Debian Bug report logs - #565233
dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5)

Toggle useless messages

Message #5 received at submit@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>

Subject: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5)

Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:28:37 +0900

Package: dvipsk-ja
Version: 5.96+jp1.7a-3.1
Severity: important

Hi Hatta-san,

In sid installed TeXLive2009, dvipsk-ja doesn't work at all
as follows.

$ dvips -f sample > /dev/null 
This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp. (www-ptex@ascii.co.jp)
based on dvips(k) 5.96 Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2009.09.24:1237' -> 
*** glibc detected *** dvips: free(): invalid pointer: 0x09f645d9 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb7671824]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6[0xb76730b3]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6d)[0xb76760ad]
/usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4[0xb777d1bd]
/usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4(kpse_fontmap_lookup+0xf0)[0xb777d4d0]
/usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4(kpse_find_file+0x403)[0xb7779843]
dvips[0x805b2cb]
dvips[0x80520d0]
dvips[0x805f03b]
dvips[0x805429d]
dvips[0x8054687]
dvips[0x805410b]
dvips[0x8050697]
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5)[0xb761cb55]
dvips[0x80498b1]
======= Memory map: ========
08048000-08072000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 489621     /usr/bin/dvips
08072000-08073000 rw-p 0002a000 03:02 489621     /usr/bin/dvips
08073000-0808a000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
09d20000-09f77000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0          [heap]
b7400000-b7421000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
b7421000-b7500000 ---p 00000000 00:00 0 
b7504000-b7520000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 848897     /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7520000-b7521000 rw-p 0001c000 03:02 848897     /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
b7541000-b7606000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
b7606000-b7747000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 115216     /lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.2.so
b7747000-b7749000 r--p 00141000 03:02 115216     /lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.2.so
b7749000-b774a000 rw-p 00143000 03:02 115216     /lib/i686/cmov/libc-2.10.2.so
b774a000-b774e000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
b774e000-b7772000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 115213     /lib/i686/cmov/libm-2.10.2.so
b7772000-b7773000 r--p 00023000 03:02 115213     /lib/i686/cmov/libm-2.10.2.so
b7773000-b7774000 rw-p 00024000 03:02 115213     /lib/i686/cmov/libm-2.10.2.so
b7774000-b7784000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 571328     /usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4.0.0
b7784000-b7785000 rw-p 00010000 03:02 571328     /usr/lib/libkpathsea.so.4.0.0
b7785000-b7787000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
b77a5000-b77a9000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 
b77a9000-b77aa000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0          [vdso]
b77aa000-b77c6000 r-xp 00000000 03:02 848951     /lib/ld-2.10.2.so
b77c6000-b77c7000 r--p 0001b000 03:02 848951     /lib/ld-2.10.2.so
b77c7000-b77c8000 rw-p 0001c000 03:02 848951     /lib/ld-2.10.2.so
bfdbc000-bfdd1000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0          [stack]

Please fix this problem.  Thanks for your maintenance.

Regards,   		  	 2010-1-14(Thu)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages dvipsk-ja depends on:
ii  libc6                      2.10.2-5      Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libkpathsea4               2007.dfsg.2-8 TeX Live: path search library for 
ii  texlive-base               2009-7        TeX Live: Essential programs and f
ii  texlive-binaries [texlive- 2009-5        Binaries for TeX Live

Versions of packages dvipsk-ja recommends:
pn  dvi2ps-fontdata-ja            <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages dvipsk-ja suggests:
ii  jtex-bin                2.1-1.1          NTT Japanese TeX binary files
ii  ptex-bin                3.1.11+0.04b-0.1 The ASCII pTeX binary files

-- no debconf information

Message #8 received at 565233-submitter@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: 565233-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5)

Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:28:04 +0900

Hi,

 Upstream is updated build based on TeXLive2009, I can get it from
 http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-5.98-p1.7b-tl2009.tar.gz


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Message #13 received at 565233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

To: henrich@debian.or.jp, 565233@bugs.debian.org

Cc: 565233-submitter@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Re: Bug#565233: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5)

Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:57:24 +0900 (JST)

Hi Yamane-san,

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:28:04 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:

>  Upstream is updated build based on TeXLive2009, I can get it from
>  http://w32tex.org/generic/dvipsk-5.98-p1.7b-tl2009.tar.gz

Well, I'm afraid this is not delivered to a maintainer
because you only specified To: nnn-submitter

Basically, it is necessary to send followup email to
nnn@bugs.debian.org and, if necessary, also to 
nnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org, IMHO.
Only sending nnn-submitter means almost private conversation ;-)
(precisely, it is in BTS also)

Umm, I'd like to know your real intention of the email.
Do you request me something?

