Debian Bug report logs - #609300
Protocol version mismatch with experimental kernel 2.6.37-trunk-amd64

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: EspeonEefi <espeoneefi@eep.dnsalias.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: Protocol version mismatch with experimental kernel 2.6.37-trunk-amd64

Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 04:57:31 -0500

Package: input-utils
Version: 0.0.20081014-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental

The following transcript basically illustrates the whole problem.

root@saffroncity:~# lsinput
/dev/input/event0
protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
root@saffroncity:~# uname -a
Linux saffroncity 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 6 14:13:28 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root@saffroncity:~# 

Sometime between the kernel in sid (I assume) and the current kernel in
experimental, the evdev protocol version changed. If a single
input-utils binary can support multiple protocol versions, then can an
updated input-utils be uploaded to unstable? If a single input-utils
binary can't support multiple protocol versions, would it be possible to
get an updated version in experiemental?

It looks like [1] was the related Ubuntu bug, in case that helps. As far
as I can tell, the problem was simply fixed by rebuilding the package
against newer headers.

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/input-utils/+bug/628392

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.37-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages input-utils depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.11.2-7   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib

input-utils recommends no packages.

input-utils suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Message #10 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: "Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <Mario.Holbe@TU-Ilmenau.DE>

To: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Cc: control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Protocol version mismatch with experimental kernel 2.6.37-trunk-amd64

Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:58:13 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

package input-utils
tags 609300 - experimental
thanks

On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 04:57:31AM -0500, EspeonEefi wrote:
> Tags: experimental

The experimental tag is no longer justified, the bug shows up on sid
(and wheezy with 2.6.38) as well:

# cat /etc/debian_version 
wheezy/sid
# uname -a
Linux ideapad 2.6.39-1-686-pae #1 SMP Fri May 20 20:40:05 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
# lsinput 
/dev/input/event0
protocol version mismatch (expected 65536, got 65537)
# 

Raising severity would probably also make sense since the bug makes the
package unusable.


Thanks for your work & regards
   Mario
-- 
Wine is fine but whiskey's quicker. Suicide is slow with liquor.
                                                -- Ozzy Osbourne

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #17 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

To: control@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: This package is currently completely broken

Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:56:27 +0300

severity 609300 serious
thanks

This package is currently completely broken.

Note that a proper fix also requires a breaks for older
(especially squeeze) kernel packages.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Message #26 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

Cc: 633961@bugs.debian.org, 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:41:59 +0300

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:45:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:04 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64
> > Version: 2.6.39-3
> > Severity: serious
> 
> This is not RC for the kernel.

"Upgrade makes another package completely unusable when not forcing an 
upgrade of that" is not RC?

> > Upgrading the kernel without also upgrading input-utils (e.g. when
> > using the version in squeeze or the version currently in testing)
> > makes input-utils unusable (see #609300).
> > 
> > After #609300 got fixed, the linux images should therefore add Breaks
> > for all non-fixed versions of input-utils.
> 
> Maybe.  But first you have to make input-utils work with both the kernel
> version in squeeze and the version in sid.

A versioned build-dependency on linux-libc-dev and a breaks for older 
kernel images seems to be the minimal fix.

> Ben.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Message #31 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, 633961@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:30:41 +0100

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:41:59PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 03:45:58PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 16:04 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6.39-2-amd64
> > > Version: 2.6.39-3
> > > Severity: serious
> > 
> > This is not RC for the kernel.
> 
> "Upgrade makes another package completely unusable when not forcing an 
> upgrade of that" is not RC?
 
Depends on the relative importance of the packages.

> > > Upgrading the kernel without also upgrading input-utils (e.g. when
> > > using the version in squeeze or the version currently in testing)
> > > makes input-utils unusable (see #609300).
> > > 
> > > After #609300 got fixed, the linux images should therefore add Breaks
> > > for all non-fixed versions of input-utils.
> > 
> > Maybe.  But first you have to make input-utils work with both the kernel
> > version in squeeze and the version in sid.
> 
> A versioned build-dependency on linux-libc-dev and a breaks for older 
> kernel images seems to be the minimal fix.
 
