Debian Bug report logs - #620067
O: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python

Package: wnpp; Maintainer for wnpp is wnpp@debian.org;

Reported by: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>

Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:24:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Reply or subscribe to this bug.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, jwilk@debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to jwilk@debian.org, wnpp@debian.org. (Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:14:43 +0200
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the python-pipeline package.

The package description is:

python-pipeline provides an easy way to construct pipelines of 
iterators, with a syntax resembling Unix shell. It supplies counterparts 
for some common command-line utilities: cat, cut, echo, grep, head, nl, 
sort, split, tail, uniq, wc, yes.

-- 
Jakub Wilk




Changed Bug title to 'ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python' from 'RFA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python' Request was from Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:36:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Owner recorded as Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>. Request was from Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 24 Apr 2011 00:36:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Added tag(s) pending. Request was from eriol-guest@users.alioth.debian.org to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>. (Wed, 11 Jan 2012 01:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
To: 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:04:53 +0100
Any news on the adoption? I'd *love* to get rid of this package before 
wheezy release.

-- 
Jakub Wilk




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #21 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>
To: 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:37:07 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Jakub,

On Wednesday 11 January 2012 02:04:53 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Any news on the adoption?

I asked for a sponsor on the DPMT IRC channel, but it was removed from the 
topic.

> I'd *love* to get rid of this package before wheezy release.

Since I'm not using python-pipeline anymore (sorry, it was fun anyway!) and 
I did not get a sponsor I'm okay with you.
Should I have to change the bug to RFA?

Kind regards,

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>. (Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #26 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
To: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>, 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:47:21 +0100
* Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>, 2012-01-11, 03:37:
>>Any news on the adoption?
>I asked for a sponsor on the DPMT IRC channel, but it was removed from 
>the topic.

Hmm, removed by who? Packages are normally removed by a prospective 
sponsor (to indicate that no other sponsor is needed).

>>I'd *love* to get rid of this package before wheezy release.
>Since I'm not using python-pipeline anymore (sorry, it was fun anyway!) 
>and I did not get a sponsor I'm okay with you.
>Should I have to change the bug to RFA?

If you're not interested in the package anymore, please retitle the bug 
to O.

-- 
Jakub Wilk




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:30:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:30:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #31 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>
To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Cc: 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:08:39 +0100
On Thursday 12 January 2012 20:47:21 Jakub Wilk wrote: 
> Hmm, removed by who? Packages are normally removed by a prospective
> sponsor (to indicate that no other sponsor is needed).

I must confess that I don't know.

From my log:
[Thursday 30 June 2011] [01:39:55] Topic        You set the channel topic 
to "DPMT: [python-peak.util python-pipeline] | PAPT: [kabikaboo, pynagram, 
sec-wall] | http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam | RC bugs: 
http://deb.li/pybugs | http://deb.li/py27 http://bugs.debian.org/622279 | 
http://deb.li/py26 ".

So I set python-pipeline on the topic on 30 June 2011.

Till 

> If you're not interested in the package anymore, please retitle the bug
> to O.

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:57:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:57:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #36 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>
To: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Cc: 620067@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:54:50 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
retitle 620067 O: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
noowner 620067
thanks

Ignore previus email: it was sent incomplete.

On Thursday 12 January 2012 20:47:21 Jakub Wilk wrote: 
> Hmm, removed by who? Packages are normally removed by a prospective
> sponsor (to indicate that no other sponsor is needed).

I must confess that I don't know.

From my log:
[Thursday 30 June 2011] [01:39:55] Topic        You set the channel topic 
to "DPMT: [python-peak.util python-pipeline] | PAPT: [kabikaboo, pynagram, 
sec-wall] | http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam | RC bugs: 
http://deb.li/pybugs | http://deb.li/py27 http://bugs.debian.org/622279 | 
http://deb.li/py26 ".

So I set python-pipeline on the topic on 30 June 2011.

On 27 July 2011 the topic was:
[Wednesday 27 July 2011] [00:02:06] Topic       The channel topic is "DPMT: 
[] | PAPT: [kabikaboo, sec-wall] | 
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam | RC bugs: 
http://deb.li/pybugs | http://deb.li/py27 http://bugs.debian.org/622279 | 
http://deb.li/py26".

So python-pipeline was removed but I did not get any review from a 
prospective sponsor.

> If you're not interested in the package anymore, please retitle the bug
> to O.

Sorry, I'm not using it anymore so I'm orphaning it now.

Cheers,

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Changed Bug title to 'O: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python' from 'ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python' Request was from Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:57:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>. Request was from Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:57:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:03:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:03:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #45 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
To: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>, 620067@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:00:03 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Daniele (2012.01.16_17:54:50_+0200)
> So python-pipeline was removed but I did not get any review from a 
> prospective sponsor.

Sorry, that was me. /me hangs head in shame.

I sent you reviews for python-peak.util and pdfminer at the same time,
but clearly forgot about pipeline.

My apologies.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559  UCT: x3127
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #50 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org>
To: Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org>
Cc: 620067@bugs.debian.org, Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#620067: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:05:54 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Stefano,

On Sunday 19 February 2012 20:00:03 Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Sorry, that was me. /me hangs head in shame.
> 
> I sent you reviews for python-peak.util and pdfminer at the same time,
> but clearly forgot about pipeline.
> 
> My apologies.