Regards,			2010-4-17(Sat)

-- 
 Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda AT debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima

Message #21 received at 565233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>

Cc: 565233@bugs.debian.org, uwabami@debian.or.jp

Subject: Re: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5)

Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:16 +0900

Hi,

>Well, I'm afraid this is not delivered to a maintainer
>because you only specified To: nnn-submitter

>Umm, I'd like to know your real intention of the email.
>Do you request me something?

 This is because maintainer seems to be busy to track this, I just want to hear
 your opinion to deal with this.

 I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve Bug#562440
 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips  (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')".


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Message #26 received at 565233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>

To: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

Cc: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 565233@bugs.debian.org

Subject: RFC: dvipsk-ja package (Re: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5))

Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 14:50:30 +0900

Hi, 

At Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:55:16 +0900,
Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> wrote:
> >Umm, I'd like to know your real intention of the email.
> >Do you request me something?
> 
>  This is because maintainer seems to be busy to track this, I just
>  want to hear your opinion to deal with this.

dvipsk-ja is very useful. I want to resolve this bug with to the
freeze deadline(too late?).

>  I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve
>  Bug#562440 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find
>  library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips
>  (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')".

I don't think so. AFAK this patch is l10n support, not i18n, so I
hesitate to join texlive-bin package...

BTW, I create dvipsk-ja package using upstream patch and upstream
texlive-bin_2009 src. See this url:

        http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/tmp/

# I want to upload mentors.debian.net, but It seems the new queue of
# this server is temporary down...

This package is 4 lintian warning(ancient-libtool. this warning is
unrelated to dvipsk) and piuparts clean.

Requeset for comment.

        * Using upstream texlive-bin source. this is large file.
          Should I separate dvipsk source from upstream tarball?

        * Now I tested some personal tex documents. Please use
          dvipsk-ja and check result PostScript.

Regards, 
---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
  1024/DSA: 8BF1 ABFE 00D2 526D 6822 2AC6 13E0 381D AEE9 95F4

Message #31 received at 565233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

To: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>

Cc: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 565233@bugs.debian.org, debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFC: dvipsk-ja package (Re: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5))

Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 20:42:20 +0900

Hi (add cc: debian-tex-maint),

On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:50:30 +0900
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org> wrote:
> dvipsk-ja is very useful. I want to resolve this bug with to the
> freeze deadline(too late?).

 Thank you for your work, Youhei. Some comments for that.

 - Debian revision is not correct, it should be 5.98+jp1.7b-0.1.
   (or, if you can help to maintain it, consider to add yourself to Uploaders
    and use revision as -1 :) 
 - Your update would solve #562440 with TeXLive2009 based one, so please
   describe it in changelog.
 - Don't add debian/source.lintian-overrides without appropriate reason.
 - You can improve debian/dirs more
 - README.jpatch, ChangeLog.jpatch and README-tl.txt are not debian specific
   files, right? You would be better to move those files to appropriate directory.
 - Please describe more with your debian/control changes.
 - Please add descriptions for each patch, especially its origin (URIs).
   It is useful to track changes with upstream.
 - Does it work well? if so, please describe the steps to check it.
   With testcase is better.


>>  I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve
>>  Bug#562440 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find
>>  library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips
>>  (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')".
>
>I don't think so. AFAK this patch is l10n support, not i18n, so I
>hesitate to join texlive-bin package...

 You don't agree with merge it to TeXLive2009 packages, not for Bug#562440
 issue, right?

 Generally, we should avoid to upload different source packages with same origin
 but some exceptions are there (i.e. xpdf and xpdf-{c,j,k} packages). We should
 track and deal with security fix in TeXLive if we wouldn't merged to TeXLive
 source package. However, it's a kind of balance between costs and profit.


 Anyway, current dvipsk-ja maintainer and/or TeX folks, please review Yohei's
 work and upload it to make Squeeze release better.

