Debian Bug report logs - #613317
upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display

version graph

Package: src:linux-2.6; Maintainer for src:linux-2.6 is Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:48:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch, upstream

Found in version linux-2.6/2.6.32-30

Done: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, eddy.petrisor@gmail.com, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package upgrade-reports. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:48:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to eddy.petrisor@gmail.com, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:48:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:45:21 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal

Hello,

After upgrading to squeeze I've noticed I am experiencing some weird
glyph/graphic area reshuffling in GNOME (maybe X?) after recovering from
hibernate. With a total (according to my current sloppy counting) 5 resumes,
things get back to normal, but I suspect the next hibernate-resume cycle will
restart the glyph reshuffling cycle.

By glyph/graphic area reshuffling I mean alterations of the shapes of the
glyphs (and some areas on the background picture) in such a manner that it
seems that within a set of 8/16/N (?) lines are shifted/rotated sideways with
some undefined and different amount each, but in a reproducible manner ("b"
will always be doodled in the same way, no matter if is in the word "be" or if
is in the word "absurd".

I'll try to provide some picture in the bug report, once I report this issue in
BTS.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ro_RO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ro_RO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[scrambled-glyphs1.png (image/png, attachment)]
[scrambled-glyphs2.png (image/png, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package upgrade-reports. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:39:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>, 613317@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:36:18 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Package: upgrade-reports
> Severity: normal

> After upgrading to squeeze I've noticed I am experiencing some weird
> glyph/graphic area reshuffling in GNOME (maybe X?) after recovering from
> hibernate. With a total (according to my current sloppy counting) 5 resumes,
> things get back to normal, but I suspect the next hibernate-resume cycle will
> restart the glyph reshuffling cycle.

> By glyph/graphic area reshuffling I mean alterations of the shapes of the
> glyphs (and some areas on the background picture) in such a manner that it
> seems that within a set of 8/16/N (?) lines are shifted/rotated sideways with
> some undefined and different amount each, but in a reproducible manner ("b"
> will always be doodled in the same way, no matter if is in the word "be" or if
> is in the word "absurd".

> I'll try to provide some picture in the bug report, once I report this
> issue in BTS.

If you can determine where this is breaking, I would suggest reassigning
this bug report to the appropriate package rather than opening a new bug
report.  This doesn't appear to be a problem with the upgrade process (which
is what upgrade-reports is meant for tracking), but a bug in the system
post-upgrade.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package upgrade-reports. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:03:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:03:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Cc: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:58:59 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 14.02.2011 04:36, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Package: upgrade-reports
>> Severity: normal
> 
>> After upgrading to squeeze I've noticed I am experiencing some weird
>> glyph/graphic area reshuffling in GNOME (maybe X?) after recovering from
>> hibernate. With a total (according to my current sloppy counting) 5 resumes,
>> things get back to normal, but I suspect the next hibernate-resume cycle will
>> restart the glyph reshuffling cycle.
> 
>> By glyph/graphic area reshuffling I mean alterations of the shapes of the
>> glyphs (and some areas on the background picture) in such a manner that it
>> seems that within a set of 8/16/N (?) lines are shifted/rotated sideways with
>> some undefined and different amount each, but in a reproducible manner ("b"
>> will always be doodled in the same way, no matter if is in the word "be" or if
>> is in the word "absurd".
> 
>> I'll try to provide some picture in the bug report, once I report this
>> issue in BTS.
> 
> If you can determine where this is breaking, I would suggest reassigning
> this bug report to the appropriate package rather than opening a new bug
> report.

That was the idea, but for my own tracking I wrote about this problem
first on my blog, so that's why it might sound weird the way I phrased
the last sentence.

Still, there is the background image alteration issue which hasn't been
captured and now, just after a resume, it doesn't seem to manifest yet.

>  This doesn't appear to be a problem with the upgrade process (which
> is what upgrade-reports is meant for tracking), but a bug in the system
> post-upgrade.


I am also aware that upgrade-reports is a temporary package, but I
haven't started the investigation on identifying the culprit. I am
suspecting some X component, but I was mostly hoping for an X
maintainer/developer to identify a possible package and suggest some
hints to identify the package.

-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package upgrade-reports. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:48:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:48:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #20 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:44:21 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 14.02.2011 12:58, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> I'll try to provide some picture in the bug report, once I report this
>>> issue in BTS.

Attached are more screenshot of the messed glyphs. The background is
still OK.

