Debian Bug report logs - #569829
package not in unstable according to pts

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: package not in unstable according to pts

Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:52:54 +0100

Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal


It seems there is a small bug in the pts somewhere.  For some
packages, the pts reports they are not in unstable, even though
rmadison (and the pool) says they are.

For example:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/frama-c.html



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Message #10 received at 569829-done@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>

To: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>, 569829-done@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#569829: package not in unstable according to pts

Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:44:18 +0100

On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> It seems there is a small bug in the pts somewhere.  For some
> packages, the pts reports they are not in unstable, even though
> rmadison (and the pool) says they are.
> 
> For example:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl.html
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/frama-c.html

This is no longer the case (the pages are fine), it was probably a small
glitch.  Closing the bug.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.