 Thanks.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane

Message #36 received at 565233@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>

To: Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>

Cc: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>, 565233@bugs.debian.org, debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org

Subject: Re: RFC: dvipsk-ja package (Re: dvipsk-ja: doesn't work under TeXLive2009(libkpathsea5))

Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 01:08:55 +0900

Hi, thanks reply!

I revise new package, please see this url:

  http://www.gfd-dennou.org/member/uwabami/software/tmp/
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_amd64.build
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_amd64.changes
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_amd64.deb
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
   - dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.xz

At Wed, 12 May 2010 20:42:20 +0900,
Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> wrote:
> 
>  - Debian revision is not correct, it should be 5.98+jp1.7b-0.1.
>    (or, if you can help to maintain it, consider to add yourself to Uploaders
>     and use revision as -1 :) 

Change version 5.98+p1.7b-1 and add Uploaders(p1.7b is upstream patch version).
But may I do whithout any permission? If wrong, I'll revise it.

>  - Your update would solve #562440 with TeXLive2009 based one, so please
>    describe it in changelog.

Added.

>  - Don't add debian/source.lintian-overrides without appropriate reason.
>  - README.jpatch, ChangeLog.jpatch and README-tl.txt are not debian specific
>    files, right? You would be better to move those files to appropriate directory.

I create stipped dvipsk soruce from texlive-bin_2009, and change
source format using multiple upstream sources. This package is lintian
clean now. 

>  - You can improve debian/dirs more

Ok. remove duplicate entry.

>  - Please add descriptions for each patch, especially its origin (URIs).
>    It is useful to track changes with upstream.

Ok. I add description in not debian-specific patches.

>  - Please describe more with your debian/control changes.

Add discriptions

>  - Does it work well? if so, please describe the steps to check it.
>    With testcase is better.

Hmm. It's bit difficult because of ghostscript can't handling japanese
PostScript now(I don't have any idea...Hmm...)

> >>  I think it's better to join texlive because it would also solve
> >>  Bug#562440 "dvipsk-ja: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: couldn't find
> >>  library libkpathsea.so.4 needed by debian/dvipsk-ja/usr/bin/dvips
> >>  (ELF format: 'elf64-x86-64'; RPATH: '')".
> >
> >I don't think so. AFAK this patch is l10n support, not i18n, so I
> >hesitate to join texlive-bin package...
> 
>  You don't agree with merge it to TeXLive2009 packages, not for
>  Bug#562440 issue, right?

Yes. 

>  Generally, we should avoid to upload different source packages with
>  same origin but some exceptions are there (i.e. xpdf and
>  xpdf-{c,j,k} packages). We should track and deal with security fix
>  in TeXLive if we wouldn't merged to TeXLive source
>  package. However, it's a kind of balance between costs and profit.

I think so. I don't know "ptexlive" activity in Debian, so I hesitate...
Now, I create dvipsk source stripped upstream texlive-bin_2009 source.

---
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
              <uwabami@debian.or.jp>
GPG fingerprint:
  4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07
  1024/DSA: 8BF1 ABFE 00D2 526D 6822 2AC6 13E0 381D AEE9 95F4

Message #41 received at 565233-close@bugs.debian.org (full text, mbox, reply):

