicolas.francois@centraliens.net>

Subject: Re: Should pootle be removed

Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 08:36:48 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkranz@debian.org):
> clone 635963 -1
> reassign -1 src:pootle
> found -1 2.0.5-0.3
> severity -1 serious
> tags -1 - moreinfo
> block 635963 by -1
> thanks
> 
> 
> Let's create a bug to track pootle progresses.
> 
> Il 30/07/2011 17:17, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
> > Nicolas, is pootle still active/maintained/useful, etc.? If so, would
> > you like to take over maintaining python-django-djblets?
> 
> Nicolas, are you willing to provide an update for pootle? I see there
> are some RC bugs that need fixing. In case you don't/can't, what about
> removing it from unstable completely?
> 
> ( also CCed Christian, who showed interest for pootle in recent past )


Interest, but not enough skills, I'm afraid.

I made some packaging changes to pootle during spring 2011. They're
staging in SVN. The most difficult problem is indeed handling the
upgrade from pootle 1 installs.

We very briefly discussed about this with Nicolas at DC11...and
indeed, we regret that we don't have a "pootle2" package to escape
this problem.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #40 received at 635963-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

To: 635963-close@bugs.debian.org

Cc: python-django-djblets@packages.debian.org, python-django-djblets@packages.qa.debian.org

Subject: Bug#635963: Removed package(s) from unstable

Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:18:17 +0000

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

python-django-djblets | 0.5.10~alpha0+git201005030944-2 | source, all

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; no longer useful
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically.  But please check all old bugs, if they where closed
correctly or should have been re-assign to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 635963@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/635963

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.