-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
[scrabmled-glyphs3.png (image/png, attachment)]
[scrambed-glyphs4.png (image/png, attachment)]
[scrambled-glyphs44.png (image/png, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package upgrade-reports. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:09:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Testing Group <debian-testing@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:09:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #25 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: upgrade-reports: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:06:37 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 14.02.2011 12:58, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> On 14.02.2011 04:36, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:45:21AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> Package: upgrade-reports
>>> Severity: normal
>>
>>> After upgrading to squeeze I've noticed I am experiencing some weird
>>> glyph/graphic area reshuffling in GNOME (maybe X?) after recovering from
>>> hibernate. With a total (according to my current sloppy counting) 5 resumes,
>>> things get back to normal, but I suspect the next hibernate-resume cycle will
>>> restart the glyph reshuffling cycle.
>>
>>> By glyph/graphic area reshuffling I mean alterations of the shapes of the
>>> glyphs (and some areas on the background picture) in such a manner that it
>>> seems that within a set of 8/16/N (?) lines are shifted/rotated sideways with
>>> some undefined and different amount each, but in a reproducible manner ("b"
>>> will always be doodled in the same way, no matter if is in the word "be" or if
>>> is in the word "absurd".
>>
>>> I'll try to provide some picture in the bug report, once I report this
>>> issue in BTS.
>>
>> If you can determine where this is breaking, I would suggest reassigning
>> this bug report to the appropriate package rather than opening a new bug
>> report.
> 
> That was the idea, but for my own tracking I wrote about this problem
> first on my blog, so that's why it might sound weird the way I phrased
> the last sentence.
> 
> Still, there is the background image alteration issue which hasn't been
> captured and now, just after a resume, it doesn't seem to manifest yet.

I have the screenshot. This happened after 3 cycles hibernate-resume
after a reboot.

I hope this helps and I would really appreciate some hints on how to
identify and help debugging this issue.

>>  This doesn't appear to be a problem with the upgrade process (which
>> is what upgrade-reports is meant for tracking), but a bug in the system
>> post-upgrade.
> 
> 
> I am also aware that upgrade-reports is a temporary package, but I
> haven't started the investigation on identifying the culprit. I am
> suspecting some X component, but I was mostly hoping for an X
> maintainer/developer to identify a possible package and suggest some
> hints to identify the package.
> 


-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
[scrambled-background.png (image/png, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Message sent on to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Bug#613317. (Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:33:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #28 received at 613317-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
To: control@bugs.debian.org, 613317-submitter@bugs.debian.org
Subject: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:29:09 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tags 613317 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Eddy,

please also send your dmesg and xorg logs to the bug.


cheers,
	Holger
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Added tag(s) moreinfo. Request was from Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:39:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Bug reassigned from package 'upgrade-reports' to 'linux-2.6'. Request was from Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Removed tag(s) moreinfo. Request was from Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:12:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information stored :
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:12:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and filed, but not forwarded. (Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:12:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #39 received at 613317-quiet@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, 613317-quiet@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:09:04 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
tags 613317 - moreinfo
thanks

> Hi Eddy,

Hello,

> please also send your dmesg and xorg logs to the bug.

Attached.

I also did some tests and the same problem is visible in fluxbox.

> 
> cheers,
> 	Holger


-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
[dmesg.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[Xorg.0.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Brad Lanam <brad.lanam@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #44 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Brad Lanam <brad.lanam@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Same problem w/fresh install of debian 6
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:53:04 -0800
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
 I did a fresh install of debian 6 - amd64, and have the same or
similar problem.
 dmesg and Xorg logs attached.
[dmesg.txt (text/plain, attachment)]
[Xorg.0.log (text/x-log, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:57:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #49 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Cc: linux-2.6@packages.debian.org, brad.lanam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:55:42 +0200
Hello,

I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel.

I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and
installed it on my laptop. I will report about the results, either way
they turn out. If necessary, I might do a bisect, but I hope someone
with more expertise than myself will help us reduce the search area
for the cause of the issue.

2011/3/3 Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>:
> reassign 613317 linux-2.6
> # this is not an upgrade issue as it persists after upgrading
> # maybe its an xorg issue but I'm sure you (linux-2.6) can reassign ;)
> thanks
>
> Hi Eddy,
>
> On Mittwoch, 2. März 2011, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> tags 613317 - moreinfo
>> Attached.
>> I also did some tests and the same problem is visible in fluxbox.
>
> Thanks,
>        Holger
>



-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:21:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Sat, 12 Mar 2011 22:21:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #54 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Cc: linux-2.6@packages.debian.org, brad.lanam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:18:24 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 11.03.2011 12:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel.
> 
> I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and
> installed it on my laptop. I will report about the results, either way
> they turn out. If necessary, I might do a bisect, but I hope someone
> with more expertise than myself will help us reduce the search area
> for the cause of the issue.

