Debian Bug report logs - #629585
RM: mondo -- RoQA; totally unmaintained

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: RM: mindi -- RoQA; totally unmaintained

Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:03:51 +0100

Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

mindi has only been updated once in 3 years (which was an NMU).  It
has outstanding RC bugs for over 6 months with no response from the
maintainer, and is not present in any release.

Ben.

Message #10 received at 628875@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

To: 628875@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: RM: mindi

Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:14:49 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

tags 628875 + moreinfo
thanks


mondo still requires mindi:
# Broken Depends:
mondo: mondo [amd64 i386]


Should it be removed too?

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #17 received at 628875@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

To: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>, 628875@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#628875: RM: mindi

Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 07:55:55 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:14 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> tags 628875 + moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> 
> mondo still requires mindi:
> # Broken Depends:
> mondo: mondo [amd64 i386]
> 
> 
> Should it be removed too?

Obviously, yes.  And so should afio (#509287).

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #22 received at 628875@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>

To: 628875@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#628875: RM: mindi

Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 23:28:34 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

clone 628875 -1
retitle -1 RM: mondo -- RoQA; totally unmaintained
tags 628875 - moreinfo
thanks


Il 07/06/2011 08:55, Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:14 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
>> mondo still requires mindi:
>> # Broken Depends:
>> mondo: mondo [amd64 i386]
>>
>> Should it be removed too?
> 
> Obviously, yes.  And so should afio (#509287).

OK then, acting accordingly.

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
 `.  `'
   `-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message #31 received at 629585-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>

To: 629585-close@bugs.debian.org

Cc: mondo@packages.debian.org, mondo@packages.qa.debian.org

Subject: Bug#629585: Removed package(s) from unstable

Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:32:44 +0000

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

     mondo | 1:2.2.7-2.1 | source, amd64, i386
 mondo-doc | 1:2.2.7-2.1 | all

------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA; totally unmaintained
----------------------------------------------

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any
mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the
earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically.  But please check all old bugs, if they where closed
correctly or should have been re-assign to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 629585@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/629585

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.