This is wrong on so many levels.
1. There is no way to declare relations to 'all kernel packages'.
2. input-utils doesn't break them!  They don't depend on input-utils;
   they'll keep on running.
3. You know how people complain about udev and kernel upgrade ordering
   dependencies?  You're proposing to do the same thing.

I suspect that the correct way to deal with this may be to build
input-utils from the linux-2.6 source package and add some sort of
wrapper in linux-base to select the right version (like we do for
perf).

Or, you change the program to check which protocol version to use at
run-time.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
                                                              - Albert Camus

Message #36 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>

Cc: 633961@bugs.debian.org, 609300@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:29:47 +0300

tags 609300 +patch
thanks

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>...
> This is wrong on so many levels.
> 1. There is no way to declare relations to 'all kernel packages'.

Why not?

How could a package declare "I need at least kernel 2.6.39"?
(I know that self-compiled kernels are a different story, but for
 kernel packages that should be possible.)

>...
> 3. You know how people complain about udev and kernel upgrade ordering
>    dependencies?  You're proposing to do the same thing.

udev is a special case, since it is very essential and udev and kernel 
upgrade ordering was a tricky problem.

input-utils is a peripheral package without much hassle.

> I suspect that the correct way to deal with this may be to build
> input-utils from the linux-2.6 source package and add some sort of
> wrapper in linux-base to select the right version (like we do for
> perf).
> 
> Or, you change the program to check which protocol version to use at
> run-time.

After looking a bit into it, and especially at commit ab4e0192
(Input: define separate EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2/EVIOCSKEYCODE_V2) in
the kernel, the correct fix for input-utils is a different and
quite simple one:

The input kernel<->userspace API might be enhanced with additional 
functionality in the future, but it will never change in a way that 
breaks the ABI.

Therefore the old functionality input-utils is using will always
be available, and the bug was that EVIOCGVERSION shouldn't be used
to check with equality for EV_VERSION (version >= 0x010001 might
be a valid check for software using EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2).

A patch for input-utils to remove the wrong version check is below.

After that, a Breaks in all kernel images on the unfixed input-utils 
would be required.

> Ben.

cu
Adrian


<--  snip  -->


--- input.c.old	2011-07-18 14:12:14.000000000 +0300
+++ input.c	2011-07-18 14:12:32.000000000 +0300
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
 int device_open(int nr, int verbose)
 {
 	char filename[32];
-	int fd, version;
+	int fd;
 
 	snprintf(filename,sizeof(filename),
 		 "/dev/input/event%d",nr);
@@ -96,17 +96,6 @@
 	if (verbose)
 		printf("%s\n",filename);
 
-	if (-1 == ioctl(fd,EVIOCGVERSION,&version)) {
-		perror("ioctl EVIOCGVERSION");
-		close(fd);
-		return -1;
-	}
-	if (EV_VERSION != version) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "protocol version mismatch (expected %d, got %d)\n",
-			EV_VERSION, version);
-		close(fd);
-		return -1;
-	}
 	return fd;
 }
 

Message #43 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, 633961@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>, 609300@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:45:20 +0200

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:29:47PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> tags 609300 +patch
> thanks
> 
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >...
> > This is wrong on so many levels.
> > 1. There is no way to declare relations to 'all kernel packages'.
> 
> Why not?
> 
> How could a package declare "I need at least kernel 2.6.39"?
See http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=linux-image-2.6.39-2 for
the kernel you'd have to depend on only to cover 2.6.39 and not all
future kernels with all then valid featuresets.
And note that a machine having installed 2.6.39 but runs 2.6.32
satisfies that Depends. So you need a runtime check.
($(uname -r) >= 2.6.39)

> (I know that self-compiled kernels are a different story, but for
>  kernel packages that should be possible.)
> 
> >...
> > 3. You know how people complain about udev and kernel upgrade ordering
> >    dependencies?  You're proposing to do the same thing.
> 
> udev is a special case, since it is very essential and udev and kernel 
> upgrade ordering was a tricky problem.
> 
> input-utils is a peripheral package without much hassle.
> 
> > I suspect that the correct way to deal with this may be to build
> > input-utils from the linux-2.6 source package and add some sort of
> > wrapper in linux-base to select the right version (like we do for
> > perf).
> > 
> > Or, you change the program to check which protocol version to use at
> > run-time.
> 
> After looking a bit into it, and especially at commit ab4e0192
> (Input: define separate EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2/EVIOCSKEYCODE_V2) in
> the kernel, the correct fix for input-utils is a different and
> quite simple one:
> 
> The input kernel<->userspace API might be enhanced with additional 
> functionality in the future, but it will never change in a way that 
> breaks the ABI.
> 
> Therefore the old functionality input-utils is using will always
> be available, and the bug was that EVIOCGVERSION shouldn't be used
> to check with equality for EV_VERSION (version >= 0x010001 might
> be a valid check for software using EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2).
I think this is the way to go.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Message #48 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@bytesex.org>

