Debian Bug report logs - #583832
dulwich: FTBFS: FAILED (SKIP=2, errors=7)

version graph

Package: src:dulwich; Maintainer for src:dulwich is Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>;

Reported by: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>

Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 22:03:01 UTC

Severity: serious

Found in version dulwich/0.6.0-4

Done: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, kibi@debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug#583832; Package src:dulwich. (Sun, 30 May 2010 22:03:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to kibi@debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>. (Sun, 30 May 2010 22:03:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: dulwich: FTBFS: FAILED (SKIP=2, errors=7)
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 00:01:48 +0200
Source: dulwich
Version: 0.6.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd

Hi,

your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 (but not kfreebsd-amd64) with:
| Ran 335 tests in 51.597s
| FAILED (SKIP=2, errors=7)

A quick grep shows:
| ERROR: test_fetch_pack (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_incremental_fetch_pack (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_send_pack (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_send_pack_multiple_errors (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_send_pack_nothing_to_send (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_send_pack_one_error (test_client.DulwichClientTest)
| ERROR: test_send_without_report_status (test_client.DulwichClientTest)

Full build logs:
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dulwich

Mraw,
KiBi.




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug#583832; Package src:dulwich. (Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:39:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>. (Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:39:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 583832@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
To: 583832@bugs.debian.org, debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#583832: dulwich: FTBFS: FAILED (SKIP=2, errors=7)
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:35:41 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
# dulwich used to build fine on kfreebsd-*
severity 583832 serious
thanks

* Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, 2010-05-31, 00:01:
>Source: dulwich
>Version: 0.6.0-4
>Severity: important
>User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
>Usertags: kfreebsd
>
>Hi,
>
>your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386 (but not kfreebsd-amd64) with:
>| Ran 335 tests in 51.597s
>| FAILED (SKIP=2, errors=7)

They all fail with the following traceback:

| Traceback (most recent call last):
|   File "/build/buildd-dulwich_0.6.0-4-kfreebsd-i386-nJTtmQ/dulwich-0.6.0/dulwich/tests/compat/test_client.py", line 50, in setUp
|     if check_for_daemon(limit=1):
|   File "/build/buildd-dulwich_0.6.0-4-kfreebsd-i386-nJTtmQ/dulwich-0.6.0/dulwich/tests/compat/utils.py", line 163, in check_for_daemon
|     s.connect(('localhost', port))
|   File "<string>", line 1, in connect
| error: (22, 'Invalid argument')

I cannot reproduce these failures on my kfreebsd-i386 porterbox.

Dear debian-bsd@ readers: any ideas what's wrong here?

-- 
Jakub Wilk
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' Request was from Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> to control@bugs.debian.org. (Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:39:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug#583832; Package src:dulwich. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:39:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:39:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #17 received at 583832@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>
To: 583832@bugs.debian.org, jwilk@debian.org, kibi@debian.org
Subject: successfull build of dulwich on porterbox
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:35:41 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi all!

    I've had no problems building dulwich on io (k-i porterbox) after it
got a /etc/hosts and a resolvable localhost (before it failed as well --
with test problems similar to the once in this bugs + of the type
below).

    KiBi, are you sure field (both failing builds have been there) had a
usual network setup for the test? Or some special stuff I could use to
get a environment where this problem is manifesting? Otherwise maybe a
retry is helpfull?

Thanks

    Christoph

======================================================================
ERROR: test_fetch_from_dulwich (test_web.SmartWebTestCase)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/christoph/dulwich-0.6.0/dulwich/tests/compat/server_utils.py", line 68, in test_fetch_from_dulwich
    port = self._start_server(self._new_repo)
  File "/home/christoph/dulwich-0.6.0/dulwich/tests/compat/test_web.py", line 76, in _start_server
    server_class=WSGIServer)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/wsgiref/simple_server.py", line 181, in make_server
    server = server_class((host, port), handler_class)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/SocketServer.py", line 402, in __init__
    self.server_bind()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/wsgiref/simple_server.py", line 50, in server_bind
    HTTPServer.server_bind(self)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/BaseHTTPServer.py", line 108, in server_bind
    SocketServer.TCPServer.server_bind(self)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/SocketServer.py", line 413, in server_bind
    self.socket.bind(self.server_address)
  File "<string>", line 1, in bind
gaierror: [Errno -2] Name or service not known
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug#583832; Package src:dulwich. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:51:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #22 received at 583832@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>
To: 583832@bugs.debian.org, jwilk@debian.org, kibi@debian.org
Subject: [added] successfull build of dulwich on porterbox
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:50:09 +0200
On a side note it failed / succeded exactly the same on k-i and k-a




Information forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>:
Bug#583832; Package src:dulwich. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:06:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>. (Sat, 17 Jul 2010 23:06:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #27 received at 583832@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
To: Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org>
Cc: 583832@bugs.debian.org, jwilk@debian.org
Subject: Re: successfull build of dulwich on porterbox
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:03:39 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

Christoph Egger <christoph@christoph-egger.org> (17/07/2010):
>     KiBi, are you sure field (both failing builds have been there)
> had a usual network setup for the test? Or some special stuff I
> could use to get a environment where this problem is manifesting?
> Otherwise maybe a retry is helpfull?

I think I've checked that on Jakub's request, and I think the setup
looked sane back then; I've just given it back, and will look into it
when I receive the log.

Mraw,
KiBi.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Reply sent to Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:54:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:54:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #32 received at 583832-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christoph Egger <christoph@debian.org>
To: 583832-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: builds fine on porterbox, builds on same buildd now
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:51:50 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi all!

    dulwich is now building on both, the buildd where it failed
previously and the k-i porterbox so assuming this was a temporary
problem.

Regards

    Christoph
[Message part 2 (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:31:54 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Wed Apr 23 13:16:57 2014; Machine Name: beach.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.