I don't seem to experience the problem anymore with the vanilla 2.6.38
kernel (HEAD is git version 35d34df7).

Please tell me if I should try a bisect.

-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:15:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:15:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #59 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Cc: linux-2.6@packages.debian.org, brad.lanam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:12:48 +0200
2011/3/13 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
> On 11.03.2011 12:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel.
>>
>> I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and
>> installed it on my laptop. I will report about the results, either way
>> they turn out. If necessary, I might do a bisect, but I hope someone
>> with more expertise than myself will help us reduce the search area
>> for the cause of the issue.
>
> I don't seem to experience the problem anymore with the vanilla 2.6.38
> kernel (HEAD is git version 35d34df7).

Spoke too soon. I've seen the problem after the 3rd or 4th
hibernate-resume cycle (no reboot).

> Please tell me if I should try a bisect.

Maybe I should try an older kernel...

-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:27:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:27:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #64 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
To: 613317@bugs.debian.org
Cc: linux-2.6@packages.debian.org, brad.lanam@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Bug#613317: dmesg + Xorg logs wanted
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 18:24:05 +0200
2011/3/14 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
> 2011/3/13 Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
>> On 11.03.2011 12:55, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I see Brad has a similar problem on the official Debian linux kernel.
>>>
>>> I have just managed to compile the current vanilla 2.6.38+ version and
>>> installed it on my laptop. I will report about the results, either way
>>> they turn out. If necessary, I might do a bisect, but I hope someone
>>> with more expertise than myself will help us reduce the search area
>>> for the cause of the issue.
>>
>> I don't seem to experience the problem anymore with the vanilla 2.6.38
>> kernel (HEAD is git version 35d34df7).
>
> Spoke too soon. I've seen the problem after the 3rd or 4th
> hibernate-resume cycle (no reboot).

I have payed more attention and the problem with the new kernel is
restricted only to the background issue, while there are no observed
glyph issues.

>> Please tell me if I should try a bisect.
>
> Maybe I should try an older kernel...
>
> --
> Regards,
> EddyP
> =============================================
> "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
>



-- 
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#613317; Package linux-2.6. (Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:12:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>. (Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:12:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #69 received at 613317@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>
Cc: 613317@bugs.debian.org, Brad Lanam <brad.lanam@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: After upgrade to squeeze, hibernate-resume cycles mess up part of the display
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:07:47 -0500
reassign 613317 src:linux-2.6 2.6.32-30
tags 613317 + upstream patch moreinfo
quit

Hi Eddy,

Eddy Petrișor wrote:

> After upgrading to squeeze I've noticed I am experiencing some weird
> glyph/graphic area reshuffling in GNOME (maybe X?) after recovering from
> hibernate.

There's a patch for another i915 hibernate corruption problem at [1].
If you get a chance to test it, that would be interesting.

Thanks,
Jonathan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/645547#26




Bug reassigned from package 'linux-2.6' to 'src:linux-2.6'. Request was from Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:12:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Marked as found in versions linux-2.6/2.6.32-30. Request was from Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:12:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Added tag(s) upstream, moreinfo, and patch. Request was from Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:12:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Reply sent to Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:18:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Eddy Petrișor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Fri, 05 Jul 2013 18:18:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #80 received at 613317-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
To: 607364-done@bugs.debian.org, 607793-done@bugs.debian.org, 608698-done@bugs.debian.org, 609157-done@bugs.debian.org, 609407-done@bugs.debian.org, 610507-done@bugs.debian.org, 613317-done@bugs.debian.org, 613564-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Closing
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:16:22 +0200
Hi,
your bug has been filed against the "linux-2.6" source package and was filed for
a kernel older than the recently released Debian 7.x / Wheezy with a severity
less than important.

We don't have the ressources to reproduce the complete backlog of all older kernel
bugs, so we're closing this bug for now. If you can reproduce the bug with Debian Wheezy
or a more recent kernel from testing or unstable, please reopen the bug by sending
a mail to control@bugs.debian.org with the following three commands included in the
mail:

reopen BUGNUMBER
reassign BUGNUMBER src:linux
thanks

Cheers,
        Moritz



Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:28:51 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Sat Apr 19 07:19:21 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.