From: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>

To: 565233-close@bugs.debian.org

Subject: Bug#565233: fixed in dvipsk-ja 5.98+p1.7b-1

Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:06:47 +0000

Source: dvipsk-ja
Source-Version: 5.98+p1.7b-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dvipsk-ja, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/d/dvipsk-ja/dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
  to main/d/dvipsk-ja/dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_i386.deb
  to main/d/dvipsk-ja/dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_i386.deb
dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
  to main/d/dvipsk-ja/dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.gz
  to main/d/dvipsk-ja/dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 565233@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org> (supplier of updated dvipsk-ja package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:23:53 +0900
Source: dvipsk-ja
Binary: dvipsk-ja
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.98+p1.7b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Masayuki Hatta (mhatta) <mhatta@debian.org>
Changed-By: Youhei SASAKI <uwabami@gfd-dennou.org>
Description: 
 dvipsk-ja  - DVI-to-PostScript translator with Japanese support
Closes: 562440 565233
Changes: 
 dvipsk-ja (5.98+p1.7b-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Add myself to Uploaders.
   * Change Source format: 3.0(quilt)
     - multipule source format, jpatch and dvipsk(stripped texlive-bin_2009)
   * rempve README.Debian, PSTricks.patch: PSTricks.patch merge upstream.
   * remove obsolute patches:
     - remove dpatch in Build-Depend, using quilt instead of dpatch
     - 01_dvipsk-ja_5.96-p1.7a.dpatch: remove, using new upstream patches
     - 02_rename_getline.dpatch: upstream using tl_getline instead of getline
   * Add new patches:
     - change_m4_and_build-aux_path: location changed by stripped source
     - rename_test_script: binary name changed by jpatch
     - change_install_destination: set install path for Debian TeX Policy.
   * Change debian/rules:
     - change drastically, using magic debhelper 7 rules.
   * Bumped to Standards-Version: 3.8.4
   * Build using new libkpathsea-dev (Closes: #562440, #565233)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 62777b2898e7f5e256b5232caa3175b512f1d890 2066 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
 f1e55cd259353a1df6bafba7179876187b5509df 175191 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
 9f13bbb3f48af80185882be99541c66cdfdf93ef 1449160 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.gz
 3bb233f88741364e6d52e18afcd689889bdd7ab4 11885 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
 a2ef3d314446c31f6e64882a884031b8d6d6fe25 150086 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 3aaf8fe0f22060ca05299fb0cf0d7d6da92a6230e17ca478aeee803d7d301981 2066 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
 00bdc152bc322249644f9a05f70405959e5d5eeb11d9e709b13994fe69ad300f 175191 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
 82a294733e54f1880dc8610abe02f7ba5ecf07c2a5f47630d6a453fdb09e1a53 1449160 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.gz
 d32bce7669f4f209f84569b14c852fc7bf0242a860ccdd214dfd2e7af00b4844 11885 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
 881c6d331e3125defc4a76d2b416bf49ffa1ca2e088d6a3904d3c826de7cdb88 150086 dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_i386.deb
Files: 
 8d262924f6d2b9e49cceba8eca956bb5 2066 tex optional dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.dsc
 77c4f82856739e5b7d6e30b6a4557c61 175191 tex optional dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig-jpatch.tar.gz
 267a8f3de4f459dfd241d832341e02b0 1449160 tex optional dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b.orig.tar.gz
 17121be57b67d40c565fe4a7f6c905d8 11885 tex optional dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1.debian.tar.gz
 d39b74693246365da186737a77796dab 150086 tex optional dvipsk-ja_5.98+p1.7b-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJMBnesAAoJEF0yjQgqqrFALMwP/RsaGtnJo5iAHijJwDflruds
P5ts5tS3GBCQSKI+zK7TuF2Xjk9MTWyLESRYMO6TAA4sy/WLke5zuvT5IJY0Jp5f
Ez9EWHb3FarDwv7Z1j3t++6eY9UcNaUObDiIa6BP2rDaH8MxwHiFvrgArnUk0Qf9
ZnakiGjUfRfxkPHbYbL63TTBRvAN3JLqK4i04uiXEcO1hLjXvbCZLer2zjvGgHN4
6BbPji3xHBJHjqf8el61WbpZNWcSd3tU7k80at4i3/WEM52sFy1sKmmT+if6THbf
EjCNCFoZp4TLj1oH75QCbeC46KJMsfzt+3QB5bENayZlPha0m/q/5XFfkDZnEkwB
OwRUZfHDkL6kVC4fA3RmDLLujUk1DfbHrdmCiVXwuUvHKENXw/PF8v7frcpjptjc
TPqDlJr8qgEygpK9c6LuAyQ2+/nqQDSETDOau9P4f5tt45mfr3DoNuVNT0yrKpR7
y+uRsmavAvPSxoFjpoHengIUjiRGX8zXell3ieu9eqdkv+DTkI8iffamIaHPulMY
VI9v6+9qR1XjpiweKImy39uqzs/0Jgp3KKcsZha/sJO9pPTQi2D9b3TdE8tNtxwV
nlmOoZDoR7cXmweB9JsMYqc4P8L8nZBoSvulOLaGBrEazB1eQ06DN9IN+HeylRfd
QuDx0sERsR3ONh/XOs8e
=+RA9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Send a report that this bug log contains spam.