Don't worry it was a little oversight... I have my part in this issue: I 
had to use also the mailing list for the RFS: It's easy to miss a package 
updating the channel topic.

Next time I won't use the channel topic alone. :-)
Thanks for your past reviews! 

Kind regards,

-- 
 Daniele Tricoli 'Eriol'
 http://mornie.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Wed, 16 May 2012 09:03:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Wed, 16 May 2012 09:03:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #55 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>
To: debian-devel <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Cc: 620067@bugs.debian.org, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Subject: future of python-pipeline package
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:57:07 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

I'm trying to package a ReviewBoard package that depends on
django-pipeline module. Unfortunately there is already another package
named python-pipeline in debian that uses same python module name
(pipeline). This another package is orphaned for a year:

	http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620067

I've asked it's upstream and author is going to rename it to something
else:

	http://code.google.com/p/python-pipeline/issues/detail?id=1

(btw I've also asked upstream of django-pipeline but without any luck for
now)

apt-cache rdepends shows nothing for current python-pipeline. Also popcon
shows only 48 installation without information about usage:

	http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python-pipeline

So I'm asking how to deal with it? django-pipeline looks like more popular
according to project github page and bugtracker. 

Holger suggests to ask here and thinks that it's better to remove orphaned
pipeline package. Any ideas or suggestions?

-- 
WBR, Dmitry
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Tue, 22 May 2012 17:09:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #58 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: future of python-pipeline package
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 19:05:53 +0200
* Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>, 2012-05-16, 11:57:
>I'm trying to package a ReviewBoard package that depends on 
>django-pipeline module. Unfortunately there is already another package 
>named python-pipeline in debian that uses same python module name 
>(pipeline). This another package is orphaned for a year:
>
>	http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620067
>
>I've asked it's upstream and author is going to rename it to something 
>else:
>
>	http://code.google.com/p/python-pipeline/issues/detail?id=1
>
>(btw I've also asked upstream of django-pipeline but without any luck 
>for now)
>
>apt-cache rdepends shows nothing for current python-pipeline. Also 
>popcon shows only 48 installation without information about usage:
>
>	http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python-pipeline
>
>So I'm asking how to deal with it? django-pipeline looks like more 
>popular according to project github page and bugtracker.
>
>Holger suggests to ask here and thinks that it's better to remove 
>orphaned pipeline package.

How would the removal help?

With my upstream and ex-maintainer hats on, I'm fine with removing 
python-pipeline from unstable. However, I object to another package 
taking over the module name.

-- 
Jakub Wilk




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:00:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Fri, 08 Jun 2012 08:00:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #63 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>, 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: future of python-pipeline package
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:56:57 +0200
Hi Jakub,

On Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Dmitry Nezhevenko <dion@dion.org.ua>, 2012-05-16, 11:57:
> >I'm trying to package a ReviewBoard package that depends on
> >django-pipeline module. Unfortunately there is already another package
> >named python-pipeline in debian that uses same python module name
> >(pipeline). This another package is orphaned for a year:
> >	http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620067
> >
> >I've asked it's upstream and author is going to rename it to something
> >
> >else:
> >	http://code.google.com/p/python-pipeline/issues/detail?id=1

but it seems this issue is stalled.

> >apt-cache rdepends shows nothing for current python-pipeline. Also
> >
> >popcon shows only 48 installation without information about usage:
> >	http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python-pipeline
> >
> >So I'm asking how to deal with it? django-pipeline looks like more
> >popular according to project github page and bugtracker.
> >
> >Holger suggests to ask here and thinks that it's better to remove
> >orphaned pipeline package.
> 
> How would the removal help?

well, with the following request from yours, not much:
 
> With my upstream and ex-maintainer hats on, I'm fine with removing
> python-pipeline from unstable. However, I object to another package
> taking over the module name.

So the current situation is, that a package which is orphaned, has a low 
popcon score, no reverse depends and which the upstream maintainer is fine 
being removed from Debian, blocks another package, which is a depends for 
reviewboard (see reviewboard.org), which is a rather useful package, which now 
probably will not make it into wheezy because of this.

I think this is a pretty sad situation. 

Frankly I wonder if it's reasonable to listen to your objections or not. You 
clearly stated you don't care about python-pipeline in Debian (sid), so I'm 
not sure you have any grounds blocking django-pipeline to enter.

Comments, suggestions, ideas?


cheers,
	Holger





Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, wnpp@debian.org:
Bug#620067; Package wnpp. (Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Denis Doria <denisdoria@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to wnpp@debian.org. (Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:30:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #68 received at 620067@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Denis Doria <denisdoria@gmail.com>
To: 620067@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITA: python-pipeline -- iterator pipelines for Python
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:27:09 +0100
Changing the bug from O to ITA, since I have the intention do adopt it.

-- 
Denis Doria



Removed tag(s) pending. Request was from Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 01 Feb 2014 15:12:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sun Apr 20 13:22:57 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.