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, 633961@bugs.debian.org, 609300@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:59:51 +0200

http://www.kraxel.org/blog/2011/07/input-1-0-released/

Message #53 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, 633961@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>, 609300@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:35:21 +0200

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 14:29:47 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> How could a package declare "I need at least kernel 2.6.39"?

You can't, and shouldn't, do that (at least until after the wheezy
release).

Cheers,
Julien

Message #58 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Cc: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>, 633961@bugs.debian.org, 609300@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#633961: linux images must conflict with unfixed input-utils

Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:09:34 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 14:29 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 06:30:41PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >...
> > This is wrong on so many levels.
> > 1. There is no way to declare relations to 'all kernel packages'.
> 
> Why not?

1. There are many different binary packages for different hardware
configurations, and we add and remove them quite regularly.
2. Although the binary packages provide virtual packages, virtual
packages aren't versioned.

> How could a package declare "I need at least kernel 2.6.39"?
> (I know that self-compiled kernels are a different story, but for
>  kernel packages that should be possible.)

It can't.  The only kind of relation you can use to binary kernel
packages is an exact dependency from a binary module package.

[...]
> > I suspect that the correct way to deal with this may be to build
> > input-utils from the linux-2.6 source package and add some sort of
> > wrapper in linux-base to select the right version (like we do for
> > perf).
> > 
> > Or, you change the program to check which protocol version to use at
> > run-time.
> 
> After looking a bit into it, and especially at commit ab4e0192
> (Input: define separate EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2/EVIOCSKEYCODE_V2) in
> the kernel, the correct fix for input-utils is a different and
> quite simple one:
> 
> The input kernel<->userspace API might be enhanced with additional 
> functionality in the future, but it will never change in a way that 
> breaks the ABI.
> 
> Therefore the old functionality input-utils is using will always
> be available, and the bug was that EVIOCGVERSION shouldn't be used
> to check with equality for EV_VERSION (version >= 0x010001 might
> be a valid check for software using EVIOCGKEYCODE_V2).
> 
> A patch for input-utils to remove the wrong version check is below.
> 
> After that, a Breaks in all kernel images on the unfixed input-utils 
> would be required.
[...]

Not going to happen.  You need to fix this through a stable update.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #63 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>

To: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: this is fixed in input-utils 1.0.0

Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:25:56 -0300

Please do package the new upstream version (although it is probably best
to use the latest git or at least cherry pick a few of the commits
there).

It fixes the version check issue, among other things.

A stable update (either a minimal backport, or, should the release
managers accept it, a full backport as we'd want to use EVIOCGKEYCODE2
when possible) is still needed to close this bug in stable, though.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh

Message #68 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>, 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#609300: this is fixed in input-utils 1.0.0

Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:12:09 +0200

On 2011-08-13 20:25, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Please do package the new upstream version

Will look into it shortly.

Cheers,

Marcus

Message #73 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>

Cc: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: this is fixed in input-utils 1.0.0

Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:18:47 +0300

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:25:56PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Please do package the new upstream version (although it is probably best
> to use the latest git or at least cherry pick a few of the commits
> there).
>...

There's nothing worth cherry-picking, since the commits that make a 
functional difference are patches I forwarded from the Debian package.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Message #78 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>

To: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

Cc: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:48:29 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I would really like to be able to use input-utils again, please upload
the new version sometime soon!

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #83 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>

To: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#609300: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 22:10:26 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ping, any news from the maintainer?

regards,
-mika-

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #88 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

To: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>, 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#609300: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:38:20 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-12-08 22:10, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Ping, any news from the maintainer?

Yes! Expect an upload within a week.

