Debian Bug report logs - #578356
Please binNMU oprofile_0.9.6-1 on all architectures against newer libbfd (binutils)

Package: release.debian.org; Maintainer for release.debian.org is Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>;

Reported by: aloiret@debian.org

Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:51:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Toggle useless messages

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org, oprofile@packages.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>:
Bug#578356; Package release.debian.org. (Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:51:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to aloiret@debian.org:
New Bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to oprofile@packages.debian.org, Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org>. (Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:51:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: Arthur Loiret <aloiret@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Please binNMU oprofile_0.9.6-1 on all architectures against newer libbfd (binutils)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:49:50 +0200
Package: release.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: oprofile@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
/usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:

Dynamic Section:
  NEEDED               libbfd-2.20.so => not found
  NEEDED               libdl.so.2
  NEEDED               libc.so.6
  SONAME               libopagent.so.1

libbfd-2.20.so is now replaced by libbfd-2.20.1-system.20100303.so.
This renders linking against libopagent impossible. More info can be
found on #558412.


Thanks,
Arthur.




Reply sent to "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:12:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to aloiret@debian.org:
Bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:12:09 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 578356-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
To: aloiret@debian.org, 578356-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#578356: Please binNMU oprofile_0.9.6-1 on all architectures against newer libbfd (binutils)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:10:13 +0100
On Mon, April 19, 2010 09:49, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> oprofile is dynamically linked against binutils' libbfd, which doesn't
> have a stable ABI and bumps soname quite often. From
> /usr/lib/oprofile/libopagent.so.1.0.0:
>
> Dynamic Section:
>   NEEDED               libbfd-2.20.so => not found
[...]
> libbfd-2.20.so is now replaced by libbfd-2.20.1-system.20100303.so.

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam





Bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <owner@bugs.debian.org> to internal_control@bugs.debian.org. (Tue, 18 May 2010 07:36:33 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.


Debian bug tracking system administrator <owner@bugs.debian.org>. Last modified: Fri Apr 18 08:18:30 2014; Machine Name: buxtehude.debian.org

Debian Bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.