Cheers,

Marcus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk7hLkkACgkQXjXn6TzcAQnXXACgxss35PCSdA6awPMotZdYqQJ/
u/IAoInjnkACBOCi4Zpzn30VPORrrkc4
=nDVO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #93 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>

To: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

Cc: Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org>, 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#609300: input-utils: 609300: please fix this!

Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:40:02 +0100

On jeu., 2011-12-08 at 22:38 +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> On 2011-12-08 22:10, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > Ping, any news from the maintainer?
> 
> Yes! Expect an upload within a week.
> 
So we're now a month later, what's the status on this?

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

Message #100 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

To: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Cc: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

Subject: input-utils: Protocol version mismatch with experimental kernel 2.6.37-trunk-amd64

Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:14:31 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There is a fixed package here, and waiting for a sponsor:

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0-1.dsc

Cheers,

Marcus
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8OpHQACgkQXjXn6TzcAQmh+ACdEDsqspdkgxRG7+lmNa72gCEU
FoYAnAg2MsiRU7PL2ATFv0T0sZqdEPpm
=jzgb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #105 received at 609300@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>

To: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

Cc: 609300@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: input-utils: Protocol version mismatch with experimental kernel 2.6.37-trunk-amd64

Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:06:05 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/12/2012 10:14 AM, Marcus Better wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0-1.dsc

uploaded;
> 
sorry for the delay.

- -- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8OvpwACgkQ+C5cwEsrK57+NQCfXG7JocVaSmGU0xUY8c2gKCKs
4lQAoMuNESfXUGb/BdJdQGss2wcW6VIW
=yu8Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Message #110 received at 609300-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

To: 609300-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#609300: fixed in input-utils 1.0-1

Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:17:42 +0000

Source: input-utils
Source-Version: 1.0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
input-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

input-utils_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
input-utils_1.0-1.dsc
  to main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0-1.dsc
input-utils_1.0-1_i386.deb
  to main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0-1_i386.deb
input-utils_1.0.orig.tar.gz
  to main/i/input-utils/input-utils_1.0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 609300@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> (supplier of updated input-utils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 21:16:50 +0100
Source: input-utils
Binary: input-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Changed-By: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>
Description: 
 input-utils - utilities for the input layer of the Linux kernel
Closes: 609300
Changes: 
 input-utils (1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version (Closes: #609300).
   * Packaging changed to use git and TopGit.
   * debian/copyright: update copyright information.
   * debian/compat: Bumped level to 8.
   * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.2 (no changes).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2af7dd9ef11aa3d4802f93083c49ef6a594a6e22 1190 input-utils_1.0-1.dsc
 e30a3a9551f5ea6e89751d683577aef38a829084 33125 input-utils_1.0.orig.tar.gz
 18ecd4b667a3cdc8f32ed15c43bafadeb3447113 6898 input-utils_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
 0eaf61d8b2bce12724fb7f1cc59353ac06dc7fe9 19500 input-utils_1.0-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 92a6ce55583d63ec95f6c225b365b744e28948acb36d8235b6ed60f713ed1890 1190 input-utils_1.0-1.dsc
 ab6f550f01bb5fcede492ab88711d82bacee4229cf2f5dc55a349b3bff4e3b13 33125 input-utils_1.0.orig.tar.gz
 22ccecf1aa4af77e5d913c6428fe1983137394575c04d0fc7bb76167ee7cac30 6898 input-utils_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
 0b90f09bc3d05b50db6edbe193daa130b78de79814c5c9450da6071dabd293a7 19500 input-utils_1.0-1_i386.deb
Files: 
 7c107fc329c95dc3f6d2dfac4bb8cd7f 1190 utils optional input-utils_1.0-1.dsc
 3e58772e8647093b1de2f2c90bfb9ee8 33125 utils optional input-utils_1.0.orig.tar.gz
 01b841c3e70cc91c8d8b88531cb8b72d 6898 utils optional input-utils_1.0-1.debian.tar.gz
 464c1f470bb39930ed1f97d7774ffe43 19500 utils optional input-utils_1.0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8OvowACgkQ+C5cwEsrK54D3QCglYTQsukWY6jOTSrvTnfo7L6a
fWYAn1ernFNmJI1u8at3qFhr+HOaEqFR
=cQv5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.